Practical Orthopaedic Sports Medicine & Arthroscopy
1st Edition

32
Sports Related Bony Lesions of the Hip: Fractures, Stress Fractures, Avulsion, AVN, Dislocation, and Subluxation
Carlos A.M. Higuera MD
Joshua M. Polster MD
Wael K. Barsoum MD
Viktor E. Krebs MD
Sports related hip injuries are relatively uncommon, occurring in only 2% to 5% of athletes (1). These injuries are most common in sports and activities that require rapid acceleration-deceleration, side-to-side movement, jumping, kicking, quick directional changes, repetitive twisting, endurance running, and cyclical impact loading. There have been reports in the literature describing hip injuries in football, basketball, rugby, soccer, hockey, skiing, martial arts, running, dance, and track and field (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13). Contact sports have the most highly reported incidence of severe skeletal injury to the hip region (4,8,10). In the acute injury the diagnosis can be relatively straightforward, but in the more chronic and subtle injuries the diagnosis can remain undefined in approximately 30% of cases. This difficulty arises from the complex anatomy of the hip joint, its deep anatomic location, and a high frequency of coexisting injuries that can obscure a hip problem (3). The differential diagnosis for hip and groin pain is extensive (Table 32-1), and should be defined by the clinical setting, as most of the etiologies have subtle or no radiographic evidence of abnormality.
A comprehensive history is critical, and in athletes, the distinction between an injury, event, or overuse is important. Most bony lesions of the hip joint fall into the emergent category, and should be approached with a high index of suspicion. Initially, considering the patient’s diagnosis from deep to superficial is an effective strategy, as critical problems that require prompt treatment usually involve the axial skeleton. The most emergent orthopaedic and nonorthopaedic causes of hip and groin pain should be the focus of the initial assessment (Table 32-2), as failure to diagnose these conditions
P.548

can result in a potentially devastating situation for the patient/athlete.
TABLE 32-1 Differential Diagnosis of Hip and Groin Pain in Athletes
Infection
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE)
Femoral neck fracture
Acetabular labral tears
Avascular necrosis (AVN)
Osteoarthritis
Iliopsoas abscess
Pelvic inflammatory disease
Loose bodies
Synovitis (transient)
Stress fracture
Hip subluxation
Appendicitis
Herniated lumbar disk
Adductor strain
Athletic pubalgia
Nerve entrapments
Piriformis syndrome
Snapping hip
Iliopsoas tendonitis
Iliotibial band syndrome
Osteitis pubis/Gracilis syndrome
Contusion
Avulsion fracture
“Sports hernia”
Transient osteoporosis
TABLE 32-2 Emergent Causes of Hip and Groin Pain
Orthopaedic Nonorthopaedic
Infection Appendicitis
SCFE Abscess
Legg-Calve-Perthes - Retroperitoneal
Dislocation/Subluxation - Iliopsoas
AVN Bowel obstruction
Femoral neck fracture/ Carcinoma
Stress fracture -Testicular
Tumors -Rectal
SCFE, slipped capital femoral epiphysis; AVN, Avascular Necrosis.
The age of the athlete should be considered, primarily in the assessment of hip pain, as the nature of the injuries, tendencies, and pathologies differ with the age. The growth of organized sports and practice schedules for children has increased the number of injuries seen by physicians treating the pediatric age group. Fortunately these young athletes are most likely to sustain only musculotendinous sprains and contusions in the hip and groin region. Skeletal injuries are less frequent in this population, and when present are typically apophyseal avulsions and stress fractures that rarely require treatment beyond conservative rest, icing, anti-inflammatory medications, and physical therapy (14). In the adolescent and young adult athlete, more significant sports related hip injuries are being reported (14,15). This trend may be related to a societal impetus for progressive levels of competition, sport specialization, and unremitting practice that exceeds the repair and regenerative capabilities of the immature and growing musculoskeletal system. Sports injuries to the hip and groin region have been noted in 5% to 9% of high school athletes, a higher percentage than that of the overall population of athletes (9). Another level and type of sports related injury has also emerged in adults and mature athletes, and is associated with the effects of tissue aging, systemic disease, and joint degeneration (3,14).
The goal in all age groups of athletes with hip related injuries is to first understand the types of injuries that occur, make the diagnosis, and rapidly treat the problem so the participants may return to their sport with a pain-free hip. Another objective is to identify any underlying bony abnormalities that increase the susceptibility to injury, and counsel them to modify activities and sport to avoid irreparable damage, when subjected to the high demands and hip joint stresses.
Ultimately, the patient and surgeon share a common goal: a painless hip that is strong enough and mobile enough to allow normal function and activity. The use of thorough history and comprehensive physical exam when evaluating hip injuries will establish the working foundation for successful and safe sports participation.
Basic Science
Hip Joint Anatomy and the Biology of Development
The hip joint is classified as an enarthrosis, or ball and socket joint. The slightly incongruous articulation occurs between the acetabulum, which is less than a hemisphere, and the femoral head, which is normally about two-thirds of a sphere. It is a complex joint and allows rotational movement in three anatomic planes: sagittal, coronal, and transverse. The capsule, which is reinforced by the iliofemoral, pubofemoral, and ischiofemoral ligaments, contains and stabilizes the joint, protecting it from the extremes of motion. The capsule tightens in extension, providing maximum passive stability, and loosens in flexion. In flexion, the 27 separate musculotendinous units that cross the hip joint work both individually and in groups to provide positional dynamic stability. These muscles are unique in their large volume and length, spanning the hip and knee joint both anteriorly and posteriorly, and allowing the hip joint to generate large forces through an extremely broad range of motion between 240 to 300 degrees (Table 32-3).
