1. Bashore TM, et al. American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Standards. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37:2170–2214.
2. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet A, et al. AHA/ACC guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the ACC/AHA Task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1756.
3. Budoff MJ. Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1867–1878.
4. Ropers D, et al. Visualization of coronary artery anomalies and their anatomic course by contrast-enhanced electron beam tomography and three dimensional reconstruction. Am J Cardiol 2001;87:193–197.
4a. Martuscelli E, et al. Evaluation of venous and arterial conduit patency by 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2004;110:3234–38.
5. Davies RF, Goldberg AD, Forman S, et al. Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study two-year follow-up: outcomes of patients randomized to initial strategies of medical therapy versus revascularization. Circulation 1997;95:2037.
6. The TIMI IIIB Investigators. Effects of tissue plasminogen activator and a comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction—results of the TIMI IIIB trial (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia). Circulation 1994;89:1545.
7. Miltenberg AJM, et al. Incidence and follow-up of Braunwald subgroups in unstable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25:1286.
8. Ryan TJ, Anderson JL, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: executive summary. Circulation 1996;94:2341.
9. The TIMI Study Group. Comparison of invasive and conservative strategies after treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1989;320: 618.
10. Spaulding CM, Joly L, Rosenberg A, et al. Immediate coronary angiography in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1629.
11. Panza JA, Laurienzo JM, Curiel RV, et al. Investigation of the mechanism of chest pain in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries using transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:293.
12. Eagle KA, et al. Guidelines for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery (report of the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27:910.
13. Neufeld NH, Blieden LC. Coronary artery disease in children. Prog Cardiol 1975;4:119.
14. Roberts WC. No cardiac catheterization before cardiac valve replacement—a mistake. Am Heart J 1982;103:930.
15. Baim DS, Kuntz RE. Appropriate uses of angiographic follow-up in the evaluation of new technologies for coronary intervention. Circulation 1994;90:2560.
16. Conti CR. Coronary arteriography. Circulation 1977;55:227.
17. Noto TJ, Johnson LW, Krone R, et al. Cardiac catheterization 1990: a report of the registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1991;24:75.
18. Fierens E. Outpatient coronary arteriography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1984;10:27.
19. Maher PR, Young C, Magnusson PT. Efficacy and safety of outpatient cardiac catheterization. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1987;13:304.
20. Lee JC, et al. Feasibility and cost-saving potential of outpatient cardiac catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:378.
21. Talley JD. The cost of performing diagnostic cardiac catheterization. J Intervent Cardiol 1994;7:273.
22. Kohli RS, Vetrovec GW, Lewis SA, Cole S. Study of the performance of 5 French and 7 French catheters in coronary angiography: a functional comparison. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989;18:131.
23. Judkins MP. Selective coronary arteriography, a percutaneous transfemoral technique. Radiology 1967;89:815.
24. Amplatz K, Formanek G, Stanger P, Wilson W. Mechanics of selective coronary artery catheterization via femoral approach. Radiology 1967;89:1040.
25. Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, Keon WJ, Hooper DG, Burton JR. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:616.
26. Eisenhauer TL, Collier E, Cambier PA. Beneficial impact of aorto-coronary graft markers on post-operative angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997;40:249.
27. Kuntz RE, Baim DS. Internal mammary angiography: A review of technical issues and newer methods. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1990;20:10–16.
28. Ayres RW, et al. Transcatheter embolization of an internal mammary artery bypass graft sidebranch causing coronary steal syndrome. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994;31:301.
29. Breal JA, et al. Coronary-subclavian steal—an unusual cause of angina pectoris after successful internal mammary artery bypass grafting. Cathet Cardiovac Diagn 1991;24:274.
30. Bilazarian SD, Shemin RJ, Mills RM. Catheterization of coroanry artery bypass graft from the descending aorta. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1990;21:103.
31. Mills NL, Everson CT. Right gastroepiploic artery: a third arterial conduit for coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;47:706.
