Rockwood & Wilkins’ Fractures in Children
6th Edition

Chapter 9
Fractures of the Distal Radius and Ulna
Peter M. Waters
Alexander D. Mih
Forearm fractures in children are the most common long bone fractures, comprising about 40% of all pediatric fractures (1,2,3). The distal aspect of the radius and ulna is the most common site of fracture in the forearm (2,4,5,6,7). These fractures have been reported to be three times more common in boys; however, the increased participation in athletics by girls at a young age may be changing this ratio. Although these fractures occur at any age, they are most frequent during the adolescent growth spurt (8). The fractures are described by location, metaphyseal or physeal, as well as by severity of displacement. The pediatric Galeazzi injury usually involves a distal radial metaphyseal fracture and a distal ulnar physeal fracture that result in a displaced distal radioulnar joint. These injuries are rare, but need to be identified acutely for proper management. The specifics of fracture patterns for individual fracture types are discussed in separate sections of this chapter. Most of these injuries have traditionally been treated with closed reduction and cast immobilization. Indications for percutaneous pinning and open

reduction in pediatric patients are evolving and are discussed in each section.
Mechanism of Injury
A direct fall is the usual mechanism of injury. With the wrist and hand extended, a fracture occurs if the mechanical force is sufficient. Usually this is secondary to a sporting event. Snowboarding, skateboarding, soccer goalkeeping, and horse back riding have been shown to be high-risk-sports (9,10,11,12,13,14,15), but a severe enough fall in any recreational activity can lead to a fracture. There is seasonal variation, with an increase in both incidence and severity of fractures in summer (16). Children who are overweight have poor postural balance, ligamentous laxity, or less bone mineralization, and are at increased risk for distal radial fractures (17,18,19). The fractures generally occur with an extension deformity because of the mechanism of a fall on an outstretched hand. Occasionally a direct blow or a fall onto a flexed wrist and hand causes volar displacement or angulation of the distal fragment. In either case, there may be a rotational component to the fracture pattern.
Repetitive loading of the wrist can lead to physeal stress injuries of the distal radius and, less commonly, the ulna. These injuries are rare, and occur most frequently in gymnasts (20,21,22,23,24,25,26). Any patient with chronic physeal region wrist pain who participates in an activity with repetitive axial loading of the wrist, such as gymnastics or break dancing (27), should be examined for a stress injury.
Signs and Symptoms
Regardless of the type, these fractures cause pain in the distal forearm, tenderness directly over the fracture site, and limited motion of the forearm, wrist, and hand. Deformity depends on the degree of fracture displacement. Fractures with marked extension displacement can lead to a silver fork deformity similar to an adult Colles’ fracture. Standard anteroposterior (AP) and lateral x-rays are diagnostic of fracture type and displacement. Metaphyseal fractures are most common, followed by physeal fractures (3,28,29); the distal fragment in either usually is extended. Neurovascular examination should be performed before treatment to assess for median or ulnar neuropathy or the rare compartment syndrome. Hand and elbow regions need to be examined clinically and, if appropriate, radiographically for associated injuries.
Associated Injuries
Associated fractures of the hand and elbow regions are rare but need to be assessed because their presence implies more severe trauma. The risk of a compartment syndrome is higher with a “floating elbow” combination of radial, ulnar, and elbow fractures (30). With marked radial or ulnar fracture displacement, neurovascular compromise can occur. Median neuropathy results from contusion at the time of fracture displacement, persistent direct pressure from an unreduced fracture, or an acute compartment syndrome (31). Ulnar neuropathy has been described with similar mechanisms as well as entrapment. Wrist ligamentous and articular cartilage injuries have been described in association with distal radial and ulnar fractures in adults and less commonly in children (32,33). Concomitant scaphoid fractures have occurred (34). Associated wrist injuries need to be treated both in the acute setting and in the patient with persistent pain after fracture healing. Some patients with distal radial and ulnar fractures are multi-trauma victims. Their systemic care modifies their distal forearm fracture care.
Diagnosis and Classification
Distal radial and ulnar fractures are defined by their anatomic relationship to the physis. Transphyseal injuries are classified by the widely accepted Salter-Harris system (35). Metaphyseal injuries may be torus or buckle fractures, greenstick or incomplete fractures, or complete injuries. Pediatric equivalents of adult Galeazzi fracture–dislocations involve a distal radial fracture and either a soft-tissue disruption of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) or a transphyseal fracture of the ulna (Table 9-1). In contrast to adults, skeletally immature patients rarely sustain intra-articular fractures of the distal radius. On occasion, a Salter-Harris type III fracture, a triplane fracture (36), or an adolescent intra-articular Colles’ fracture occurs.
