Epilepsy: A Comprehensive Textbook
2nd Edition

Chapter 65
Long-Term Sequelae of Status Epilepticus
Shlomo Shinnar
Thomas L. Babb
Solomon L. Moshé
Claude G. Wasterlain
Introduction
Status epilepticus (SE) is a common neurologic emergency that can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Convulsive status epilepticus is the most common and potentially detrimental form of status, but long-term sequelae have been reported even following nonconvulsive status. Three major population-based prospective studies investigated the epidemiology of SE. The annual incidence of SE around Richmond, Virginia, was 41/100,000 individuals.37 It was 27/100,000 for young adults and 86/100,000 for the elderly. The mortality rate was also higher in the elderly: 14% for young adults and 38% for the elderly, but only 3% in children. The annual incidence from two prospective studies in Europe was 17.1/100,000 in Germany76 and 10.3/100,000 in the French-speaking part of Switzerland.31 These findings are close to the incidence of 18.1/100,000 found in an early retrospective study of SE from 1965 to 1984 in Rochester, Minnesota.72
It is estimated that, in the United States alone, status epilepticus affects 100,000 to 150,000 individuals each year, approximately half of whom are children. In >50% of the cases, there is no prior history of seizures.40,67 Status epilepticus can occur either as part of an established seizure disorder or in the context of an acute illness. Approximately 10% of children and adults who have epilepsy initially present with status epilepticus.15,40,67,142
In the past, status epilepticus was associated with a high morbidity and mortality. This has changed dramatically, especially in children. Recent clinical data (see Chapter 126) indicate that with proper treatment, the acute morbidity and the mortality of status per se is quite low, particularly in children. The adult data still show a significant morbidity and mortality, much of which is related to the underlying etiology.3,36,40,45,46,64,92,166,171 This chapter reviews the potential long-term sequelae of status epilepticus with an emphasis on the issue of whether status epilepticus results in a chronic seizure disorder. The old definition of status epilepticus was a condition in which epileptic seizures are sufficiently prolonged or repeated at sufficiently brief intervals to produce “an unvarying and enduring epileptic condition.”60,126 More recent data suggest that if this occurs in humans, it is not very common. In this context we also review the association between status epilepticus, particularly in early life, and mesial temporal sclerosis.
Cognitive Deficits Following Status Epilepticus
In animal models, status epilepticus has been associated with neuronal changes, particularly in the adult animals.32,95,96,97,126,127,131,132,157,158 In humans, chronic intractable seizure disorders have been associated with cognitive deficits and in some cases even intellectual decline.38,54,125 Isolated case reports of cognitive impairment following status epilepticus, whether convulsive or complex partial or even absence, are frequent,41,135 but none gives a sense of how commonly this occurs. In an entity associated with a significant morbidity and mortality, one would expect that cognitive impairment might occur. However, much of the morbidity and mortality of status epilepticus is associated with the precipitating acute neurologic insult.3,36,39,40,45,46,64,66,92,116,166,171 The morbidity and mortality have dramatically declined over the last 50 years, especially in children, and other sequelae may have decreased as well.2,3,4,7,36,40,45,46,64,92,127,166,171 Therefore, the high rate of adverse sequelae reported in the older series are probably not representative of the current reality.39,40,64 In this section we address the issue of whether status epilepticus per se results in long term-cognitive impairment.
To answer this question, we need to identify the appropriate group of patients. This turns out to be a very difficult task. Status epilepticus is often seen in the context of an acute brain insult such as trauma, stroke, or encephalitis.3,39,40,92 In this setting, it is difficult if not impossible to differentiate cognitive impairment due to prolonged status epilepticus from that caused by the acute brain injury itself. Status epilepticus also occurs in the context of chronic intractable epilepsy. In this setting it may be difficult to separate the effect of status epilepticus from the cumulative effects of many briefer seizures. Ideally, one would look at patients who had an isolated episode of status epilepticus near the onset of their epilepsy. This is a not an infrequent occurrence. Approximately 10% of patients who present with a first unprovoked seizure or with newly diagnosed epilepsy present with status epilepticus.11,16,64,67,68,69,70,91,139 However, very few of these patients have had neuropsychological testing before their episode of status. Thus, when a subtle deficit is found, it is difficult to know whether it was a result of status or preexisted. These considerations apply to both adults and children. In children, there is the additional difficulty that status epilepticus most often occurs in very young children, with half the cases under age 15 years occurring under age 3 years.92 At this young an age it is very difficult to get an accurate estimate of premorbid intellectual function unless the child was very severely impaired.
The data regarding cognitive impairment following status epilepticus were reviewed by Dodrill and Wilensky.39 They excluded case reports and reviewed 14 studies of status.3,7,29,38,42,46,47,48,58,59,66,81,92,117,127 They noted that most studies are of children, and few studies of children or adults used any formal psychological testing. In addition, many studies were retrospective. Of the 14 studies reviewed, the more recent and prospective ones were the ones that reported the lowest morbidity, including cognitive outcomes. This may be attributable to less skewed patient samples in prospective
P.752

studies, an improved ability to identify etiologies (e.g., some older studies included cases of meningitis in the category of febrile status epilepticus), and perhaps improved treatment in the modern era.
There are some excellent prospective data on adults. Dodrill and Wilensky performed complete neuropsychological testing on 143 adults on two occasions 5 years apart.39 Of these, 9 had a definite episode of status epilepticus in the 5-year period, including cases of both generalized tonic–clonic status and complex partial status. These were compared to matched controls that had not experienced an episode of status in the 5-year period. The group with status epilepticus had lower IQ scores and performed worse on a variety of cognitive measures. However, some of these differences were present at the baseline testing prior to the episode of status. This is consistent with the epidemiologic data that status epilepticus is more common among those who are neurologically abnormal.40,66,67,68,92 The authors concluded that most investigators described at least a few adverse changes attributable to SE rather than to underlying neurologic disease. However, in general, status epilepticus has only a modest adverse effect on cognitive abilities and in many individuals no effects are discernible.39
The data on children are even more difficult to tease out. However, data from the National Collaborative Perinatal Project (NCPP) suggest that status epilepticus per se has few if any adverse effects on the young child. Ellenberg and Nelson examined 27 children with febrile convulsions lasting >30 minutes and found no differences in cognitive function at 7 years of age between them and their siblings.47 They also found no evidence of decline in cognitive function in children with onset of epilepsy between ages 4 and 7 years who had cognitive testing as part of the NCPP at ages 4 and 7 years.48 The group included 8 children who experienced status. Dunn46 and Maytal et al.92 also found few long-term sequelae following status epilepticus in children unless it was associated with an acute or progressive central nervous system (CNS) insult. Animal data also suggest that the immature CNS, while more susceptible to developing status epilepticus, is more resistant to adverse sequelae.6,21,27,33,65,73,74,75,83,102,103,105,112,116,150,151,152,167,168
In summary, there are case reports that document the occurrence of cognitive deficits following status epilepticus in both children and adults. These deficits may occur not only following convulsive status, but also following complex partial status and perhaps absence status. However, in large studies the morbidity of status epilepticus is primarily a function of the underlying etiology. Patients with status epilepticus are more likely to have had prior cognitive deficits. The incidence of demonstrable cognitive deficits following an episode of status appears to be low. More studies are needed to address this issue.
Hemiconvulsion-Hemiplegia-Hemiparesis Syndrome
A particular neurologic syndrome frequently found in the older series of convulsive status in children was an acquired hemiplegia, the so-called hemiconvulsion-hemiplegia-epilepsy syndrome (HHE).3,59,61 In one series, the syndrome was present in 25 of 79 children with convulsive SE lasting >1 hour.59 The association is well established in the older literature.3,5,28,59,61,126 These cases of acquired hemiplegia were also almost invariably associated with subsequent intractable seizures.