P.549

Table 32-3 Normal Hip Joint Range of Motion
Flexion - 130 degrees
Extension - 15 to 30 degrees
Abduction - 40 to 60 degrees (increased in flexion)
Adduction - 30 degrees
Internal Rotation - 70 degrees (increased in extension)
External Rotation - 90 degrees (increased in extension)
Total Motion 240 to 300 degrees
Understanding the normal and abnormal growth and development of the bony hip joint in relation to its muscular, ligamentous, and capsular support is paramount in comprehending the injuries and pathologic conditions that can affect it. Both the acetabulum and proximal femur develop from multiple primary ossification centers, and their final shape is influenced by a dynamic interaction between the developing bone, joint position, and its response to internally and externally transmitted forces (15,16). The physeal growth sections of the iliac, pubic, and ischial portions of the acetabulum join centrally through a common epiphysis, the triradiate cartilage. This common epiphysis is responsible for relatively spherical expansion of the acetabulum during growth, and simultaneously accommodates uninterrupted congruency with the femoral head as it enlarges. In addition to growth of the head, complex structural dynamics occur during development of the proximal femur, which includes elongation and anteversion of the femoral neck, differentiation of the extra-capsular greater and lesser trochanteric apophyses, and transition of the neck-shaft angle (17). Hip joint structural maturation occurs from before birth to approximately age 16 to 18, when the majority of the physeal growth plates have closed. Critical time frames include; formation of acetabular morphology by age 8 to 9, structural quiescence from 9 to 12, rapid growth of the capital femoral epiphysis from age 13 to 15, and closure of the triradiate cartilage and femoral epiphysis by age 16 (16,18). These time frames are important, as they correspond to the types of hip injuries that can occur in the growing athlete.
Applied Biomechanics
The normal function of the hip joint is requisite for successful sports performance, and is based on the anatomic bony architecture that provides the foundation for movement and inherent mechanical stability. The prime function of the hip joint is to act as a fulcrum to provide a mechanical advantage to the muscles moving the leg, stabilizing the pelvis, and holding the body upright. The biomechanical study of hip kinematics and kinetics describes this relationship and defines how the joint interacts with the surrounding soft tissues and environment to generate motion and accommodate the static and dynamic forces that are generated and absorbed. The explanation of joint reactive forces and gait analysis is beyond the scope of this chapter, but should be reviewed by the physician evaluating and treating hip injuries and disorders. Awareness of the normal or “ideal” biomechanical configuration can be helpful in assessing radiographs, providing clues to the mechanism of injury, making a difficult diagnosis, and planning surgical correction.
Deviations in the bony anatomy of the hip can result in biomechanical alterations that amplify force transmission, affect the strength and moment-generating capacity of the muscles, and can increase susceptibility to injury and early degeneration (19). Developmental dysphasia of the hip (DDH) is the most frequently encountered example, and describes a variety of structural problems and malformations that can also result in increased susceptibility to instability, subluxation, and/or dislocation of the joint (20). In the athletic population, the less severely affected joints are typically diagnosed after an injury, and should be evaluated for variations in acetabular position/joint center location, femoral neck anteversion angle, head-neck angle, neck length, and resultant leg length discrepancy.
Clinical Evaluation of Bony Hip Lesions
History
The history and chief complaint are critical in the initial assessment of an athlete with a hip injury, and the information gathered allows the physician to formulate a provisional diagnosis, focus the physical exam, and direct the most appropriate diagnostic testing. Considering the entire patient without isolating the hip injury is of paramount importance. Other historical information that is necessary includes a general medical history, account of previously treated musculoskeletal conditions, family history, and a social history. Autonomous treatments, modalities, compensations, and responses should also be noted. For some bony hip lesions the consequences of a delayed diagnosis and treatment can be significant, and may be the difference between life-long disability and a normally functioning joint.
Groin and/or thigh pain are a typical consequence of hip joint capsule or sensorial inflammation. The possibility of infection should always be considered in a patient with the acute onset of groin and thigh pain, especially when it is constant and unremitting accompanied by fevers, chills, and malaise. Bony hip lesions can present similarly with an acute limp or inability to bear weight, but also can result in more chronic situations with vague nonlocalized pain and/or limited motion, which impairs functional ability. The pain characteristics should be investigated, noting the location, severity, and frequency. A team physician is in a unique position to do this because in many cases they are present to witness the incident and/or receive the patient exiting the field of play. This real-time history and exposure can make the diagnosis straightforward. In situations where the injury is not witnessed, the patient’s account and description of the events surrounding the problem become more important.
P.550

Aspects of the history in this athletic population that can influence a prompt diagnosis and expedient treatment include: a) the age of the patient, b) injury acuity, c) description and mechanism of the injury event, and d) potential for overuse. These historical aspects will be detailed for each of the bony hip lesions discussed in this chapter.
Physical Exam
The physical examination begins the moment a physician encounters the injured athlete, on the field or in the office. The exam differs for the acute and more chronic injury, and should be guided by the patient’s level of pain and guarding. Active and passive motion is significant in this triaxial joint, varies considerably between individuals, and should be measured side to side for relative equivalence. In the acute hip injury, when motion is restricted, palpation of the bony and soft tissue landmarks for pain and asymmetry is most important. Fractures and dislocations result in abnormalities that should be quickly recognized, and should increase the level of urgency to acquire appropriate diagnostic tests and prepare for expedient treatment. In the patient with a subacute or chronic hip problem, the exam follows basic principles. A general musculoskeletal exam including an assessment of gait, posture, physical maturity, muscular symmetry, and body habitus should be done before focusing on the injured hip. Specific exam maneuvers and findings will be presented in this chapter as they relate to the bony lesions and injuries presented.
Imaging
Plain radiographs of the hip and pelvis remain the standard for initial evaluation of sports injuries. Routine radiographic evaluation of a painful hip joint should include the anteroposterior (AP) view of the pelvis and dedicated AP and frog lateral views of the symptomatic hip (21). The information derived either establishes a diagnosis of the primary disorder or screens for other differential pathology, directing acquisition of advanced imaging techniques. In the acute injury setting detection of fracture is paramount, and involves systematic inspection of bony landmarks; iliopubic line–anterior column, ilioischial line–posterior column, obturator rings, anterior acetabular rim, posterior acetabular rim, and medial acetabular wall (radiographic tear drop). Slight variation and malalignment should be scrutinized for symmetry, as they may represent fractures that are not immediately obvious. When clinical presentation does not coincide with the radiographic findings, advanced studies should be considered.
Advanced diagnostic imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) scans, and radionuclide scans are useful adjuncts important when occult injuries and pathology warrant further assessment. MRI imaging with or without intra-articular contrast has been considered the second line of evaluation by many because of its high sensitivity and specificity for the wide range of bony, intra-articular, and soft tissue problems that can occur in the hip region (21,22,23). In situations where no radiographic abnormalities are visible, MRI imaging has become an indispensable technique with the capability to differentiate the most frequent diagnoses responsible for the painful hip.
