Diabetes Mellitus: A Fundamental and Clinical Text
3rd Edition

91
Diabetic Neuropathies: An Overview of Clinical Aspects, Pathogenesis, and Treatment
Aaron I. Vinik
Gary L. Pittenger
Patricia Barlow
Anahit Mehrabyan
Please note: There are currently no therapeutic agents approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration specifically for diabetic neuropathy.
Diabetic neuropathy is a heterogeneous condition that encompasses a wide range of dysfunction and whose development might be attributable to diabetes mellitus (DM) per se or to factors associated with the disease. The most common form of diabetic neuropathy is distal symmetric polyneuropathy, which can affect somatic sensory or motor nerves and the autonomic nervous system. In general, it is an insidious disorder with slow progression and a predilection for early involvement of the longest axons. Thus, symptoms often begin in the feet and progress proximally to involve the hands. Similarly, damage to the long vagal nerve fibers precedes that of the shorter sympathetic nervous system fibers. Focal or multifocal forms are asymmetric and affect cranial, trunk, or limb innervation. The most striking feature seen histopathologically is the loss of nerve fibers affecting the most remote nerve trunks first. The loss of sensation is what predisposes diabetic patients to ulceration, infection, and ultimately limb loss, accounting for the high morbidity. Once the autonomic nervous system is involved, the mortality rate may be as high as 50% within 5 years, pointing to the serious consequences of this complication. The disorder can be manifested by obvious symptoms, or it can be subclinically apparent, with abnormalities detectable only with careful testing. Frequently, the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy is difficult to make because the manifestations are nonspecific and may occur in a number of other conditions. Neuropathy is not confined to a single type of DM, but can occur in type 1 and type 2 DM and in various forms of acquired DM (1,2,3). Although there is considerable uncertainty as to the prevalence of neuropathy in the diabetic population, it is generally accepted that neuropathy is the most common, and often the most troublesome, of the major complications affecting this group. In this chapter, we present an overview of current thinking on the etiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentations, diagnostic tests, and various forms of specific and general therapies for diabetic neuropathies.
Classification
Table 91.1 provides a current classification of diabetic neuropathy; this clearly will be modified as our understanding of the disease process improves. The signs, symptoms, and neurologic deficits vary depending on the classes of nerve fibers involved. Neuropathies may be either sensory or motor (4,5,6) and may involve primarily small or large nerve fibers (7). Small nerve fiber damage usually (although not always) precedes large nerve fiber damage and is manifested first in the lower limbs, with pain and hyperalgesia, followed by a loss of thermal sensitivity and reduced light touch and pinprick sensation (8). When pain occurs, nerve conduction velocity (NCV) is often normal or only minimally reduced (9). Large fiber neuropathies are manifested by reduced vibration and position sense, weakness, muscle wasting, and depressed tendon reflexes. Most diabetic peripheral neuropathy is of the “mixed” variety, a combination of both large and small nerve fiber involvement. In our outpatient population, only 15.0% of patients with symptoms of confirmed neuropathy had no objective signs, and 63.7% of patients with signs had no symptoms (8). A very small proportion show “pure” small nerve or large nerve fiber deficit (7,8).
Involvement of the autonomic nervous system can occur as early as the first year after diagnosis (10,11,12) and may affect any system in the body. Subclinical abnormalities in cardiovascular (12) and gastrointestinal function (13) may be found at diagnosis (14), or even in teenage patients with DM (15). The clinical features, however, often are unsuspected, and without careful scrutiny may go undetected. These features include the following: resting tachycardia with exercise intolerance, orthostatic hypotension, impaired sweating and cutaneous blood flow regulation, hypoglycemic unawareness, delayed gastric emptying,
P.1332

diarrhea alternating with constipation, bladder atony, and impotence in male patients.
Table 91.1. Classification and pathologic processes of neuropathies in diabetes mellitus
Focal
   Mononeuritis
   Entrapment syndromes
Diffuse
   Proximal neuropathies
   Distal symmetric polyneuropathies
      Large fiber
      Small fiber
Prevalence of Neuropathy
Prevalence data for diabetic neuropathy are sparse. Few population-based studies have been undertaken, and because the prevalence of undiagnosed DM in the general population is estimated to be at least as great as the prevalence of diagnosed DM (16), there must be a significant number of undisclosed cases. Furthermore, most published studies entail substantial selection biases because they are limited to that portion of the diabetic population with access to medical care. In addition, lack of consensus as to the appropriate diagnostic criteria for diabetic neuropathy has resulted in a wide range of prevalence estimates reported in the literature, ranging from 0% to 93% (17). When neuropathy is defined as loss of Achilles reflexes with symptoms or objective signs of polyneuropathy, then prevalence is 7% for people within 1 year of being diagnosed with DM, rising to 50% for those who have had DM for approximately 25 years (18). A cohort of 278 healthy subjects with type 1 DM enrolled in the feasibility phase of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT), and subclinical polyneuropathy was detectable in 39% of the asymptomatic subjects on careful examination (19). Evidence of autonomic neuropathy (20) and reduction in motor NCVs have been documented, even among diabetic children (21,22), as have reductions in vibratory sensation sosenko (20).
There are few published estimates of the prevalence of other syndromes of somatic neuropathy, mainly because these conditions occur so infrequently. In a sample of 351 patients attending our DM clinic, we observed prevalence rates for mononeuropathy, radiculopathy, and amyotrophy to be 3.0%, 3.5%, and 2.1%, respectively (18,23).
Estimates of the prevalence of autonomic neuropathy based on the presence of abnormalities of cardiovascular autonomic reflexes have ranged in the literature from 14% to nearly 50% (24,25,26,27,28). The prevalence is associated both with duration of DM (28) and with age (24), and is equal or higher in type 2 than in type 1 DM (29), although these correlations may not hold for all indices of autonomic function. A striking association has been found among autonomic neuropathy and hypertension, elevation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (30). In addition, an increased prevalence of autonomic neuropathy has been found among female patients and patients with a relatively high body mass index (31).
Natural History
Slowing of NCVs is one of the earliest neuropathic abnormalities in DM and often is present even at diagnosis (14,32,33,34), especially in patients with type 2 DM. After diagnosis, slowing of NCV usually progresses at a steady rate by approximately 1 m/s/yr, and level of impairment is positively correlated with duration of DM (35). The large initial decline seen in type 2 DM is possibly responsible for the difficulty in obtaining significant reversibility when intervention is made late in the disease process. Sensory fibers are usually affected first, followed by motor fibers, testifying to the need for sophisticated measures of sensory function if early intervention is to be possible (36). Although slowing of NCV is common in DM and often occurs early in the course of the disease, there is considerable uncertainty as to the relevance of these abnormalities to the future development of either subclinical manifestations or clinically apparent diabetic neuropathy. Although most studies have documented that symptomatic patients are more likely to have slower NCVs than patients without symptoms (36,37,38,39,40,41), NCV does not appear to be related to the severity of symptoms (42). Symptoms referable to one fiber tract may not relate to those of other tracts. For example, progressive reduction of vibratory sensation and loss of tendon reflexes have been observed in patients who at the same time reported an improvement in pain symptoms (42,43).
Much remains to be learned of the natural history of diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Testing of cardiovascular reflexes has revealed that signs of autonomic neuropathy may occur relatively early in the course of DM (24,44,45). Both sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve fibers may be affected, with parasympathetic dysfunction preceding sympathetic dysfunction (28,45,46). Improvements in the methods to measure sympathetic function have now shown, however, that sympathetic damage may occur earlier than previously thought (47). For example, using infrared pupillometry, Ziegler et al. (34) demonstrated that the speed of pupillary dilation may be slowed even at diagnosis of type 1 DM.
Although symptomatic somatosensorimotor neuropathy usually precedes the development of symptomatic autonomic neuropathy (5,48), signs of parasympathetic neuropathy sometimes appear before other signs of neuropathy (49). In contrast, sympathetic nerve abnormalities are rarely found in the absence of signs of somatosensorimotor neuropathy (49). The mortality rate for diabetic autonomic neuropathy has been estimated to be on the order of 44% within 2.5 years of diagnosis of symptomatic autonomic neuropathy (45), but based even on asymptomatic subjects with abnormalities only in autonomic function tests, the overall mortality rate may be as high as 25% to 40% over 10 years (50).
P.1333

Pathogenesis
Figure 91.1 shows our current view on the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy. The figure depicts multiple etiologies, as discussed previously, including metabolic, vascular, autoimmune, and neurohormonal growth factor deficiency. Although there is increasing evidence that the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy comprises several mechanisms, the prevailing theory implicates persistent hyperglycemia as the primary factor within the metabolic hypothesis (28,51). Persistent hyperglycemia increases polyol pathway activity with accumulation of sorbitol and fructose in nerves, damaging them by an as yet unknown mechanism. This is accompanied by decreased myo-inositol uptake and inhibition of the Na+/K+-adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase), resulting in Na+ retention, edema, myelin swelling, axoglial disjunction, and nerve degeneration. Deficiencies of dihomo-γ-linolenic acid (GLA) as well as N-acetyl-L-carnitine have also been implicated (52). Recent focus has been upon oxidative/nitrative stress and the role of protein kinase C (PKC).
Oxidative/Nitrative Stress
Numerous population studies of diabetes mellitus and its long-term complications support the idea that there is an association between diabetes and oxidative stress (53,54,55). Less certain, however, is whether oxidative stress contributes to the development of long-term complications or merely reflects associated processes that are affected by diabetes. Diabetic neuropathy is among the complications recognized to be associated with increased oxidative stress (56,57). An increase in oxidative stress may occur because of either an increase in free radical production or a reduction in antioxidant defenses (58). There are many suggestions regarding the origins of oxidative stress in diabetes, including free radical accumulation related to glycation of proteins (59), consumption of NADPH through the polyol pathway (60), glucose autoxidation (61), hyperglycemia-induced pseudohypoxia (62), or activation of PKC (63). Diabetic monocytes also have an increased capacity to produce superoxide anion (64). In addition, superoxide dismutase, which has the important role of neutralizing superoxide radicals, is reduced in diabetic peripheral nerve tissue, thus compounding any enhancement of free radical formation (65,66). When not scavenged properly, superoxide anion may interact with NO produced by vascular endothelium or nitrergic nerves to form peroxynitrite (ONOO–) (67), which would result in the reduction of endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation and nitrergic neurotransmission. Peroxynitrite can readily nitrosylate proteins, potentially altering their function, or break down to give highly reactive hydroxyl radicals that are cytotoxic (68). Increased concentrations of nitrotyrosine have been noted in vessels from diabetic patients and endothelial cells cultured under high glucose conditions (69). Furthermore, peroxynitrite can avidly oxidize tetrahydrobiopterin, an endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) cofactor, to dihydrobiopterin. Under conditions of BH4 deficiency, eNOS is in an uncoupled state, resulting in the production of superoxide, rather than NO. Indeed, there is direct evidence for a dysfunctional, uncoupled NOS in experimental (70) and clinical studies (71), showing that the administration of the eNOS cofactor BH4 improves endothelial dysfunction in the setting of diabetes mellitus. The peroxynitrite formation can be enhanced in diabetes not only by increased superoxide formation, but also by enhanced NO formation, due to upregulation of NOS in some tissues, particularly early in the disease (72). Endothelium-dependent relaxation of aorta from diabetic rats could be protected by NO scavenger treatment (73). Also, the early degenerative changes of corpus cavernosum nitrergic innervation were partially attenuated by NO synthase inhibitor treatment (74). However, the widely accepted
P.1334

strategy in improving the oxidative balance in diabetes does not target the reduction of NO production, but rather inhibits the formation of reactive oxygen species, including superoxide anion and efficiently scavenging peroxynitrite. In general, both lipophilic and hydrophylic scavengers are effective against endothelial and nerve dysfunction in experimental diabetes. Another approach is to prevent reactive oxygen species formation by autoxidation and the Fenton reaction, which are both catalyzed by free transition metals, particularly iron and copper. The normally tight regulation of free transition metals is compromised in diabetes (75). Clinical neuropathy trials in diabetic patients are under way using lipoic acid, which is both a scavenger and a metal chelator. Early reports show some improvement for autonomic neuropathy as well as modest improvements in nerve conduction velocity (76).
Figure 91.1. Theoretic framework for the pathogenesis and treatment of diabetic neuropathy.
Recent evidence in experimental animals has indicated that hyperglycemia stimulates the production of NO, which reacts with superoxide anion to form peroxynitrite, which is damaging to the endothelium of blood vessels (77) and the perineurium of nerves (78). This at first glance appears contradictory to the abundant data indicating that NO is a beneficial endothelium-derived vasodilating factor that is deficient in diabetes (77). However, NO production in the endothelium mediated by eNOS may respond differently to NO production in the skin ostensibly mediated by inducible or neuronal nitric oxide synthase (iNOS or nNOS). NO is produced by keratinocytes, macrophages, and smooth muscle cells and nitrergic neurons in the skin, and it has been shown (77) and it has been reported that nitrotyrosine (NTY) staining of the endothelium in diabetic rats is associated with failure of endothelial-dependent vasodilation (77). The findings of normal or overproduction of NO in the skin of patients with diabetes (79) are in keeping with the notion that this is a compensatory mechanism for the impaired vasodilation or that it reflects a pathologic overproduction of an alternative source of NO. Stimulation of iNOS and NO overproduction also enhances lipid peroxidation, and the formation of lipid peroxides in nerve membranes has adverse effects on nerve function, membrane fluidity, and electrical activity (80). Most recently Hoeldtke et al. measured circulating levels of plasma nitrite and nitrate (collectively NOx) since peroxynitrite is relatively unstable in 37 type 1 diabetics and 41 healthy controls and showed elevated levels of NOx and NTY in the diabetic patients. These patients were monitored for 3 years, and positive correlations were found for NCV in the median, ulnar, and peroneal nerves in patients with high levels of NTY (81). NO overproduction in diabetes has now been reported in several studies in animals (26) and clinical studies in humans (82,83). It is therefore not inconceivable that the NO overproduction in skin reflects this nitrosative stress, and the correlation we have found in nerve function and the excretion of 8-iso-PGF2α is supportive of this concept. The origin, however, of the NO remains to be determined.
Metabolic factors cannot account for all forms of neuropathy, or for the heterogeneity of the clinical syndromes. In a subpopulation of neuropathic patients, immune mechanisms may be responsible for the clinical syndrome, especially in patients with the proximal variety of neuropathy and those with a more marked motor component to their neuropathy. Our data support the hypothesis that circulating antineuronal antibodies are present in diabetic serum, at least in some patients (84,85). The circulating autoantibodies directed against motor and sensory nerve structures have been detected by indirect immunofluorescence, and antibody and complement deposits in various components of sural nerves have been shown (86,87,88).
A frequent (12%) association of antiganglioside (GM1) antibodies with distal symmetric peripheral neuropathy characterized by a slight emphasis on a motor deficit with electrophysiologic signs of demyelination was found in our population studies, but we are a tertiary referral center, and this may not be true for neuropathy in general. We have also found antiphospholipid antibodies (PLAs) in 88% of our diabetic population with neuropathy, compared with 32% in diabetic patients without apparent neurologic complications, and in only 2% in the general population (89). PLAs are present in a number of autoimmune, neurologic, and hematologic disorders (90). There is evidence that PLAs may indeed be injurious to neural tissue and that damage may be selective for specific parts of the nervous system (89,90). Because PLAs are associated with a tendency to develop vascular thrombosis, their presence may provide a link between the immune and vascular theories of causation of neuropathy. Because our understanding of autoimmune neuropathies in general is constantly being fueled by new evidence, this area of research in DM promises to be exciting and fruitful.
Microvascular insufficiency has been proposed by a number of investigators as a possible cause of diabetic neuropathy (91,92,93). The interest in microvascular derangement in diabetic neuropathic patients has arisen from studies suggesting that absolute or relative ischemia may exist in the nerves of diabetic subjects because of altered function of the endoneurial or epineurial blood vessels. Histopathologic studies show the presence of different degrees of endoneurial and epineurial microvasculopathy, mainly thickening of the blood vessel wall or occlusion (94,95). A number of functional disturbances have also been demonstrated in the microvasculature of the nerves of diabetic subjects. Studies have demonstrated decreased neural blood flow (96), increased vascular resistance (97), decreased PO2 (52,96), and altered vascular permeability characteristics such as a loss of the anionic charge barrier and decreased charge selectivity. It has also been shown that abnormalities of cutaneous blood flow correlate with neuropathy (98,99), suggesting that there is a clinical counterpart to the microvascular insufficiency that may prove to be a simple noninvasive test of small nerve fiber dysfunction.
Persistent hyperglycemia increases polyol pathway activity with accumulation of sorbitol, fructose, and advanced glycation end products (AGEs) in nerves, damaging them by an as yet unknown mechanism (44,51) (Fig. 91.2). This is linked to altered activity of PKC, in all likelihood the β2 moiety, implicated in the pathogenesis of neuropathy by as yet undefined mechanisms. Alternatively, a hyperglycemia-induced increase in diacylglycerol levels leads to the activation of PKC, which then modulates the activity of Na+/K+-ATPase (100) in both neurons and Schwann cells (SCs). Neural and glial elements of the peripheral nervous system maintain their homeostasis by a bidirectional interaction, either as direct contact or through the
P.1335

local release of autocrine and paracrine soluble mediators such as the various cytokines. Changes in the activity of PKC or Na+/K+-ATPase alter the expression of a variety of genes, including the cytokines. It has been shown that impaired activity of Na+/K+-ATPase or increased activity of PKC leads to the upregulation of the inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) gene expression in mononuclear cells (101). PKC-mediated intercellular signaling is one of the major pathways of information transfer through cytokine receptors in glial cells. Cytokines can in turn modulate the activity of Na+/K+-ATPase (102,103), suggesting that the changes in the sodium pump may be a consequence of cytokine activation rather than a cause. The situation, however, is not all that clear because SC proliferation, which is necessary for nerve regeneration after injury, is also mediated through PKC activity (104,105), and it remains to be determined whether PKC exerts harmful or beneficial effects in the pathogenesis of neuropathy and attempts at repair. Deficiency of GLA as well as N-acetyl-L-carnitine have also been implicated (106). It is also apparent that oxidative stress with a reduction in available endogenous antioxidants plays a role in aging and its effects on the peripheral nervous system. Nitric oxide (NO) has been suggested as the potential bridge between the metabolic and the vascular hypotheses (107). One of the actions of cytokines is the induction of iNOS and the production of NO. SCs have been shown to upregulate iNOS and produce NO in response to cytokines (108). In endothelial cells, a decrease in Na+/K+-ATPase synergizes the effects of proinflammatory and immune cytokines on iNOS induction as well as the induction of various cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) (109). The relative inefficacy of aldose reductase inhibitors (ARIs) (110) and the failure of intense glycemic control to abolish the development of neuropathy have suggested that alternative mechanisms for the pathogenesis of neuropathy must be sought. We have shown that circulating levels of the cytokine IL-6 are higher in diabetic patients with neuropathy than in non-neuropathic diabetic patients, and Jude et al. (111) have shown that there is a predictive value of elevated levels of the CAM p-selectin for the development or progression of diabetic neuropathy or both, independent of glycemic control.
Figure 91.2. How too much glucose may lead to the chronic complications of diabetes mellitus.
Apart from the metabolic, immunologic, and vascular factors involved in the pathogenesis of neuropathy, there are data to support a role for growth factor deficiency. Many of the neuronal changes characteristic of diabetic neuropathy are similar to those observed after either removal of target-derived growth factors by axotomy or depletion of endogenous growth factors by experimental induction of growth factor autoimmunity. Because neuronal growth factors can promote the survival, maintenance, and regeneration of neurons subject to the noxious effects of DM, as well as affect their function, the success of diabetic patients in maintaining normal nerve morphology and function may ultimately depend on the expression and efficacy of these factors (106).
It has been known for some time that sympathetic and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons are developmentally dependent on nerve growth factor (NGF), but, more recently it has been shown that adult DRG and sympathetic neurons, both populations of neurons affected in diabetic neuropathy, depend on NGF either for their maintenance or their survival (111). NGF belongs to a gene family encoding structurally and functionally related proteins called neurotropins. NGF has been implicated in diverse and widespread activities, including vasodilatation, gut motility, and nociception (111). There are data to suggest that a decline in NGF synthesis in DM has a role in the pathogenesis of neuropathy, namely, in functional deficits of small fibers. These fibers have a role in pain and thermal sensation. The effect of NGF depletion may be mediated through the downregulation of neurofilament gene expression, or messenger
P.1336