However, more recent studies report not only a much lower acute morbidity and mortality of status epilepticus,36,40,45,46,64,67,92,166,171 but also a lower rate of adverse sequelae. The syndrome of HHE is notably absent from studies of status epilepticus over the last two decades.36,40,45,46,64,67,92,166,171 Whether this is a result of improved therapy or of other factors remains a matter of speculation. However, it does coincide with the decrease in mortality and other acute and long-term adverse sequelae of status epilepticus.
Status Epilepticus and the Development of Future Seizures
The textbook definition of status epilepticus as “a seizure of such duration as to create a fixed epileptic condition”60,126 might lead one to assume that all cases of status epilepticus are inevitably associated with a subsequent chronic seizure disorder. Indeed, if “seizures beget seizures” as has been argued by some authors,49,62,122,123 then one would expect that the occurrence of a prolonged seizure such as status epilepticus would inevitably result in subsequent seizures. However, the epidemiologic data do not support this conclusion.15,17a,67,69,70,106,130,137,139 This section reviews the data regarding the development of a subsequent seizure disorder following an episode of status epilepticus.
Experimental Data
Status epilepticus–induced epileptogenesis is a widespread phenomenon that reproducibly occurs in the vast majority of animals after many types of experimental status epilepticus. The majority of subjects develop spontaneous recurrent seizures after status epilepticus induced by kainate, pilocarpine with or without lithium, tetanus toxin, stimulation of excitatory pathways such as the perforant path, or stimulation of limbic structures such as amygdala111 or ventral hippocampus in a number of animal species.20,22,79,82,129,133,160 Acutely, neuronal loss in the dentate hilus and CA1 and increases in diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted imaging (by magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) are seen in hippocampus.50,124 Chronically, an increased T2 signal reveals hippocampal cell loss coupled to gliosis, a combination that is reminiscent of human medial temporal sclerosis.124 The respective role in epileptogenesis of loss of GABAergic interneurons115,147 and of sprouting of excitatory fibers154,155,169 is debated. In immature animals, SE can lead to spontaneous recurrent seizures and chronic epilepsy, although the immature brain is more resistant than the adult brain.71a,71b,132,133 However, this epileptogenicity is highly model dependent: Whereas the lithium-lipocarpine model is highly epileptogenic,133,153 the perforant path model of status epilepticus generates spontaneous recurrent seizures in only about 15% of subjects.134,169
Domoic acid (a close analog of kainic acid) ingested from mussels induced status epilepticus in a man who later developed chronic epilepsy, and this case may offer the closest human approximation to the animal models.26
Status Epilepticus as a First Unprovoked Seizure
Approximately 10% of patients who come to medical attention with a first unprovoked seizure present with SE.11,16,40,64,67,68,69,70,91,139 The majority of these have a cryptogenic or idiopathic etiology. In both children and adults, the risk of seizure recurrence following a cryptogenic/idiopathic first unprovoked seizure is not influenced by the duration of the initial seizure.11,15,69,70,139,142,143,143a This is true whether one
P.753

examines seizure duration as a continuous variable or compares those with status epilepticus as their first unprovoked seizures with those who presented with a brief first seizure. These studies, which include follow-up periods of >15 years, support the view that status epilepticus per se does not create a permanent seizure disorder.70,142,143,143a
In both children and adults who present with status epilepticus as their first unprovoked remote symptomatic seizure, the risk of recurrence is increased.16,69,70,139 As discussed later, these patients are at increased risk not just for recurrent seizures, but also for recurrent status epilepticus.15,43,140,143a However, it should be noted that status epilepticus as the initial seizure is relatively uncommon in this group. In one study of childhood status epilepticus, 29 (63%) of 46 children with idiopathic status epilepticus had no prior history of seizures, whereas 34 (75%) of 45 children with remote symptomatic status had a prior history of seizures.92 The fact that status epilepticus is a risk factor for subsequent seizures in remote symptomatic cases but not in idiopathic ones suggests that either it is a marker for epilepsy in those cases or that the already compromised brain is more susceptible to injury as a result of status. More research is needed on this point, and animal models are being developed to address this issue (see Chapter 36).
When one looks at long-term outcomes following an initial episode of status epilepticus, the epidemiologic data in children also do not show long-term adverse effects of an isolated episode of status epilepticus. The occurrence of status epilepticus does not influence long-term remission rates in children who present with status epilepticus as their first unprovoked cryptogenic seizure.141a,142 In a case–control study of predictors of intractability in children with newly diagnosed epilepsy, the occurrence of status epilepticus was found to be a marker for future intractability.18 The best predictor, however, was the presence of an underlying neurologic abnormality. Furthermore, of the four children believed to have cryptogenic epilepsy whose presentation included an episode of status epilepticus, one was later diagnosed as having a brain tumor, one had retardation, and one had a progressive neurologic disorder. Thus, status in this population seems to be a marker for an abnormal brain, which is known to be a predictor of future intractability.18 Similarly, in Sillanpaa’s study, the occurrence of status epilepticus was more common in remote symptomatic cases, which are also more prone to recurrent status. However, it had an only modest effect on long-term outcome once one controls for etiology.145,146 Few data are available on this question in adult-onset epilepsy.
Epilepsy Following Febrile Status Epilepticus
The literature regarding this issue is confusing. Retrospective studies from tertiary epilepsy centers reported that many adults with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy had a history of prolonged or atypical febrile seizures in childhood.1,19,24,25,52,53,58,84,86,87,88,89 However, population-based studies failed to find this association, nor did prospective studies of febrile seizures.8,10,48,90,108,163,164 In this section we review some of the data as they relate to the association of prolonged febrile seizures and subsequent epilepsy.
One must be careful to distinguish between very prolonged febrile convulsions, which are the extreme end of the complex febrile seizure spectrum,107 and status epilepticus associated with fever. The latter term often includes cases of encephalitis, meningitis, and other forms of acute brain injury as well as children with already established epilepsy who decompensate in the context of an acute febrile illness. These are discussed in the section on acute symptomatic status epilepticus. This section focuses on the data on the consequences of prolonged febrile seizures (for a more detailed discussion see Chapter 63).
Studies that limit themselves to children with prolonged febrile seizures uniformly report a low morbidity and mortality.8,10,36,40,45,46,48,64,67,89,90,108,163,164,166,171 As with all forms of complex febrile seizures, there is a somewhat higher risk of epilepsy compared to children with a simple febrile convulsion.8,10,17,40,48,51,89,90,108,163,164 In a study of a British cohort of 16,004 children born during a single week in April 1970, the proportion of those who developed afebrile seizures was 3.4% after febrile convulsions lasting <30 minutes but 21% after febrile convulsions lasting >30 minutes.164 This increased risk may express itself many years later.8,10,164 At highest risk are those whose febrile seizures are both prolonged and focal10 and those who are already neurologically abnormal prior to the febrile seizure.10,16,90 In children who were previously neurologically abnormal, even the short-term risks of developing epilepsy are substantial.90
The difficulty in interpreting the data centers on whether the febrile seizures are markers for subsequent epilepsy or a cause of the epilepsy. Those who argue that there is a causal relationship point to the retrospective studies of temporal lobectomy patients, autopsy studies,1,19,24,25,32,51,52,53,58,84,89,172 and adult animal data on the sequelae of status epilepticus.83,95,96,97,148 On the other hand, there are those who would argue that febrile seizures are simply an age-specific marker for subsequent epilepsy.141 Namely, those patients with a predisposition to epilepsy based on a genetic predisposition or based on underlying structural abnormalities will, at the age-specific developmental window, also be more likely to experience febrile seizures, possibly even prolonged ones. The data in favor of this view include the fact that the risk of subsequent epilepsy is highest in those with focal seizures or prior neurologic abnormality.8,10,17a,90,108,139a,163,164 The risk of epilepsy is also high in those with four or more febrile seizures even if they are brief.10 This population tends to have a high incidence of generalized spike-and-wave abnormalities on the electroencephalogram (EEG) when older, pointing again to probable genetic causes.42,139a,161 Finally, in the study of Annegers et al.,10 which provided the longest follow-up, those with generalized status developed a generalized seizure disorder, whereas those with focal status developed a focal disorder, which is what one would expect if the prolonged febrile seizure were a marker for subsequent epilepsy.10 By contrast, if one proposed a causal relationship between status per se and later epilepsy, then one would expect a high rate of focal seizure disorders regardless of whether the initial episode of status was generalized or focal.