Hip Fractures
Hip fractures, and fracture-dislocations are extremely uncommon in sports. When they do occur, they are associated with direct trauma encountered during contact and high-speed sports such as football, rugby, snow/cross-country skiing, cycling, and all forms of motor sports/racing (3). The injury is more common in the mature athlete, and the incidence may be directly related to increased age, and osteopenic bones. These high-energy and often violent injuries have the potential to damage the blood supply to the proximal femur and femoral head, and even when treated appropriately have a possible higher risk for a compromised long-term prognosis and poor outcome (24,25). Stress and avulsion hip fractures are fortunately the most common type encountered in sports, and occur in a younger age group, and carry a much better prognosis (14).
The hip fractures may be divided into the following categories, based on the anatomical configuration of the joint: femoral head fractures, femoral neck fractures, intertrochanteric hip fractures, subtrochanteric fractures, and acetabular fractures. The majority of reported cases refer only to fractures of the femoral neck or proximal portion of the femoral shaft (26). Regardless of the configuration and etiology, traumatic displaced and nondisplaced fractures of the hip are best treated surgically with open reduction and internal fixation (27). In athletes, these are season-ending injuries, with the potential to be career ending and disabling.
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation
Patients with suspected hip fractures should always go through the trauma initial assessment (Advance Trauma Life Support). Special attention should be placed on the ipsilateral upper extremity to rule out possible associated injuries. At the same time, careful evaluation of the lower extremity should be performed to identify other injuries. A neurovascular assessment needs to be done as soon as possible. When a life-threatening condition is identified, it should be managed first. The patient should be transported as soon as possible to a facility that can perform definitive evaluation and treatment.
During the physical exam, pain and deformity around the hip joint are the hallmarks for a fracture, which usually present as shortening with deformation in flexion and rotation, depending on the fracture pattern. The athlete is disabled with severe groin pain and an inability to bear weight on the affected limb. When a hip fracture is suspected, AP and lateral radiographs should be performed and will usually reveal the fracture pattern. However, occult or stress fractures of
P.551

the femoral neck may require additional imaging to establish the diagnosis. MRI is the most commonly used diagnostic test after radiographs, and helps to identify the location and verticality of the fracture (23,28). When the hip pain has been present for several days, a bone scan may be useful to identify stress fractures and pathologic fractures associated with tumors and/or infections.
Treatment
Selection of the appropriate treatment is based on the fracture pattern, patient age, associated injuries, and medical comorbidities.
Femoral head fractures should undergo emergent closed reduction with a posterior CT scan evaluation to determine displacement (25). These fractures are treated based on fragment location, size, displacement, and stability. When the displacement is minimal, the fracture can be treated nonsurgically with limitation of weight-bearing and daily activities, if the patient is reliable. If significant displacement is present, open reduction and internal fixation should be performed expediently within 6 hours of the injury, with titanium screws. When associated with acetabular fractures, usually located on the posterior wall, a concomitant internal fixation of the acetabulum is performed.
Femoral neck fractures are treated based on the Garden classification (29), as nondisplaced (stage I and II) and displaced (stage III and IV), because prognosis is also grouped in this manner. The Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification is also broadly used. Nondisplaced fractures are treated with internal fixation using multiple parallel cannulated cancellous screws, near the cortex of the femoral neck avoiding varus, shortening and external rotation displacement. Nonsurgical treatment is reserved for very friable patients. Displaced fractures should be treated emergently to avoid necrosis of the femoral head (10,24,25). If closed reduction is adequate, internal fixation should be performed based on the verticality pattern. If closed reduction cannot be performed, open reduction is indicated. Radiographic examination of the contralateral hip may guide the anatomical angle orientation of the femoral neck. In older patients, a hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty are recommended depending upon the degree of degenerative arthritis in the acetabulum (30).
The equivalent of the femoral neck fracture in the adolescent athlete is a slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). These injuries can occur up until the growth plates are closed, and are most commonly seen in 11 to 14 year old males who are overweight and growing rapidly (15,31). SCFE commonly presents as a limp, groin pain, limited passive internal rotation of the hip, and/or isolated medial knee pain. The onset can be associated with acute trauma or chronic overuse, but does not require these mechanisms for establishment of the diagnosis. In either acute or chronic situations, the diagnosis is critical, and should top the differential list in this age group. If the diagnosis is suspected the athlete should be immediately placed on crutches nonweight bearing, sent for bilateral hip radiographs, and referred to an orthopaedic surgeon. The standard treatment for these lesions is surgical pinning in situ for stabilization. Up to 40% of cases have been reported bilaterally, and long-term monitoring of both hips is indicated in any patient with a confirmed diagnosis (15,31). Delayed treatment may result in slip progression, and increases the incidence of subsequent avascular necrosis (AVN).
Intertrochanteric hip fractures are described and treated based on the number of fragments and stability pattern. The correct device selection and adequate reduction are the most important variables in the management of this type of fracture. A sliding hip screw is the most commonly used device for this treatment, except in the case of reverse obliquity pattern, in which a 95 degree angle device such as dynamic condylar screw or a condylar blade plate is recommended (32). Another option is the use of intramedullary devices (33). Prosthetic replacement for salvage of failed internal fixation has shown excellent results (34). This type of treatment for acute fractures should be reserved for pathologic fractures, poor bone stock limiting internal fixation, and contralateral severe joint degeneration/fracture that may preclude rehabilitation (34).
When fractures are in the area below the lesser trochanter to the proximal aspect of the femoral isthmus, these are considered as subtrochanteric fractures. Different classifications are based on the location relative to the lesser trochanter and the presence of the fracture line extension into the piriformis fossa. Different fixation devices have been described, including the sliding hip screw, dynamic condylar screw, angled blade plate for proximal fractures, and interlocking cephalomedullary nailing for distal fractures (35). In case of comminution, these areas should be bridged and stable proximal and distal fixation should be obtained maintaining correct length, alignment and rotation using plating techniques. However, intramedullary nailing is the most commonly used method for fixation in this type of fractures (36).