ribonucleic acids that encode the precursor molecules of substance P, both shown to be NGF dependent (106). Another member of the neurotropin family, neurotropin 3, may be important for the survival and function of the large nerve fibers subserving position, vibration, and possibly motor functions (106). The insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), IGF-1 and IGF-2, have also been implicated in the growth and differentiation of neurons, and IGF receptors are present in nerve tissues (i.e., neurons, SCs, ganglia) involved in DM-associated nerve disorders. IGFs and their binding proteins are regulated by insulin and the glycemic state (106,112,113). One of the consequences of insulin insufficiency is reduction in circulating IGF-1 concentration. It seems reasonable to hypothesize that abnormal IGF-1 and IGF-2 metabolism plays a causative role in some aspect of diabetic neuropathy. However, little is known about the other effects of DM on local expression, synthesis, and transport of these growth factors in the nerve tissue.
Schwann cell proliferation is essential for the successful regeneration of injured peripheral nerve (104,105). Morphologic changes in SCs such as onion bulb formation have been well described in both animal models and human DM (114), and biochemical defects in SCs related to the extracellular matrix proteins (ECMs) and insufficient production of growth factors or overproduction of inflammatory cytokines have been implicated (115,116,117).
Integrins and Cytokines
Regeneration and remyelination of the peripheral nerve is mediated by SC-axonal contact through extracellularly derived ECMs, which form the basal lamina, and corresponding SC membrane ligands, CAMs. The necessary signals for these processes may be provided by direct contact between SCs and axons, or by soluble mediators such as the cytokines (118). Cytokines modulate important glial cell functions, such as the induction of growth factors, other cytokines, ECMs, and CAMs, and protection from apoptosis (119). We have shown that IL-6, for example, is able to overcome in part the neurotoxicity of serum of patients with type 1 DM on neuroblastoma cells in vitro. Thus, the pleiotropic cytokines can function in both neurodegeneration as well as regeneration and neuroprotection (120,121). When nerves are damaged by trauma, toxins, or infections, cytokine production by SCs, macrophages, mast cells, and neurons is increased. These include the proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α), the immunomodulatory cytokines such as TGF-β, and the immune cytokines, such as IL-2 and interferon-γ. By their vast array of actions through autocrine, paracrine, and direct cellular effects, these cytokines can exert major effects on SCs with regard to ECM production, CAM expression (122,123), production of trophic and growth factors (124,125), and production of the cytoskeleton (126,127).
In the peripheral nerve, three anatomic compartments with different cellular and ECM composition can be distinguished: epineurium, perineurium, and endoneurium. The epineurium surrounds the perineurial ensheathment of the fascicles and contains collagen type 1, fibroblasts, fat cells, blood vessels, and lymphatics. The perineurium consists of flattened perineurial cells covered by basement membrane and interspersed collagen fibrils and tenascin c. These cells are linked together with tight junctions that constitute the blood–nerve barrier. The endoneurium contains collagen types 1 and 3 and encases the blood vessels and the axon–SC units, macrophages, and fibroblasts. The basement membrane is composed of ECM proteins secreted by the SCs. Depending on the nature of the neuritis, T cells and immunoglobulins are found with these different components, and there may be characteristic aspects of the different neuropathies.
Experimental allergic neuritis (EAN) is an acute demyelinating inflammatory neuropathy that is induced in susceptible species by active immunization with peripheral myelin proteins or by adoptive transfer of neuritogenic T cells. Integrin expression on SCs is associated with defined histopathologic alterations in EAN that resemble the findings in human neuropathies. In vitro, both cytokines and the assembly of the basal lamina influence the expression pattern of integrins on SCs. The observed neoexpression of α4β5 in EAN is important because in early development it is strongly present on SCs, is downregulated in the adult, and is again neoexpressed in noninflammatory conditions such as nerve regeneration after nerve transection in the chick. However, other integrins may play a vital role in the development of neuritis.
Laminin is a large, heteromeric, cruciform glycoprotein composed of one large A chain and two smaller B chains, β1 and β2 (128,129). Laminin has been shown to promote neurite extension by cultured neuroblastoma cells (130,131,132,133,134). Our studies show that lack of normal expression of the laminin β2 gene may contribute to the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy. First, we showed that all normal adult rat DRG neurons express the laminin β2 chain gene (135). In other experiments, we described the upregulation of the laminin β2 gene in regenerating neurons (136,137). This finding indicates its importance in the process of neuronal regeneration. However, laminin β2 expression under basal conditions and during neuronal regeneration was decreased in diabetic animals (138). If these changes are present in diabetic patients with neuropathy, it might lay the foundation for exploring the therapeutic potential of laminin.
In summary, diabetic neuropathy is a heterogeneous disease with widely varying pathologic effects, suggesting differences in the pathogenetic mechanisms of the different clinical syndromes. Recognition of the clinical homologues of these pathologic processes is the first step in achieving the appropriate form of intervention.
Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis
From a clinical perspective, it is useful to classify diabetic neuropathy into the two broad categories of focal and diffuse neuropathies, each with its own further subdivisions (Table 91.1). The diffuse neuropathies tend to fall into two major subdivisions: symmetric distal polyneuropathies and proximal motor neuropathies. Although it is convenient to consider these separately, in practice observed patterns often overlap, and involvement of sensory, motor, and autonomic nerves usually coexists (7,139,140).
P.1337

Somatic Neuropathies
Focal Neuropathies (Mononeuritis and Entrapment Syndromes)
Truncal Mononeuropathy (Radiculopathy)
This syndrome is primarily a sensory neuropathy affecting the nerve root, and is almost always unilateral and asymmetric. The sex distribution is equal, and primarily older patients are affected. Occasionally, young patients with type 1 DM of long duration are affected. It usually is associated with peripheral neuropathy and can resemble diabetic cachexia. Hyperesthesia often is found in the root distribution, and the clinical presentation may mimic acute abdominal or thoracic crisis, resulting in unnecessary invasive procedures. Denervation of muscles in the root segment may also occur (141,142,143,144,145). This syndrome sometimes resembles herpes zoster infection in the prevesicular phase and, occasionally, spinal cord compression from neoplasms or other causes. Nocturnal exacerbation of pain is troublesome, but there is spontaneous remission, usually within 3 months of the onset, dictating a need for supportive therapy during the painful phase.
Mononeuritis
Focal and multifocal diabetic neuropathies cause neurologic deficits confined to the distribution of a single nerve (mononeuropathy) or multiple individual nerves (mononeuropathy multiplex). The onset is typically acute, often heralded by severe pain, and the differential diagnosis must exclude a vascular catastrophe. There is no clear relationship between the age or sex of the patient or with the type of DM, its duration, the degree of DM control, and treatment. For common mononeuropathies in DM, see Table 91.2.
Cranial Nerve Lesions
Lesions in the cranial nerves are manifested as isolated or multiple palsies that occur primarily in the older population, sometimes in the absence of other evidence of neuropathy. The onset usually is abrupt, and although painless in 50% of patients, may be extremely painful in others for reasons that are not understood (146). Lesions of the third nerve are most common. It characteristically presents with sudden onset, with a severe ipsilateral headache often preceding the neurologic deficit by several days. Ptosis and ophthalmoplegia are found, but in contrast to posterior communicating artery aneurysm rupture, the pupils usually are spared (147). Of the other extraocular ophthalmoplegias, the sixth nerve is less commonly involved and the fourth nerve seldom involved. The seventh nerve may also be affected, resulting in an isolated Bell palsy. All other cranial nerves have been reported to be involved, but much less commonly. Recovery is usually complete within 6 to 8 weeks and does not appear to be a function of DM control.
Table 91.2. Common mononeuropathies
Cranial
   III, IV, VI, VII
Thoracic
   Mononeuritis multiplex
Peripheral
   Peroneal
   Sural
   Sciatic
   Femoral
   Ulnar
   Median
Isolated Peripheral Nerve Lesions
Isolated peripheral neuropathies involve particularly the ulnar, median, radial, femoral, and lateral cutaneous nerves of the thigh. The nerves involved usually are mixed or motor, but pure sensory lesions occasionally occur. Nerves at risk for compression are the peroneal nerve at the head of the fibula, the ulnar nerve at the elbow, the median nerve at the wrist, the lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh (affected patients may present with unexplained pain and hyperesthesia in the upper, outer quadrant of the thigh), and the peroneal nerves (148,149). Again, these lesions are self-limiting, but may take somewhat longer to resolve than the cranial nerve lesions. Mononeuropathies are due to vasculitis and subsequent ischemia or infarction of nerves (8). They heal spontaneously, usually within 6 to 8 weeks. In mononeuropathies, such as peroneal palsy, where weakness is a prominent feature, physical therapy may be necessary to maintain good muscle tone and prevent contractures.
Common mononeuropathies involve cranial nerves III, IV, VI, and VII; thoracic nerves; and peripheral nerves, including peroneal, sural, sciatic, femoral, ulnar, and median nerves. Their onset is acute and associated with pain, and their course is self-limiting, resolving over a period of 6 weeks. They must be distinguished from entrapment syndromes, which start slowly, progress, and persist without intervention (Table 91.3). Common entrapments involve the median nerve with impaired sensation in the first three fingers and positive Tinel sign. Ulnar entrapment decreases sensory perception in the little and ring fingers. Medial and lateral plantar entrapments decrease sensation in the inside and outside of the feet, respectively. The entrapment neuropathies are prevalent in the diabetic population and should be actively sought in every patient with signs and symptoms of neuropathy because the treatment may be surgical (150).
Carpal tunnel syndrome occurs twice as frequently in the diabetic population than in the normal, healthy population, and its increased prevalence in DM may be related to repeated undetected trauma, metabolic changes, or accumulation of fluid or edema in the confined space of the carpal tunnel (8). If recognized, the diagnosis can be confirmed by electrophysiologic study, and therapy is simple surgical release. The unaware physician seldom realizes that symptoms may spread to the whole hand or arm in carpal tunnel syndrome, and the signs may extend beyond those subserved by the nerve entrapped. Thus, the very nature of the trouble goes unrecognized, and an opportunity for successful therapeutic intervention is often
P.1338

missed. The mainstays of nonsurgical treatment are avoidance of the use of the wrist, placement of a wrist splint in a neutral position for day and night use, and antiinflammatory medications. Surgical treatment consists of sectioning the volar carpal ligament. The decision to proceed with surgery should be based on several considerations, including severity of symptoms, appearance of motor weakness, and failure of nonsurgical treatment.
Table 91.3. Comparison of features of mononeuritis and entrapment
  Mononeuritis Entrapment
Onset Sudden Gradual
Pain Acute Chronic
Multiplex Occurs Rare
Course Resolves Persists without intervention
Treatment   Physical therapy, rest/splints/steroid and local anesthetic injection/surgery
Proximal Neuropathy (Diabetic Amyotrophy)
The common features of proximal neuropathy include:
  • Primarily affects the elderly
  • Can be gradual or abrupt in onset
  • Begins with pain followed by significant weakness
  • Begins unilaterally and spreads bilaterally
  • Coexists with distal symmetric polyneuropathy
  • Includes patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS), GM1 antibodies, and inflammatory vasculitis
  • Formerly thought to resolve spontaneously in 1.5 to 2 years, but now, if found to be immune mediated, can resolve within days on immunotherapy
Proximal motor neuropathy can be clinically identified based on proximal muscle weakness and muscle wasting. It may be symmetric or asymmetric in distribution and is sometimes associated with pain in the lateral aspect of the thighs (151,152). The condition is readily recognizable clinically with prevailing weakness of the iliopsoas, obturator, and adductor muscles, together with relative preservation of the gluteus maximus and minimus and hamstrings (151,152). Affected patients have great difficulty rising out of chairs unaided and often climb up their bodies. Heel or toe standing is surprisingly good. In the classic form of diabetic amyotrophy, axonal loss is the predominant process and the condition coexists with distal symmetric peripheral neuropathy (86). Electrophysiologic evaluation reveals lumbosacral plexopathy (87). In contrast, if demyelination predominates and the motor deficit affects proximal and distal muscle groups, the diagnosis of CIDP should be considered (87,88). It is important to divide proximal syndromes into these two subcategories because the CIDP variant responds dramatically to intervention (87), whereas amyotrophy runs its own course over months to years (Table 91.4). Until more evidence is available, we consider them as separate syndromes. Another frequently seen focal syndrome is multifocal, predominantly sensory neuropathy, which can be easily identified based on clinical evaluation (153).
Table 91.4. Distribution (%) of symptoms and signs of neuropathies in older subjects
Clinical presentation Vasculitis CIDP MGUS Diabetes mellitus
Distal symmetric polyneuropathy motor/sensory 3 91 100 67
Distal asymmetric 27 9 0 0
Multifocal 70 0 0 33
CIDP, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy; MGUS, monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance.
Therapies for debilitating neuropathies in the older patient that masquerade as diabetic neuropathy:
  • Vasculitis: Withdraw drugs, treat with steroids or immunosuppressive agents.
  • CIDP: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), 1.0 g/kg/day for 2 days repeated at 3-week intervals for at least three treatments. Plasmapheresis or immunosuppressive therapy (steroids, azathioprine, tacrin) can also be considered for refractory cases or in combination with IVIG.
  • MGUS: The neuropathy of MGUS is usually predominantly motor (154) and progresses slowly. Treatment is
    P.1339

    mostly supportive with physical therapy and rehabilitation but, if there is severe loss of function and an acceleration in loss of motor function, plasmapheresis may be worthy of trial. Several exchanges twice a week for 3 weeks are the minimum required for benefit.
  • Diabetes: If the preceding causes have been ruled out, the only known therapy in patients with DM and debilitating forms of proximal neuropathy is improved glycemic control.
Symmetric Distal Polyneuropathy
Symmetric distal polyneuropathy is the most common and widely recognized form of diabetic neuropathy. The onset is usually insidious but occasionally acute, after stress or initiation of therapy for DM. The deficit is predominantly sensory, with lesser involvement of motor fibers. Signs include depression or loss of ankle jerks and vibratory sensation, with calf tenderness and hyperalgesia in some patients. The neurologic deficit is peripheral, involving the distal sensorimotor nerves in a “glove-and-stocking” distribution of the hands, arms, legs, and feet. The lower extremities receive the brunt of the disease. The stocking is not a single line of loss of one modality of sensation; rather, there are multiple gloves and stockings, one for each modality (Fig. 91.3). In general, the long myelinated fibers that are most severely affected, such as those for position sense and touch, have the highest stocking and the short pain fibers the lowest stocking. The type of neuropathy varies with the type of nerve fiber involved. Large fibers are associated with loss of position and vibration sense, some light touch, and sensory ataxia with loss of ankle reflexes. The symptoms may be minimal: sensations of walking on cotton, floors feeling “strange,” inability to turn the pages of a book, or inability to discriminate among coins. In contrast, small fiber involvement is associated with pain initially, followed by a loss of pain sensation and temperature discrimination (Fig. 91.4).
Generalized motor weakness may occur in peripheral symmetric neuropathy, but wasting of the small muscles of the hands and feet is a characteristic finding. This usually occurs in advanced cases and may resemble motor neuron disease, although the latter has no sensory component. Loss of the deep tendon reflexes is a hallmark of peripheral symmetric neuropathy, and when pure motor neuropathy is found, causes other than DM must be considered.
Figure 91.3. A simplified view of the peripheral nervous system indicating fiber diameter, the degree of myelination, and function of each component.
Differential Diagnosis
Diabetes mellitus as the cause of neuropathy is diagnosed by exclusion of various other causes of neuropathy (8) (Table 91.5). In those patients with DM and neuropathy who present with symptoms of distal symmetric sensorimotor deficit, differential diagnosis should include hereditary sensory neuropathies, vitamin B12 and folate deficiency, syphilis, Lyme disease, neuropathy associated with immunoglobulin M (IgM) MGUS, other paraneoplastic conditions, autoimmune diseases, and toxic neuropathies. In patients with one or more motor neurologic syndromes, chronic motor neuropathies, acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, CIDP, and IgG and IgA MGUS neuropathies should actively be sought.
Evidence supports an autoimmune etiology for neuropathy in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, Lyme disease, acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, CIDP, multifocal motor neuropathy, MGUS neuropathies, and even diabetic polyneuropathy (155). Hence, we usually perform an intensive workup for humoral immune mechanisms. If any of these are found, the appropriate therapeutic regimen for the specific disease must be instituted before embarking on a regimen of diabetic neuropathy management.
It is not always possible to determine the exact cause of neuropathy if monoclonal gammopathy and DM coexist in the same patient. A course of IVIG or immunosuppression should be tried, depending on the class of monoclonal antibody.
Figure 91.4. The different presentations of large and small fiber neuropathies.
P.1340

The clinical presentation of large fiber neuropathy includes the following:
  • Impaired vibration perception
  • Aδ–type pain that is deep seated and gnawing
  • Ataxia
  • Wasting of small muscles of feet with hammer toes, with weakness of hands and feet
  • Shortening of the Achilles tendon with equinus
  • Increased blood flow, the “hot foot”
  • Risk of Charcot neuroarthropathy
Neuropathic (Perforating) Ulcer
Foot ulcer constitutes a major source of morbidity among patients with DM. Loss of protective sensation and repetitive trauma (e.g., walking) are the major causes. Ulceration occurs most frequently over the metatarsal heads, but also appears at other areas of increased pressure. Loss of tone in the small muscles of the feet leads to an imbalance between the flexors and extensors, ultimately resulting in the classic hammer-claw toe. The altered architecture of the foot is associated with increased pressure over the ball of the foot, corresponding to the heads of the metatarsals. Also, the normal person constantly shifts the area of pressure in the foot while walking or running, whereas the diabetic patient with neuropathy is unable to do so because of lack of sensory input from the soles. This constant pressure causes calluses with increased pressure and ultimately ulceration in the high-pressure areas. The hyperhidrosis, cracked and dry skin, and increased small blood vessel flow due to autonomic dysfunction create an excellent milieu for infection to take hold and proliferate (156). Infection develops after the skin breaks down and, combined with ischemia, can eventually lead to gangrene.
Neuropathic Arthropathy (Charcot Joint)
Neuropathic arthropathy, or Charcot joint, occurs in the presence of impaired sensation of pain and proprioception, intact motor power, and repeated minor trauma, and usually is found in feet with normal pulses and warmth. The clinical course may be one of acute, painful joint destruction, but usually is painless and characterized by nonedematous enlargement of the foot so that the foot becomes shorter, wider, everted, and externally rotated with a flattening of the arch. The gait becomes abnormal, and clubfoot develops. It is usually limited to the ankle and tarsal joints in DM. Pathologic radiographic features include osteopenia, bone lysis, fragmentation, and eburnation. There is disarticulation and dissolution of the joints with bony overgrowth followed by calcification in and around the joints. Eventually pressure ulcers, infection, and osteomyelitis develop. The feet of diabetic patients often have bounding pulses that suggest an adequate large blood vessel supply. The impression is erroneous, however, and these pulses are now thought to be due to the shunting of blood through the small arteriovenous fistulas normally regulated by the sympathetic nervous system. The enhanced blood flow may be conducive to excessive bone resorption, fractures, and osteoarthropathy (11,157).
Charcot joint may present acutely with severe pain, a warm to hot foot with increased blood flow (despite decreased warm sensory perception and vibration detection), and clear evidence of acute osteopenia. Pain and inflammation respond to bisphosphonate within 3 to 4 weeks (158). An important factor in the development of Charcot joint is equinovarus deformity due to Achilles tendon shortening. This is correctable by surgical lengthening. Orthotic devices are the only means of treatment once destruction of a Charcot joint is complete.
Emerging evidence supports the notion that the cause of Charcot neuroarthropathy is not simply repeated minor trauma. Animal studies have documented the need for denervation combined with repeated minor trauma to reproduce the findings in people with Charcot joint. Our own findings suggest that there is a failure of restriction of blood flow that normally occurs in the patient with neuropathy (159) (Fig. 91.5), and that this is associated with osteopenia (160). The osteopenia predisposes the small bones of the foot to small fractures with minimal provocation, especially with the development of equinus. Equinus is due to the shortening of the Achilles tendon
P.1341