In reviewing the data from retrospective series of epilepsy surgery candidates,1,19,23,24,25,32,52,53,58,84,86,87,88,89 one must keep in mind that these are highly selected patient groups. Many of these patients had complex febrile seizures or at least seizures associated with fever, but few actually had status epilepticus. It is often very unclear whether they truly had febrile seizures or if seizures were associated with fever in patients who may have had an acute brain insult such as encephalitis or in patients with a preexisting epilepsy. Atypical febrile seizures of the latter type have been associated with a worse prognosis for remission18,138,141 but should not be confused with febrile seizures. If febrile seizures are simply a marker for seizure susceptibility, then quite possibly those most susceptible will experience more frequent and/or more prolonged febrile seizures.139a Note that complex febrile seizures in general and very prolonged febrile seizures in particular are much more common in children who are already neurologically abnormal and are most likely to be focal, suggesting prior focal pathology.10,28,47,108,163,164 Current prospective studies on the long-term outcomes of febrile SE with an emphasis on the development of mesial temporal sclerosis and epilepsy will provide the answer to these questions, but given the long latency, it will be some time before the precise relationships between
P.754

febrile SE and subsequent epilepsy are defined (see Chapter 63).
Epilepsy Following Acute Symptomatic Status Epilepticus
A proportion of patients with acute symptomatic status epilepticus develop a seizure disorder at some time in the future. This proportion varies and is a function of the severity of the underlying insult. In most cases it is on the order of 15% to 30%. However, the seizure disorder may not develop for several years.9,68,71,156 There are few data that support prophylactic antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment to prevent the subsequent development of epilepsy in acute symptomatic seizures.56,104,137,156 There is some evidence that acute symptomatic seizures, including status epilepticus, are associated with an increased risk of subsequent epilepsy in patients with acute CNS injury. However, it is unclear whether patients with acute symptomatic status epilepticus have a higher risk than other patients with briefer acute symptomatic seizures.66,67,70,71 The majority of patients with acute symptomatic or febrile status epilepticus do not have unprovoked seizures later, even with long follow-up periods.8,10,56,66,67,68,90,108,156,163,164
Recurrent Status Epilepticus
Although not clearly a sequela of status epilepticus, the issue of recurrent status is best dealt with in this chapter because it is closely related to the issue of status epilepticus and subsequent seizures. Most of the available data in this regard are in pediatric series, which are discussed first. Pediatric studies report that 11% to 25% of children with status epilepticus experience at least two episodes.3,43,46,92,140 These studies included both prospective and retrospective cases. Shinnar et al.140 followed 95 children from the time of their first episode of status. Sixteen children (17%) experienced recurrent status, including 5 with three or more episodes. All but 2 of the 16 had prior neurologic abnormalities. The risk of recurrent status epilepticus in the remote symptomatic and progressive encephalopathy group was almost 50%, compared with only 3% in children who were otherwise neurologically normal. The neurologically abnormal group constituted 32 (34%) of the 95 children, but they accounted for 14 of 16 (88%) of children with recurrent status epilepticus and all 5 children with three or more episodes of status epilepticus.
It is of interest that the increased risk of recurrent status epilepticus for neurologically abnormal children was present not only in the remote symptomatic and progressive encephalopathy group, but also in the febrile92,140 and acute symptomatic group. Driscoll et al.43 reported similar findings in a retrospective review. Thus, it would appear that the risk of recurrent status epilepticus is primarily in children with preexisting neurologic abnormalities. This is also the population that is at higher risk for developing seizures14,68,71,109 and status epilepticus in the first place.3,36,40,45,46,64,67,92,166,171 These data support the notion that status epilepticus is primarily a marker for an abnormal or injured brain destined to be epileptic rather than the cause of an injury sufficient to produce an epileptic condition. In adults there is one study with similar conclusions.13
More recently, there is an accumulation of data that suggest that there is a subgroup of children with a predisposition to prolonged seizures.17,18a,18b,31a,139,143,143a,146a These children are not necessarily at risk for frequent or intractable seizures, but are at increased risk for prolonged seizures. The evidence comes from several studies. In children with febrile seizures, an initial prolonged febrile seizure is not associated with an increased risk of recurrent febrile seizures. However, if another febrile seizure does occur, it is likely to be prolonged.17 Similarly, in children with a first unprovoked seizure who are neurologically normal, a prolonged first seizure including status does not increase the risk of recurrence, but if a recurrence does occur, it is likely to be prolonged.139,143,143a In the Finnish childhood onset epilepsy cohort, the majority of cases of status occurred early in the disorder. If status did occur, there was a high likelihood of recurrent status. However, if there was no episode of status in the first few years of the disorder, then status did not occur even if there was a continuing active seizure disorder for many years.146a In the Connecticut study, the majority of cases of status also occurred early, but there were more late cases.18a,18b Finally, genetic studies of twins have shown that, if one twin has status, there is an increased risk of not just seizures, but also status in identical but not fraternal twins.31a
Status Epilepticus and Mesial Temporal Sclerosis
The pathological entity of mesial temporal sclerosis is described in detail in Chapter 13. In this section we review the data regarding whether MTS is a sequela of status epilepticus, particularly in early childhood (see also Chapter 65).
Falconer et al. described the pathologic findings in temporal lobes obtained from 100 patients with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy.53 Forty-seven percent had mesial temporal sclerosis, varying from loss of cells in Sommer (H1) sector of the hippocampus to more widespread involvement of the temporal lobe. Of those with MTS, 40% had a history of prolonged convulsions in infancy. The major controversy regarding mesial temporal sclerosis is whether it is a sequela of status epilepticus, particularly of prolonged febrile seizures in early life or due to some other cause.128 We review the data for and against the hypothesis that MTS is a sequela of status.