In the pediatric population, acute traumatic hip fractures are approached in a different manner, frequently using the Delbet’s classification (37) that includes:
  • Transepiphyseal fractures of the femoral head
  • Transcervical fractures
  • Cervicotrochanteric fractures
  • Intertrochanteric fractures
In transepiphyseal fractures the results are generally poor (38). Only closed reduction and application of spica cast, as well as fixation with pins across the growth plate following reduction have been described (37). For minimally displaced transcervical fractures, treatment with closed reduction and internal fixation with small-diameter, smooth pins, in addition to spica cast has been recommended (37). Cervico trochanteric fractures in children are similar to that of adults, and are treated in the same fashion as femoral neck fractures in adults. The surgeon should be cautious, when applying the fixation devices since the cancellous trabeculae
P.552

on the pediatric neck are different from those in the adult. The cancellous trabeculae are not oriented along the lines of stress, which may cause distraction during fixation (39). Intertrochanteric fractures are easier to treat due to a more stable pattern, and can be treated with a spica cast (39).
Complications
Nonunion rates of femoral neck fractures are reported as <10%. Rates of posttraumatic osteonecrosis are 10% for nondisplaced fractures and 25% for displaced fractures (25).
Special consideration should be taken in young athletes due to the bone growth pattern that may be affected by the configuration of the hip fracture. Any interruption of the vascular supply may injure the growth plate at the proximal femur, which may cause premature closure of the physis resulting in varus deformity of the femoral head and neck. Additionally, in trans epiphyseal fractures in children, some series described rates of AVN close to 100%. In transcervical fractures, the rates are 15% to 50% depending upon the amount of displacement. In cervico trochanteric fractures the rates of AVN are between 30% to 40% (37).
Hip Stress Fractures
Stress fractures are most common in the lower extremities in the athletes and are seen at all levels of training and competition. There is a predilection for females, which may be mediated by hormonal mechanisms (11,40). These types of fractures are typically overuse and overload injuries sustained during endurance running, jumping, and dance (41). The mechanism involves microfractures sustained during repetitive and cyclical impact loading that overwhelm the body and bone’s ability to remodel and heal. Once a certain threshold is past, the fractures become symptomatic. Structural and chemical metabolic imbalances can alter this threshold. These fractures can occur in normal bone exposed to persistent abnormal stress, or in abnormal bone exposed to normal stress (12,31). Anything that interferes with bone remodeling, i.e., medications, nutritional deficiencies, and hormonal disturbances, can predispose an athlete to stress fractures under normal conditions. Altered bony anatomy and pathology can also be responsible and should not be overlooked (42,43).
In the hip, stress fractures can occur on both the femoral and pelvic sides of the joint. On the pelvic side, fractures occur in the medial wall and roof of the acetabulum, and in the pubic rami. These types of stress fractures should alert the physician to metabolic or structural abnormalities, as most occur due to bone insufficiency. These fractures are uncommon in young athletes, and can usually be treated symptomatically, when identified. On the femoral side, stress fractures can occur in the femoral head and neck, and depending on the configuration may have much more significant consequences, when diagnosis and treatment is delayed (5,44).
The history and clinical presentation for all stress fractures in the hip region involve the vague onset of groin and anterior thigh pain that is initially bothersome and later becomes unremitting and activity limiting. There is usually no history of trauma. Important antecedent events that should raise the level of suspicion for stress fracture include a recent increase or change in a training or practice program, footwear or training surface, and episodes of extreme muscle fatigue (14,45). When the pubic rami are affected, patients are tender to direct palpation. The physical examination is relatively nonspecific when the proximal femur and acetabulum are involved, and the only finding may be slight limitation of internal rotation in flexion. These findings can occur in numerous less consequential injuries, so frequent consecutive exams should be performed if a stress fracture is suspected. Single leg hopping is a provocative maneuver that can also help identify the problem, but it is should be done cautiously. Further diagnostic testing should be considered if the pain pattern persists after a 3 to 4 week period of relative rest.
Plain radiographs should be obtained in all patients with unremitting hip pain, despite the fact that they will likely be normal in patients with stress fractures two to four weeks after the onset of symptoms (7). The plain radiographs should be evaluated for unsuspected abnormalities, and are also useful later in the treatment process to assess healing. When plain radiographs are normal and the index of suspicion remains high for pathology because of continued or increased symptoms, advanced imaging is indicated. There is controversy as to the best modality for evaluation bone scintigraphy or MRI. Both tests have a sensitivity approaching 100% for stress fracture, but bone-scan lacks specificity and when positive is typically followed by an MRI. MRI including the proximal femur and pelvis has become our initial preference after plain films in the athlete, because the scans are readily available, identify stress fractures, localize and quantify the lesions, define the peri-articular soft-tissue, and can identify other pathology.
Femoral neck stress fractures carry the most significant consequences when diagnosis and treatment are delayed. They are more common in the skeletally mature athlete, but do occur in younger patients (7). The significance of the fracture depends on its location and extent, and if it is associated with any cortical irregularity or displacement. If displacement is present, treatment is expedient surgical reduction and fixation with cannulated titanium screws. Nondisplaced femoral neck stress fractures are assessed and treated based on a classification that combines location and biomechanical stability, lateral “tension-side” or medial “compression-side” fractures. Lateral tension-side fractures are inherently unstable, and are best treated with operative fixation (44). Compression-side fractures are biomechanically stable (Fig 32-1), and have been treated successfully with rest, limited weight bearing, and activity restriction in dependable patients (44). Unfortunately, these stable
P.553

fractures can go on to nonunion, and additional classification, based on radiographic/MRI findings, is recommended. Compression-side fractures with a visible fatigue line ≥50% of the width of the femoral neck should be treated operatively with screws. Those being treated nonoperatively should be followed with bi-weekly serial radiographs, and if delayed healing or fracture progression is noted, internal fixation is recommended (44).
Fig 32-1. A medial “compression-side” fracture of the right femoral neck. AP radiograph of the proximal femur demonstrates a subtle area of trabecular condensation in the medial femoral neck consistent with stress fracture just above the lesser trochanter (A). T1-weighted coronal MR image depicts a zone of decreased signal intensity perpendicular to the cortex in the medial femoral neck (B). A coronal STIR image (C) highlights the stress fracture as a zone of marked brightening/edema (arrow) on the compression side of the femoral neck.