as a result of destruction of collagen fiber elasticity, presumably caused by accumulation of advanced glycation end products (161). We postulate the sequence of events illustrated in Figure 91.5.
Table 91.5. Differential diagnosis of distal symmetric polyneuropathy
Congenital/familial Charcot-Marie-Tooth syndrome
Traumatic Entrapment syndromes
Inflammatory Sarcoidosis
Leprosy
Lyme disease
Human immunodeficiency virus infection
Neoplastic Carcinoma–paraneoplastic syndromes
Myeloma, amyloid
Reticuloses, leukemias, lymphomas
Metabolic/endocrine Diabetes mellitus
Uremia
Pernicious anemia (vitamin B12 deficiency)
Hypothyroidism
Porphyria (acute intermittent)
Vascular Diabetes mellitus, vasculitis
Toxic Alcohol
Heavy metals (lead, mercury, arsenic)
Hydrocarbons, chemotherapeutic drugs
Autoimmune Diabetes mellitus
Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy
Multifocal motor neuropathy
Guillain-Barré syndrome
Management of Large Fiber Neuropathy
Once neuropathy is diagnosed, therapy can be instituted with the goals of ameliorating symptoms and, it is hoped, preventing progression. Successful management of these syndromes must be geared to the individual pathogenic processes. Patients with large fiber neuropathies are incoordinate and ataxic. As a result, they are 17 times more likely to fall than their non-neuropathic counterparts (162). Older subjects have more neuropathy than younger subjects, especially that involving large fibers. It is vitally important to do everything possible to improve strength and balance in the person with large fiber neuropathy. It has been demonstrated that high-intensity strength training, including leg presses, knee extension, back extension, lateral pull-downs, and abdominal extension, in older people increases the strength of a variety of muscles, thereby reducing risk factors for osteoporotic bone fractures. More important, strength training results in improved coordination and balance, quantifiable with backward tandem walking (163). Thus, to preserve nerve function in older people, it is vital to embark on a program of strength training and improvement of balance. Low-impact activities such as Tai Chi are particularly helpful.
To reduce the likelihood of osteopenia contributing to further joint destruction, we now treat all such patients at risk for joint destruction, when they are in the inflammatory phase of the condition, with the bisphosphonate pamidronate, given by slow intravenous infusion over 12 hours. This has been reported by Selby and colleagues (158) to be effective in a small group of patients. What is needed, however, is a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to prove the efficacy of this agent. It is unsafe to treat diabetic patients with the oral forms of these compounds because esophageal dysfunction increases the risk for obstruction and perforation. We now regularly quantitate the pressure in the feet using an F-scan device and the degree of limitation of ankle flexion with goniometry. If flexion is restricted with shortening of the Achilles tendon and distortion of the midfoot, we simply cut the Achilles tendon and resuture it so that the ball of the foot is no longer receiving the full brunt of body weight in contact with the floor. It is also important to ensure that the patient has proper shoes, has orthotics for correction of improper foot alignment, and, if necessary, has the foot reconstructed by someone experienced in this type of problem.
Figure 91.5. Sequence of events leading to Charcot neuroarthropathy in diabetes mellitus.
P.1342

Small Fiber Neuropathies
Clinical Manifestations of Small Fiber Neuropathies
The reader is referred to Fig. 91.6.
  • Symptoms are prominent. Pain is of the C-fiber type. It is burning and superficial and associated with allodynia (i.e., interpretation of all stimuli as painful; touch, for example).
  • Late in the condition there is hypoalgesia.
  • A defective warm thermal sensation is noted.
  • Defective autonomic function with decreased sweating, dry skin, impaired vasomotion and blood flow, and a cold foot are present.
  • There is remarkable intactness of reflexes, motor strength.
  • The newer may be electrophysiologically silent.
  • Loss of cutaneous nerve fibers using PGP 9.5 staining is apparent (Fig. 91.7).
  • The neuropathy is diagnosed clinically by reduced sensitivity to 1.0 g Semmes Weinstein monofilament and pricking sensation using the Waardenberg wheel or similar instrument.
  • Abnormalities in thresholds are observed for warm thermal perception, neurovascular function, pain, quantitative sudorimetry, and quantitative autonomic function tests.
  • There is risk of foot ulceration and subsequent gangrene (there are 65,000 amputations in the United States each year, 1 every 2 minutes, and 50% are preventable).
Figure 91.6. Clinical presentation of small fiber neuropathy. [From
Vinik AI, Erbas T, Stansberry K, et al. Small fiber neuropathy and the neurovascular disturbances in diabetes mellitus. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2001;109(suppl 2):451–473
, with permission.]
Some patients have a predominantly small fiber neuropathy that is manifested by pain and paresthesia (Fig. 91.8). Symptoms often are exacerbated at night and are manifested in the feet more than the hands. Spontaneous episodes of pain can be severely disabling. The pain varies in intensity and character. In some patients the pain has been variably described as burning, lancinating, stabbing, tearing, aching, or like “a dog gnawing at the bones.” In others it has been described as dull, “like a toothache in the bones of the feet,” or even crushing or cramplike. Pain often is accompanied by paresthesia or episodes of distorted sensation, such as pins and needles, tingling, coldness, numbness, or burning (164). The lower legs may be exquisitely tender to touch, with any disturbance of the hair follicles resulting in excruciating pain. Because pain can be aggravated by repeated contact of the lower limbs with foreign objects, even basic daily activities such as sitting at a desk may be disrupted. Pain often occurs at the onset of the disease (9) and is often worsened by initiation of therapy with insulin or sulfonylureas (165,166,167). In this early form of the painful syndrome, the condition often remits spontaneously, and management entails supportive therapy. It may be associated with profound weight loss and severe depression that has been termed diabetic neuropathic cachexia (167). The syndrome occurs predominantly in male patients and may occur at any time in the course of both type 1 and type 2 DM.
There is another variety of painful polyneuropathy, with onset occurring later in the course of DM, often years later, in which the pain persists and becomes quite debilitating. There is a sequence in DM, beginning when nerve function (Aβ and C-fiber
P.1343

function is intact and there is no pain. With damage to C fibers there is sympathetic sensitization, and peripheral autonomic symptoms are interpreted as painful. With death of C fibers there is nociceptor sensitization and Aβ fibers conduct all varieties of peripheral stimuli such as touch, and these are interpreted as painful (e.g., allodynia). With time there is reorganization at the cord level and the patient experiences cold hyperalgesia and ultimately even with the death of all fibers pain is registered in the cerebral cortex whereupon the syndrome becomes chronic without the need for peripheral stimulation. (See Fig. 91.8 for explanation of the stages of pain.) Disappearance of pain may not necessarily reflect nerve recovery but rather nerve death. When patients volunteer the loss of pain, progression of the neuropathy must be excluded by careful examination. This condition may lead to tolerance to narcotics and analgesics, and finally to addiction. Neuropathy that persists for more than 5 years is relatively rare, it is inordinately resistant to all forms of intervention, and it is most trying to the patient and his or her physician.
Figure 91.7. Changes in skin nerve fiber density in small fiber neuropathy. Loss of cutaneous nerve fibers that stain positive for the neuronal antigen PGP 9.5 in sensory neuropathy. A: Normal density of epidermal nerve fibers (arrows) in back. B: Slightly reduced density and abnormal nerve fiber swellings (arrows) in proximal thigh. C: Complete clearance of nerve fibers in calf.
Figure 91.8. Mechanisms for pain in neuropathy. Concepts of the generation of neuropathic pain. The spinal cord is the oval. Normal stimulation = no pain. C-fiber sensitization occurs with damage to C-fibers, allowing nociceptor sensitization in the periphery (star) causing burning pain, heat, and mechanical hyperalgesia. Aβ and Aδ fibers are unrestrained with spinal cord reorganization, leading to mechanical and punctate allodynia. Peripheral adrenergic stimulation may also be painful. With C-fiber loss, Aβ tactile stimulation becomes painful, and with central disinhibition, hyperalgesia to cold also occurs.
The mechanism for acute pain in small fiber neuropathy is not well understood. In some patients, the heralding features of DM may be the onset of acute painful neuropathy (168); in others, the condition may appear soon after initiation of therapy (167). Hyperglycemia may be a factor in lowering the pain threshold (169); however, in some patients there is a striking amelioration of symptoms with the intravenous administration of insulin (9,166). Pain frequently occurs when objective measures suggest recovery from the neuropathy, implying that regrowth of small fibers may be an important constituent of this syndrome. Indeed, loss of pain with evidence of progression of the disease may be indicative of nerve death and thus may not be a welcome sign.
Small, unmyelinated C fibers subserve pain sensation, warm thermal perception, and autonomic function. Initially, when
P.1344

there is ongoing damage to the nerves, the patient experiences pain of the burning, dysesthetic type, often accompanied by hyperalgesia and allodynia. The pain is distinct from that found with large fiber damage, which is often deep seated and gnawing. Because the peripheral sympathetic nerve fibers are also small, unmyelinated C fibers, it is not surprising to find that the pain is improved by sympathetic blocking agents. Also, loss of sympathetic regulation of sweat glands and of arteriovenous shunt vessels in the foot creates a favorable environment for bacteria to penetrate, multiply, and wreak havoc in the foot. As a result of dryness and cracking, a portal of entry is created for microorganisms, and defenses are hampered because of impaired blood flow. Furthermore, these fibers have the neuropeptide substance P as their neurotransmitter, and depletion of substance P often leads to amelioration of pain. However, when the destructive forces persist, the pain disappears and the patient becomes pain free and has decreased warmth and pain thresholds. This may be due in part to the decrease in NGF, which is responsible for the maintenance of small fiber neurons, and the decrease in skin content of substance P among the neurons that subserve pain. Disappearance of pain in these circumstances should not be hailed as successful treatment but rather as a warning that the neuropathy is progressing. There are, however, a number of simple measures that can protect the C fiber–depleted foot from ulceration, which culminates in gangrene and amputation:
  • Foot protection is of the utmost importance—a procedure as simple as wearing padded socks can reduce the likelihood of development of an ulcer or can facilitate the healing of an existing ulcer (170).
  • Appropriate shoes with adequate support are mandatory.
  • Feet and shoes should be inspected regularly. Patients need to purchase a mirror for their bathrooms so they can inspect the undersurface of their feet on a daily basis. (Most are too obese to see their feet, let alone the undersurface.)
  • Extreme caution is necessary to avoid exposure to heat injury. Instruct the patient always to test the bathwater with a part of the body that is not insensate before plunging a numb foot into the water, and not to fall asleep in front of the fireplace with his or her insensate feet close to the fire.
  • Emollient creams should be used to moisturize the dry skin.
Autonomic Neuropathies
Diabetic autonomic neuropathy may involve any system in the body. Its manifestations are protean, and the onset often is insidious. Using cardiovascular reflex tests, the prevalence is reported to be 17% to 40% (15,171,172,173,174). Of teenagers with type 1 DM, 31% have abnormal test results (15). The relationship with sensorimotor neuropathy is variable, but autonomic and sensory motor abnormalities usually coexist. Of people with peripheral neuropathy, 50% have asymptomatic autonomic neuropathy. When symptoms of autonomic neuropathy are present, the anticipated mortality rate is 15% to 40% within 5 years (50,175,176,177). With gastroparesis, 35% die within 3 years, usually of aspiration pneumonia. Reduced exercise tolerance, edema, paradoxic supine or nocturnal hypertension (178), and intolerance to heat due to defective thermoregulation are consequences of autonomic neuropathy. Silent myocardial infarction, respiratory failure, and sudden death are hazards for the diabetic patient with cardiac autonomic neuropathy (179,180,181,182). It is therefore vitally important to make this diagnosis early so that appropriate intervention can be instituted. For a complete discussion of the clinical and biochemical features of autonomic neuropathy and its management, the reader is referred to our extensive review (183).
Diagnosis of Diabetic Neuropathies
The American Diabetes Association and the American Academy of Neurology recommend that at least one parameter from each of the following five categories be measured to establish the presence of diabetic neuropathy: symptoms profiles, neurologic examination, quantitative sensory testing (QST), nerve conduction studies, and quantitative autonomic function testing (QAFT) (184). The panel recommended that the neurologic examination be a systematic assessment “of neuropathic signs and symptoms, including sensory, motor, and reflex measures in upper and lower extremities, cranial nerves and autonomic function.” Suggested motor and sensory nerve conduction studies included amplitudes and conduction velocities from both an arm and a leg.
Clinical Evaluation
A thorough clinical examination is essential in the evaluation of patients suspected of neuropathy, with special attention to the feet, examining for (a) dryness, shiny skin, cracking of the skin; (b) ulceration; (c) loss of hair; (d) levels of loss of sensory modalities, with particular emphasis on vibratory and thermal sensation; (e) reflexes; and (f) motor power. Diabetic neuropathy is diagnosed by exclusion of a variety of other causes of neuropathy (Table 91.5).
Systematic questioning, including a family history of nondiabetic peripheral nerve disease and the presence of toxic, metabolic, mechanical, and vascular causes of nerve disease, should be conducted. If any other potentially neuropathic factors are present, other diagnostic methods should be used to determine the cause of nerve disease. Appropriate laboratory screening for the differential diagnoses (Table 91.3) should be performed.
To aid in the assessment of neuropathy during a clinical examination, coded scores of neurologic function have been developed that allow assignment of broad categories of functional abnormalities based on the clinical examination (e.g., 1 = normal, 2 = mild abnormality, 3 = moderate abnormality, 4 = severe abnormality, and 5 = total loss of function). Both signs and symptoms can be scored, and the nerve symptom score can be maintained as a record of the patient’s response to treatment. Equally important, and neglected in the routine physical examination, are the functional correlates of nerve impairment. The nerve disability score is a useful instrument, and we have developed an activity of daily living instrument to measure the functional impact of neuropathy that ascertains the degree of restriction associated with tasks of living (e.g., the ability to put
P.1345

on a shirt, button a shirt, squeeze toothpaste, use a fork, turn the pages of a book). We also routinely have the patient fill out a neuropathy quality-of-life questionnaire, which, in these days of outcomes consciousness, is often the primary interest of the patient and the health-care providers. These tests have not been applied widely in the evaluation of diabetic neuropathy, but they offer a means of evaluating the degree of restriction of activities that are of vital importance to the patient as well as monitoring progress of the neuropathy.
Quantitative Testing in Diabetic Neuropathy
More objective indices are found in the QST (156) and QAFT (178). Combined, these tests cover vibratory, proprioceptive, tactile, pain, thermal, and autonomic function (37,185,186). QST provides standardized procedures for evaluating neuropathy that are sensitive, specific, and reproducible in detecting dysfunction before symptoms appear (183). We use standardized equipment to determine levels of cutaneous sensitivity. This equipment provides (a) interval data, (b) more precise methods of stimulus presentation, and (c) minimal subject and operator bias.
The QAFT consists of a series of simple, noninvasive tests for detecting cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy. Developed by Ewing and Clarke (187), they have been successfully applied by many clinicians (188,189,190,191). These tests can be performed at the bedside and provide an index of the neuropathy that correlates roughly with the vibration threshold and certain other measures of somatic and gut neuropathy (192,193). The precise relationship between autonomic and somatic neuropathy remains unclear. Positive correlations of various degrees using different indices of somatic function have been reported (184,192,193,194,195), but further study of the relationship between autonomic and somatic large and small fiber involvement in diabetic neuropathy is required.
Laser Doppler measurement of cutaneous blood flow in the pulp of the fingers and toes may be the most sensitive measurement of sympathetic autonomic dysfunction in the extremities (196). Flow autoregulation in these areas is modulated by sympathetic input and hence depends on the integrity of those fibers, providing another measure of autonomic function.
Electrophysiologic Testing in Diabetic Neuropathy
Electrodiagnostic nerve conduction studies yield values of amplitude and velocity that can be related to numbers of viable axons, extent of demyelination, axonal resistance, and conduction block (207,208). Electrophysiological testing is not specific for diabetic neuropathy, but plays an important role in detecting, characterizing, and measuring progress of the different forms of diabetic neuropathies (184). Sensory conduction delays and absence of response commonly are found in patients with neuropathic symptoms, and as much as 20% of asymptomatic patients have positive electrophysiological findings (208). NCV provides a measure of transmission time in the largest myelinated fibers. Transmission time may be influenced by a number of factors, including fiber size, degree of myelination, nodal and internodal length, axonal resistance, and temperature (207,208). In diffuse neuropathies, slowing of conduction velocity may become more apparent if measurement is obtained over long nerve segments. F-response latency measurement, which includes conduction over the entire motor nerve, is thus a sensitive method for detecting neuropathy (209). F-wave latencies also provide a means of assessing proximal motor nerve function that may be useful in conditions such as diabetic amyotrophy or proximal neuropathies (197). Conduction studies also help to identify and localize focal lesions in a nerve by demonstrating localized slowing or conduction block, both of which can occur in diabetic neuropathy. This is particularly helpful when there is coincident carpal tunnel or tarsal tunnel entrapment, to which diabetic patients are susceptible.
Electrophysiological tests correlate with nerve biopsy results (210,211), and they serve well as a surrogate for histological determination in longitudinal studies. There are limitations, however, to the prognostic relevance of these abnormalities. The demonstration of a conduction delay in an asymptomatic patient does not provide specific information about what pattern of neuropathy may subsequently develop, nor does the NCV disclose dysfunction in the various fiber subtypes in a nerve. For example, even though small fibers that mediate pain and autonomic function are often the first to demonstrate dysfunction, these fibers are essentially silent in the routine NCV study. Another potential limitation of the standard electrophysiological techniques is in detecting therapeutic benefit. Clinical studies have failed to show large or rapid improvements in conduction velocity with treatments that have beneficial behavioral effects (212).
Needle electromyography (EMG) in conjunction with nerve conduction studies may reveal fibrillation, a sensitive indicator of axonal degeneration that precedes other clinical or electrophysiological evidence of neuropathy (213). The needle examination is also helpful in determining the distribution of nerve involvement. EMG, for example, is the electrodiagnostic study of choice in the evaluation of diabetic polyradiculopathy (214,215) and provides important information in the assessment of both proximal motor neuropathy (216,217) and plexopathy.
Additional quantitative testing can be done with single-fiber EMG, which allows measurement of muscle fiber density and evaluation of neuromuscular transmission (209). Muscle fiber density is increased in cases of axonal loss with subsequent reinnervation by collateral sprouting. Ongoing collateral sprouting also may be assessed quantitatively by the jitter, which reflects neuromuscular transmission.
Other modalities useful in the evaluation of diabetic neuropathy, but which may not be available at all centers, include near-nerve recording, somatosensory evoked potentials (EPs), or repetitive stimulation with measurement of refractory periods. Sensory EPs have been shown to be very useful diagnostic and prognostic tools in neurologic disease and trauma. A number of investigators have described EP abnormalities in diabetic patients (218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229). Most reports have concentrated on the somatosensory pathways (218,220,223,224,227,228), although visual and auditory modalities have received some attention (219,221,222,225,229). Consistent with nerve conduction studies, EPs show upper- and lower-extremity peripheral conduction
P.1346