In favor of this hypothesis are the elegant experiments in adult animals that have produced MTS with a variety of models of status including kainic acid, pilocarpine, and fluorothyl.21,83,95,96,97,102,103,105,150,151,152 Meldrum et al. showed that in the adult monkey, even if one paralyzes the animal and adequately ventilates and oxygenates it, neuronal changes occur as a sequela of status.95,96,97 Such changes are readily produced in the adult rat as well.21,83,102,103,105,150,151,152
In patients with refractory complex partial seizures who undergo epilepsy surgery and are found to have mesial temporal sclerosis, a substantial number have a history of complex febrile seizures in early life, although, as discussed previously, not necessarily of status epilepticus.1,19,24,25,32,51,52,53,58,84,89,172
A number of imaging studies found cerebral edema acutely, and atrophy chronically, after convulsive or nonconvulsive status epilepticus,30,77,78 but others did not.129 One 5-year-old patient had a normal brain MRI before and atrophy after nonconvulsive status epilepticus,119 and neuronal loss was found at autopsy in areas that became atrophic after his bout of status epilepticus.113 Focal atrophy has been reported to develop in areas of intense seizure activity,57,100,101 supporting a mechanistic explanation. However, the problem with these studies is that although they establish that sequelae can occur, they do not give any sense of how common the event is.136
Although this view of a causal relationship between prolonged seizures in early childhood and subsequent MTS has become entrenched in the literature, there is a large body of data that do not support this view. The animal and clinical data simply do not match in this regard. The clinical
P.755

data from adults evaluated for epilepsy surgery suggest that MTS is associated with an insult or seizure onset in early childhood but not in adult life.1,12,24,25,58,85,86,87,88,89 The animal data indicate that although the immature CNS is more susceptible to seizures in general and status epilepticus in particular, it is far more resistant to its sequelae.6,21,27,33,65,73,74,75,83,102,103,105,112,116,150,151,152,167,168 In many, although not all, animal models of status, rat pups who experience an episode of status do not develop MTS. This is true in a variety of models, including kainic acid, pilocarpine, flurothyl, and kindling.102,103,104,105,150,151,152 Reversible hippocampal injury has been shown in the infant rat using the kainic acid model.27 Based on the use of Timm staining, aberrant reinnervation has been demonstrated following status in the adult rat, but it only occurs in some models in the rat pup.133,134,150,151,152 Rat pups that experience kainate status and are allowed to reach adulthood have the same seizure threshold as control adult animals using the kindling model,116 but in other models, after status epilepticus at P15, a majority of animals show spontaneous recurrent seizures.153
The pathologic data show that MTS is often associated with developmental abnormalities such as migration defects, suggesting that there is preexisting pathology.12,80,86,87,93 The association of MTS with brain tumors of the adjacent temporal lobe, particularly when these tumors are adjacent to the hippocampus, also points to preexisting pathology as a frequent correlate of MTS.12,89 Using autopsy material of patients who died following an episode of status epilepticus is problematic because these are extreme cases, which do not necessarily represent the effects of status per se, which has a low mortality, but rather probably represent the results of acute brain injuries associated with status epilepticus.55,94,149,172
The clinical data are also problematic. MTS is most common in cases with childhood onset. However, MTS is not diagnosed in childhood but many years later. In fact, documentation of MTS under age 6 years is uncommon.44,110 Whether this is because MTS occurs later in the course of the epilepsy or is simply due to lack of early diagnosis is unclear. Recent data indicate that mesial temporal sclerosis, similar to that found in adults, can be seen in children with intractable mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.88
Radiologic evidence of hippocampal damage is reported primarily in adults. An example is a paper in which five adults with status had magnetic resonance imaging with fast spin echo techniques demonstrating reversible abnormal hyperintensity and swelling of the hippocampus and amygdala.159 Two of these patients subsequently had evidence of hippocampal atrophy. In children, the data are sparse. One case report of a very young child with status epilepticus followed by MTS has been reported.114 The child was neurologically abnormal previously, had focal status suggesting focal pathology, and had almost no latent period between the status and the intractable seizures. Although this case is interesting in demonstrating that MTS can occur early in life, it is hardly a demonstration of the proposed paradigm of a prolonged seizure followed by a silent interval and then complex partial seizures. In fact, most childhood intractable epilepsy is extratemporal.44,104,110 Although temporal lobe epilepsy does occur in children and can be associated with MTS, other etiologies such as cortical dysplasia and developmental tumors are more common.44,63,170 Status epilepticus is actually much more common in frontal lobe epilepsy and in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, neither of which is associated with MTS. The clinical data regarding the association of prolonged febrile seizures and subsequent MTS or temporal lobe epilepsy were discussed previously.
More recently a number of case reports and series have shown that febrile SE can cause increased T2 signal in the hippocampus, which in some cases is associated with subsequent hippocampal volume loss.80a,80b,101,144,162 Some of those radiologic findings were confirmed at autopsy.113 Recent animal data from rats with hyperthermic seizures have also indicated increased T2 signal,43a although in that model it was not associated with cell death. Thus, it is now clear that febrile status epilepticus can lead to hippocampal atrophy, although the frequency with which this occurs and the required seizure duration are unclear.135a,136 For a detailed review of this important topic see Chapter 63.
Mathern et al. have tried to document the relationship between mesial temporal sclerosis and various preceding insults.84,85,86,87,88,89 They found that an injury prior to age 5 years, whether or not associated with a seizure, was most likely to be associated with MTS. Those with MTS were most likely to have initial precipitating injuries, including trauma and encephalitis. In addition, severe hippocampal neuronal losses (hippocampal sclerosis) were often associated with mesial temporal lesions or masses adjacent to the body of the hippocampus.89 Longer durations of temporal lobe epilepsy were associated with some secondary neuron losses. The data “support the hypothesis that the etiology of hippocampal sclerosis is an acquired injury to the hippocampus and that the pathogenesis is a combination of acute, subacute, and progressive changes following the initial injury.”86 Note that the initial injury need not necessarily be a seizure.
The entire field is being rewritten as newer studies with better imaging techniques are leading to a better understanding of the relationship of very prolonged febrile seizures and subsequent MTS. For a better discussion, see Chapter 63.
Other Pathologic Sequelae of Status Epilepticus
In postmortem examinations of five children who died after status epilepticus associated with a febrile illness, Fowler described neuronal necrosis in the cerebral cortex, basal ganglia, and cerebellum.55 The exact etiology of these seizures, which lasted from 1 to 6 hours, is unclear, although the children were febrile. Similar findings were described in several other reports.94,149 Of particular interest is the case of a 20-year-old who died following prolonged focal status epilepticus associated with fever and had unilateral pathology.149 It is unclear whether the pathologic changes were due to hypoxia as suggested by Fowler, to the underlying brain insult, or to the status epilepticus. Cell loss in the cerebellum has also been described in patients with long-standing seizure disorders even without a history of status epilepticus.12 Brain damage is often seen in children or adults who died from SE,32 although the complexity of clinical situations usually makes it very difficult to tell whether damage resulted from the seizures themselves or from medical complications such as hypoxia or hypotension. DeGiorgio et al.34 found decreased hippocampal neuronal densities in five patients who died after complex partial status epilepticus. Given the overall low morbidity and mortality of SE per se, it is difficult to extrapolate from these postmortem findings to those who survive an episode of SE, particularly when it is not associated with an acute neurologic insult.
What Further Studies are Needed
Further studies are needed in several areas. Prospective long-term follow-up studies after episodes of status epilepticus are needed to determine whether status epilepticus is associated with subsequent mesial temporal sclerosis and, if so, how often
P.756

this occurs. These studies should take into account differences in etiology and age that may affect outcome. Given the recent association of mesial temporal sclerosis with migration defects, studies are needed on whether preexisting brain abnormality or injury makes the brain more susceptible not only to developing status epilepticus, but also to sustaining damage as a result. Modern imaging techniques should also allow for better studies of pathologic changes associated with status epilepticus in humans as well as in animal models. Animal and human studies are also needed on ways to not just stop the seizures, but also to prevent the damage. The role of N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists and other agents that may prevent secondary neuronal damage following brain injury is being evaluated in animals but not yet in humans.
Summary and Conclusions
The morbidity and mortality of status epilepticus have declined significantly in the last two decades. In the absence of an acute or progressive CNS insult, the morbidity and mortality of status epilepticus are low, particularly in children. Long-term sequelae are also difficult to document in the absence of an acute associated neurologic insult. Motor and cognitive sequelae, although they may occur, are rare. The epidemiologic data do not support the idea that status epilepticus is necessarily associated with a subsequent chronic seizure disorder. Status epilepticus is most common in young children. However, although the immature brain is more prone to develop status epilepticus, both human and animal data suggest that it is more resistant to its adverse sequelae.
Textbook definitions of status epilepticus that imply that it is always associated with subsequent chronic epilepsy need to be revised. The relationship between status epilepticus and mesial temporal sclerosis also needs further study. Defining the precise role of status epilepticus in human epileptogenesis requires further research.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by grants R01-NS26151 (S.S.), R01-NS-43209 (S.S.), RO1-NS-13515 (C.G.W.), and R01-NS 20253 (S.L.M.) from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, and by the research service of the Veterans Health Administration.
References
1. Abou-Khalil B, Andermann E, Andermann F, et al. Temporal lobe epilepsy after prolonged febrile convulsions: Excellent outcome after surgical treatment. Epilepsia. 1993;34:878–883.