Distal radial fracture stability has been more clearly defined in adults (37) than in children. At present, an unstable fracture in a child is often defined as one in which closed reduction cannot be maintained. Pediatric classification systems have yet to more precisely define fracture stability, but this issue is critical in determining proper treatment management. Distal radial metaphyseal fractures have been shown to have a high degree of recurrent displacement and, therefore, inherent instability (38,39,40,41,42).
Fractures also are defined by the degree of displacement and angulation. Static AP and lateral x-rays can be diagnostic of the

fracture type and degree of deformity (Fig. 9-1). In adults, the distal radial articular alignment averages 22° on the AP view and 11° on the lateral view (43,44,45,46,47). Radial inclination is a goniometric measurement of the angle between the distal radial articular surface and a line perpendicular to the radial shaft on the AP x-ray. Palmar tilt is measured by a line across the distal articular surface and a line perpendicular to the radial shaft on the lateral view. Pediatric values for radial inclination tend to be less, depending on the degree of skeletal maturity of the patient. Palmar tilt tends to be more consistent regardless of the age of the patient.
TABLE 9-1 Distal Forearm Fractures: General Classification
Physeal fractures
   Distal radius
   Distal ulna
Distal metaphyseal (radius or ulna)
   Complete fractures
Galeazzi fracture–dislocations
   Dorsal displaced
   Volar displaced
FIGURE 9-1 Angulation of the x-ray beam tangential to the articular surface, provides the optimal lateral view of the distal radius. The wrist is positioned as for the standard lateral x-ray, but the x-ray beam is directed 15° cephalad. (Redrawn from Johnson PG, Szabo RM. Angle measurements of the distal radius: a cadaver study. Skel Radiol 1993;22:243; with permission.)
Rarely, tomographic views are necessary to assess intraarticular involvement or displacement. This can be by AP and lateral tomograms, computerized tomographic (CT) scans, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Dynamic motion studies with fluoroscopy can provide important information on fracture stability and the success of various treatment options. Dynamic fluoroscopy requires adequate pain relief and has been used more often in adult patients with distal radial fractures. Ultrasound has been used to diagnose fractures in some centers (48,49).
The distal radial epiphysis normally appears between 0.5 and 2.3 years in boys and 0.4 and 1.7 years in girls (50). Initially transverse in appearance, it rapidly becomes more adult-like with its triangular shape. The contour of the radial styloid progressively elongates with advancing skeletal maturity. The secondary center of ossification for the distal ulna appears at about age 7. Similar to the radius, the ulnar styloid appears with the adolescent growth spurt. It also becomes more elongated and adult-like until physeal closure. On average, the ulnar physis closes at age 16 in girls and age 17 in boys, whereas the radial physis closes on average 6 months later than the ulnar physis (44,51). The distal radial and ulnar physes contribute approximately 75% to 80% of the growth of the forearm and 40% of the growth of the upper extremity (Fig. 9-2) (52).
The distal radius articulates with the distal ulna at the DRUJ. Both the radius and ulna articulate with the carpus, serving as the support for the hand. The radial joint surface has three concavities for its articulations: the scaphoid and lunate fossa for the carpus and the sigmoid notch for the ulnar head (Fig. 9-3). These joints are stabilized by a complex series of volar and dorsal radiocarpal, ulnocarpal, and radioulnar ligaments. The volar ligaments are the major stabilizers. Starting radially at the radial styloid, the radial collateral, radioscaphocapitate, radiolunotriquetral (long radioulnate), and radioscapholunate (short radioulnate) ligaments volarly stabilize the radiocarpal joint. The dorsal radioscaphoid and radial triquetral ligaments are less important stabilizers.
The triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) is the primary stabilizer of the ulnocarpal and radioulnar articulations. It extends from the sigmoid notch of the radius across the DRUJ and inserts into the base of the ulnar styloid. It also extends distally as the ulnolunate, ulnotriquetral, and ulnar collateral ligaments and inserts into the ulnar carpus and base of the fifth metacarpal (53). The interosseous ligament of the forearm (Fig. 9-4) helps stabilize the radius and ulna more proximally in the diaphysis of the forearm. The ulna remains relatively immobile as the radius rotates around it. The complex structure of ligaments stabilize the radius, ulna, and carpus through the normal wrist motion of 120 degrees of flexion and extension, 50 degrees of radial and ulnar deviation, and 150 degrees of forearm rotation (53).