delays in diabetic patients (218,220,222,223,224,225,226,227,228) that may be related to the duration of disease (224,226,227); however, the evidence for central conduction abnormalities is equivocal. Several investigators have reported an incidence of central nervous system abnormalities ranging from 20% to 50% (221,222,225,228,230). Many of these studies were of patients with minimal or no signs of peripheral neuropathy. Other investigators, however, have failed to demonstrate significant evidence of central (220) or supraspinal dysfunction (222,227) in somatosensory pathways. Ziegler et al. (218) used tibial nerve sensory EPs to evaluate 100 patients with type 1 DM grouped into Dyck’s stages 0,1, and 2 (231). They found that the latency, interpeak latencies, and amplitude of scalp-recorded components of tibial nerve potentials correlated with small fiber dysfunction, as indicated by alterations of heart rate variation and thermal perception threshold. Despite inconsistencies and gaps in the literature, there are enough data available to suggest that EPs are sensitive to subtle levels of neural dysfunction and may be able to detect subclinical or occult lesions of prognostic significance. This has yet to be demonstrated conclusively, particularly with regard to central dysfunction. Further study of large, well-defined populations would be desirable to address this question. Multimodality EPs are capable of disclosing a variety of patterns of abnormality in diabetic patients quite early in the disease, and there is a trend over time toward progression of EP abnormalities to include new areas of the nervous system (226).
The peripheral autonomic surface potential (also known as the sympathetic skin response) is an electrodermal potential that has been used for many years as an indicator of autonomic integrity (232,233,234,235,236). This response is mediated by muscarinic mechanisms, and a few studies in diabetic patients have shown that the response is diminished or absent in patients with autonomic dysfunction (232,233,236).
The utility of electrophysiological testing lies in its reliability and reproducibility. These measurements are largely independent of patient cooperation and are reproducible among different examiners in different centers. They have also been shown to play an important role in studies evaluating disease progression or regression and the response to medical treatment (210,211).
It is important when performing these tests to control for sources of error (184). One factor of particular importance is limb temperature. Amplitude, latency, and conduction velocity all vary with limb temperature (207). As the limb cools, there is less dispersion of the evoked response, and the amplitude subsequently increases. At the same time, decreases in conduction velocity and increases in distal latencies are seen. It is generally recommended, therefore, that limb temperatures be kept at 32°C to 36°C (213), with warming of limbs occasionally necessary to maintain them in the ideal range. It may be difficult in some patients to maintain proper temperature because of ischemia or denervation, in which case corrections can be made as outlined in other texts (213).
Quantification of Cutaneous Sensitivity
Quantitative sensory testing is the determination of the sensory threshold, defined as the minimal energy reliably detected for a particular modality. It is a logical extension of the sensory portion of the clinical neurologic examination and has the principal advantage of assigning a numeric value. A number of relatively inexpensive devices have been developed that allow suitable assessment of somatosensory function, including vibration, thermal energy, and light touch.
Quantitative sensory testing can be used to document subtle sensory loss, characterize patients at the onset of a clinical trial, and monitor a modality known to be associated with a specific complication of diabetic neuropathy (197,198,199). The evaluation contributes to the differentiation of the relative deficit in small-diameter (e.g., temperature) versus large-diameter (e.g., vibration) axons, as well as polyneuropathy versus mononeuropathy.
Calibration and units of measure should be expressed in standard terminology, such as micrometers (vibration), degrees Celsius (temperature), and dynes per square centimeter (light touch), and the physical dimensions of stimulation (e.g., waveform, frequency, rise time) should be reported.
Two testing procedures are emerging as the standards in the field: (a) modified up-down stimulation with two alternative forced-choice responses, and (b) ramping of stimulus intensity (method of limits) combined with a yes-no paradigm (186). With the first procedure, the most common definition of threshold is the stimulus intensity corresponding to the 75% correct response point. With the second procedure, threshold usually is defined as the stimulus intensity corresponding to 50% correct detection. To be acceptable, the two alternative procedures must allow sufficient reversals to converge on a true threshold. The yes-no paradigm must include catch trials (where stimulus is not delivered) in sufficient numbers and variable ramps to minimize guessing. More details concerning the different psychophysical methods, response paradigms, and their critical evaluation can be found in Maurissen’s study (200).
Sensory Modalities
Vibration Perception Testing
This measure is the most widely studied QST procedure and has produced the most extensive normal and neuropathy data. If frequencies of 120 to 200 Hz are used, it principally assesses function in Meissner and Pacinian corpuscles and their associated large-diameter fibers. Typical sites of assessment are the glabrous skin of the fingers and toes.
Thermal Perception
This measure assesses function in free nerve endings and their associated unmyelinated and thinly myelinated fibers. The value and reliability of this measure are enhanced by separately assessing warm and cold perception. Although thermal thresholds have proven to be especially variable, they uniquely index small fiber dysfunction (201).
Light Touch
Quantitative esthesiometry techniques require a relatively sophisticated stimulus delivery system. This measure tests the integrity
P.1347

of Merkel touch domes and Meissner corpuscles and their associated large-diameter fibers. The expanded use of this technique in assessing diabetic neuropathy will be a function of the anticipated increased availability of devices specific for this modality.
In addition to the aforementioned modalities, QST procedures are available for pain thresholds and cutaneous current perception (202). Pain thresholds test nociceptors and C fibers. Although they may be important for selected studies, the Consensus Statement (184) rejected their inclusion in a general assessment of diabetic neuropathy because of subject discomfort and the limited experience in multicenter trials. Electrical current perception assesses the detection threshold for electrical sine wave stimuli produced by a constant-current generator and delivered to the skin through surface electrodes. There are no known receptors for electrical current, and this form of stimulation appears to excite the cutaneous axons directly. Multiple frequencies have been reported to excite different axonal subgroups, but this claim awaits validation. Studies in patients with DM suggest strong correlations with other QST measures (198,203). Additional studies are required, however, to explore the specificity and sensitivity of electrical current perception for the assessment of diabetic neuropathy (183).
Nerve conduction indices and sensory symptom status are highly correlated with QST (203,204,205). Using electrophysiologic findings and symptoms to identify neuropathic patients, an elevated vibration threshold was associated with a sensitivity of 73% and a false-positive rate of 7% (204). Furthermore, asymptomatic diabetic patients have significantly higher thresholds than nondiabetic people, suggesting that QST may be useful in detecting subclinical neuropathy.
Average intrasubject coefficients of variation for normal subjects have been reported as low as 7% to 10% for vibration thresholds. In diabetic subjects, coefficients of variation for vibration thresholds are on the order of 10% to 20%, whereas levels of approximately 20% have been observed for thermal thresholds. We have shown that the greatest sensitivity for detection of neuropathy is obtained by using a combination of thermal and vibration perception tests (206).
Thorough assessment of the neurologic status of patients presenting with clinical signs or symptoms of a peripheral sensory neuropathy requires an evaluation of neural afferent function in the peripheral skin. Technological advancements have provided more sophisticated measures of some dimensions of sensory function. A variety of instruments is now available for the detection of impairment in thermal sensitivity and vibration perception, as well as electrical current, pressure, and pain perception. These instruments allow for cutaneous sensory functions to be assessed noninvasively, and their measurements are, by definition, correlates of specific nerve fiber function. The proper application of these instruments will lead to advances in descriptions of cutaneous sensitivity, with a level of detail regarding the magnitude of impairment of different cutaneous sensory modalities that is useful to both the researcher and the clinician. Information concerning fiber specificity and progression of sensory neuropathies cannot be assessed fully until advances in the quantification of cutaneous sensory function are put to use in both research and clinical assessments of sensory neuropathies. The use of standardizable equipment to determine levels of cutaneous sensitivity provides distinct advantages over otherwise-derived assessments, primarily through its allowance for (a) improvements in scaling techniques, and (b) more exacting and standardized methods of stimulus presentation and response.
Quantification of Autonomic Function
Cardiovascular Tests
A series of simple noninvasive tests are capable of detecting cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy. These were developed by Ewing and colleagues (45) and have been successfully applied by others and ourselves (188,189,190,191,237,238,239). The following is a list of the measures and the normal values:
  • Resting heart rate: Approximately 100 beats per minute is abnormal.
  • Beat-to-beat heart rate variation: With the patient at rest and supine, breathing 6 breaths per minute with heart rate monitored by electrocardiography (ECG), a difference (maximal – minimal) in heart rate of approximately 15 beats per minute is normal; a difference of 10 beats per minute or less is abnormal.
  • Valsalva maneuver: The subject blows into the mouthpiece of a manometer to 40 mm Hg for 15 seconds with continuous ECG monitoring before, during, and after the procedure. Healthy subjects normally have tachycardia and peripheral vasoconstriction during strain, and an overshoot increase in blood pressure and bradycardia on release. The Valsalva ratio is longest R-R/shortest R-R; the normal value is more than 1.21.
  • Heart rate response to standing: The subject stands with continuous ECG monitoring, and the R-R interval is measured at beats 15 and 30. The 30/15 ratio is normally approximately 1.03. Tachycardia at beat 15 and bradycardia at beat 30 are normal.
  • Systolic blood pressure response to standing: The response is abnormal if the blood pressure decreases by approximately 30 mm Hg within 2 minutes of standing.
  • Diastolic blood pressure increase with sustained exercise: A hand-grip dynamometer is squeezed to 30% of maximum (predetermined in the subject) for 5 minutes. The normal response is an increase of diastolic blood pressure of approximately 16 mm Hg.
  • QT interval on ECG: The QT interval corrected for the cardiac cycle length (QTc) is QT/square root of longest-shortest R-R interval. A normal QTc is 440 milliseconds.
Gastrointestinal Tests
A number of imaging studies and laboratory tests have been developed to investigate gastrointestinal neuropathy. These include the following:
  • Technetium resin and chicken liver gastric emptying studies (240): A positive test is retention of more than one half of
    P.1348

    the radioactivity in the stomach for approximately 100 minutes.
  • Pressure/motility studies of intestinal function (240).
  • Insulin hypoglycemia test of pancreatic polypeptide and catecholamine responses (241,242,243,244,245).
Special Tests of Bladder Function
In suspect cases of vesical dysfunction, it may be necessary to do the following tests:
  • Cystometry
  • Sphincter EMG
  • Uroflometry
  • Urethral pressure profile
  • Electrophysiologic test of bladder innervation
Special Tests of Penile Function
A variety of tests have been developed to quantitate erectile impotence. These are designed to distinguish psychogenic from organic, and vascular from neuropathic impotence, and include the following:
  • Doppler ultrasound measurement of brachial and penile systolic blood pressure
  • Nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity measurement by strain gauge
  • Penile responses to intracavernosal injection of vasodilators
  • Bulbocavernosus reflex response latency and sensory tests
Sudomotor Sympathetic Function
Sudomotor function can be evaluated with the thermoregulatory sweat test, quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test, skin potentials, or sweat imprint quantitation.
Peripheral Skin Blood Flow Reactions
Microvascular skin blood flow may be accurately measured noninvasively using laser Doppler flowmetry (246). Smooth muscle microvasculature in the periphery reacts sympathetically and parasympathetically to a number of stressor tasks.
Hypoglycemia Unawareness/Unresponsiveness
Testing for the presence of these syndromes requires elaborate and expensive equipment and is best done in a research environment with the stepped hypoglycemic clamp technique (247). The insulin infusion test, applied to normal subjects and patients with type 1 DM, also has been described in detail (248). The test must be performed by two people, one of whom must be a physician (because a medical judgment must be made as to whether an end point is reached and insulin infusion should be stopped). It also requires accurate glucose measurement at the bedside.
Biopsy
Biopsy of nerve tissue may be helpful for excluding other causes of neuropathy, such as the familial hypertrophic forms, amyloid, sarcoid, and other granulomata, but the pathologic process of diabetic neuropathy is not unique. The pathologic process of early sensorimotor neuropathy is not known, but in established neuropathy, the characteristic picture is that of distal fiber loss and degeneration. Histologic data have been reexamined in light of the subtle asymmetries and focal nature of the clinical presentation; findings have supported the hypothesis that there are differences in the types of neuropathies occurring in type 1 versus type 2 DM. Unlike type 1 DM, in type 2 the major observation is Wallerian degeneration, which may be patchy and irregular, supporting the notion of a vascular origin of the disease in this form of DM (12,92,94,249,250,251,252). Although these findings cannot be distinguished clearly from other causes of neuropathy, a microvascular occlusive picture in the absence of known vasculitides may be pathognomonic of DM. Skin biopsy is receiving increasing recognition for documentation of disease of small nerve fibers. Several elegant studies have shown the loss of axons expressing the protein PGP 9.5 in idiopathic small fiber neuropathies. Studies are under way to determine if this is a feature of the small fiber component of diabetic neuropathy (253).
Management of Diabetic Neuropathies
Management of diabetic neuropathies may be divided into general and specific measures. The specific measures include DM control and drug therapies directed at the underlying cause of the symptom complex. The general measures include symptomatic, palliative, and supportive treatment directed at the symptom complex present.
Trials of Therapies Aimed at Pathogenetic Mechanisms
Diabetes Mellitus Control
Retrospective and prospective studies have suggested a relationship between hyperglycemia and the development and severity of diabetic neuropathy. Pirart (254) monitored 4,400 diabetic patients over 25 years and showed an increase in prevalence of clinically detectable diabetic neuropathy from 12% of patients at the time of diagnosis of DM to almost 50% after 25 years. The highest prevalence occurred in those patients with poorest DM control. The DCCT investigators (255) reported significant effects of intensive insulin treatment on prevention of neuropathy. The prevalence rates for clinical or electrophysiologic evidence of neuropathy were reduced by approximately 50% in those treated by insulin treatment at 5 years. At that stage in the study, 3% of the patients in the primary prevention cohort treated with insulin showed at least minimal signs of diabetic neuropathy, compared with 10% of those treated using the conventional regimen. In the secondary prevention cohort, insulin treatment significantly reduced the prevalence of clinical neuropathy by 56% (7% in insulin treatment group vs. 16% in conventionally treated).
The outcome of the multicenter trial (256) has clearly shown that, with the elimination of people with symptomatic neuropathy, rigorous DM control can decrease the prevalence of symptomatic, electrophysiologic, and autonomic indicators
P.1349

of neuropathy by 38% to 59%. The respective roles of insulin administration per se and the many other variables that were altered in this trial in the amelioration of neuropathy are not yet apparent, nor is it clear why so many did not respond, and the degree of response in any given person was small (255,256). Nonetheless, it would be prudent to normalize DM control as much as possible, especially in those patients who have evidence of early neuropathy. The DCCT results support the necessity for strict glycemic control, but the effects of insulin as a growth factor and immunomodulator, aside from its metabolic effects, must also be taken into account.
Nutritional Factors
A variety of nutritional factors have been implicated in the pathogenesis of neuropathy, including deficiencies in vitamin B12, vitamin A, and pyridoxine (vitamin B6), as well as a host of macronutrients and micronutrients. Data suggest that supplementing the diet with 3.2 g/day of inositol and 500 mg/day of dihomo-γ-linolenic acid (evening primrose oil) or N-acetyl-L-carnitine may have some beneficial effects; however, studies have not been well controlled, and the current recommendation is to maintain adequate and healthy nutrition and to give only supplements that are innocuous. Excessive intake of pyridoxine, for example, results in a severe form of sensory neuropathy.
Aldose Reductase Inhibitors
Aldose reductase inhibitors reduce the flux of glucose through the polyol pathway, inhibiting tissue accumulation of sorbitol and fructose, and preventing reduction of redox potentials. Alrestatin, the first ARI studied, was shown to improve scores of sensory impairment in one study by Fagius and Jameson (181); however, in other studies no objective benefits were noted (34,35,228,229,257,258). Patient selection, in which patients with severe neuropathy were treated, may have complicated interpretation of these trials, because these patients may have had irreversible conditions. Sorbinil, another widely studied ARI, generated more promising clinical effects. In a double-blinded, crossover trial, treatment with sorbinil resulted in small but significant improvements in both motor and sensory conduction velocities compared with placebo (259). Additional studies have also demonstrated minor improvements in test results but failed to demonstrate progressive benefit with long-term therapy (260,261). Enrollment in clinical trials was ultimately discontinued because of the presence of significant toxicity, including lymphadenopathy, rash, fever, and pancytopenia. In a placebo-controlled, double-blinded study of another ARI, tolrestat, 45 diabetic patients with asymptomatic autonomic neuropathy, as defined by at least one pathologic cardiovascular reflex, were treated for 1 year (262). Patients who received tolrestat showed significant improvement in autonomic function test results as well as in vibration perception, whereas placebo-treated patients showed deterioration in most of the parameters measured. In addition, a large, multicenter trial is under way in the United States and Canada, using carefully standardized clinical measures of symptoms and physical findings as well as quantitative physiologic testing and sural nerve biopsy. Those who firmly believe in a role for ARIs may obtain prescriptions in Mexico, Ireland, or Italy. The promise shown by ARIs is being exploited by at least two other companies, and an array of new ARIs should be available shortly.
Aldose reductase inhibitor trials are still very much in the research arena, and although there are some promising reports on improvement in symptoms and in some objective measures of neuropathy, the degree of benefit obtained has not been outstanding. It is still too early to evaluate the place of ARIs in the management of diabetic neuropathy (210,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267).
None of the ARIs is approved for clinical use in the United States; all patients receiving treatment are participants of trials conducted by various centers. A major problem related to the interpretation of the data generated in the early studies has been a lack of standardized approaches to the following: (a) determination of clinical symptomatic responsiveness, (b) measurement of subtle changes in thermal and vibratory perception, (c) electrophysiological quantification of improvement, and (d) use of surrogate data as supportive evidence of nerve regeneration. Furthermore, variability in the measurements recorded by different centers in control studies has been considerable, highlighting the need for minimizing both intercenter and intracenter variability. Thus, for trials of this nature to be successful and for meaningful results to be achieved, it will be necessary to carefully standardize the clinical measurements of symptoms and physical findings, as well as those for quantitative physiological testing, and to identify prospectively the histologic end points to be used as primary goals of therapy.
As alluded to earlier, patient selection is also an important consideration, with ideal candidates having only mild or very modest neuropathy. Because many of these patients experience predominantly small fiber neuropathy, which is not detected by electrophysiological measures, quantitation of neural deficits is based primarily on subjective responses. Therefore, these studies should be blinded and placebo controlled.
Myo-inositol
Myo-inositol deficiency has been reported in animal models, and intolerance to myo-inositol has been reported in diabetic humans. There are several studies suggesting that myo-inositol supplements of the normal diet improve neuropathy (8,268,269,270,271), but the treatment may have to be prolonged for at least 6 months for a significant effect to be achieved (268). In desperate situations, however, people whose normal myo-inositol intake is 800 mg/day may increase this to 3,200 mg/day. This is easily obtainable by purchasing Brewer’s yeast (or inositol) from a health-food store, where it comes in two forms, one containing 400 mg and the other containing 800 mg of inositol, with the appropriate number of tablets prescribed per day.
Gangliosides
Gangliosides are sialoglycolipids found in nerve cell membranes and nerve growth cones. A series of studies reported from Europe (182,211,242,243,244,245,246,272,273,274,275,276) and one from the United States (247) have shown some improvement in lower-extremity sensation after ganglioside administration in small groups of patients, but no changes in the electrophysiological measurements
P.1350