2. Aicardi J. Consequences and prognosis of convulsive status epilepticus in infants and children. Jpn J Psychiatr Neurol. 1986;40:283–290.
3. Aicardi J, Chevrie JJ. Convulsive status epilepticus in infants and in children; a study of 239 cases. Epilepsia. 1970;11:187–197.
4. Aicardi J, Chevrie JJ. Consequences of status epilepticus in infants and children. In: Delgado-Escueta AV, Wasterlain CG, Treiman DM, et al., eds. Status Epilepticus. New York: Raven Press; 1983:115–125.
5. Aicardi J, Amsili J, Chevrie JJ. Acute hemiplegia in infancy and childhood. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1969;11:162–173.
6. Albala BJ, Moshe SL, Okada R. Kainic acid–induced seizures: a developmental study. Dev. Brain Res. 1984;13:39–148.
7. Aminoff MJ, Simon RP. Status epilepticus causes, clinical features and consequences in 98 patients. Am J Med. 1980;69:657–666.
8. Annegers JF, Hauser WA, Elveback LR, et al. The risk of epilepsy following febrile convulsions. Neurology. 1979;29:297–303.
9. Annegers JF, Grabow JD, Groover RV, et al. Seizures after head trauma: a population study. Neurology. 1980;30:683–689.
10. Annegers JF, Hauser WA, Shirts SB, et al. Factors prognostic of unprovoked seizures after febrile convulsions. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:493–498.
11. Annegers JF, Shirts SB, Hauser WA, et al. Risk of recurrence after an initial unprovoked seizure. Epilepsia. 1986;27:43–50.
12. Babb TL, Pretorius JK. Pathologic substrates of epilepsy. In: Wyllie E, ed. The Treatment of Epilepsy: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1993.
13. Barry E, Hauser WA. Status epilepticus: The interaction of epilepsy and acute brain disease. Neurology. 1993;43:1473–1478.
14. Berg AT. The epidemiology of seizures and epilepsy in children. In: Shinnar S, Amir N, Branski D, eds. Childhood Seizures. Basel, Switzerland: S Karger; 1995:1–10.
15. Berg AT, Shinnar S. The risk of seizure recurrence following a first unprovoked seizure: a quantitative review. Neurology. 1991;41:965–972.
16. Berg AT, Shinnar S. Unprovoked seizures after a first febrile seizure. Pediatric Perinatal Epidemiol. 1994;8:A7–A8.
17. Berg AT, Shinnar S. Complex febrile seizures. Epilepsia. 1996;37:126–133.
17a. Berg AT, Shinnar S. The contributions of epidemiology to the understanding of childhood seizures and epilepsy. J Child Neurol. 1994;9 (Suppl):2S19–2S26.
18. Berg AT, Novotny EJ, Levy SR, et al. Predictors of intractable epilepsy in children: a case control study. Epilepsia. 1994;35(Suppl 8):34.
18a. Berg AT, Shinnar S, Levy SR, et al. Status epilepticus in children with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 1999;45:618–623.
18b. Berg AT, Shinnar S, Testa FM, et al. Status epilepticus after the initial diagnosis of epilepsy in children. Neurology. 2004;63:1027–1034.
19. Bruton CJ. The Neuropathology of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. New York: Oxford University Press; 1988.
20. Cavalheiro EA, Riche DA, Le Gal La SG. Long-term effects of intrahippocampal kainic acid injection in rats: a method for inducing spontaneous recurrent seizures. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1982;53(6):581–589.
21. Cavalheiro EA, Silva DF, Turski WA, et al. The susceptibility of rats to pilocarpine-induced seizures is age-dependent. Dev Brain Res. 1987;37:43–58.
22. Cavalheiro EA, Leite JP, Bortolotto ZA, et al. Long-term effects of pilocarpine in rats; structural damage of the brain triggers kindling and spontaneous recurrent seizures. Epilepsia. 1991;32(6):778–782.
23. Cavazzuti GB, Ferrari P, Lalla M. Follow-up study of 482 cases with convulsive disorders in the first year of life. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1984;26:425–437.
24. Cendes F, Andermann F, Dubeau F, et al. Early childhood prolonged febrile convulsions, atrophy and sclerosis of mesial structures, and temporal lobe epilepsy: an MRI volumetric study. Neurology. 1993;43:1083–1087.
25. Cendes F, Andermann F, Gloor P, et al. Atrophy of mesial structures in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: cause or consequence of repeated seizures. Ann Neurol. 1993;34:795–801.
26. Cendes F, Andermann F, Carpenter S, et al. Temporal lobe epilepsy caused by domoic acid intoxication: evidence for glutamate receptor-mediated excitotoxicity in humans. Ann Neurol. 1995;34:123–126.
27. Chang D, Baram TZ. Status epilepticus results in reversible neuronal injury in infant rat hippocampus: novel use of a marker. Dev Brain Res. 1994;77:133–136.
28. Chevrie JJ, Aicardi J. Duration and lateralization of febrile convulsions. Etiological factors. Epilepsia. 1975;16:781–789.
29. Chevrie JJ, Aicardi J. Convulsive disorders in the first year of life: neurological and mental outcome and mortality. Epilepsia. 1978;19:67–74.
30. Chu K, Kang DW, Kim JY, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in convulsive status epilepticus. Arch Neurol. 2001;58(6):993–998.
31. Coeytaux A, Jallon P, Galobardes B, et al. Incidence of status epilepticus in French-speaking Switzerland: (EPISTAR). Neurology. 2000;55(5):693–697.
31a. Corey LA, Pellock JM, Boggs JG, et al. Evidence for a genetic predisposition for status epilepticus. Neurology. 1998;50:558–560.
32. Corsellis JAN, Bruton CJ. Neuropathology of status epilepticus in humans. In: Delgado-Escueta AV, Wasterlain CG, Treiman DM, et al., eds. Status Epilepticus. Mechanisms of Brain Damage and Treatment. New York: Raven Press; 1983:129–139.
33. de Feo MR, Mecarelli O, Palladini G, et al. Long-term effects of early status epilepticus on the acquisition of conditioned avoidance behavior in rats. Epilepsia. 1986;27:476–482.
34. DeGiorgio CM, Tomiyasu U, Gott PS, et al. Hippocampal pyramidal cell loss in human status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 1992;33(1):23–27.
35. DeGiorgio CM, Gott PS, Rabinowicz AL, et al. Neuro-specific enolase, a marker of acute neuronal injury, is increased in complex partial status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 1996;37(7):606–609.
36. DeLorenzo RJ, Towne AR, Pellock JM, et al. Status epilepticus in children adults and the elderly. Epilepsia. 1992;33(Suppl 4):S15–S25.
37. DeLorenzo RJ, Hauser WA, Towne AR, et al. A prospective, population-based epidemiologic study of status epilepticus in Richmond, Virginia. Neurology. 1996;46(4):1029–1035.
38. Dodrill CB. Correlates of generalized tonic–clonic seizures with intellectual, neuropsychological, emotional and social function in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1986;27:399–411.
P.757

39. Dodrill CB, Wilensky AJ. Intellectual impairment as an outcome of status epilepticus. Neurology. 1990;40(Suppl 2):23–27.
40. Dodson WE, DeLorenzo RJ, Pedley TA, et al. The treatment of convulsive status epilepticus: recommendations of the Epilepsy Foundation of America’s Working Group on Status Epilepticus. JAMA. 1993;270:854–859.
41. Doose H, Volzke E. Petit mal status in early childhood and dementia. Neuropaediatrie. 1979: 10:10–14.
42. Doose H, Ritter K, Volzke E. EEG longitudinal studies in febrile convulsions. Genetic aspects. Neuropediatrics. 1983;14:81–87.
43. Driscoll SM, Towne AR, Pellock JM, et al. Recurrent status epilepticus in children [Abstract]. Neurology. 1990;40(Suppl 1):297.