Fatigue fractures of the subchondral femoral head have also been reported, and are important to consider and recognize because it can be misdiagnosed as AVN, and treated inappropriately (12). This is a rare condition in athletes, and is more likely to occur in individuals with poor bone quality. In the healthy athlete with no risk factors for AVN, the hip MRI should be evaluated closely by a musculoskeletal radiologist alerted to the possible diagnosis. In a hip with a subchondral fatigue fracture, the signal changes and bone marrow edema patterns differ. In cases without evidence for collapse, successful treatment involves limited weight-bearing and rest. When collapse is evident, bone grafting has been successful (12).
The complications associated with delayed diagnosis of hip joint related stress fractures can be devastating and extremely disabling for a healthy, athletic individual. Elite athletes seldom return to their prior level of function or sport (5). When these lesions displace, the outcome has been globally dismal, and reported complications associated with surgical fixation include infection, malalignment, leg-length discrepancy, nonunion, and AVN (44). It is therefore imperative that the physician caring for the athlete develops a high index of suspicion for hip stress fractures, understands the natural history of the process, and becomes comfortable either fully assessing and treating the problem or expediently referring the patient. In all cases, treatment should include careful evaluation and modification of the anatomic, metabolic, and environmental factors that contributed to the injury.
Avulsion Fractures
Avulsion fractures are the most common type of fracture encountered by the sports practitioner, especially in young male athletes (3). This type of fractures is seen more often in football and soccer players, sprinters, and jumpers (14). When the skeletal system is immature, a sudden violent muscular contraction or an excessive amount of sustained muscle action across an open apophysis may cause an avulsion fracture. Separation occurs in the cartilaginous area between the apophysis and the bone. Occasionally, they may be the result of chronic overuse apophysitis, similar to the Osgood-Schlatter’s syndrome in the knee. Different types of avulsion fractures around the hip joint have been described, and the most common are avulsion of the lesser trochanter, avulsion of the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS), and ischial apophysis.
Clinical Evaluation
Generally, when the avulsion fracture is in the pelvis, there is localized pain and edema after an extreme effort. Often,
P.554

there is no history of external trauma. They are often mistaken for muscle or tendon injuries. Plain radiographs (AP pelvis, AP and lateral of the compromised hip) are useful to confirm diagnosis. When the suspected fracture is present in children, it is necessary to obtain contralateral side radiographs for comparison and evaluation of the skeletal maturity. If the fracture is not shown clearly in the radiographs, but suspicion is high, then further imaging should be obtained. A computer tomography is helpful when the amount of displacement is minimal (23).
Avulsion of the Lesser Trochanter
Approximately 85% of the avulsion fractures of the lesser trochanter occur in patients under 20 years of age (46). This injury results from a sudden contracture of the iliopsoas muscle and presents with sudden onset of severe antero-medial hip pain mainly while running (47). At the physical exam, resisted hip flexion exacerbates the pain. Most of the time, plain radiographs reveal the avulsed fragment of the lesser trochanter (47).
Avulsion of the Anterior Superior Iliac Spine
This injury occurs when there is an over pull of the sartorius muscle during activities that involve extension of the hip and flexion of the knee, like running and jumping (48). The patient presents with localized pain, tenderness exacerbated by flexion or abduction and mild edema. The diagnosis is confirmed with plain radiographs. Sometimes, the fascia lata and the inguinal ligament prevent significant displacement, and a CT scan may be helpful to confirm the diagnosis.
Avulsion of the Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine
This is less common than the ASIS due to earlier ossification and less exposure to stress during running. This type of fracture occurs with vigorous contraction of the straight head of the rectus femoris muscle, a muscle action that occurs with distance ball kicking seen in soccer or football (14). In the course of physical exam, active flexion of the hip reproduces the pain. Plain radiographs show distal displacement of a fragment of the AIIS.
Avulsion of the Ischial Apophysis
This type of fracture may happen in patients up to age 25, when the ischial apophysis unites with the bony skeleton, one of the last to fuse (48). Avulsion is caused by maximum hamstring contraction with the pelvis fixed in flexion and the knee in extension (47). This mechanism of injury may be seen in gymnastics and hurdling. The patient usually presents with sudden onset of pain at the ischial tuberosity with tenderness to palpation, discomfort when sitting and occasionally an antalgic gait. Physical exam reveals pain when the knee is extended and the hip is flexed, the classic hamstring stretch position. Plain radiographs show a displaced fragment of the ischial tuberosity (Fig 32-2). Displacement of this fragment is rarely significant because of the robust sacrotuberous ligament.
Fig 32-2. AP radiograph of the pelvis demonstrates an acute displaced avulsion fracture of the right ischial tuberosity (arrow) in a skeletally immature female athlete.
Treatment
The treatment of avulsion fractures depends on the type of fracture and amount of displacement. Most avulsion fractures of the pelvis and hip can be treated nonoperatively, with initial bed rest, ice, and analgesics (47,49,50,51). Open reduction and internal fixation have been advocated by some when the displacement is significant enough to create a functional disability in competitive athletes (50). The implementation of a rehabilitation program is key in the treatment of these fractures, with increased excursion an early goal can be achieved through gentle active and passive range of motion exercises (49). Progressive resistance exercise is started when 75% of the range of motion is achieved. Once the involved muscles have regained 50% of their anticipated strength the resistance exercise can be stopped. Before returning to competitive sports integration of muscle function should be attained through stretching and strengthening exercises combined with pattern motions (49).
Complications
After conservative treatment, the development of hypertrophic callus has been described (14). Additionally, nonunion and chronic pain may cause functional disability and may require surgical intervention remote to the injury (14).
Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head
AVN or osteonecrosis of the femoral head as a direct result of sports participation or training without significant prior
P.555

injury has not been described. Often the diagnosis is made incidentally, when an athlete is being evaluated for another problem, because more than one-third of the cases are idiopathic. AVN is more common in males, typically affects patients in their 30s and 40s, and is bilateral in 50% of the cases (52). It usually presents with pain in the groin region, exacerbated with activity and ambulation, but may also be asymptomatic in early stages. It should be suspected in athletes with recurrent groin pain, especially in individuals with risk factors such as steroid use, smoking, alcohol abuse, and hypercoagulable states. Special attention should be taken in the athlete with recurrent groin pain after trauma, as the reported incidence of traumatic AVN is 10% (53). Femoral head osteonecrosis is the result of altered blood supply, which causes bone necrosis, subcortical fractures, and finally collapse of the hip joint. It has been reported after hip subluxation, dislocation, and femoral neck fractures, which can all cause traumatic disruption of the vasculature (29). In the young athlete under age 12 experiencing continued groin pain and limping, Legg-Cálve-Perthes Syndrome is a variant of AVN that should be considered. In this condition, the growing femoral head loses its blood supply and a portion of the femoral head dies, causing a flattening of the weight-bearing surface of the femoral head that has a characteristic radiographic appearance.