The length relationship between the distal radius and ulna is defined as ulnar variance. In adults, this is measured by the relationship of the radial corner of the distal ulnar articular surface to the ulnar corner of the radial articular surface (54). However, measurement of ulnar variance in children requires modifications of this technique. Hafner (55) described measuring from the ulnar metaphysis to the radial metaphysis to lessen the measurement inaccuracies related to epiphyseal size and shape (Fig. 9-5). If the ulna and radius are of equal lengths, there is a neutral variance. If the ulna is longer, there is a positive variance, and if the ulna is shorter, there is a negative variance.
Variance is not dependent on the length of the ulnar styloid (56), but the measurement is dependent on forearm positioning and radiographic technique (57,58,59). X-rays of the wrist to determine ulnar variance should be standardized with the hand and wrist pronated on the cassette, the elbow flexed 90 degrees, and the shoulder abducted 90 degrees (Fig. 9-6). The importance of ulnar variance relates to the force transmission across the wrist with axial loading. Normally the radiocarpal joint bears approximately 80% of the axial load and the ulnocarpal joint bears 20%. Changes in the length relationship of the radius and



ulna alter respective load bearing. Biomechanical and clinical studies have shown that this load distribution is important in fractures, TFCC tears, and Kienbock’s disease (26,60,61).
FIGURE 9-2 Ossification of the distal radius. A. Preossification distal radius with transverse ossification in a 15-month-old boy. B. The triangular secondary ossification center of the distal radius in a 2-year-old girl. C. The initial ossification center of the styloid in this 7-year-old girl progresses radially (arrow). D. Extension of the ulnar ossification center into the styloid process of an 11-year-old. E. The styloid is fully ossified and the epiphyses have capped their relative metaphyses in this 13-year-old boy.
FIGURE 9-3 Articulations of the distal radioulnar joint. (Redrawn from Bowers WH. Green’s operative hand surgery. New York: Churchill–Livingstone, 1993:988.)
FIGURE 9-4 The attachment and the fibers of the interosseous membrane are such that there is no attachment to the distal radius. (Redrawn from Kraus B, Horne G. Galeazzi fractures. J Trauma 1985;25:1094; with permission.)
FIGURE 9-5 Hafner’s technique to measure ulnar variance. A. The distance from the most proximal point of the ulnar metaphysis to the most proximal point of the radial metaphysis. B. The distance from the most distal point of the ulnar metaphysis to the most distal point of the radial metaphysis. (From Hafner R, Poznanski AK, Donovan JM. Ulnar variance in children. Standard measurements for evaluation of ulnar shortening in childhood. Skel Radiol 1989;18:514; with permission.)
FIGURE 9-6 Technique for neutral rotation x-ray with wrist neutral, forearm pronated, elbow flexed 90 degrees and shoulder abducted 90 degrees.
Distal radial physeal injuries were described more than 100 years ago (62,63), and these early descriptions raised concerns regarding permanent deformity from this injury. In the 1930s, however, Aitken (64,65) concluded from his observations at the Boston City Hospital outpatient clinic that permanent deformity was rare. Instead, he emphasized the remodeling potential of distal radial physeal fractures, even when not reduced. The observations of Aitken have been confirmed throughout the 20th century (Fig. 9-7). Most researchers agree that as long as there is sufficient growth remaining, a distal radial extension deformity from a fracture malunited in extension has the potential to remodel. Permanent deformity, however, can occur in malunited fractures near the end of growth, with rotational deformity, or fractures that cause distal radial growth arrest.
FIGURE 9-7 A. A 13-year-old boy presented 1 month after injury with a displaced and healed Salter-Harris type II distal radial fracture with obvious clinical deformity. B. Over the next 6 months the patient grew 4 inches and the deformity remodeled without intervention.