32. Suma H, et al. The right gastroepiploic artery graft—clinical and angiographic mid-term results in 200 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;105:615.
33. Tanimoto Y, et al. Angiography of right gastroepiploic artery for coronary artery bypass graft. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989;16:35.
34. Sones FM, Shirey EK. Cine coronary arteriography. Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis 1962;31:735.
35. Schoonmaker FW, King SB. Coronary arteriography by the single catheter percutaneous femoral technique, experience in 6,800 cases. Circulation 1974;50:735.
36. Ovitt T, et al. Electrocardiographic changes in selective coronary arteriography: the importance of ions. Radiology 1972;102:705.
37. Tragardh B, Bove AA, Lynch PR. Mechanism of production of cardiac conduction abnormalities due to coronary arteriography in dogs. Invest Radiol 1976;11:563.
38. Paulin S, Adams DF. Increased ventricular fibrillation during coronary arteriography with a new contrast medium preparation. Radiology 1971;101:45.
39. Lasser EC, et al. Pretreatment with corticosteroids to alleviate reactions to intravenous contrast material. N Engl J Med 1987;317:845.
40. Parfrey PS, et al. Contrast material-induced renal failure in patients with diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, or both. N Engl J Med 1989;329:143.
41. Ritchie JL, et al. Use of nonionic or low osmolar contrast agents in cardiovascular procedures (ACC Position Statement). J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:269.
42. Harvey JR, et al. Use of balloon flotation pacing catheters for prophylactic temporary pacing during diagnostic and therapeutic catheterization procedures. Am J Cardiol 1988;62:941.
43. Dodge JT, Nykiel M, Altmann J, Hobkirk Km, Brennan M, Gibson CM. Coronary artery injection technique: a quantitative in vivo investigation using modern catheters. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998;44:34.
44. Ireland MA, et al. Safety and convenience of a mechanical injector pump for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989;16:199.
45. The BARI protocol. Protocol for the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation. Circulation 1991;84:V1.
46. Angelini P, Villason S, Chan AV, Diez JG. Normal and amnomalous coronary arteries in humans. In: Angelini P, ed. Coronary artery anomalies—a comprehensive approach. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999.
47. Yamanaka O, Hobbs RE. Coronary artery anomalies in 126,595 patients undergoing coronary arteriography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1990;21:28.
48. Serota H, et al. Rapid identification of the course of anomalous coronary arteries in adults—the “dot and eye” method. Am J Cardiol 1990;65:891.
49. Ishikawa T, Brandt PWT. Anomalous origin of the left main coronary artery from the right aortic sinus—angiographic definition of anomalous course. Am J Cardiol 1985;55:770.
50. Shirani J, Roberts WC. Solitary coronary ostium in the aorta in the absence of other major congenital cardiovascular abnormalities. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:137.
51. Cohen DJ, Kim D, Baim DS. Origin of the left main coronary artery from the “non-coronary” sinus of Valsalva. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1991;22:190.
52. Aldridge HE. A decade or more of cranial and caudal angled projections in coronary arteriography—another look. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1984;10:539.
53. Elliott LP, et al. Advantage of the cranial-right anterior oblique view in diagnosing mid left anterior descending and distal right coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1981;48:754.
54. Grover M, Slutsky R, Higgins C, Atwood JE. Terminology and anatomy of angulated coronary arteriography. Clin Cardiol 1984; 7:37.
55. Taylor CR, Wilde P. An easily constructed model of the coronary arteries. Am J Radiol 1984;142:389.
56. Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Pichard AD, et al. Limitations of angiography in the assessment of plaque distribution in coronary artery disease: a systematic study of target lesion eccentricity in 1446 lesions. Circulation 1996;93:924.
57. Randall PA Mach bands in cine coronary arteriography. Radiology 1978;129:65.
58. Arnett EN, et al. Coronary artery narrowing in coronary heart disease: comparison of cineangiographic and necropsy findings. Ann Intern Med 1979;91:350.