43a. Dube C, Yu H, Nalcioglu O, et al. Serial MRI after experimental febrile seizures: altered T2 without neuronal death. Ann Neurol. 2004;56:709–714.
44. Duchowny M, Levin B, Jayakar P, et al. Temporal lobectomy in early childhood. Epilepsia. 1992;33:298–303.
45. Dulac O, Aubourg P, Chercoury A, et al. Infantile status epilepticus: clinical, etiological and prognostic aspects. Rev Electroencephalogr Neurophysiol. 1985;14:255–262.
46. Dunn WD. Status epilepticus in children: etiology, clinical features and outcome. J Child Neurol. 1988;3:167–173.
47. Ellenberg JH, Nelson KB. Febrile seizures and later intellectual performance. Arch Neurol. 1978;35:17–21.
48. Ellenberg JH, Hirtz DG, Nelson KB. Do seizures in children cause intellectual deterioration? N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1085–1088.
49. Elwes RDC, Johnson AL, Shorvon SD, et al. The prognosis for seizure control in newly diagnosed epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:944–947.
50. Fabene PF, Marzola P, Sbarbati A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of changes elicited by status epilepticus in the rat brain: diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted images, regional blood volume maps, and direct correlation with tissue and cell damage. Neuroimage. 2003;18:375–389.
51. Falconer M. The pathological substrate of temporal lobe epilepsy. Guy’s Hosp Rep. 1970;119:47–60.
52. Falconer M. Genetic and related etiological factors in temporal lobe epilepsy: a review. Epilepsia. 1971;12:13–31.
53. Falconer MA, Serafetinides EA, Corsellis JAN. Etiology and pathogenesis of temporal lobe epilepsy. Arch Neurol. 1964;10:233–248.
54. Farwell JR, Dodrill CB, Batzell LW. Neuropsychological abilities of children with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1985;26:395–400.
55. Fowler M. Brain damage after febrile convulsions. Arch Dis Child. 1957;32:67–76.
56. Foy PM, Chadwick DW, Rajgopalan N, et al. Do prophylactic anticonvulsant drugs alter the pattern of seizures after craniotomy? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;55:753–757.
57. Freeman JL, Coleman LT, Smith LJ, et al. Hemiconvulsion-hemiplegia-epilepsy syndrome: characteristic early magnetic resonance imaging findings. J Child Neurol. 2002;17(1):10–16.
58. French JA, Williamson PD, Thadani M, et al. Characteristics of medial temporal lobe epilepsy: I. Results of history and physical examination. Ann Neurol. 1993: 34:774–780.
59. Fujiwara T, Ishida S, Mlyakoshi M. Status epilepticus in childhood: A retrospective study of initial convulsive status and subsequent epilepsies. Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn. 1979;33:337–344.
60. Gastaut H. Dictionary of Epilepsy. Part I. Definitions. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1973.
61. Gastaut H, Poirer F, Pagan G, et al. HHE syndrome: hemiconvulsions, hemiplegia, epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1960;1:418–447.
62. Gowers WR. Epilepsy and Other Chronic Convulsive Disorders. London: J&A Churchill; 1881.
63. Grattan-Smith JD, Harvey AS, Desmond PM, et al. Hippocampal sclerosis in children with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy: detection with MR imaging. AJR. 1993;161:1045–1048.
64. Gross-Tsur V, Shinnar S. Convulsive status epilepticus in children. Epilepsia. 1993;34(Suppl 1):S12–S20.
65. Hamon JB, Heinemann U. Developmental changes in neuronal sensitivity to excitatory amino acids in area CA1 of the rat hippocampus. Brain Res. 1988;466:286–290.
66. Hauser WA. Status epilepticus, frequency, etiology and neurological sequelae. In: Delgado-Escueta AV, Wasterlain CG, Treiman DM, et al., eds. Status Epilepticus. Advances in Neurology, Vol. 34. New York: Raven Press; 1983:3–14.
67. Hauser WA. Status epilepticus: epidemiologic considerations. Neurology. 1990;40(Suppl 2):9–13.
68. Hauser WA, Hesdorffer DC. Epilepsy: Frequency, Causes and Consequences. New York: Demos; 1990.
69. Hauser AW, Anderson VE, Loewenson RB. Seizure recurrence after a first unprovoked seizure. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:522–528.
70. Hauser WA, Rich SS, Annegers JF, et al. Seizure recurrence following a first unprovoked seizure: an extended follow-up. Neurology. 1990;40:1163–1170.
71. Hauser WA, Annegers JF, Kurland LT. Incidence of epilepsy and unprovoked seizures in Rochester, Minnesota: 1935–1984. Epilepsia. 1993;34:453–468.
71a. Hasson H, Haut S, Moshé SL, et al. Temporal lobe epileptogenesis and epilepsy in the developing brain: bridging the gap between the laboratory and the clinic. In: Arzimanoglou A, Aldenkamp A, Cross H, et al., eds. Cognitive Dysfunction in Children with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. London: John Libbey; 2005:183–202.
71b. Haut SR, Veliskova J, Moshe SL. Susceptibility of immature and adult brains to seizure effects. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3:608–617.
72. Hesdorffer DC, Logroscino G, Cascino G, et al. Incidence of status epilepticus in Rochester, Minnesota, 1965–1984. Neurology. 1998;50(3):735–741.
73. Holmes GL, Moshe SL. Consequences of seizures in the developing brain. J Epilepsy. 1990;3(Suppl):7–13.
74. Holmes GL, Thompson JL, Bates T, et al. Behavioral effects of kainic acid administration on the immature brain. Epilepsia. 1988;29:721–730.
75. Holmes GL, Thompson JL, Bates T, et al. Detrimental effects of frequent seizures on learning, memory, and behavior: a study using the pubescent genetically epilepsy-prone rat. Ann Neurol. 1990;27:24–32.
76. Knake S, Rosenow F, Vescovi M, et al. Incidence of status epilepticus in adults in Germany: a prospective, population-based study. Epilepsia. 2001;42(6):714–718.
77. Lansberg MG, O’Brien MW, Norbash AM, et al. MRI abnormalities associated with partial status epilepticus. Neurology. 1999;52:1021–1027.
78. Lazeyras F, Blanke O, Zimine I, et al. MRI, (1)H-MRS, and functional MRI during and after prolonged nonconvulsive seizure activity. Neurology. 2000;55(11):1677–1682.
79. Leite JP, Garcia-Cairasco N, Cavalheiro EA. New insights from the use of pilocarpine and kainate models. Epilepsy Res. 2002;50(1–2):93–103.
80. Levesque MF, Nakasato N, Vinters H, et al. Surgical treatment of limbic epilepsy associated with extrahippocampal lesions: the problem of dual pathology. J Neurosurg. 1991;75:364–370.
80a. Lewis DV, Barboriak DP, MacFall JR, et al. Do prolonged febrile seizures produce medial temporal sclerosis? MRI evidence and unanswered questions. Prog Brain Res. 2002;135:263–278.
80b. Lewis DV, Bello JA, Chan S, et al. Hippocampal abnormalities subsequent to febrile status epilepticus: findings on early postictal imaging. Epilepsia. 2005;46(Suppl 8):52–53.
81. Lindsay J, Ounsted C, Richards P. Long-term outcome in children with temporal lobe seizures. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1979;21:285–298.
82. Loscher W. Animal models of epilepsy for the development of antiepileptogenic and disease-modifying drugs. A comparison of the pharmacology of kindling and post–status epilepticus models of temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2002;50(1–2):105–123.
83. Lothman EW, Bertram EH. Epileptogenic effects of status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 1993;34(Suppl 1):S59–S70.
84. Margerison JH, Corsellis JAN. Epilepsy and the temporal lobes. Brain. 1966;89:499–530.
85. Mathern GW, Babb TL, Vickrey BG, et al. Traumatic compared to nontraumatic clinical-pathologic associations in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 1994;19:129–139.