Distal radial physeal fractures are far more common than distal ulnar physeal fractures (2,29,66,67,68). The nondominant arm in boys is most commonly injured. The peak incidence is in the preadolescent growth spurt (2,6,69). More than 50% of distal radial physeal fractures have an associated ulnar fracture. This usually is an ulnar styloid fracture but can be a distal ulnar plastic deformation, greenstick, or complete fracture (70,71,72). The mechanism of injury generally is a fall on an outstretched hand and wrist. Many of the injuries are nondisplaced and present only with pain at the physis (73,74). With displaced fractures, the distal fragment usually moves dorsally, creating an extension deformity that is usually clinically apparent. Patients have pain and tenderness at the fracture site, and the range of motion at the wrist and hand usually is limited by pain. Neurovascular compromise is uncommon but can occur (31). When present, it usually consists of median nerve irritability or dysfunction caused by direct trauma to the nerve at the time of injury or ongoing ischemic compression from the displaced fracture. Thenar muscle function and discriminatory sensibility (two-point discrimination) should be tested before reduction in the emergency setting. Acute carpal tunnel syndrome or forearm compartment syndrome can occur, but more often is caused by marked volar forearm and wrist swelling that occurs after reduction and application of a well-molded, tight cast

(31,75,76). Open physeal fractures are rare, but the local skin should be examined closely for penetration.
FIGURE 9-8 Dorsally displaced physeal fracture (type A). The distal epiphysis with a small metaphyseal fragment is displaced dorsally (curved arrow) in relation to the proximal metaphyseal fragment.
Plain AP and lateral x-rays are diagnostic of the fracture type and deformity. The Salter-Harris system is the basis for classification of physeal fractures (35). Most are Salter-Harris type II fractures. The dorsal displacement of the distal fragment of the epiphysis and dorsal Thurstond-Holland metaphyseal fragment is evident on the lateral view (Fig. 9-8). Salter-Harris type I fractures also usually displace dorsally. Volar displacement of either a Salter-Harris type I or II fracture is less common (Fig. 9-9). Nondisplaced Salter-Harris type I fractures may be indicated only by a displaced pronator fat pad sign (Fig. 9-10) (77,78) or tenderness over the involved physis (70,79). A scaphoid fat pad sign may indicate a scaphoid fracture (Fig. 9-11). If the acute fracture is unrecognized, a late-appearing periosteal reaction may indicate the fracture.
FIGURE 9-9 Volarly displaced physeal fracture (type B). Distal epiphysis with a large volar metaphyseal fragment is displaced in a volar direction (curved arrow). (Reprinted from Wilkins KE, ed. Operative management of upper extremity fractures in children. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1994:21; with permission.)
Salter-Harris type III fractures are rare and may be caused by a compression injury or an avulsion of the radial origin of the volar radiocarpal ligaments (Fig. 9-12) (71,80). Triplane equivalent fractures (81,82,83), a combination of Salter-Harris type II and III fractures in different planes, are rare. CT scans may be necessary to define the fracture pattern and degree of intra-articular displacement. Stress injuries to the physis occur most commonly in competitive gymnasts (Fig. 9-13).
Current Treatment Options
Treatment options include no reduction, closed reduction and cast immobilization, closed reduction and pin fixation, and open reduction. Nondisplaced fractures are immobilized until appropriate healing and pain resolution have been achieved (70,79). If there is a question of fracture stability, these fractures should be treated with a well-molded cast and monitored closely during the first 3 weeks of healing to be certain that there is no loss of alignment. Most acute displaced Salter-Harris type I and II fractures can be treated successfully with gentle closed reduction and cast immobilization. There are advocates for both long-arm and short-arm treatment methods (84,85,86,87,88,89,90). Closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation are performed in patients with neurovascular compromise and displaced physeal fractures (31) to lessen the risk of development of a compartment syndrome in the carpal tunnel or forearm. Open reduction is indicated for irreducible fractures, open fractures, displaced Salter-Harris type III and IV fractures, and triplane equivalent fractures. Irreducible fractures usually are due to an entrapped periosteum or pronator quadratus (91). Internal fixation usually is with smooth, small diameter pins to lessen the risk of growth arrest. Plates and screws rarely are used unless the patient is near skeletal maturity because of concerns about further physeal injury. In the rare displaced intra-articular Salter-Harris type III or IV fracture, internal fixation can be intra-epiphyseal without violating the physis. If it is necessary to cross the physis, then smooth, small diameter pins should be used to lessen the risk of iatrogenic physeal injury. Extra-articular external fixation also can be used to stabilize and align the fracture.