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation
Osteonecrosis of the femoral head should be always considered as a possible cause of persistent hip or groin pain in young, high-level athletes, because the institution of the appropriate treatment may help to prevent later degenerative sequelae. The onset of hip pain may coincide temporally with a traumatic injury. These patients generally have normal findings on radiographs at presentation (54). However, if the symptoms persist, a further diagnostic imaging with MRI is required.
Classification and treatment of AVN are based on symptoms, radiographs, and MRI findings (55). Stage 0 is when asymptomatic patients have osteonecrotic findings in MRI. Stage I is when symptomatic patients have positive MRI findings without abnormality in plain radiographs. In stage II, radiographs show sclerotic bone in the femoral head without subchondral bone collapse and in stage III subchondral bone collapse is evident (crescent sign). In stage IV, there is collapse of the femoral head with secondary degenerative changes of the hip joint. When >30% of the femoral head is involved the prognosis is considered to be poor (56).
Treatment
Treatment of these lesions depends on the stage of AVN at the time of diagnosis. The initial stages (0 to II) are best treated conservatively. Wang et al. (57) compared the use of noninvasive treatment with extracorporeal shock waves to core decompression and bone grafting in young patients with early-stage osteonecrosis, and concluded that the former appeared to be more effective than the latter.
Joint preserving-measures such as core decompression and vascularized fibular graft have been described. Core decompression involves drilling multiple holes through the avascular portion of the femoral head under fluoroscopic guidance. Vascularized bone grafting involves the use of a vascularized fibular graft with microsurgical anastomosis to local blood vessels. The vascularized graft is harvested from the mid-shaft fibula, which is then inserted through a drill hole into the avascular zone of the femoral head. In a study done by Kim et al. (58), vascularized fibular grafting was associated with better clinical results and was more effective than nonvascularized fibular grafting for the prevention of collapse of the femoral head in a population with stage II or higher AVN lesions. The results of vascularized grafting were best when the procedure was used to treat precollapse lesions.
In more advanced stages (III and IV), hemi-resurfacing arthroplasty may be considered in the younger athlete. In middle-aged and older patients, total hip arthroplasty is the treatment of choice. Recently, bone grafting of the femoral head by elevating the articular cartilage flap (trapdoor approach) has been described for patients with stage II and III AVN, and may be an excellent alternative to arthroplasty in the younger patient (56).
Dislocation and Subluxation
Hip dislocation is a high-energy traumatic injury, and is an absolute orthopaedic emergency. The injury is most commonly seen in motor vehicle accidents and motor sports. In nonvehicle based sports the incidence of hip dislocation is rare, but the injury has been reported in football, rugby, hockey, gymnastics, skiing, and snowboarding (8,10,59,60,61). Although hip dislocation in contact sports is usually isolated and not associated with other visceral injuries, a screening trauma evaluation should always be performed. The age of the patient is an important consideration when dislocation is suspected because the injury may occur in lower energy situations, but has the same consequences (62). Traumatic hip subluxation follows the same injury pattern as dislocation, and is essentially the same injury with the same implications, but occurs in lower energy circumstances. The transient nature of these injuries and lack of deformity may result in under-diagnosis, and for this reason subluxation may ultimately be more significant than dislocation, because they are not evaluated and treated with the same level of urgency (8). The hip subluxation/dislocation continuum is associated with a very high incidence of long-term complications and disability, when the diagnosis and treatment are delayed (25,63,64).
Hip dislocation and subluxation can occur in anterior and posterior directions. Classification systems reference this directionality, which is based on the underlying biomechanics
P.556

of the joint and capsule. The patient’s bony morphology and capsular compliance also influence susceptibility; dysplastic hips with shallow acetabuli, patients with connective tissue disorders, and young patients with cartilaginous pliability and ligamentous laxity are at increased risk for dislocation or subluxation. The hip is in its most stable configuration in full extension, with the capsule and ligaments twisted tight and the articular surfaces compressed. In flexion the ligaments are lax and stability depends on articular congruence, which is optimized in abduction and external rotation, and least congruent in adduction. These biomechanical concepts are supported clinically by the fact that posterior dislocations are by far the most common, and account for up to 90% of all hip dislocations (25). The extent of bony damage is also dependent on the position of the leg when axial force is transmitted. When the leg is neutral or adducted, a simple dislocation without fracture occurs, but when the leg is abducted, a posterior wall acetabular and femoral head fracture is likely because increased force is required to overcome the congruence of the articular surfaces. Conversely, anterior dislocations are rare, accounting for 10% to 18% of hip dislocations, as would be predicted by the biomechanics (25). In sports, anterior dislocations have only been reported in snowboarding (60). Anterior dislocations occur in superior and inferior directions, the later being more common because the hip is in a relaxed capsule position of flexion.
Dislocations and subluxations typically present acutely during sports competition, and are caused by falls on a flexed knee with the hip adducted and flexed, but also can occur with direct blows to the hip region and knee in the same position (8). Dislocations are obvious and extremely painful, the affected leg is typically in a flexed and internally or externally rotated position, and a leg length discrepancy may be evident. Subluxations occur from the same mechanism, but spontaneous relocation can occur and the leg length discrepancy is not present. In both situations joint movement is actively and passively limited by pain. The athlete is not capable of standing when a dislocation has occurred, and should not be encouraged to stand if a subluxation is suspected. There are advocates for attempting gentle closed reduction immediately when these injuries are witnessed on the field, while the trauma literature supports reduction under anesthesia or sedation to avoid further damage to the femoral head or acetabular rim caused by muscle spasm and involuntary resistance (10,65).