86. Mathern GW, Babb TL, Vickrey BG, et al. The clinical-pathologic mechanisms of hippocampal neuronal loss and surgical outcomes in temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain. 1995;118:105–118.
87. Mathern GW, Pretorius JK, Babb TL. Influence of the type of initial precipitating injury and at what age it occurs on course and outcome in patients with temporal lobe seizures. J Neurosurg. 1995;82:220–227.
88. Mathern GW, Babb TL, Mischel PS, et al. Childhood generalized and mesial temporal epilepsies demonstrate different amounts and patterns of hippocampal neuron loss and mossy fiber synaptic reorganization. J Neurosci. In press.
89. Mathern GW, Babb TL, Pretorius JK, et al. The pathophysiologic relationships between lesion pathology, intracranial ictal EEG onsets, and hippocampal neuron loses in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. In press.
90. Maytal J, Shinnar S. Febrile status epilepticus. Pediatrics. 1990;86:611–616.
91. Maytal J, Shinnar S. Status epilepticus in children. In: Shinnar S, Amir N, Branski D, eds. Childhood Seizures. Basel, Switzerland: S Karger; 1995:111–122.
92. Maytal J, Shinnar S, Moshe SL, et al. Low morbidity and mortality of status epilepticus in children. Pediatrics. 1989;83:323–331.
93. Meencke HJ. Pathology of childhood epilepsies. Cleve Clin J Med. 1988;56:S111–S120.
94. Meldrum BS. Secondary pathology of febrile and experimental convulsions. In: Brazier MAB, Coceani F, eds. Brain Dysfunction in Infantile Febrile Convulsions. New York: Raven Press; 1976:213–222.
95. Meldrum BS, Brierley JB. Prolonged epileptic seizure in primates. Ischemic cell change and its relations to ictal physiological event. Arch Neurol. 1973;28:10–17.
96. Meldrum BS, Horton RW. Physiology of status epilepticus in primates. Arch Neurol. 1973;28:1–9.
97. Meldrum BS, Horton RW, Brierley JB. Epileptic brain damage in adolescent baboons following seizures induced by allyl-glycine. Brain. 1974;97:407–418.
98. Men S, Lee DH, Barron JR, et al. Selective neuronal necrosis associated with status epilepticus: MR findings. Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1837–1840.
99. Morimoto T, Fukuda M, Suzuki Y, et al. Sequential changes of brain CT and MRI after febrile status epilepticus in a 6-year–old girl. Brain Dev. 2002;24:190–193.
P.758

100. Moshe SL. Epileptogenesis and the immature brain. Epilepsia. 1987;28(Suppl 1):S3–S15.
101. Moshe SL, Albala BJ. Maturational changes in postictal refractoriness and seizure susceptibility in developing rats. Ann Neurol. 1983;13:552–557.
102. Moshe SL, Shinnar S. Early Intervention. In: Engel J Jr, ed. Surgical Treatment of the Epilepsies, 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press; 1993:123–132.
103. Moshe SL, Sperber EF, Haus K, et al. Effect of the maturational process on epileptogenesis. In: Luders H, ed. Epilepsy Surgery. New York: Raven Press; 1991:741–747.
104. Musicco M, Beghi E, Solari A, and the First Seizure Trial Group. Effect of antiepileptic treatment initiated after the first unprovoked seizure on the long-term prognosis of epilepsy. Neurology. 1994;44(Suppl 2):A337–A338.
105. National Institutes of Health. Febrile Seizures: Consensus Development Conference Summary, Vol. 3, No. 2. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Health, 1980.
106. Nelson KB, Ellenberg JH. Prognosis in children with febrile seizures. Pediatrics. 1978;61:720–727.
107. Nelson KB, Ellenberg JH. Antecedents of seizure disorders in early childhood. Am J Dis Child. 1986;140:1053–1061.
108. Nespeca M, Wyllie E, Luders H, et al. EEG recording and functional localization studies with subdural electrodes in infants and young children. J Epilepsy. 1990;3(Suppl):107–124.
109. Nissinen J, Halonen T, Koivisto E, et al. A new model of chronic temporal lobe epilepsy induced by electrical stimulation of the amygdala in rat. Epilepsy Res. 2000;38:177–205.
110. Nitecka L, Tremblay E, Charton G, et al. Maturation of kainic acid seizure–brain damage syndrome in the rat. II. Histopathological sequelae. Neuroscience. 1984;13:1073–1094.
111. Nixon J, Bateman D, Moss T. An MRI and neuropathological study of a case of fatal status epilepticus. Seizure. 2001;10(8):588–591.
112. Nohria V, Lee N, Tien RD, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging evidence of hippocampal sclerosis in progression: a case report. Epilepsia. 1994;35:1332–1336.
113. Obenaus A, Esclapez M, Houser CR. Loss of glutamate decarboxylase mRNA–containing neurons in the rat dentate gyrus following pilocarpine-induced seizures. J Neurosci. 1993;13(10):4470–4485.
114. Okada R, Moshe SL, Albala BJ. Infantile status epilepticus and future seizure susceptibility in the rat. Dev Brain Res. 1984;15:177–183.
115. Oxbury JM, Whitty CW. Causes and consequences of status epilepticus in adults: a study of 86 cases. Brain. 1971;94:733–744.
116. O’Regan ME, Brown JK. Serum neuron specific enolase: a marker for neuronal dysfunction in children with continuous EEG epileptiform activity. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 1998;2(4):193–197.
117. Pascual-Castroviejo I, Pascual-Pascual SI, Pena W, et al. Status epilepticus–induced brain damage and opercular syndrome in childhood. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1999;41(6):420–423.
118. Pitkanen A. Drug-medicated neuroprotection and antiepleptogenesis: animal data. Neurology. 2002;59(9 Suppl 5):S27–S33.
119. Rabinowicz AL, Correale JD, Bracht KA, et al. Neuron-specific enolase is increased after nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 1995;36:475–479.
120. Reynolds EH. Early treatment and prognosis of epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1987;28:97–106.
121. Reynolds EH, Elwes RDC, Shorvon S. Why does epilepsy become intractable? Prevention of chronic epilepsy. Lancet. 1983;2(356):952–954.
122. Roch C, Leroy C, Nehlig A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the study of the lithium–pilocarpine model of temporal lobe epilepsy in adult rats. Epilepsia. 2002;43(4):325–335.
123. Rodin EA. The Prognosis of Patients with Epilepsy. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas; 1968.
124. Roger J, Lob H, Tassinari CA. Status epilepticus. In: Vinken PL, Bruyn CW, eds. The Epilepsies. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Vol. 15. Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier; 1974:145–188.
125. Rowan AJ, Scott DF. Major status epilepticus. Acta Neurol Scand. 1970;46:573–584.
126. Sagar HJ, Oxbury JM. Hippocampal neuron loss in temporal lobe epilepsy: correlation with early childhood convulsions. Ann Neurol. 1987;22:334–340.
127. Salmenpera T, Kalviainen R, Partanen K, et al. MRI volumetry of the hippocampus, amygdala, entorhinal cortex, and perirhinal cortex after status epilepticus. Epilepsy Res. 2000;40(2–3):155–70.
128. Sander JWAS. Some aspects of prognosis in the epilepsies: a review. Epilepsia. 1993;34:1007–1016.
129. Sankar R, Shin DH, Wasterlain CG. Serum neuron-specific enolase is a marker for neuronal damage following status epilepticus in the rat. Epilepsy Res. 1997;28:129–136.
130. Sankar R, Shin DH, Liu H, et al. Patterns of status epilepticus–induced neuronal injury during development and long-term consequences. J Neurosci. 1998;18:8382–8393.
131. Sankar R, Shin D, Mazarati AM, et al. Epileptogenesis after status epilepticus reflects age- and model-dependent plasticity. Ann Neurol. 2000;48(4):580–589.