of nerve function. Although these studies held promise, the development of Guillain-Barré syndrome in many of the recipients of the brain extracts has led to a moratorium on further therapeutic trials or research.
Gamma-Linolenic Acid
Diabetic subjects are unable to convert linoleic acid to GLA, a necessary precursor for membrane phospholipids, and thus have a deficient substrate for the synthesis of certain prostaglandin derivatives. In a Dutch study, and in a multicenter British and European study, diabetic subjects were treated for 1 year or longer with GLA, which bypasses the enzyme block, and these patients showed improved nerve function compared with a placebo-treated group (47,277). The results generated by these small trials are exciting because GLA also has an important effect in reducing lipid concentrations and thus could be useful in the general management of DM. Further exploration in this area is needed.
Aminoguanidine
Animal studies have been conducted using aminoguanidine, an inhibitor of the formation of AGEs. These studies show improvement in NCV in streptozotocin-induced DM with neuropathy in rats. Thus, aminoguanidine may be of some value in the treatment of diabetic neuropathy. Controlled clinical trials are under way to determine its efficacy in humans (34,226).
N-Acetyl-L-Carnitine
Treatment of neuropathy with N-acetyl-L-carnitine in various animal models of DM yielded exciting indications of potential therapeutic benefit. Unfortunately, the early promise of this compound was not fulfilled when the essentially negative results of the multicenter Canadian and American study were reported (99).
Human Intravenous Immunoglobulin
We have embarked on immune intervention in patients with forms of peripheral diabetic neuropathy that are associated with signs of antineuronal autoimmunity. The neuropathic syndromes seen in these patients include (a) predominantly motor distal symmetric peripheral neuropathy, (b) distal diabetic neuropathy with a more severe motor component, and (c) classic distal symmetric peripheral neuropathy with predominantly large fiber dysfunction. The treatment that we use is IVIG. We have shown that IVIG treatment has the potential to ameliorate disturbances in both non-neurologic and neurologic autoimmune diseases. These observations are consistent with those of Krendel et al. (87), who reported significant neurologic improvement in 15 of 23 patients with either peripheral diabetic polyneuropathy or a demyelinating form of distal symmetric peripheral neuropathy who were treated with various immunotherapies. Patients with peripheral diabetic polyneuropathy showed favorable responses to IVIG, whereas those with distal symmetric peripheral neuropathy improved during a course of treatment with steroids. These exciting observations indicate that immune-directed treatment may significantly improve the armamentarium used in the therapy of diabetic neurologic complications. Treatment with immunoglobulin is well tolerated and is considered safe, especially with respect to viral transmission. Even so, potential toxicity must be considered because commercial IVIG is human IgG prepared from pooled plasma from as few as 2 to as many as 10,000 or more donors. Historically, the major toxicity of IVIG has been an anaphylactic reaction, but the frequency of these reactions is now low and confined mainly to patients with immunoglobulin (usually IgA) deficiency. In neurologic patients who do not have hypogammaglobulinemia or disorders associated with IgA deficiency, screening for IgA deficiency before IVIG is probably not justified. If an anaphylactic reaction occurs, treatment is immediately halted and appropriate corrective procedures initiated. For induction, our patients receive 1.0 g/kg IVIG per day for 2 consecutive days. Thereafter, maintenance consists of 1.0 g/kg once every 4 weeks until there is no further evidence of improvement. In some instances, it may be necessary to combine treatment with prednisone or azathioprine.
Neurotrophic Therapy
Figure 91.1 indicates that even with ongoing destructive forces, all is not lost, and therapy can be directed toward regeneration of damaged nerves. We have projected specific growth factors for specific nerve deficits, such as NGF for small fiber, neurotropin 3 for large fibers, and IGF-1 and IGF-2 for motor fibers.
Nerve growth factor is one of several neurotrophic factors that is known to play an important role in the development, maintenance, and survival of neuronal tissues. NGF binds to high- and low-affinity NGF receptors. The high-affinity receptor is a tyrosine kinase transmembrane protein called TrkA; the low-affinity receptor is a 75-kd glycoprotein referred to as p75. Both are present on small, unmyelinated fibers of the sensory neurons of the peripheral nervous system, on sympathetic neurons in the autonomic nervous system, and in regions of the central nervous system. Alterations of the small, unmyelinated DRG neurons are responsible for the pain, paresthesias, and numbness of diabetic neuropathy (278,279,280). There is now considerable evidence in animal models of DM for decreases in the expression of NGF and TrkA, reduced retrograde transport of NGF, and diminished support of small, unmyelinated neurons and their neuropeptide neurotransmitters, substance P and CGRP, both potent vasodilators alluded to previously (281,282,283,284). Furthermore, recombinant NGF (rNGF) administration restores these neuropeptide levels toward normal and prevents the manifestations of sensory neuropathy in animals (285).
We completed a phase II study in humans testing NGF (286). This was a 15-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of rNGF in 250 subjects with symptomatic small fiber neuropathy. NGF decreased the amount of neurologic impairment measurable on clinical examination of the lower limbs and improved small fiber function
P.1351

measured as the ability to detect cooling (Aδ fibers) and the ability to perceive heat pain (C fibers) (HP; 5.0) compared with placebo. These results are consistent with NGF’s postulated actions on TrkA receptors present on small fiber neurons. Data from two large trials just concluded in the United States and elsewhere do not support our phase II study inasmuch as the objective of a greater response in the NGF-treated groups compared with the placebo-treated patients was not achieved. For this reason, the clinical trials have been stopped, but it is not readily apparent why this discrepancy should have occurred.
Symptomatic Therapy
Pain Control
Control of pain in diabetic neuropathy may present one of the most frustrating problems for both physician and patient. Often, patients are depressed, and the depression does not appear to be a function of the extent or severity of the neuropathy, but rather of a sense of hopelessness. An accompanying sense of “weakness” may also be present, and this often is due not to a muscle deficit, but again to a feeling of hopelessness. Enrollment of some patients into various drug trials for neuropathy has yielded improvement in approximately 50% of subjects even before institution of the drug therapy, or with the administration of placebo (Fig. 91.9). This trial effect highlights the need for physicians to treat these patients with compassion, sympathy, understanding, and a sense of hope. Simple maneuvers, such as wearing body stockings to decrease movement of hair follicles, can be very helpful.
There are two general types of pain in neuropathy. The first type, C-fiber pain, is marked by hyperesthesia and a burning, lancinating dysesthetic component. This subgroup may respond to topical application of capsaicin (287). The second type, Aδ-fiber pain, is dull and gnawing, like a toothache, and usually does not respond well to topical therapy. Figure 91.8 outlines treatment paths for these two types of neuropathic pain.
Figure 91.9. Therapeutic interventions for painful distal symmetric diabetic polyneuropathy based on pathogenetic mechanisms.
C-Fiber Pain
Patients with C-fiber pain are initially treated with capsaicin or clonidine.
Capsaicin
Marked hyperesthesia with burning, lancinating, dysesthetic pain is typical of C-fiber pain and may respond to capsaicin applied topically three to four times daily. Capsaicin is extracted from chili peppers, and a simple preparation can be obtained by adding 3 teaspoons of cayenne pepper to a jar of cold cream and applying this to the area of pain. Care must be taken to avoid eyes and genitals, and gloves must be worn. Because of volatility, it is safer to cover affected areas with cellophane. There is an initial exacerbation of symptoms followed by relief in 2 to 3 weeks.
Clonidine
There may be an element of sympathetic mediation of C-fiber pain that can be overcome with clonidine (or phentolamine). Our regimen is to test the response by infusion of phentolamine. If a response occurs, we start treatment with clonidine. In practice, a clinical trial of clonidine (Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, CT, U.S.A.), 0.1 mg every night escalating to 0.5 mg/day in divided doses, usually discloses the likelihood of success or failure. The patient needs to be warned of the potential side effects of orthostasis and given precautionary measures. If this fails, the local anesthetic agent, mexiletine, warrants a trial.
Ad-Fiber Pain
The second type of pain, Aδ-fiber pain, is a more deep-seated ache that often does not respond to the aforementioned measures. A number of different agents have been used with varying
P.1352

success. Continuous intravenous insulin infusion without resort to blood glucose lowering may be useful in these patients. The regimen we use is to admit the patient in the evening. Usual DM treatment is instituted and the regular meal plan followed. An intravenous line is started, administering NaCl. In the morning, insulin is infused in a dose of 0.8 to 1 unit hourly. A response with reduction of pain usually occurs within 48 hours, and the insulin infusion can be discontinued. If this measure fails, there are several medications available that may abolish the pain.
Tramadol and Dextromethorphan
If failure of drugs active at the peripheral level has ruled out sympathetic and superficial sources of pain, the next step is to attack the pain at the spinal level. There are two possible targets. One is to apply the endogenous opiate receptor agonist tramadol, which binds to μ receptors. Another spinal cord target for pain relief is the excitatory glutaminergic NMDA receptor. Blockade of NMDA receptors is believed to be one mechanism by which dextromethorphan exerts analgesic efficacy. The dose is 30 to 150 mg three times a day.
Antidepressants
Several studies have examined the effects of various tricyclic drugs in combination with phenothiazines and have reported a beneficial effect that is unrelated to the relief of depression (227,228,229). The usual treatment is 50 to 150 mg amitriptyline, either at bedtime or in divided doses, plus 1 to 2 mg fluphenazine orally at night. Unfortunately, however, the dysautonomia, dry mouth, and visual disturbances caused by tricyclics may be limiting and the tardive dyskinesia caused by phenothiazines troublesome. Some of the anticholinergic effects of amitriptyline may be lessened by switching to nortriptyline. A benefit of treatment with tricyclics alone in double-blinded, placebo-controlled studies has been reported, indicating greater effectiveness of the drug compared with placebo (288,289). As mentioned earlier, many of these patients are depressed, and a trial of imipramine alone or amitriptyline given together with fluphenazine may be of benefit. A clinical trial by Max et al. (288) has focused on interruption of pain transmission by antidepressant drugs that inhibit the reuptake of norepinephrine or serotonin. This central action accentuates the effects of these neurotransmitters in activating endogenous pain-inhibitory systems in the brain that modulate pain transmission cells in the spinal cord. Several studies have shown the tricyclic antidepressants in combination with the phenothiazine fluphenazine to be efficacious in painful neuropathy, with benefits unrelated to relief of depression (290,291).
Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation
Transcutaneous nerve stimulation must be considered if only because it represents one of the most benign approaches to management. Often this approach is abandoned prematurely when the practitioner fails to move the electrodes around sufficiently to identify sensitive areas. Salutary results usually are obtained only when the electrodes are moved to multiple areas, including those not in the distribution of the nerves involved.
Nerve Blocking
The administration of lidocaine by slow infusion of 5 mg/kg over 30 minutes has been shown to provide relief of intractable pain for 3 to 21 days (292). When the pain is localized to a nerve root distribution, the temporary pain relief provided by the local nerve blockers may constitute sufficient management because such pain is self-limiting. If a positive response to lidocaine is found, therapy can be continued with oral mexiletine in divided doses totalling more than 10 mg/kg/day. These compounds target pain due to hyperexcitability of superficial free nerve endings (292).
Rheologic Agents
Pentoxyfylline is a rheologic agent that increases the deformability of red blood cells and increases blood flow with enhanced oxygenation of tissues. Use of this agent has been reported sporadically in diabetic neuropathy, but results of the completed six-center clinical investigation of its safety and efficacy in painful diabetic neuropathy were negative.
Antiepileptic Agents
Carbamazepine
Several double-blinded, placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated carbamazepine to be effective in the management of pain in diabetic neuropathy (8). Toxic side effects may limit its use in some patients. It is, however, the agent of choice for alleviating pain.
Phenytoin
Diphenylhydantoin (Dilantin, Parke-Davis, Morris Plains, NJ, U.S.A.) has long been used in the treatment of painful neuropathies. Double-blinded, crossover studies have not, however, demonstrated a therapeutic benefit using Dilantin compared with placebo in diabetic neuropathy (293,294). In addition to its side effects militating against its use in patients with DM, its ability to suppress insulin secretion has resulted in precipitation of hyperosmolar diabetic coma.
Gabapentin
Gabapentin (Neurontin, Warner Lambert, Morris Plains, NJ, U.S.A.) is an effective anticonvulsant whose mechanism is not well understood, but which holds additional promise as an analgesic agent that improves the quality of life of the patient with painful diabetic neuropathy, as shown in a multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study conducted in the United States (99). It is wise to start with a small dose, 300 mg three times a day, and then to increase gradually if there is no response. The maximum dose can be as high as 3,600 mg/day. Side effects may be limiting and include somnolence, dizziness, and feeling “spaced out,” with impairment of memory, confusion, and disorientation. Patients with C-fiber pain tend to get the most improvement, and 75% of patients have a 35% reduction
P.1353

in pain, whereas only 50% of patients have a 25% reduction in pain with placebo treatment.
Analgesics
Analgesics are rarely of much benefit in the treatment of painful neuropathy, although they may be of some use on a short-term basis for some of the self-limited syndromes such as painful diabetic third-nerve palsy. Use of narcotics in the setting of chronic pain usually is avoided because of the risk of addiction. Tramadol (Ultram, Ortho McNeil Pharmaceutical, Raritan, NJ, U.S.A.), however, has proved to be of use in small-scale clinical trials and is undergoing more rigorous trial in the United States.
Calcitonin
Investigators have described the analgesic effects of salmon calcitonin nasal spray in a woman with painful diabetic neuropathy (295). In another placebo-controlled study, ten patients with painful diabetic neuropathy were treated with 100 IU of calcitonin per day. Approximately 39% of patients had near-complete relief of symptoms. The improvement was seen after only 2 weeks of treatment.
Specific Treatments in Certain Forms of Painful Neuropathy
Painful neuropathy can actually be precipitated by initiation of diabetic therapy, although it usually subsides with ongoing treatment. The syndrome of acute painful neuropathy associated with marked weight loss (diabetic neuropathic cachexia) also responds to control of hyperglycemia, although symptoms may persist for as long as 6 to 18 months, requiring constant reassurance to the patient. We believe this to be a variant of CIDP, and we have seen dramatic responses to IVIG in a small number of patients.
Neuropathic Ulcers
Neuropathic ulcers constitute the greatest hazard for loss of limbs in patients with DM, and it is the responsibility of the physician to ensure that the patient understands the importance of foot care.
Meticulous Foot Care
Drying between the toes after bathing and application of drying powder (e.g., talcum, cornstarch) and softening creams (e.g., lanolin) are critical measures for the prevention of foot ulcers. Daily inspection of the feet is paramount, and patients must be taught proper toenail-cutting techniques.
Orthotic Devices
If a patient presents with marked loss of sensation and the development of ulcers in the pressure areas of the foot (discussed earlier), the purchase of a shoe one size larger than regular with an insert of plastozet or alzet, which will mold to the foot and distribute the pressure, can result in healing of ulcers within several months. A simple yet effective measure is to wear padded socks (e.g., Thorlo), a maneuver shown to reduce the likelihood of foot ulceration.
Ulcer Care
Ulcer care requires débridement of necrotic tissue, repeated sterile dressings, removal from further pressure with supportive devices, or even bed rest or a plaster cast. Infection must be treated aggressively, with appropriate antibiotics often prescribed for at least 3 weeks and an underlying osteomyelitis excluded by radiography. Trials of topical platelet-derived growth factor as a means of accelerating wound healing are being undertaken in several U.S. centers. This area probably constitutes the single greatest cause of mismanagement of patients with DM, giving rise to medical lawsuits.
Charcot Joints: Orthotic Devices
Once destruction of a Charcot joint is complete and there is total loss of joint pain and perception, the only means of treatment is with orthotic devices.
Mononeuropathies
Physiotherapy is important to prevent contractures, and the joints should be protected until spontaneous recovery occurs.
Autonomic Neuropathies
The development of autonomic neuropathy is of particular significance. Cardiac function is markedly impaired, exercise tolerance is limited, and the ability to withstand heat impaired, making it essential that the patient be protected from temperature extremes.
Diurnal Blood Pressure Rhythm
Diabetic patients with proteinuria have a severalfold increase in mortality risk compared with the nondiabetic population. Abnormalities in well established cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., dyslipidemia, hypertension, smoking, and obesity) cannot fully account for this finding (253). It has been shown that patients with type 2 or type 1 DM with albuminuria have a blunted normally occurring nocturnal decline in blood pressure (255,296). The prevalence of sympathetic and parasympathetic autonomic insufficiency is increased in these patients, indicating a possible role of persistently high cardiac output and total peripheral resistance in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular events in this high-risk diabetic population (297). Reduced vagal activity may be an important factor in the pathophysiology of sudden cardiovascular death, and silent myocardial ischemia/ myocardial infarction occurs with loss of sympathetic innervation. These findings explain the poor prognosis in diabetic patients with autonomic failure. Furthermore, when antihypertensive
P.1354

drugs are prescribed to patients with a blunted or reversed circadian blood pressure rhythm, overnight coverage of blood pressure becomes an important issue.
Postural Hypotension
Postural hypotension in the patient with diabetic autonomic neuropathy can present a difficult management problem. Elevating the blood pressure in the standing position must be balanced against preventing hypertension in the supine position.
Supportive Garments
Whenever possible, attempts should be made to increase venous return from the periphery using total-body stockings. The patient should be instructed to put them on while lying down and to not remove them until returning to the supine position. Clearly, they can be uncomfortable, especially in hot weather, making compliance an issue. In severe cases, an Air Force antigravity suit may be needed.
Drug Therapy
Some patients with postural hypotension may benefit from treatment with 9-fluorohydrocortisone 0.5 mg daily and supplementary salt 2 to 6 g daily (172). Unfortunately, symptoms do not improve until edema occurs, and there is a significant risk for development of congestive heart failure and hypertension. If fluorohydrocortisone does not work satisfactorily, various adrenergic agonists and antagonists may be used. If the adrenergic receptor status is known, therapy can be guided to the appropriate agents. Metoclopramide 10 mg three times daily may be helpful in patients with dopamine excess or increased sensitivity to dopaminergic stimulation. Patients with α2-adrenergic receptor excess may respond to the α2-antagonist yohimbine, 10 mg three times a day. Those few patients in whom β receptors are increased may be helped with propranolol 10 mg four times a day. An α2-adrenergic receptor deficiency may be treated with clonidine, which in this setting may paradoxically increase blood pressure. The patient should start with small doses and gradually increase the dose to 0.5 mg/day. If the preceding measures fail, midodrine, an α1-adrenergic agonist, at a dose of 2.5 to 40 mg every 6 hours, or dihydroergotamine in combination with caffeine (Cafergot, Novartis, Summit, NJ, U.S.A.) may help. A particularly refractory form of postural hypotension occurs in some patients postprandially and may respond to therapy with octreotide (Sandostatin, Novartis) 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg given subcutaneously in the morning. Care should be taken to avoid higher doses, which could result in hypertension.
Gastropathy
The first step in the management of diabetic gastroparesis (8) consists of multiple small feedings. The amount of fat should be decreased because it tends to delay gastric emptying. Metoclopramide 10 mg up to four times a day may be added, if necessary. The drug is not well absorbed, however, if large gastric residuals secondary to severe gastroparesis are present. In this instance, gastric suctioning and intravenous nutrition, as well as intravenous drug administration, are needed until the stomach begins to empty, at which time oral therapy can be reinstituted. Other medications such as the cholinergic agonist bethanechol and the cholinesterase inhibitor pyridostigmine have been advocated, but in general are of little therapeutic benefit and may cause unpleasant side effects, including dry mouth, blurred vision, and colic. Domperidone, 10 to 40 mg taken 30 minutes before meals, has been shown to be effective in some patients, although probably no more so than metoclopramide. Erythromycin given as either a liquid or suppository may also be helpful. Erythromycin acts on the motilin receptor, “the sweeper of the gut,” and shortens gastric emptying time. If medications fail and severe gastroparesis persists, jejunostomy placement into normally functioning bowel may be needed. Feedings can be given at night, freeing patients during the day, and insulin can be adjusted to accommodate the feeding schedule. Nausea often accompanies gastroparesis and may be central or peripheral. We use a mixture of the following: 45 mL Maalox (Rhone-Poulenc-Rorer, Collegeville, PA, U.S.A.), one teaspoon of Donnatal Elixir (A. H. Robins, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A.; phenobarbital, hyoscyamine sulfate, atropine sulfate, and scopolamine hydrobromide), and one teaspoon Benadryl (Parke-Davis). If the dose is given one time only, 5 mL viscous lidocaine should be used instead of the Benadryl. The mixture can be given every 4 to 6 hours and is very effective for the symptom of nausea. When pain is a concomitant of gastroparesis, this may be due to bile-induced gastritis and can be relieved by the administration of Riopan (Whitehall Robins, Madison, NJ, U.S.A.), with or without the bile-chelating agent cholestyramine.
Enteropathy
Enteropathy involving the small bowel and colon can produce both chronic constipation and explosive diabetic diarrhea, making treatment of this particular complication difficult (8).
Antibiotics
Stasis of bowel contents with bacterial overgrowth may contribute to the diarrhea. Treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics is the mainstay of therapy, including tetracycline or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Metronidazole 750 mg three times daily appears to be the most effective agent and should be continued for at least 3 weeks. Treatment can be empiric or, when possible, the breath hydrogen test should be checked as an indication that bacterial overgrowth has been controlled.
Cholestyramine
Retention of bile may occur and can be highly irritating to the gut. Chelation of bile salts with cholestyramine, 4 g three times a day mixed with fluid, may offer relief of symptoms.
P.1355