59. Dodge JT, Brown BG, Bolson EL, Dodge HT. Lumen diameter of normal human coronary arteries—influence of age, sex, anatomic variation, and left ventricular hypertrophy or dilation. Circulation 1992;86:232.
60. Gould KL, et al. Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis—instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 1974;33:87.
61. Uren NG, et al. Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of coronary artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 1994; 330:1782.
62. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL, et al. TIMI frame count: a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Circulation 1996;93:879.
63. Pijls NHJ, de Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1703.
64. Gibson CM, Safian RD. Limitations of cineangiography—impact of new technologies for image processing and quantitation. Trends Cardiovasc Med 1992;2:156.
65. Stadius ML, Alderman EL. Coronary artery revascularization—critical need for and consequences of objective angiographic assessment of lesion severity. Circulation 1990;82:2231.
66. Scoblionko DP, et al. A new digital electronic caliper for measurement of coronary arterial stenosis—comparison with visual estimates and computer-assisted measurements. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53:689.
67. Gronenshild E, Jannsen J, Tijdent F. CAAS II—a second generation system for off-line and on-line quantitative coronary angiography. Cathetet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994;33:61.
68. Escaned J, Baptiwsta J, DiMario C, et al. Significance of automated stenosis detection during quantitative angiography: insights gained from intracoronary ultrasound imaging. Circulation 1996; 94:966.
69. Folland ED, Vogel RA, Hartigan P, et al. Relation between coronary artery stenosis assessed by visual, caliper, and computer methods and exercise capacity in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease. Circulation 1994;89:2005.
70. Danchin N, Foley D, Serruys PW. Visual versus quantitative assessment of the severity of coronary artery stenoses—can the angiographer’s eye be reeducated? Am Heart J 1993;126:594.
71. Ambrose JA, Hjemdahl-Monsen CE. Angiographic anatomy and mechanisms of myocardial ischemia in unstable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;9:1397.
72. Dangas G, Mehran R, Wallenstein S, et al. Correlation of angiographic morphology and clinical presentation in unstable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:519.
73. Mintz GS, Pichard AD, Popma JJ, et al. Determinants and correlates of lesion calcium in coronary artery disease: a clinical, angiographic and intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:268.
74. Waxman S, Sassower MA, Mittleman MA, et al. Angioscopic predictors of early adverse outcome after coronary angioplasty in patients with unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Circulation 1996;93:2106.
75. Fishbein MC, Siegel RJ. How big are coronary atherosclerotic plaques that rupture? Circulation 1996;94:2662.
76. Levin DC. Pathways and functional significance of the coronary collateral circulation. Circulation 1974;50:831.
77. Piek JJ, van Liebergen RAM, Koch KT, Peters TJG, David GK. Clinical, angiographic and hemodynamic predictors of recruitable collateral flow during balloon angioplasty of coronary occlusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:275.
78. Seiler C, Fleisch M, Garachemani A, Meier B. Coronary collateral quantitation in patients with coronary artery disease using intravascular flow velocity or pressure measurements. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:1272.
79. Levin DC, Fellows KE, Abrams HL. Hemodynamically significant primary anomalies of the coronary arteries. Angiographic aspects. Circulation 1978;58:25.
80. Click RL, et al. Anomalous coronary arteries: location, degree of atherosclerosis and effect on survival—a report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;13:531.
81. Liberthson RR. Sudden death from cardiac causes in children and young adults. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1039.
82. Doorey AJ, et al. Six-month success of intracoronary stenting for anomalous coronary arteries associated with myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol 1000;86:580–582.
83. Newburger JW, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and long-term management of Kawasaki Disease. Circulation 2004;110: 2747–71.
84. Papadakis MC, et al. Frequency of coronary artery ectasia in patients undergoing surgery for ascending aprtic aneurysms. Am J Cardiol 2004;94:1433–35.
85. Ge J, Erbel R, Rupprecht HJ, et al. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound and angiography in the assesssment of myocardial bridging. Circulation 1994;89:1725.