Closed Reduction
Most displaced Salter-Harris I and II fractures are treated with closed reduction and cast stabilization. Closed manipulation of the displaced fracture is performed with appropriate conscious sedation, analgesia, or rarely, anesthesia to achieve pain relief and an atraumatic reduction (70,79,92). Most of these fractures involve dorsal and proximal displacement of the epiphysis with an apex–volar extension deformity. Manipulative reduction is by gentle distraction and flexion of the distal epiphysis, carpus,

and hand over the proximal metaphysis (Figs. 9-14 and 9-15). The intact dorsal periosteum is used as a tension band to aid in reduction and stabilization of the fracture. Unlike similar fractures in adults, finger trap distraction with pulley weights is often counterproductive. However, finger traps can help stabilize the hand, wrist, and arm for manipulative reduction and casting by applying a few pounds of weight for balance. Otherwise an assistant is helpful to support the extremity in the proper position for casting.
FIGURE 9-10 A. Subperiosteal hemorrhage from an occult fracture of the distal radius causes an anterior displacement of the normal pronator quadratus fat pad (arrows). B. A 13-year-old girl with tenderness over the distal radius after a fall. The only x-ray finding is an anterior displacement of the normal pronator quadratus fat pad (arrow). C. The opposite normal side (arrow indicates normal fat pad). D. Two weeks later, there is a small area of periosteal new bone formation (arrow) anteriorly, substantiating that bony injury has occurred.
If portable fluoroscopy is available, immediate radiographic assessment of the reduction is obtained. Otherwise, a well-molded cast is applied and AP and lateral x-rays are obtained to assess the reduction. The cast should provide three-point molding over the distal radius to lessen the risk of fracture displacement and should follow the contour of the normal forearm. The distal dorsal mold should not impair venous outflow from the hand, which can occur if the mold is placed too distal and too deep so as to obstruct the dorsal veins. Advocates of short-arm casting (89,90) indicate at least equivalent results with proper casting techniques. Instructions for elevation and close monitoring of swelling and the neurovascular status of the extremity are critical.
The fracture also should be monitored closely with serial x-rays for the first 3 weeks to be certain that there is no loss of anatomic alignment (Fig. 9-16). Generally these fractures are stable after closed reduction and cast immobilization. If there is loss of reduction after 7 days, the surgeon should be wary of repeat reduction because of the risk of physeal arrest (35,70). Fortunately, remodeling of an extension deformity with growth is common if the patient has more than 2 years of growth remaining and the deformity is less than 20 degrees.
Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning
The indications for percutaneous pinning of distal radial physeal fractures are still controversial. The best indication is a displaced





radial physeal fracture with median neuropathy and significant volar soft-tissue swelling (31) (Fig. 9-17). These patients are at risk for development of an acute carpal tunnel syndrome or forearm compartment syndrome with closed reduction and well-molded cast immobilization (31,75,76,93). The torn periosteum volarly allows the fracture bleeding to dissect into the volar forearm compartments and carpal tunnel. If a tight cast is applied with a volar mold over that area, compartment pressures can increase dangerously. Percutaneous pin fixation allows the application of a loose dressing, splint, or cast without the risk of loss of fracture reduction.
FIGURE 9-11 Anatomic relationships of the navicular fat stripe (NFS). The NFS, shaded black, is located between the combined tendons of the abductor pollicis longus and extensor pollicis brevis, and the lateral surface of the carpal navicular. (Reprinted from Terry DW, Ramen JE. The navicular fat stripe. Ham J Roent Rad Ther Nucl Med 1975;124:25; with permission.)
FIGURE 9-12 Anteroposterior x-ray of Salter-Harris type III fracture of the distal radius.
FIGURE 9-13 Stress changes in a female gymnast with widening of the distal radial physis from long-standing high-level performance.
FIGURE 9-14 Acceptable method of closed reduction of distal physeal fractures of the radius. A. Position of the fracture fragments as finger trap traction with countertraction is applied (arrows). B. Often with traction alone the fracture will reduce without external pressure (arrows). C. If the reduction is incomplete, simply applying direct pressure over the fracture site in a distal and volar direction with the thumb often completes the reduction while maintaining traction. This technique theoretically decreases the shear forces across the physis during the reduction process.
FIGURE 9-15 A. Lateral x-ray of dorsally displaced Salter-Harris type II fracture. B. Lateral x-ray after closed reduction and cast application. C. Reduction of the volar displaced fracture shown in Figure 9-9. The forearm was in supination with three-point molding anterior over the distal epiphysis and proximal shaft (white arrows). The third point is placed dorsally over the distal metaphysis (open arrow). (The dorsal surface of the cast is oriented toward the bottom of this figure.) (Reprinted from Wilkins KE, ed. Operative management of upper extremity fractures in children. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1994:17; with permission.)