Diphenoxylate Plus Atropine
Lomotil (Searle, Chicago, IL) 2 mg four times a day may help to control the diarrhea, although toxic megacolon can occur and extreme care should be used.
Diet
Patients with poor digestion may benefit from a gluten-free diet. Certain fibers can lead to bezoar formation in the patient with neuropathy because of bowel stasis in gastroparetic or constipated patients. The soluble fiber psyllium can be useful for diarrhea because of its hygroscopic properties, yielding better-formed stools and slowing the gut.
Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency
A decrease in pancreatic exocrine secretions may be present, and Viokase (A. H. Robins) in large doses (10–18 tablespoons/day) may be effective. Clonidine has also been used in one small clinical trial with some success, ostensibly because of an α2-adrenergic receptor deficit in the gut epithelium. When diarrhea is particularly resistant to treatment with these agents, it responds to octreotide. Unlike orthostasis, which is particularly sensitive, higher doses are required for the diarrhea of diabetic enteropathy, in the range of 0.1–0.5 mg/kg/day.
Cystopathy
Patients with neurogenic bladder may not feel when their bladders are full. They should be instructed to palpate their bladders, and if unable to initiate micturition when full, use the Crede maneuver to start the flow of urine. Parasympathomimetics such as bethanechol 10 mg four times daily are sometimes helpful, although frequently do not help fully to empty the bladder (8). Extended sphincter relaxation can be achieved with an α1-adrenergic blocker, such as doxazosin 1 to 2 mg two to three times daily (8). Self-catheterization can be particularly useful in this setting, with the risk of infection generally being low. If α1 blockade fails in men, bladder neck surgery may help to relieve spasm of the internal sphincter. Because the somatic supply of the external sphincter remains intact, continence is preserved.
Sexual Dysfunction
From the patient’s standpoint, this problem can be one of the most disturbing complications of DM. We use a modified Florida Sexual Questionnaire for assessment of sexual function status. Our modifications have been made to establish whether there is a psychogenic or vascular component involved in the pathogenesis. If the disorder is neurogenic, counseling may be needed to help with personal and marital concerns. A number of treatment modalities are available (8). Yohimbine 10 mg three times daily, an α2-adrenergic antagonist, may help in approximately one third of patients. Topical minoxidil, another adrenergic antagonist, may also be helpful. Intrapenile injection of regitine and papaverine has also been used with some success, although a small proportion of patients may have infection, priapism, and fibrosis. More recently, prostaglandin E1 has been shown to be superior to other agents (91). It causes relaxation of corporal tissue in vitro. Large clinical series indicate not only its efficacy but its low complication rate. The introduction of sildenafil (Viagra, Pfizer, New York, NY, U.S.A.), a type 5–specific cyclic guanosine monophosphate phosphodiesterase inhibitor, has revolutionized the approach to all forms of erectile dysfunction (ED). Although in the general population with a variety of causes of ED, the response rate can be as high as 88%, with psychogenic causes having the best response rate, in the diabetic population a meta-analysis of several studies in which there were patients with DM showed that it was successful in approximately 44% of cases (298). This is not surprising in light of the complex pathogenesis of ED in the diabetic man. Because most people with ED and DM have severe generalized vascular disease and are taking nitrates, they must be cautioned about the potential for severe hypotension due to interaction between the two agents. For those patients who do not respond to medical therapy, inflatable devices that obstruct venous outflow while promoting inflow have also been used successfully. If these therapies do not help, rigid and semirigid prostheses are available.
Retrograde ejaculation may occur if the bladder neck fails to close. Clinically, it is of little significance unless the patient wishes to procreate. It can be treated with brompheniramine 8 mg twice a day, imipramine 25 mg three times a day, or phenylephrine intravenously.
Gustatory Sweating
Gustatory sweating and sudomotor disturbance may respond to treatment with propantheline hydrobromide 15 mg three times daily or to scopolamine patches.
Hypoglycemia Unawareness/Unresponsiveness/ Hypoglycemia-Associated Autonomic Failure
Patients with hypoglycemia unawareness and unresponsiveness pose a significant management problem for the physician (52,244,248). Autonomic neuropathy may improve with intensive therapy and normalization of blood glucose, but there is a risk to the patient, who may become hypoglycemic without being aware of it and cannot mount a counterregulatory response. It is our recommendation, therefore, that if a pump is used, boluses should be avoided of smaller than calculated amounts given, and if intensive conventional therapy is used, long-acting insulin with very small boluses should be given. In general, normal glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin levels should not be goals in these patients to avoid the possibility of hypoglycemia.
Further complicating treatment of some diabetic patients is the development of a functional autonomic insufficiency associated with intensive insulin treatment, which resembles autonomic neuropathy in all relevant aspects (hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure). In these instances, it is prudent to relax therapy, as for the patient with bona fide autonomic neuropathy.
P.1356

In conclusion, management of diabetic neuropathy encompasses a wide variety of therapies. Treatment must be individualized in a manner that addresses the particular manifestation and underlying pathogenesis of each patient’s unique clinical presentation, without subjecting the patient to untoward medication effects. Interesting new areas are being explored in an attempt to enhance blood flow through the vasa nervorum, including the prostacyclin analogue beraprost (299), blockade of thromboxane A2 (158), and drugs that normalize Na+/K+-ATPase activity, such as cilostazol, a potent phosphodiesterase inhibitor (300), and α-lipoic acid, a potent antioxidant. There are also trials being initiated with antagonists of β2 PKC, which is implicated in the microvascular dysfunction of diabetic neuropathy and α-lipoic acid. However, these treatments have not reached the clinical area.
Prognosis
The tendency for neuropathy, nephropathy, and retinopathy to cluster together in the same patient has long been recognized (301) and is now referred to as a triopathy. This clustering is independent of age and duration of DM (254). Neuropathy is often the first of these complications to become manifest and thus may serve as a marker for those at high risk for future development of retinopathy, as suggested by Knowler et al. (275,302), and perhaps for other diabetic complications.
Peripheral and possibly autonomic neuropathy is also an important contribution to the development of neuropathic foot ulceration, which can be a devastating complication for some patients. It has been estimated that approximately 50% of all nontraumatic amputations in this country occur in diabetic patients, and that one half of these are potentially preventable (303). These statistics highlight the need for careful attention to foot care in diabetic patients.
The presence of autonomic neuropathy may also lead to accelerated development of other morbid conditions. Among women with DM, for example, it is reported that those with cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy have a higher prevalence of bacteriuria than women of similar age, duration of DM, and glycosylated hemoglobin but without cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (304). The increased mortality risk associated with diabetic autonomic neuropathy is well established and is in the range of 25% to 50% within 5 to 10 years of diagnosis (176,305,306). However, patients who die prematurely are more likely to present with postural hypotension, gastric symptoms, and hypoglycemic unawareness at baseline examination. Possible mechanisms for the increased risk associated with diabetic autonomic neuropathy were discussed earlier.
Figure 91.10. Therapeutic interventions for distal symmetric diabetic polyneuropathy based on pathogenetic mechanisms.
Prospects for the Future
It is now abundantly clear that neuropathy is heterogeneous and that hyperglycemia and its metabolic consequences can account only for a proportion of the susceptibility to this complication. With the recognition that autoimmunity, vascular insufficiency, and growth factor deficiency may also contribute to this complication, either in conjunction with the metabolic imbalance or as independent culprits, newer therapies directed toward these mechanisms might achieve a greater degree of success than that currently enjoyed by clinicians handling these patients (Fig. 91.10). Indeed, there are now early trials of growth factor therapy for growth factor–deprived patients, and soon there will be attempts to address the autoimmune and vascular pathologic processes as well. When considered in the light
P.1357

of the types of nerve fibers involved and the dependence of the specific fibers on particular growth factors, it seems reasonable to predict that before long, targeted “cocktails” of growth factors directed toward the specific lesion in a given patient will make their way into our therapeutic armamentarium.
Conclusion
Diabetic neuropathy is a common complication of DM that often is associated both with considerable morbidity (e.g., painful polyneuropathy, neuropathic ulceration) and mortality (e.g., autonomic neuropathy). The epidemiology and natural history of diabetic neuropathy is clouded with uncertainty, largely because of confusion regarding the definition and measurement of this disorder.
We have reviewed a variety of the clinical manifestations associated with somatic and autonomic neuropathy and have discussed current views related to the management of the different abnormalities. Although unproved, the best evidence suggests that near-normal control of blood glucose in the early years after onset of DM may help delay the development of clinically significant nerve impairment. Intensive therapy to achieve normalization of blood glucose also may lead to reversibility of early diabetic neuropathy, but again, this has not been proved.
Our ability to manage successfully the many different manifestations of diabetic neuropathy depends ultimately on our success in uncovering the pathogenic processes underlying this disorder. The resurgence of interest in the vascular hypothesis, for example, and the possibility that autoimmunity may play a role have opened up new avenues of investigation for therapeutic intervention. Paralleling our increased understanding of the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy, there must be refinements in our ability to measure quantitatively the different types of defects that occur in this disorder, so that appropriate growth factor therapies can be targeted to specific fiber types. These tests must be validated and standardized to allow comparability between studies and a more meaningful interpretation of study results.
References
1. Bank S, Marks IN, Vinik AI. Clinical and hormonal aspects of pancreatic diabetes. Am J Gastroenterol 1975;64:13–22.
2. Deckert T. Late diabetic manifestations in “pancreatogenic” diabetes mellitus. Acta Med Scand 1960;168:439–446.
3. Galton DJ. Diabetic retinopathy and haemochromatosis. BMJ 1965; 1:1169.
4. Thomas PK, Eliasson SG. Diabetic neuropathy. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, Lambert EH, et al., eds. Peripheral neuropathy. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1984:1773–1810.
5. Ellenberg M. Diabetic neuropathy. In: Ellenberg M, Rifkin H, eds. Diabetes mellitus: theory and practice. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1982:777–801.
6. Greene DA, Pfeifer MA. Diabetic neuropathy. In: Olefsky JM, Sherwin RS, eds. Diabetes mellitus: management and complications. New York: Churchill Livingston, 1985:223–254.
7. Brown MJ, Asbury AK. Diabetic neuropathy. Ann Neurol 1984;15: 2–12.
8. Vinik AI, Holland MT, LeBeau JM, et al. Diabetic neuropathies. Diabetes Care 1992;15:1926–1975.
9. Archer AG, Watkins PJ, Thomas PK, et al. The natural history of acute painful neuropathy in diabetes mellitus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983;46:491–499.
10. Pfeifer MA, Weinberg CR, Cook DL, et al. Autonomic neural dysfunction in recently diagnosed diabetic subjects. Diabetes Care 1984;7:447–453.
11. O’Brien IA, O’Hare JP, Lewin IG, et al. The prevalence of autonomic neuropathy in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a controlled study based on heart rate variability. Q J Med 1986;61: 957–967.
12. Ewing DJ, Bellavere F, Espi F, et al. Correlation of cardiovascular and neuroendocrine tests of autonomic function in diabetes. Metabolism 1986;35:349–353.
13. Feldman M, Schiller LR. Disorders of gastrointestinal motility associated with diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med 1983;98:378–384.
14. Fraser DM, Campbell IW, Ewing DJ, et al. Peripheral and autonomic nerve function in newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 1977;26:546–550.
15. Young RJ, Ewing DJ, Clarke BF. Nerve function and metabolic control in teenage diabetics. Diabetes 1983;32:142–147.
16. Orchard TJ, Dorman JS, LaPorte RE, et al. Host and environmental interactions in diabetes mellitus. J Chronic Dis 1986;39:979–999.
17. Bruyn GW, Garland H. Neuropathies of endocrine origin. In: Vinkin PJ, Bruyn GW, eds. Handbook of clinical neurology. Amsterdam: North Holland Pub. Co.;1970:29–71.
18. Vinik AI, Mitchell BD, Leichter SB, et al. Epidemiology of the complications of diabetes. In: Leslie RDG, Robbins DC, eds. Diabetes: clinical science in practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995:221–287.
19. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Factors in development of diabetic neuropathy: baseline analysis of neuropathy in feasibility phase of Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). Diabetes 1988;37:476–481.
20. Sosenko JM, Boulton AJ, Kubrusly DB, et al. The vibratory perception threshold in young diabetic patients: associations with glycemia and puberty. Diabetes Care 1985;8:605–607.
21. Kruger M, Brunko E, Dorchy H, et al. Femoral versus peroneal neuropathy in diabetic children and adolescents—relationships to clinical status, metabolic control and retinopathy. Diabetes Metab 1987;13:110–115.
22. Marcus J, Ehrlich R, Kelly M, et al. Nerve conduction in childhood diabetes. Can Med Assoc J 1973;108:1116–1119.
23. Mitchell BD, Hawthorne VM, Vinik AI. Cigarette smoking and neuropathy in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 1990;13:434–437.
24. Jeyarajah R, Samarawickrama P, Jameel MM. Autonomic function tests in non-insulin dependent diabetic patients and apparently healthy volunteers. J Chronic Dis 1986;39:479–484.
25. Ewing DJ, Irving JB, Kerr F, et al. Cardiovascular responses to sustained handgrip in normal subjects and in patients with diabetes mellitus: a test of autonomic function. Clin Sci Mol Med 1974; 46:295–306.
26. Burke CM, O’Doherty A, Flanagan A, et al. Autonomic neuropathy in a diabetic clinic. Ir Med J 1984;77:202–205.
27. Sharpey-Schafer EP, Taylor PJ. Absent circulatory reflexes in diabetic neuritis. Lancet 1960;1:559–562.
28. Brownlee M. Advanced products of nonenzymatic glycosylation and the pathogenesis of diabetic complications. In: Rifkin H, Porte D, eds. Diabetes mellitus: theory and practice. New York: Elsevier, 1990: 279.
29. Veglio M, Carpano-Maglioli P, Tonda L, et al. Autonomic neuropathy in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients: correlation with age, sex, duration and metabolic control of diabetes. Diabetes Metab 1990;16:200–206.
30. Maser RE, Pfeifer MA, Dorman JS, et al. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy and cardiovascular risk. Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study III. Arch Intern Med 1990;150:1218–1222.
31. Bergstrom B, Lilja B, Osterlin S, et al. Autonomic neuropathy in non-insulin dependent (type II) diabetes mellitus. Possible influence of obesity [see comments]. J Intern Med 1990;227:57–63.
P.1358

32. Ward JD, Barnes CG, Fisher DJ, et al. Improvement in nerve conduction following treatment in newly diagnosed diabetics. Lancet 1971;1:428–430.
33. Christensen NJ. Diabetic macroangiopathy blood flow and radiological studies. In: Camerini-Davalos RA, Cole HS, eds. Vascular and neurological changes in early diabetes. New York: Academic, 1973: 129–134.
34. Ziegler D, Cicmir I, Wiefels K. Peripheral and autonomic nerve dysfunction in newly diagnosed insulin-dependent diabetics (IDDM) [Abstract]. Diabetes 1986;35:102.
35. Gregersen G. Diabetic neuropathy: influence of age, sex, metabolic control, and duration of diabetes on motor conduction velocity. Neurology 1967;17:972–980.
36. Lamontagne A, Buchthal F. Electrophysiological studies in diabetic neuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1970;33:442–452.
37. Boulton AJ, Knight G, Drury J, et al. The prevalence of symptomatic, diabetic neuropathy in an insulin-treated population. Diabetes Care 1985;8:125–128.
38. Haimanot RT, Abdulkadir J. Neuropathy in Ethiopian diabetics: a correlation of clinical and nerve conduction studies. Trop Geogr Med 1985;37:62–68.
39. Osuntokun BO, Akinkugbe FM, Francis TI, et al. Diabetes mellitus in Nigerians: a study of 832 patients. West Afr Med J Niger Pract 1971;20:295–312.
40. Mulder DW, Lambert EH, Bastron JA, et al. The neuropathies associated with diabetes mellitus: a clinical and electromyographic study of 103 unselected diabetic patients. Neurology 1961;11(4):275–284.
41. Skillman TG, Johnson EW, Hamwi GJ, et al. Motor nerve conduction velocity in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 1961;10(1):46–51.
42. Mayne N. The short-term prognosis in diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes 1968;17:270–273.
43. Bischoff A. The natural course of diabetic neuropathy. A follow-up. Horm Metab Res Suppl 1980;9:98–100.
44. Brownlee M. Advanced products of nonenzymatic glycosylation and the pathogenesis of diabetic complications. In: Rifkin H, Porte D, eds. Diabetes mellitus: theory and practice. New York: Elsevier, 1990: 279.
45. Ewing DJ, Clarke BF. Diagnosis and management of diabetic autonomic neuropathy. BMJ 1982;285:916–918.
46. Bellavere F, Bosello G, Cardone C, et al. Evidence of early impairment of parasympathetic reflexes in insulin dependent diabetics without autonomic symptoms. Diabetes Metab 1985;11:152–156.
47. Watkins PJ, Edmonds ME. Sympathetic nerve failure in diabetes. Diabetologia 1983;25:73–77.
48. Thomas PK, Ward JD, Watkins PJ. Diabetic neuropathy. In: Keen H, Jarrett J, eds. Complications of diabetes. London: Edward Arnold Publishing, 1982:109–136.
49. Sundkvist G. Autonomic nervous function in asymptomatic diabetic patients with signs of peripheral neuropathy. Diabetes Care 1981;4: 529–534.
50. O’Brien IA, Lewin IG, O’Hare JP, et al. Abnormal circadian rhythm of melatonin in diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1986;24:359–364.
51. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on nerve conduction in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Ann Neurol 1995;38:869.
52. Zochodne D, Ho LT. Normal blood flow but lower oxygen tension in diabetes of young rats: microenvironment and the influence of sympathectomy. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1992;70:651.
53. Maxwell SR, Thomason H, Sandler D, et al. Antioxidant status in patients with uncomplicated insulin-dependent and non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Eur J Invest 1997;27:484–490.
54. Santini SA, Marra G, Giardina B, et al. Defective plasma antioxidant defenses and enhanced susceptibility to lipid peroxidation in uncomplicated IDDM. Diabetes 1997;46:1853–1858.
55. Sunndaram RK, Bhaskar A, Vijayalingam S, et al. Antioxidant status and lipid peroxidation in type II diabetes mellitus with and without complications. Clin Sci (Lond) 1996;90:255–260.
56. Low PA, Opfer-Gehrking TL. The anatomic laboratory. Am J Electrodiagn Technol 1999;39:65–76.
57. Cameron NE, Cotter MA. Metabolic and vascular factors in the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes 1997;46(suppl): 31–37.
58. Baynes JW. Role of oxidative stress in development of complications in diabetes. Diabetes 1991;40:405–412.
59. Brownlee M, Cerami A. The biochemistry of the complications of diabetes mellitus. Annu Rev Biochem 1981;50:385–432.
60. Lee AY, Chung SS. Contributions of polyol pathway to oxidative stress in diabetic cataract. FASEB J 1999;13:23–30.
61. Wolff SP, Dean RT. Glucose autoxidation and protein modification. The potential role of “autoxidative glycosylation” in diabetes. Biochem J 1987;245:243–250.
62. Williamson JR, Chang K, Frangos M, et al. Hyperglycemic pseudohypoxia and diabetic complications. Diabetes 1993;42:801–813.
63. Koya D, King GL. Protein kinase C activation and the development of diabetic complications. Diabetes 1998;47:859–866.
64. Nourooz-Zadeh J, Tajaddini-Sarmadi J, McCarthy S, et al. Elevated levels of authentic plasma hydroperoxides in NIDDM. Diabetes 1995;44:1054–1058.
65. Giugliano D, Ceriello A, Paolisso G. Oxidative stress and diabetic vascular complications. Diabetes Care 1996;19:257–267.
66. Greene DA, Sima AA, Stevens MJ, et al. Complications: neuropathy, pathogenetic considerations. Diabetes Care 1992;15:1902–1925.
67. Squadrito GL, Pryor WA. The formation of peroxynitrite in vivo from nitric oxide and superoxide. Chem Biol Interact 1995;96:203–206.
68. Beckman JS, Beckman TW, Chen J, et al. Apparent hydroxyl radical production by peroxynitrite: implications for endothelial injury from nitric oxide and superoxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87: 1620–1624.
69. Lyall F, Gibson JL, Greer IA, et al. Increased nitrotyrosine in the diabetic placenta: evidence for oxidative stress. Diabetes Care 1998;21: 1753–1758.
70. Pieper GM. Acute amelioration of diabetic endothelial dysfunction with a derivative of the nitric oxide synthase cofactor, tetrahydrobiopterin. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1997;29:8–15.
71. Heitzer T, Krohn K, Albers S, et al. Tetrahydrobiopterin improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation by increasing nitric oxide activity in patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 2000; 43:1435–1438.
72. Soriano FG, Virag L, Szabo C. Diabetic endothelial dysfunction: role of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species production and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activation. J Mol Med 2001;79:437–448.
73. Pieper GM. Review of alterations in endothelial nitric oxide production in diabetes: protective role of arginine on endothelial dysfunction. Hypertension 1998;31:1047–1060.
74. Cellek S, Rodrigo J, Lobos E, et al. Selective nitrergic neurodegeneration in diabetes mellitus—a nitric oxide–dependent phenomenon. Br J Pharmacol 1999;128:1804–1812.
75. Walter RM, Uriu-Hare JY, Olin KL, et al. Copper, zinc, manganese, and magnesium status and complications of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1991;14:1050–1056.
76. Ziegler D. Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy: clinical manifestations and measurement. Diabetes Rev 1999;7(4):342–357.
77. Coppey LJ, Gellett JS, Davidson EP, et al. Effect of antioxidant treatment of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats on endoneurial blood flow, motor nerve conduction velocity, and vascular reactivity of epineurial arterioles of the sciatic nerve. Diabetes 2001;50(8):1927–1937.
78. Pitre DA, Seifert JL, Bauer JA. Perineurium inflammation and altered connexin isoform expression in a rat model of diabetes related peripheral neuropathy. Neurosci Lett 2001;303(1):67–71.
79. Vinik A, Erbas T, Park T, et al. Dermal neurovascular dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1468–1475.
80. Marnett LJ, Wright TL, Crews BC, et al. Regulation of prostaglandin biosynthesis by nitric oxide is revealed by targeted deletion of inducible nitric-oxide synthase. J Biol Chem 2000;275(18):13424–13430.
P.1359