When a hip dislocation or subluxation is suspected, plain radiographs with oblique views should be obtained emergently. In the case of dislocation, the patient should be taken to the operating room within 6 to 12 hours of the injury for attempted reduction under anesthesia, with the orthopaedic surgeon prepared to open the hip if a stable reduction cannot be achieved (63,65). The need for repeated attempts at relocation increases the complication rate (65). After a closed reduction and in cases of suspected subluxation with joint asymmetry on plain films and/or evidence of a posterior rim fracture, an MRI and/or CT scan should be obtained to assess congruency, hemarthrosis, and to exclude associated femoral head or acetabular fractures (Fig 32-3). When fractures are found, open concentric reduction of the joint and fixation of substantial bony rim or head fragments should be performed. In cases of subluxation, aspiration of a hemarthrosis has been shown to effectively decompress the joint and decrease the likelihood of AVN and chondrolysis (8). Postreduction stability should be assessed, as it will determine the postoperative treatment. After definitive reduction and decompression have been confirmed, post-operative motion and weight-bearing are based on the postreduction stability of the joint. Unstable joints are treated in skeletal traction for 4 to 6 weeks, and then progressed like stable joints and subluxations that are treated with touch down weight-bearing, crutches, and progressive motion for 6 weeks before the joint is loaded. MRI is repeated at 6 weeks to evaluate for signs of osteonecrosis with further surveillance based on the results (66).
Fig 32-3. Axial T2 fat-saturation MRI performed after closed reduction of a traumatic right hip dislocation. The scan reveals a concentric reduction, a nondisplaced posterior acetabular lip fracture (white arrow), and significant posterior capsular disruption and tissue edema (black arrow).
Complications and the prognosis for a hip joint that has dislocated are related to the severity of the dislocation, the presence of associated fracture, and the timing of the reduction in relation to the injury (25,63,64). Femoral artery and nerve injury can occur, but are not common; in contrast sciatic nerve injuries are relatively common, with an incidence approaching 10% in posterior dislocations (67). Osteonecrosis of the femoral head is the most serious and disabling consequence. In simple dislocations, the rate of osteonecrosis is about 10%, which is similar in adults and children. In fracture dislocations, the rate of osteonecrosis can approach 50%. In cases of subluxation, the true rate of
P.557

osteonecrosis cannot be determined. In the series reported by Mooreman et al. (8), 2 out of 8 patients developed osteonecrosis, suggesting a rate of 25%. Posttraumatic hip degeneration is the most significant and common complication that occurs after hip dislocation, and has been shown to increase in situations where concentric reduction is not achieved, the time delay to reduction is greater than 12 hours, hemarthrosis are not evacuated, and in patients that develop osteonecrosis (8,25,63,64).
Conclusions and Future Directions
Injuries and lesions of the axial skeleton in the hip joint region, especially those encountered in the athletic population, are all activity limiting and also have the potential for devastating outcomes. Most bony injuries have an extended recovery and rehabilitation. Frustration from all involved— athlete, parents, and coaches—will likely be directed at the medical team. Understanding the bony pathology responsible for these hip injuries, the mechanisms, and clinical presentation is critical for the physician to appropriately care for the athlete and safely return them to their sport. When any bony injury to the hip is suspected, every athlete should be placed on crutches nonweight bearing, plain radiographs should be obtained without delay, and advanced radiography should be considered if the symptoms and exam do not correlate. The most important aspect to understand is that the majority of these bony injuries require prompt diagnosis and treatment to avoid lifelong pain and disability, a consequence that will always be significantly greater than missing any sporting event, season, scholarship, or career.
References
1. Morelli V, Smith V. Groin injuries in athletes. Am Fam Physician. 2001;64:1405–1414.
2. Beck T, Messmer P, Regazzoni P. Unilateral apophyseal fracture of the superior anterior iliac crest—a case report. Swiss Surg. 2003;9:31–34.
3. Boyd KT, Peirce NS, Batt ME. Common hip injuries in sport. Sports Med. 1997;24:273–288.
4. Giza E, Mithofer K, Matthews H, et al. Hip fracture-dislocation in football: a report of two cases and review of the literature. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38:E17.
5. Johansson C, Ekenman I, Tornkvist H, et al. Stress fractures of the femoral neck in athletes. The consequence of a delay in diagnosis. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18:524–528.
6. LeBlanc KE, LeBlanc KA. Groin pain in athletes. Hernia. 2003;7:68–71.
7. Lehman RA, Jr, Shah SA. Tension-sided femoral neck stress fracture in a skeletally immature patient. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86A:1292–1295.
8. Moorman CT III, Warren RF, Hershman EB, et al. Traumatic posterior hip subluxation in American football. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85A:1190–1196.
9. Morelli V, Espinoza L. Groin injuries and groin pain in athletes: part 2. Prim Care. 2005;32:185–200.
10. Pallia CS, Scott RE, Chao DJ. Traumatic hip dislocation in athletes. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2002;1:338–345.
11. Paluska SA. An overview of hip injuries in running. Sports Med. 2005;35:991–1014.
12. Song WS, Yoo JJ, Koo KH, et al. Subchondral fatigue fracture of the femoral head in military recruits. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86A:1917–1924.
13. Weaver CJ, Major NM, Garrett WE, et al. Femoral head osteochondral lesions in painful hips of athletes: MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:973–977.
14. Waters PM, Millis MB. Hip and pelvic injuries in the young athlete. Clin Sports Med. 1988;7:513–526.
15. Adkins SB III, Figler RA. Hip pain in athletes. Am Fam Physician. 2000;61:2109–2118.
16. Bullough P, Goodfellow J, Greenwald AS, et al. Incongruent surfaces in the human hip joint. Nature. 1968;217:1290.
17. Ponseti IV. Growth and development of the acetabulum in the normal child. Anatomical, histological, and roentgenographic studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:575–585.
18. Bombelli R, Santore RF, Poss R. Mechanics of the normal and osteoarthritic hip. A new perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;69–78.
19. Reikeras O, Bjerkreim I, Kolbenstvedt A. Anteversion of the acetabulum and femoral neck in normals and in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. Acta Orthop Scand. 1983;54:18–23.
20. Delp SL, Maloney W. Effects of hip center location on the moment-generating capacity of the muscles. J Biomech. 1993;26: 485–499.
21. Bencardino JT, Kassarjian A, Palmer WE. Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip: sports-related injuries. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;14:145–160.