132. Sankar R, Shin D, Wasterlain CG, et al. Epileptogenesis during development: injury, circuit recruitment, and plasticity. Epilepsia. 2002;43(S2):47–53.
133. Shalev RS, Amir N. Complex partial status epilepticus. Arch Neurol. 1983;40:90–92.
135a. Shinnar S. Prolonged febrile seizures and mesial temporal sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 1998;43:411–412.
134. Shinnar S. Febrile seizures and mesial temporal sclerosis. Epilepsy Currents. 2003;3:115–118.
135. Shinnar S, Berg AT. Does antiepileptic drug therapy alter the prognosis of childhood seizures and prevent the development of chronic epilepsy? Semin Pediatr Neurol. 1994;1:111–117.
136. Shinnar S, Vining EPG, Mellits ED, et al. Discontinuing antiepileptic medication in children with epilepsy after two years without seizures: a prospective study. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:976–980.
137. Shinnar S, Berg AT, Moshe SL, et al. Risk of seizure recurrence following a first unprovoked seizure in childhood: a prospective study. Pediatrics. 1990;85:1076–1085.
139a. Shinnar S, Moshe SL. Age specificity of seizure expression in genetic epilepsies. In: Anderson VE, Hauser WA, Leppik IE, et al., eds. Genetic Strategies in Epilepsy Research. New York: Raven Press; 1991:69–85.
138. Shinnar S, Maytal J, Krasnoff L, et al. Recurrent status epilepticus in children. Ann Neurol. 1992;31:598–604.
139. Shinnar S, Berg AT, Moshe SL, et al. Discontinuing antiepileptic drugs in children with epilepsy: a prospective study. Ann Neurol. 1994;35:534–545.
141a. Shinnar S, Berg AT, Moshe SL, et al. Long term outcomes of children with epilepsy after withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsia. 1994;35(Suppl 8):34.
140. Shinnar S, Berg AT, Moshe SL. The effect of status epilepticus on the long term outcomes of a cohort of children prospectively followed from the time of their first idiopathic unprovoked seizure. Presented at the European Child Neurology Society Meetings, March 1995, Eilat, Israel.
141. Shinnar S, Berg AT, O’Dell C, et al. Predictors of multiple seizures in a cohort of children prospectively followed from the time of their first unprovoked seizure. Ann Neurol. 2000;48:140–147.
143a. Shinnar S, Berg AT, Moshe SL, et al. How long do new-onset seizures in children last? Ann Neurol. 2001;49:659–664.
142. Shinnar S, Lewis DV, Bello JA, et al. T2 signal intensity distribution in hippocampus following febrile status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2005;46(Suppl 8):262.
143. Sillanpaa M. Social functioning and seizure status of young adults with onset of epilepsy in childhood. An epidemiological 20 year follow up study. Acta Neurol Scand. 1983;68(Suppl 96):7–77.
144. Sillanpää M. Remission of seizures and prediction of intractability in long-term followup. Epilepsia. 1993;34:930–936.
145. Sillanpaa M, Shinnar S. Status epilepticus in a population-based cohort with childhood-onset epilepsy in Finland. Ann Neurol. 2002;52:303–310.
146a. Sillanpaa M, Jalava M, Kaleva O, et al. Long-term prognosis of seizures with onset in childhood. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1715–1722.
147. Sloviter RS. Decreased hippocampal inhibition and a selective loss of interneurons in experimental epilepsy. Science. 1987;235(4784):73–76.
148. Sloviter RS. The functional organization of the hippocampal dentate gyrus and its relevance to the pathogenesis of temporal lobe epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 1994;35:640–654.
149. Soffer D, Melamed E, Assaf Y, et al. Hemispheric brain damage in unilateral status epilepticus. Ann Neurol. 1986;20:737–740.
150. Sperber EF, Wurpel JND, Moshe SL. Evidence for the involvement of nigral GABAB receptors in seizures in rat pups. Dev Brain Res. 1989;47:143–146.
151. Sperber EF, Wurpel JND, Zhao DY, et al. Evidence for the involvement of nigral GABAA receptors in seizures of adult rats. Brain Res. 1989;480:378–382.
152. Sperber EF, Haas KZ, Stanton PK, et al. Resistance of the immature hippocampus to seizure–induced synaptic reorganization. Dev Brain Res. 1991;60:88–93.
153. Suchomelova L, Baldwin RA, Kubova H, et al. Treatment of experimental status epilepticus in immature rats: dissociation between anticonvulsant and antiepileptogenic effects. Pediatric Res. 2006;59:237–243.
154. Sutula T, Cascino G, Cavazos J, et al. Mossy fiber synaptic reorganization in the epileptic human temporal lobe. Ann Neurol. 1989;26(3):321–330.
155. Tauck DL, Nadler JV. Evidence of functional mossy fiber sprouting in hippocampal formation kainic acid–treated rats. J Neurosci. 1985;5(4):1016–1022.
156. Temkin NR, Dikmen SS, Wilensky AJ, et al. A randomized double-blind study of phenytoin for the prevention of post-traumatic seizures. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:497–502.
157. Thompson KW, Wasterlain CG. Lithium–pilocarpine status epilepticus in the immature rabbit. Brain Res. 1997;100:1–4.
158. Thompson K, Holm AM, Schousboe A, et al. Hippocampal stimulation produces neuronal death in the immature brain. Neuroscience. 1998;82:337–348.
P.759

159. Tien RD, Felsberg GJ. The hippocampus in status epilepticus: demonstration of signal intensity and morphologic changes with sequential fast spin-echo MR imaging. Radiology. 1995;194:249–256.
160. Tremblay E, Ben-Ari Y. Usefulness of parenteral kainic acid as a model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Rev Electroencephalogr Neurophysiol Clin. 1984;14(3):241–246.
161. Tsuboi T. Epidemiology of febrile and afebrile convulsions in children in Japan. Neurology. 1984;34:175–181.
162. Van Landingham KE, Heinz ER, Cavazos JE, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging evidence of hippocampal injury after prolonged focal febrile convulsions. Ann Neurol. 1998;43:413–416.
163. Verity CM, Golding J. Risk of epilepsy after febrile convulsions: a national cohort study. Br Med J. 1991;303:1373–1376.
164. Verity CM, Ross EM, Golding J. Outcome of childhood status epilepticus and lengthy febrile convulsions: findings of national cohort study. Br Med J. 1993;307:225–228.
165. Viani F, Beghi E, Romeo A, et al. Infantile febrile status epilepticus: risk factors and outcome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1987;29(4):495–501.
166. Vigevano F, Gregory S. Status epilepticus in the pediatric age. In: Dirocco C, Vigevano F, eds. Neurologic Emergencies in Infancy and Childhood. Rome: Ricerca Scientifica; 1987:69–80.
167. Wasterlain C. Effects of neonatal status epilepticus on rat brain development. Neurology. 1976;26:975–86.
168. Wasterlain C, Plum F. Vulnerability of developing rat brain to electroconvulsive seizures. Arch Neurol. 1973;20:38–45.
169. Wasterlain CG, Niquet J, Liu H, et al. Seizure-induced neuronal death in the immature brain. Prog Brain Res. 2002;135:335–353.
169a. Wuarin JP, Dudek FE. Electrographic seizures and new recurrent excitatory circuits in the dentate gyrus of hippocampal slices from kainate-treated epileptic rats. J Neurosci. 1996;16(14):4438–4448.
170. Wyllie E, Chee M, Granstrom ML, et al. Temporal lobe epilepsy in early childhood. Epilepsia. 1993;34:859–868.
171. Yager JY, Cheang M, Seshia SS. Status epilepticus in children. Can J Neurol Sci. 1988;15:402–405.
172. Zimmerman HM. The histopathology of convulsive disorders in children. J Pediatrics. 1938;13:859–890.