81. Hoeldtke RD, Bryner KD, McNeil DR, et al. Nitrosative stress, uric acid, and peripheral nerve function in early type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2002;51(9):2817–2825.
82. Chiarelli F, Cipollone F, Romanno F, et al. Increased circulating nitric oxide in young patients with type 1 diabetes and persistent microalbuminuria: relation to glomerular hyperfiltration. Diabetes 2000;49(7):1258–1263.
83. O’Byrne S, Forte P, Roberts LJ, et al. Nitric oxide synthesis and isoprostane production in subjects with type 1 diabetes and normal urinary albumin excretion. Diabetes 2000;49(5):857–862.
84. Pittenger GL, Liu D, Vinik AI. The toxic effects of serum from patients with type I diabetes mellitus on mouse neuroblastoma cells: a new mechanism for development of autonomic neuropathy. Diabetic Med 1993;10:925–932.
85. Pittenger GL, Liu D, Vinik AI. The neuronal toxic factor in serum of type 1 diabetic patients is a complement-fixing autoantibody. Diabet Med 1995;12:380–386.
86. Said G, Goulon-Goreau C, Lacroix C, et al. Nerve biopsy findings in different patterns of proximal diabetic neuropathy. Ann Neurol 1994;35:559–569.
87. Krendel DA, Costigan DA, Hopkins LC. Successful treatment of neuropathies in patients with diabetes mellitus. Arch Neurol 1995; 52:1053–1061.
88. Barada A, Reljanovic M, Milicevic Z, et al. Proximal diabetic neuropathy-response to immunotherapy [Abstract]. Diabetes 1999;48 (suppl 1):148.
89. Vinik AI, Pittenger GL, Stansberry KB, et al. Phospholipid and glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies in diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care 1995;18:1225–1232.
90. McNeil HP, Chesterman CN, Krilis SA. Immunology and clinical importance of antiphospholipid antibodies. Adv Immunol 1991;49: 193–280.
91. Malik RA, Tesfaye S, Thompson SD, et al. Transperineurial capillary abnormalities in the sural nerve of patients with diabetic neuropathy. Microvasc Res 1994;48:236–245.
92. Dyck PJ, Hansen S, Karnes J, et al. Capillary number and percentage closed in human diabetic sural nerve. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985;82:2513–2517.
93. Low P, Lagerlund T, McManis P. Nerve blood flow and oxygen delivery in normal, diabetic, and ischemic neuropathy. Int Rev Neurobiol 1989;31:355–438.
94. Yasuda H, Dyck PJ. Abnormalities of endoneurial microvessels and sural nerve pathology in diabetic neuropathy. Neurology 1987;37: 20–28.
95. Malik RA, Veves A, Masson EA, et al. Endoneurial capillary abnormalities in human diabetic neuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992;55:557–561.
96. Tuck RR, Schmelzer JD, Low PA. Endoneurial blood flow and oxygen tension in the sciatic nerves of rats with experimental diabetic neuropathy. Brain 1984;107:935–950.
97. Newrick PG, Wilson AJ, Jakubowski J, et al. Sural nerve oxygen tension in diabetes. BMJ 1986;293:1053–1054.
98. Vinik A, Erbas T, Stansberry KB, et al. Small fiber neuropathy and neurovascular disturbances in diabetes mellitus. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2001;109(suppl 2):451–473.
99. Hotta N, Koh N, Sakakibara F, et al. Effect of propionyl-L-carnitine on motor nerve conduction, autonomic cardiac function, and nerve blood flow in rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes: comparison with an aldose reductase inhibitor. Pflugers Arch 1996;431:564–570.
100. Ishii H, Koya D, King GL. Protein kinase C activation and its role in the development of vascular complications in diabetes mellitus. J Mol Med 1998;76:21–31.
101. Foey AD, Crawford A, Hall ND. Modulation of human cytokine expression following impairment of Na+/K+ ATPase activity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1997;1355:43–49.
102. Pekary AE, Levin SR, Johnson DG, et al. Tumor necrosis factor α and transforming growth factor β inhibit the activity of Na+/K+ ATPase activity in FRTL-5 thyroid cells. J Interferon Cytokine Res 1997;17:185–195.
103. Green RM, Beier D, Gollan JL. Regulation of bile salt transporters by endotoxin and inflammatory cytokines. Gastroenterology 1996; 111:193–198.
104. Yoshimura T, Kobayashi T, Goto I. Involvement of protein kinase C in the proliferation of cultured Schwann cells. Brain Res 1993; 715:55–60.
105. Yamada H, Martin P, Suzuki K. Impairment of protein kinase C activity in twitcher Schwann cells in vitro. Brain Res 1996;718:138–144.
106. Vinik AI, Newlon PG, Lauterio TJ, et al. Nerve survival and regeneration in diabetes. Diabetes Metab Rev 1995;3:139–157.
107. Stevens MJ. Nitric oxide as a potential bridge between the metabolic and vascular hypothesis of diabetic neuropathy. Diabet Med 1995; 12:292–295.
108. Gold R, Zielasek J, Kiefer R, et al. Secretion of nitrite by Schwann cells and its effects on T-cell activation in vitro. Cell Immunol 1996; 168:69–77.
109. Bereta J, Cohen MC, Bereta M. Stimulatory effect of ouabain on VCAM-1 and iNOS expression in murine endothelial cells. FEBS Lett 1995;377:21–25.
110. Pfeifer M, Schumer M, Gelber DA. Aldose reductase inhibitors: the end of an era or the need for different trial design? Diabetes 1997;46(suppl):82–89.
111. Jude EB, Abbott CA, Young MJ, et al. The potential role of cell adhesion molecules in the pathogens of diabetic neuropathy. Diabetologia 1998;41:330–336.
112. Merimee TJ, Gardner DF, Zapf J, et al. Effect of glycemic control on serum insulin-like growth factors in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 1984;33:790–793.
113. Bowsher RR, Lee W-H, Apathy JM, et al. Measurement of insulin-like growth factor-II in physiological fluids and tissues. I. An improved extraction procedure and radioimmunoassay for human and rat fluids. Endocrinology 1991;128:805–814.
114. Kalichman MW, Joshi K, Chopra JS. Reactive, degenerative, and proliferative Schwann cell responses in experimental galactose and human diabetic neuropathy. J Neurochem 1997;69:2011–2018.
115. Rodriguez-Pena A, Botana M, Gonzalez M, et al. Expression of neurotrophins and their receptors in sciatic nerve of experimentally diabetic rats. Neurosci Lett 1995;200:37–40.
116. Wuarin L, Namdev R, Burns JG, et al. Brain insulin-like growth factor-II mRNA content is reduced in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Neurochem 1996;70:742–751.
117. Mclean WG. The role of axonal cytoskeleton in diabetic neuropathy. Neurochem Res 1997;22:951–956.
118. Somers DL, Somers MF. Treatment of neuropathic pain in a patient with diabetic neuropathy using transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation applied to the skin of the lumbar region. Phys Ther 1999;79: 767–775.
119. Fu SY, Gordon T. The cellular and molecular basis of peripheral nerve regeneration. Mol Neurobiol 1997;14:67–116.
120. Unsicker K, Grothe C, Westerman R, et al. Cykokines in neural regeneration. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1992;2:671–678.
121. Licinio J. Central nervous system cytokines and their relevance for neurotoxicity and apoptosis. J Neural Transm 1997;49:169.
122. Stewart HJS, Rougon G, Dong Z, et al. TGF-β upregulates NCAM and LI expression in cultured Schwann cells, suppresses cAMP-induced expression of O4 and galactocerebroside, and are widely expressed in cells of the Schwann cell lineage in vivo. Glia 1995;15: 419–436.
123. Chandross K, Spray D, Cohen RI, et al. TNFα inhibits Schwann cell proliferation, connexin46 expression, and gap junctional communication. Mol Cell Neurosci 1999;7:501–518.
124. Lindholm D, Heumann R, Meyer M, et al. Interleukin-1 regulates synthesis of nerve growth factor in non-neuronal cells of rat sciatic nerve. Nature 1987;330:658–659.
125. Shadiack AM. Interleukin-1 induces substance P in sympathetic ganglia through the induction of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF). J Neurosci Res 1993;2601–2609.
126. Massague J. The transforming growth factor-β family. Annu Rev Cell Biol 1990;6:597–641.
P.1360

127. Arora S, Ma JM, Cruz TD, et al. Interleukin-1 induced calcium flux in human fibroblasts is mediated through focal adhesion. J Biol Chem 1995;270:6042–6049.
128. Timple R, Rhode H, Gehron Robey P, et al. Laminin: a glycoprotein from basement membranes. J Biol Chem 1979;254:9933–9937.
129. Timple R. Structure and biological activity of basement membrane proteins. Eur J Biochem 1989;180:487–502.
130. Baron-Van Evercooren A, Kleiman HK, Ohno S, et al. Nerve growth factor, laminin and fibronectin promote neurite growth from human fetal sensory ganglion cultures. J Neurosci Res 1982;8:179–194.
131. Lander AD, Fujii DKa, Reichardt LF. Laminin is associated with the “neurite outgrowth-promoting factors” found in conditioned media. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985;82:2183–2187.
132. Longo FM, Hayman EG, Davis GE, et al. Neurite-promoting factors and extracellular matrix components accumulating in vivo within nerve regeneration chambers. Brain Res 1984;309:105–117.
133. Manthrorpe M, Engvall E, Ruoslahti E, et al. Laminin promotes neuritic regeneration from cultured peripheral and central neurons. J Cell Biol 1983;97:1882–1890.
134. Rivas RJ, Burneister DWA, Goldberg DJ. Rapid effects of laminin on the growth cone. Neuron 1992;8:107–115.
135. Le Beau JM, Liuzzi FJ, Depto AS, et al. Differential laminin gene expression in dorsal root ganglion neurons and nonneuronal cells. J Neurosci Res 1994;127:1–7.
136. Le Beau JM, Liuzzi FJ. Laminin B2 mRNA is up-regulated in sensory neurons and Schwann cells during peripheral nerve regeneration. Soc Neurosci Abstr 1991;17:1500.
137. Le Beau JM, Liuzzi FJ, Depto AJ, et al. Up-regulation of laminin B2 gene expression in dorsal root ganglion neurons and non-neuronal cells during sciatic nerve regeneration. Exp Neurol 1995;134: 150–155.
138. Depto AS, Le Beau JM, Liuzzi FJ, et al. Laminin gene expression in diabetic rat dorsal root ganglia. Soc Neurosci Abstr 1993;19:835.
139. Evans R, Harati Y. Review of clinical presentations, pathophysiology and treatment of diabetic neuropathies. Tex Med 1983;79:50–54.
140. Dyck PJ, Karnes J, O’Brien PC. Diagnosis, staging, and classification of diabetic neuropathy and association with other complications. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, Asbury AK, et al. Diabetic neuropathy. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1987:36–44.
141. Longstreth GF, Newcomer AD. Abdominal pain caused by diabetic radiculopathy. Ann Intern Med 1977;86:166–168.
142. Harati Y, Niakan E. Diabetic thoracoabdominal neuropathy: a cause for chest and abdominal pain [Editorial]. Arch Intern Med 1986;146: 1493–1494.
143. Ellenberg M. Diabetic truncal mononeuropathy—a new clinical syndrome. Diabetes Care 1978;1:10–13.
144. Streib EW, Sun SF, Paustian FF, et al. Diabetic thoracic radiculopathy: electrodiagnostic study. Muscle Nerve 1986;9:548–553.
145. Boulton AJ, Angus E, Ayyar DR, et al. Diabetic thoracic polyradiculopathy presenting as abdominal swelling. BMJ 1984;289:798–799.
146. Edvinsson L, Ekman R, Jansen I, et al. Peptide-containing nerve fibers in human cerebral arteries: immunocytochemistry, radioimmunoassay, and in vitro pharmacology. Ann Neurol 1987;21:431–437.
147. Zorrilla E, Kozak GP. Ophthalmoplegia in diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med 1967;67:968–976.
148. Fraser DM, Campbell IW, Ewing DJ, et al. Mononeuropathy in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 1979;28:96–101.
149. Calverley J, Mulder D. Femoral neuropathy. Neurology 1960;10: 963–967.
150. Dawson DM. Entrapment neuropathies of the upper extremities. N Engl J Med 1993;329:2013–2018.
151. Leedman PJ, Davis S, Harrison LS. Diabetic amyotrophy: reassessment of the clinical spectrum. Aust NZ J Med 1988;18:768–773.
152. Barohn RJ, Sahenk Z, Warmolts JR, et al. The Bruns-Garland syndrome (diabetic amyotrophy). Arch Neurol 1991;48:1130–1135.
153. Chia L, Fernandez A, Lacroix C, et al. Contribution of nerve biopsy findings to the diagnosis of disabling neuropathy in the elderly: a retrospective review of 100 consecutive patients. Brain 1996;119: 1091–1098.
154. Milicevic Z, Newlon PG, Pittenger GL, et al. Anti-ganglioside GM1 antibody and distal symmetric “diabetic polyneuropathy” with dominant motor features. Diabetologia 1997;40:1364–1365.
155. Yu RK, Ariga T, Kohriyama T, et al. Autoimmune mechanisms in peripheral neuropathies. Ann Neurol 1990;27(suppl 1):30–35.
156. Ahmed ME, Le Quesne PM. Quantitative sweat test in diabetics with neuropathic foot lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1986; 49:1059–1062.
157. Archer AG, Roberts VC, Watkins PJ. Blood flow patterns in painful diabetic neuropathy. Diabetologia 1984;27:563–567.
158. Selby PL, Young MJ, Boulton AJM. Bisphosphonates: a new treatment for diabetic charcot neuroarthropathy? Diabetic Med 1993;11: 28–31.
159. Shapiro SA, Stansberry KB, Hill MA, et al. Normal blood flow and vasomotion in the diabetic Charcot foot. J Diabetes Complications 1998;12:147–153.
160. Young MJ, Marshall M, Adams JE, et al. Osteopenia, neurological dysfunction, and the development of Charcot neuroarthropathy. Diabetes Care 1995;18:34–38.
161. Grant WP, Sullivan R, Sonenshine DE. Electron microscopic investigation of the effects of diabetes mellitus on the Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Surg 1997;36:1.
162. Cavanagh PR, Derr JA, Ulbrecht JS, et al. Problems with gait and posture in neuropathic patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 1992;9(5):469–474.
163. Nelson ME, Fiatarone MA, Morganti CM, et al. Effects of high-intensit strength training on multiple risk factors for osteoporotic fractures: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1994;272:1909–1914.
164. Said G, Slama G, Selva J. Progressive centripetal degeneration of axons in small fiber type diabetic polyneuropathy: a clinical and pathological study. Brain 1983;106:791–807.
165. Llewelyn JG, Thomas PK, Fonseca V, et al. Acute painful diabetic neuropathy precipitated by strict glycaemic control. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1986;72:157–163.
166. Boulton AJ, Drury J, Clarke B, et al. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in the management of painful diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care 1982;5:386–390.
167. Ellenberg M. Diabetic neuropathy precipitating after institution of diabetic control. Am J Med Sci 1958;236(4):466–471.
168. Ellenberg M. Diabetic neuropathic cachexia. Diabetes 1974;23:418–423.
169. Morley G, Mooradian A, Levine A, et al. Mechanisms of pain in diabetic peripheral neuropathy: effect of glucose on pain perception in humans. Am J Med 1984;77:79–82.
170. Murray H, Veves A, Young M, et al. Role of experimental socks in the care of the high risk diabetic foot: a multi-center patient evaluation study. American group for the study of experimental hosiery in the diabetic foot. Diabetes Care 1993;16:1190–1192.
171. Niakan E, Harati Y, Comstock J. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Metabolism 1986;35:224–234.
172. McLeod JG, Tuck RR. Disorders of the autonomic nervous system. Part 2. Investigation and treatment. Ann Neurol 1987;21:519–529.
173. McLeod JG, Tuck RR. Disorders of the autonomic nervous system. Part 1. Pathophysiology and clinical features. Ann Neurol 1987;21: 419–430.
174. Ewing DJ, Clarke BF. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy: present insights and future prospects. Diabetes Care 1986;9:648–665.
175. Kahn JK, Sisson JC, Vinik AI. QT interval prolongation and sudden cardiac death in diabetic autonomic neuropathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1987;64:751–754.
176. Ewing DJ, Campbell IW, Clarke BF. Mortality in diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Lancet 1976;1:601–603.
177. Sampson MJ, Wilson S, Karagiannis P, et al. Progression of diabetic autonomic neuropathy over a decade in insulin-dependent diabetics. Q J Med 1990;75:635–646.
178. Zola BE, Vinik AI. Effects of autonomic neuropathy associated with diabetes mellitus on cardiovascular function. Coron Artery Dis 1992; 3:33–41.
179. Hosking D, Bennett T, Hamptom J. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes 1978;22:1043–1055.
P.1361