22. De Paulis F, Cacchio A, Michelini O, et al. Sports injuries in the pelvis and hip: diagnostic imaging. Eur J Radiol. 1998;27(suppl 1):S49–S59.
23. Overdeck KH, Palmer WE. Imaging of hip and groin injuries in athletes. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2004;8:41–55.
24. Ogden JA. Changing patterns of proximal femoral vascularity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:941–950.
25. Sahin V, Karakas ES, Aksu S, et al. Traumatic dislocation and fracture-dislocation of the hip: a long-term follow-up study. J Trauma. 2003;54:520–529.
26. Bartonicek J. Pauwels’ classification of femoral neck fractures: correct interpretation of the original. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15: 358–360.
27. Lu-Yao GL, Keller RB, Littenberg B, et al. Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:15–25.
28. Boutin RD, Newman JS. MR imaging of sports-related hip disorders. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2003;11:255–281.
29. Garden RS. Malreduction and avascular necrosis in subcapital fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1971;53:183–197.
30. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Swiontkowski MF, et al. Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85A: 1673–1681.
31. O’Kane JW. Anterior hip pain. Am Fam Physician. 1999;60: 1687–1696.
32. Haidukewych GJ, Israel TA, Berry DJ. Reverse obliquity fractures of the intertrochanteric region of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83A:643–650.
33. Adams CI, Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15:394–400.
P.558

34. Haidukewych GJ, Berry DJ. Hip arthroplasty for salvage of failed treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85A:899–904.
35. Vaidya SV, Dholakia DB, Chatterjee A. The use of a dynamic condylar screw and biological reduction techniques for subtrochanteric femur fracture. Injury. 2003;34:123–128.
36. Wiss DA, Brien WW. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Results of treatment by interlocking nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;283:231–236.
37. Pape HC, Krettek C, Friedrich A, et al. Long-term outcome in children with fractures of the proximal femur after high-energy trauma. J Trauma. 1999;46:58–64.
38. Ratliff AH. Fractures of the neck of the femur in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1962;44B:528–542.
39. Canale ST, Bourland WL. Fracture of the neck and intertrochanteric region of the femur in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59:431–443.
40. Brukner P, Bennell K. Stress fractures in female athletes. Diagnosis, management and rehabilitation. Sports Med. 1997;24: 419–429.
41. Reeder MT, Dick BH, Atkins JK, et al. Stress fractures. Current concepts of diagnosis and treatment. Sports Med. 1996;22:198–212.
42. Annan IH, Buxton RA. Bilateral stress fractures of the femoral neck associated with abnormal anatomy—a case report. Injury. 1986;17:164–166.
43. Voss L, DaSilva M, Trafton PG. Bilateral femoral neck stress fractures in an amenorrheic athlete. Am J Orthop. 1997;26:789–792.
44. Shin AY, Gillingham BL. Fatigue Fractures of the femoral neck in athletes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1997;5:293–302.
45. Davies SJ, Walker G. Problems in the early recognition of hip dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66:479–484.
46. DeLee J. Fractures and dislocations of the hip. In: Fractures in adults. In: Rockwood CA Jr, Wilkins DE, King RE, eds. Fractures in children. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott Co; 1984.
47. Gross ML, Nasser S, Finerman, GA. Hip and pelvis. In: DeLee JC, Drez D Jr, eds. Orthopaedic sports medicine. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1994.
48. Canale ST, King RE. Pelvic and hip fractures. In: Rockwood CA Jr, Wilkins DE, King RE, eds. Fractures in children. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott Co; 1984.
49. Metzmaker JN, Pappas AM. Avulsion fractures of the pelvis. Am J Sports Med. 1985;13:349–358.
50. Moeller JL. Pelvic and hip apophyseal avulsion injuries in young athletes. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2003;2:110–115.
51. Soyuncu Y, Gur S. Avulsion injuries of the pelvis in adolescents. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2004;38(suppl 1):88–92.
52. Mont MA, Jones LC, Sotereanos DG, et al. Understanding and treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:169–185.
53. Vingard E, Alfredsson L, Goldie I, et al. Sports and osteoarthrosis of the hip. An epidemiologic study. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21:195–200.
54. Hernigou P, Poignard A, Nogier A, et al. Fate of very small asymptomatic stage-I osteonecrotic lesions of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86A:2589–2593.
55. Mitchell DG, Steinberg ME, Dalinka MK, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the ischemic hip. Alterations within the osteonecrotic, viable, and reactive zones. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;244:60–77.
56. Parvizi JP, Purtill JJ. Hip, pelvic reconstruction, and arthroplasty. In: Vaccaro AR, ed. Orthopaedic knowledge update 8. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2005.
57. Wang CJ, Wang FS, Huang CC, et al. Treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: comparison of extracorporeal shock waves with core decompression and bone-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2380–2387.
58. Kim SY, Kim YG, Kim PT, et al. Vascularized compared with nonvascularized fibular grafts for large osteonecrotic lesions of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2012–2018.
59. Byrd JW, Jones KS. Traumatic rupture of the ligamentum teres as a source of hip pain. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:385–391.
60. Matsumoto K, Sumi H, Sumi Y, et al. An analysis of hip dislocations among snowboarders and skiers: a 10-year prospective study from 1992 to 2002. J Trauma. 2003;55:946–948.
61. Mitchell JC, Giannoudis PV, Millner PA, et al. A rare fracture-dislocation of the hip in a gymnast and review of the literature. Br J Sports Med. 1999;33:283–284.
62. Price CT, Pyevich MT, Knapp DR, et al. Traumatic hip dislocation with spontaneous incomplete reduction: a diagnostic trap. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:730–735.
63. Dreinhofer KE, Schwarzkopf SR, Haas NP, et al. Isolated traumatic dislocation of the hip. Long-term results in 50 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:6–12.
64. Tornetta P III, Mostafavi HR. Hip dislocation: current treatment regimens. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1997;5:27–36.
65. Yang EC, Cornwall R. Initial treatment of traumatic hip dislocations in the adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;377:24–31.
66. Poggi JJ, Callaghan JJ, Spritzer CE, et al. Changes on magnetic resonance images after traumatic hip dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;319:249–259.
67. Barquet A. Traumatic anterior dislocation of the hip in childhood. Injury. 1982;13:435–440.