86. Klues HG, Schwarz ER, vom Dahl J, et al. Disturbed intracoronary hemodynamics in myocardial bridging: early normalization by intracoronary stent placement. Circulation 1997; 96:2905.
87. Dorros G, Thota V, Ramireddy K, Joseph G. Catheter-based techniques for closure of coronary fistulae. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1999;46:143.
88. Sherwood MC, Rockenmacher S, Colan SD, Geva T. Prognostic significance of clinically silent coronary artery fistulas. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:407.
89. Yetman AT, McCrindle BW, MacDonald C, Freedom RM, Gow R. Myocardial bridging in children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy—a risk factor for sudden death. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:1201.
90. Jennette JC, Falk RJ. Small-vessel vasculitits. N Engl J Med 1997; 337:1512.
91. Weis M, von Scheidt W. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a review. Circulation 1997;96:2069.
92. Om A, Ellaham S, Vetrovec GW. Radiation-induced coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 1992;124:1598.
93. Cohen S. Motor disorders of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 1979; 301:183.
94. Maseri A, Chierchia S. Coronary artery spasm: demonstration, definition, diagnosis, and consequences. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1982;25:169.
95. Mark DB, et al. Clinical characteristics and long-term survival of patients with variant angina. Circulation 1984;69:880.
96. Waters DD, Theroux P, Szlachcic J, Dauwe F. Provocative testing with ergonovine to assess the efficacy of treatment with nifedipine, diltiazem and verapamil in variant angina. Am J Cardiol 1981;48:123.
97. Heupler FA, et al. Ergonovine maleate provocative test for coronary arterial spasm. Am J Cardiol 1978;41:631.
98. Sueda S, Kohno H, Fukuda H, et al. Frequency of provoked coronary spasms in patients undergoing coronary arteriography using a spasm provocation test via intracoronary administration of ergonovine. Angiology 2004;55:403–411.
99. Raizner AE, et al. Provocation of coronary artery spasm by the cold pressor test. Circulation 1980;62:925.
99. Sueda S, Kohno H, Fukuda H, et al. Induction of coronary artery spasm by two pharmacological agents: comparison between intracoronary injection of acetylcholine and ergonovine. Coron Artery Dis 2003;14:451–457.
100. Nakao K, Ohgushi M, Yoshimura M, et al. Hyperventilation as a specific test for diagnosis of coronary artery spasm. Am J Cardiol 1997;80:545.
101. Harding MB, Leithe ME, Mark DB, et al. Ergonovine maleate testing during cardiac catheterization—a 10 year perspective in 3,447 patients without significant coronary artery disease or Prinzmetal’s variant angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:107.
102. Cipriano PR, et al. The effects of ergonovine maleate on coronary arterial size. Circulation 1979;59:82.
103. Friedman AC, Spindola-Franco H, Nivatpumin T. Coronary spasm: Prinzmetal’s variant angina vs. catheter-induced spasm; refractory spasm vs. fixed stenosis. Am J Radiol 1979;132:897.
104. Hays JT, Stein B, Raizner AE. The crumpled coronary artery—an enigma of arteriopathic pseudopathology and its potential for misinterpretation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994;31:293.
105. Cannon RO III, Watson RM, Rosing DR, Epstein SE. Angina caused by reduced vasodilator reserve of the small coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983;1:1359–1373.
106. Cannon RO III, et al. Left ventricular dysfunction in patients with angina pectoris, normal epicardial coronary arteries, and abnormal vasodilator reserve. Circulation 1985;72:218–226.
107. Kurisu S, Sato H, Kawagoe T, et al. Tako-tsubo-like left ventricular dysfunction with ST-segment elevation: a novel cardiac syndrome mimicking acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2002;143:448–455.
108. Sun H, Mohri M, Shimokawa H, et al. Coronary microvascular spasm causes myocardial ischemia in patients with vasospastic angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:847–851.