180. Faerman I, Faccio E, Milei J, et al. Autonomic neuropathy and painless myocardial infarction in diabetic patients: histologic evidence of their relationship. Diabetes 1977;26:1147–1158.
181. Campbell IW, Ewing DJ, Clarke BF. Painful myocardial infarction in severe diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Acta Diabetol Lat 1978; 15:201–204.
182. Hreidarsson AB, Gundersen HJ. The pupillary response to light in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes. Diabetologia 1985;28:815–821.
183. Vinik AI, Suwanwalaikorn S. Autonomic neuropathy. In: DeFronzo RA, ed. Current therapy of diabetes mellitus. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1997:165–176.
184. American Diabetes Association and American Academy of Neurology. Consensus Statement. Report and recommendations of the San Antonio conference on diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care 1988;11: 592–597.
185. Thomson FJ, Masson EA, Boulton AJ. Quantitative vibration perception testing in elderly people: an assessment of variability. Age Ageing 1992;21:171–174.
186. Wetherill GB, Chen H, Vasudeva RB. Sequential estimation of quantal response curves: a new method of estimation. Biometrika 1966;53:439–454.
187. Ewing DJ, Martyn CN, Young RJ, et al. The value of cardiovascular function tests: 10 years experience in diabetes. Diabetes Care 1985;8:491–498.
188. Abrahm DR, Hollingsworth PJ, Smith CB, et al. Decreased alpha 2-adrenergic receptors on platelet membranes from diabetic patients with autonomic neuropathy and orthostatic hypotension. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1986;63:906–912.
189. Nesto RW, Phillips RT. Asymptomatic myocardial ischemia in diabetic patients. Am J Med 1986;80:40–47.
190. Kahn JK, Zola B, Juni JE, et al. Decreased exercise heart rate and blood pressure response in diabetic subjects with cardiac autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes Care 1986;9:389–394.
191. Levitt NS, Vinik AI, Sive AA, et al. The effect of dietary fiber on glucose and hormone responses to a mixed meal in normal subjects and in diabetic subjects with and without autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes Care 1980;3:515–519.
192. Ewing DJ, Martyn CN, Young RJ, et al. The value of cardiovascular autonomic function tests: 10 years experience in diabetes. Diabetes Care 1985;8:491–498.
193. Pfeifer MA, Weinberg CR, Cook DL, et al. Correlations among autonomic, sensory, and motor neural function tests in untreated non–insulin-dependent diabetic individuals. Diabetes Care 1985;8: 576–584.
194. Goodman JI, Baumoel S, Frankel L, et al. The diabetic neuropathies. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1953.
195. Shenfield GM, McCann VJ, Tjokresetio R. Acetylator status and diabetic neuropathy. Diabetologia 1982;22:441–444.
196. McDaid EA, Monaghan B, Parker AI, et al. Peripheral autonomic impairment in patients newly diagnosed with type II diabetes. Diabetes Care 1994;17:1422–1427.
197. Sosenko JM, Kato M, Soto R, et al. Comparison of quantitative sensory-threshold measures for their association with foot ulceration in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 1990;13:1057–1061.
198. Masson EA, Veves A, Fernando D, et al. Current perception thresholds: a new, quick, and reproducible method for the assessment of peripheral neuropathy in diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 1989;32: 724–728.
199. Arrezzo J, Laudadio C, Schaumburg H. The optacon tactile tester and the Pfizer thermal tester: new devices for the detection of diabetic neuropathy [Abstract]. Diabetes 1984;33(suppl 1):185.
200. Maurissen JP. Quantitative sensory assessment in toxicology and occupational medicine: applications, theory, and critical appraisal. Toxicol Lett 1988;43:321–343.
201. Sosenko JM, Kato M, Soto RA, et al. Specific assessments of warm and cool sensitivities in adult diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 1988; 11:481–483.
202. Katims JJ, Naviasky EH, Rendell MS, et al. Constant current sine wave transcutaneous nerve stimulation for the evaluation of peripheral neuropathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987;68:210–213.
203. Rendell MS, Dovgan DJ, Bergman TF, et al. Mapping diabetic sensory neuropathy by current perception threshold testing. Diabetes Care 1989;12:636–640.
204. Sosenko JM, Gadia MT, Natori N, et al. Neurofunctional testing for the detection of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1741–1744.
205. Masson EA, Boulton AJ. The neurometer: validation and comparison with conventional tests for diabetic neuropathy. Diabet Med 1991;8(suppl):63–66.
206. Vinik AI, Suwanwalaikorn S, Stansberry KB, et al. Quantitative measurement of cutaneous perception in diabetic neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 1995;18:574–584.
207. Kimura J. Electrodiagnosis in disease of nerve and muscle. Philadelphia: Davis, 1989.
208. Daube JR. Electrophysiologic testing in diabetic neuropathy. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, Asbury AK, eds. Diabetic neuropathy. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1987:162–176.
209. Argyropoulos CJ, Panayiotopoulos CP, Scarpalezos S, et al. F-wave and M-response conduction velocity in diabetes mellitus. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1979;19:443–458.
210. Fagius J. Effects of aldose reductase inhibitor treatment in diabetic polyneuropathy: a clinical and neurophysiological study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1981;44:991–1001.
211. Bassi S, Albizati MG, Calloni E, et al. Electromyographic study of diabetic and alcoholic polyneuropathic patients treated with gangliosides. Muscle Nerve 1981;5:351–356.
212. Greene D. DCCT one year later symposium. Program of ADA, New Orleans, 1994.
213. Greene DA, Sima AAF, Albers JW, et al. Diabetic neuropathy. In: Diabetes mellitus: theory and practice. New York: Elsevier Science, 1990:710–755.
214. Kitka DG, Breuer AC, Wilbourn AJ. Thoracic root pain in diabetes: the spectrum of clinical and electromyographic findings. Ann Neurol 1982;11:80.
215. Sun SF, Streib EW. Diabetic thoracoabdominal neuropathy: clinical and electrodiagnostic features. Ann Neurol 1981;9:75–79.
216. Chokroverty S. Proximal nerve dysfunction in diabetic proximal amyotrophy: electrophysiology and electron microscopy. Arch Neurol 1982;39:403–407.
217. Williams IR, Mayer RF. Subacute proximal diabetic neuropathy. Neurology 1976;26:108–116.
218. Ziegler D, Mühlen H, Dannehl K, et al. Tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials at various stages of peripheral neuropathy in insulin dependent diabetic patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1976;56:58–64.
219. Cirillo D, Gonfiantini E, DeGrandis D, et al. Visual evoked potentials in diabetic children and adolescents. Diabetes Care 1984;7: 273–275.
220. Collier A, Reid W, McInnes A, et al. Somatosensory and visual evoked potentials in insulin-dependent diabetics with mild peripheral neuropathy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1988;5:171–175.
221. Donald MW, Bird CE, Lawson JS, et al. Delayed auditory brain stem responses in diabetes mellitus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1981;44:641–644.
222. Harkin SW, Gardner DF, Anderson RA. Auditory and somatosensory far-field evoked potentials in diabetes mellitus. Int J Neurosci 1985;28:41–47.
223. Nakamura R, Noritake M, Hosoda Y, et al. Somatosensory conduction delay in central and peripheral nervous system of diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 1992;15:532–535.
224. Nakamura Y, Takahashi M, Kitaguchi M, et al. Clinical utility of somatosensory evoked potentials in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1989;7:17–23.
225. Pozzessere G, Rizzo PA, Valle E, et al. Early detection of neurological involvement in IDDM and NIDDM. Multimodal evoked potentials versus metabolic control. Diabetes Care 1988;11:473–480.
226. Pozzessere G, Rizzo PA, Valle E, et al. A longitudinal study of multimodal evoked potential in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res 1989;10: 17–20.
P.1362

227. Gupta PR, Dorfman LJ. Spinal somatosensory conduction in diabetes. Neurology 1981;31:841–845.
228. Cracco J, Castells S, Mark E. Spinal somatosensory evoked potentials in juvenile diabetes. Ann Neurol 1984;15:55–58.
229. Pozzessere G, Valle ECS, Cordischi VM, et al. Abnormalities of cognitive functions in IDDM revealed by P300 event-related potential analysis: comparison with short-latency evoked potentials and psychometric tests. Diabetes 1991;40:952–958.
230. Fedele D, Martini A, Cardone C, et al. Impaired auditory brainstem-evoked responses in insulin-dependent diabetic subjects. Diabetes 1984;33:1085–1089.
231. Dyck PJ. Detection, characterization and staging of polyneuropathy: assessed in diabetes. Muscle Nerve 1988;11:21–32.
232. Hoeldtke RD, Davis KM, Hshieh PB, et al. Autonomic surface potential analysis: assessment of reproducibility and sensitivity. Muscle Nerve 1992;15:926–931.
233. Knezevic W, Bajada S. Peripheral autonomic surface potential. A quantitative technique for recording sympathetic conduction in man. J Neurol Sci 1985;67:239–251.
234. Shahani BT, Day TJ, Cros D, et al. RR interval variation and the sympathetic skin response in the assessment of autonomic function in peripheral neuropathy. Arch Neurol 1990;47:659–664.
235. Shahani BT, Halperin JJ, Boulu P, et al. Sympathetic skin response—a method of assessing unmyelinated axon dysfunction in peripheral neuropathies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984;47:536–542.
236. Soliven B, Maselli R, Jaspan J, et al. Sympathetic skin response in diabetic neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 1987;10:711–716.
237. Kahn J, Zola B, Juni J. Radionuclide assessment of left ventricular diastolic filling in diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;7:1303–1309.
238. Abrahm DR, Hollingsworth PA, Smith CB, et al. Decreased alpha 2-adrenergic receptors on platelet membranes from diabetic patients with autonomic neuropathy and orthostatic hypotensin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1986;63:906–912.
239. Zola BE, Kahn JK, Juni JE, et al. Abnormal cardiac function in diabetic patients with autonomic neuropathy in the absence of ischemic heart disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1986;63:208–214.
240. Achem-Karam SR, Funakoshi A, Vinik AI, et al. Plasma motilin concentration and interdigestive migrating motor complex in diabetic gastroparesis: effect of metoclopramide. Gastroenterology 1985; 88:492–499.
241. Hilsted J, Madsbad S, Krarup T, et al. No response of pancreatic hormones to hypoglycemia in diabetic autonomic neuropathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1982;54:815–819.
242. Levitt NS, Vinik AI, Sive AA, et al. Impaired pancreatic polypeptide responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in diabetic autonomic neuropathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1980;50:445–449.
243. Krarup T, Schwartz TW, Hilsted J, et al. Impaired response of pancreatic polypeptide to hypoglycaemia: an early sign of autonomic neuropathy in diabetics. BMJ 1979;2:1544–1546.
244. Hoeldtke RD, Boden G, Shuman CR, et al. Reduced epinephrine secretion and hypoglycemia unawareness in diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Ann Intern Med 1982;96:459–462.
245. White NH, Gingerich RL, Levandoski LA, et al. Plasma pancreatic polypeptide response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia as a marker for defective glucose counterregulation in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 1985;34:870–875.
246. Rendell M, Bergman T, O’Donnell D, et al. Microvascular blood flow, volume, and velocity measured by laser Doppler techniques in IDDM. Diabetes 1989;38:819–822.
247. Boyle PJ, Schwartz NS, Shah SD, et al. Plasma glucose concentrations at the onset of hypoglycemic symptoms in patients with poorly controlled diabetes and in nondiabetics. N Engl J Med 1988;318: 1487–1492.
248. White NH, Skor DA, Cryer PE, et al. Identification of type I diabetic patients at increased risk for hypoglycemia during intensive therapy. N Engl J Med 1983;308:485–491.
249. Williams E, Timperley W, Ward J, et al. Electron microscopical studies of vessels in diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Clin Pathol 1980; 33:462–470.
250. Johnson PC, Doll SC, Cromey DW. Pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy. Ann Neurol 1986;19:450–457.
251. Dyck PJ, Karnes JL, O’Brien P, et al. The spatial distribution of fiber loss in diabetic polyneuropathy suggests ischemia. Ann Neurol 1986; 19:440–449.
252. Dyck PJ, Lais A, Karnes JL, et al. Fiber loss is primary and multifocal in sural nerves in diabetic polyneuropathy. Ann Neurol 1986;19: 425–439.
253. McArthur JC, Stocks EA, Hauer P. Epidermal nerve fiber density: normative reference range and diagnostic efficiency. Arch Neurol 1998;55:1513–1520.
254. Pirart J. [Diabetes mellitus and its degenerative complications: a prospective study of 4,400 patients observed between 1947 and 1973 (3rd and last part) (author’s translation)]. Diabetes Metab 1977;3:245–256.
255. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977–986.
256. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). Design and methodologic considerations for the feasibility phase. The DCCT Research Group. Diabetes 1986;35:530–545.
257. Culebras A, Alio J, Herrera JL, et al. Effect of an aldose reductase inhibitor on diabetic peripheral neuropathy: preliminary report. Arch Neurol 1981;38:133–134.
258. Handelsman DJ, Turtle JR. Clinical trial of an aldose reductase inhibitor in diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes 1981;30:459–464.
259. Judzewitsch RG, Jaspan JB, Polonsky KS, et al. Aldose reductase inhibition improves nerve conduction velocity in diabetic patients. N Engl J Med 1983;308:119–125.
260. Young RJ, Ewing DJ, Clarke BF. A controlled trial of sorbinil, an aldose reductase inhibitor, in chronic painful diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes 1983;32:938–942.
261. Christensen JE, Varnek L, Gregersen G. The effect of an aldose reductase inhibitor (Sorbinil) on diabetic neuropathy and neural function of the retina: a double-blind study. Acta Neurol Scand 1985;71:164–167.
262. Boulton AJ. Effects of Tolrestat, a new aldose reductase inhibitor, on nerve conduction and paresthetic symptoms in diabetic neuropathy [Abstract]. Diabetologia 1986;29:521–522.
263. Harati Y, Niakan E, Comstock J, et al. Aldose reductase inhibitor (tolrestat) therapy in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy [Abstract]. Ann Neurol 1987;22:129.
264. Gabbay KH, Spack N, Loo S, et al. Aldose reductase inhibition: studies with alrestatin. Metabolism 1979;28:471–476.
265. Jaspan JB, Towle VL, Maselli R, et al. Clinical studies with an aldose reductase inhibitor in the autonomic and somatic neuropathies of diabetes. Metabolism 1986;35:83–92.
266. Lewin IG, O’Brien IA, Morgan MH, et al. Clinical and neurophysiological studies with the aldose reductase inhibitor, sorbinil, in symptomatic diabetic neuropathy. Diabetologia 1984;26:445–448.
267. Fagius J, Brattberg A, Jameson S, et al. Limited benefit of treatment of diabetic polyneuropathy with an aldose reductase inhibitor: a 24-week controlled trial. Diabetologia 1985;28:323–329.
268. Greene DA, Brown MJ, Braunstein SN, et al. Comparison of clinical course and sequential electrophysiological tests in diabetics with symptomatic polyneuropathy and its implications for clinical trials. Diabetes 1981;30:139–147.
269. Gregersen G, Borsting H, Theil P, et al. Myoinositol and function of peripheral nerve in human diabetics: a controlled clinical trial. Acta Neurol Scand 1978;58:241–248.
270. Salway JG, Whitehead L, Finnegan JA, et al. Effect of myo-inositol on peripheral-nerve function in diabetes. Lancet 1978;2:1282–1284.
271. Clements RS Jr, Vourganti B, Kuba T, et al. Dietary myo-inositol intake and peripheral nerve function in diabetic neuropathy. Metabolism 1979;28:477–483.
272. Abraham RR, Abraham RM, Wynn V. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of mixed gangliosides in diabetic peripheral and autonomic neuropathy. Adv Exp Med Biol 1984;174:607–624.
P.1363

273. Naarden A, Davidson J, Harris L, et al. Treatment of painful diabetic polyneuropathy with mixed gangliosides. Adv Exp Med Biol 1984; 174:581–592.
274. Pozza G, Saibene V, Comi G, et al. The effect of ganglioside administration in human diabetic peripheral neuropathy. In: Rapport MM, Gorio A, eds. Gangliosides in neurological and neuromuscular function, development, and repair. New York: Raven, 1981:253–257.
275. Crepaldi G, Fedele D, Tiengo A, et al. Ganglioside treatment in diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a multicenter trial. Acta Diabetol Lat 1983;20:265–276.
276. Bradley WG, Tandan R, Fillyaw MJ, et al. Double-blind controlled trials of cronassial in chronic peripheral neuropathies [Abstract]. Neurology 1987;37(suppl 1):254–255.
277. Keen H, Payan J, Allawi J, et al. Treatment of diabetic neuropathy with γ-linolenic acid. Diabetes Care 1993;16:8–15.
278. Stevens MJ, Feldman EL, Greene DA. The aetiology of diabetic neuropathy: the combined roles of metabolic and vascular defects. Diabet Med 1995;12:566–579.
279. Stewart JD, Low PA. Small-fiber neuropathy. In: Low PA, ed. Clinical autonomic disorders: evaluation and management. Boston: Little, Brown, 1993:653–666.
280. Thomas PK, Tomlinson DR. Diabetic and hypoglycemic neuropathy. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, eds. Peripheral neuropathy. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1993:1219–1250.
281. Hellweg R, Hartung HD. Endogenous levels of nerve growth factor (NGF) are altered in experimental diabetes mellitus: a possible role for NGF in the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy. J Neurosci Res 1990;26:258–267.
282. Hellweg R, Hartung HD, Hock C, et al. Nerve growth factor (NGF) changes in rat diabetic neuropathy. Soc Neurosci Abstr 1991;17:1497.
283. Diemel LT, Stevens JC, Willars GB, et al. Depletion of substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide in sciatic nerve of rats with experimental diabetes: effects of insulin and aldose reductase inhibition. Neurosci Lett 1992;137:253–256.
284. Tomlinson DR, Fernyhough P, Diemel LT. Neurotrophins and peripheral neuropathy. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1996;351: 455–462.
285. Apfel SC, Kessler JA. Neurotropic factors in the therapy of peripheral neuropathy. Baillieres Clin Neuropathy 1995;4:593–606.
286. Apfel SC, Adornato BT, Dyck PJ, et al. Results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of recombinant human nerve growth-factor in diabetic polyneuropathy. Ann Neurol 1996;40:T194.
287. Vinik AI. Management of painful syndromes in diabetes mellitus. Clin Diabetes 1991;9(4):57–62.
288. Max MB, Culnane M, Schafer SC, et al. Amitriptyline relieves diabetic neuropathy pain in patients with normal or depressed mood. Neurology 1987;37:589–596.
289. Young RJ, Clarke BF. Pain relief in diabetic neuropathy: the effectiveness of imipramine and related drugs. Diabet Med 1985;2:363–366.
290. Davis JL, Lewis SB, Gerich JE, et al. Peripheral diabetic neuropathy treated with amitriptyline and fluphenazine. JAMA 1977;238:2291–2292.
291. Gomez-Perez FJ, Rull JA, Dies H, et al. Nortriptyline and fluphenazine in the symptomatic treatment of diabetic neuropathy: a double-blind cross-over study. Pain 1985;23:395–400.
292. Kastrup J, Petersen P, Dejgard A, et al. Intravenous lidocaine infusion—a new treatment of chronic painful diabetic neuropathy? Pain 1987;28:69–75.
293. Ellenberg M. Treatment of diabetic neuropathy with diphenylhydantoin. NY State J Med 1968;68:2653–2655.
294. Saudek CD, Werns S, Reidenberg MM. Phenytoin in the treatment of diabetic symmetrical polyneuropathy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1977;22:196–199.
295. Quatraro A, Minei A, De-Rosa N, et al. Calcitonin in painful diabetic neuropathy [Abstract]. Lancet 1992;339:746–747.
296. Dyrberg T, Benn J, Christiansen JS, et al. Prevalence of diabetic autonomic neuropathy measured by simple bedside tests. Diabetologia 1981;20:190–194.
297. Wood RJ, Allen LH. Evidence for insulin involvement in arginine- and glucose-induced hypercalciuria in the rat. J Nutr 1983;113: 1561–1567.
298. Vinik AI, Richardson D. Erectile dysfunction in diabetes. Diabetes Rev 1998;6:16–33.
299. Schneider-Schaulies J, Kirchoff F, Archelos J, et al. Down-regulation of myelin-associated glycoprotein on Schwann cells by interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α affects neurite outgrowth. Neuron 1991; 7: 995.
300. Kihara M, Schmelzer JD, Low PA. Effect of cilostazol on experimental diabetic neuropathy in the rat. Diabetologia 1995;38:914–918.
301. Root H, Pote W, Frehner H. Triopathy of diabetes: sequence of diabetes, retinopathy and nephropathy in one hundred and fifty-five patients. Arch Intern Med 1954;94:931–941.
302. Knowler WC, Bennett PH, Ballintine EJ. Increased incidence of retinopathy in diabetics with elevated blood pressure: a six-year follow-up study in Pima Indians. N Engl J Med 1980;302:645–650.
303. American Diabetes Association. The physician’s guide to type II diabetes (NIDDM): diagnosis and treatment. New York: American Diabetes Association, 1984.
304. Sawyers J, Todd W, Kellett H. Bacteriuria and autonomic nerve function in diabetic women. Diabetes Care 1986;9:460–464.
305. Ewing DJ, Campbell IW, Clarke BF. The natural history of diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Q J Med 1980;49:95–108.
306. Clarke BF, Campbell IW, Ewing DJ. Prognosis in diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Horm Metab Res Suppl 1980;9:101–104.