FIGURE 9-16 A. Anteroposterior and lateral x-rays of severely displaced Salter-Harris type II fracture of the distal radius. B. Closed reduction shows marked improvement but not anatomic reduction. The cast had to be bivalved due to excessive swelling. C. Unfortunately, the patient lost reduction after a new fiberglass cast was applied. D. Out of cast x-rays show a healed malunion in a similar position to the prereduction x-rays.
Pin fixation can be either single or double (Fig. 9-18). Fluoroscopy is used to guide proper fracture reduction and pin placement. Anesthesia is used for adequate pain relief and to lessen the risk of further physeal injury. The fracture is manipulated into anatomic alignment and the initial, and often only, pin is placed from the distal epiphysis of the radial styloid obliquely across the physis into the more proximal ulnar aspect of the radial metaphysis (Fig. 9-19). A sufficient skin incision should be made with pin placement to be certain there is no iatrogenic injury to the radial sensory nerve or extensor tendons. Stability of the fracture should be evaluated with flexion and extension and rotatory stress under fluoroscopy. Often in children and adolescents, a single pin and the reduced periosteum provide sufficient stability to prevent redisplacement of the fracture. If fracture stability is questionable with a single pin, a second pin should be placed. The second pin can either parallel the first pin or, to create cross-pin stability, can be placed distally from the ulnar corner of the radial epiphysis between the fourth and fifth dorsal compartments and passed obliquely to the proximal radial portion of the metaphysis (53,84,94). Again, the skin incisions for pin placement should be sufficient to avoid iatrogenic injury to the extensor tendons.
FIGURE 9-17 A. Clinical photograph of patient with a displaced Salter-Harris type II fracture of the distal radius. The patient has marked swelling volarly with hematoma and fracture displacement. The patient had a median neuropathy upon presentation. B. Lateral x-ray of the displaced fracture. C. Lateral x-ray in postoperative splint after percutaneous pinning to lessen the risk of neurovascular compromise in a cast.
The pins are bent, left out of the skin, and covered with a sterile dressing. Splint or cast immobilization is used but does not need to be tight because fracture stability is provided by the pins. The pins are left in until there is adequate fracture healing, usually 4 weeks. The pins can be removed in the office without sedation or anesthesia.
One of the arguments against pin fixation is the risk of additional injury to the physis by a pin (36). The risk of physeal arrest is more from the displaced fracture than from a short-term, smooth pin. As a precaution, smooth, small-diameter pins should be used, insertion should be as atraumatic as possible, and removal should be done as soon as there is sufficient fracture healing for fracture stability in a cast or splint alone.
FIGURE 9-18 A. Anteroposterior and lateral x-rays of displaced Salter-Harris type II fracture pinned with a single pin. B. After reduction and pinning with parallel pins.
FIGURE 9-19 A. AP and lateral displaced SH II distal radius. B. AP and lateral views 1 month post simple pin fixation of SH II radial physeal fracture.



Open Reduction
The main indication for open reduction of a displaced distal radial Salter-Harris type II physeal fracture is irreducibility. Most often this is caused by interposed periosteum or, less likely, pronator quadratus (91,95,96). Open reduction is done through a volar approach to the distal radial physis. The interval between the radial artery and the flexor carpi radialis is used. This dissection also can proceed directly through the flexor carpi radialis sheath to protect the artery. The pronator quadratus is isolated and elevated from radial to ulnar. Although this muscle can be interposed in the fracture site, the volar periosteum is more commonly interposed. This is only evident after elevation of the pronator quadratus. The periosteum is extracted from the physis with care to minimize further injury to the physis. The fracture can then be easily reduced. Usually a percutaneous smooth pin is used for stabilization of the reduction. The method of pin insertion is the same as after closed reduction.
FIGURE 9-20 A. A markedly displaced Salter-Harris type IV fracture of the distal radius in an 11-year-old boy who fell from a horse. B. X-ray taken 3 weeks after closed reduction demonstrates displacement of the comminuted fragments. C. Eighteen months after injury, there was 15 mm of radial shortening, and the patient had a pronounced radial deviation deformity of the wrist.
Open physeal fractures are rare but require irrigation and debridement. Care should be taken with mechanical debridement of the physeal cartilage to avoid further risk of growth arrest. Cultures should be taken at the time of operative debridement,

and appropriate antibiotics are used to lessen the risk of deep space infection.
The rare Salter-Harris type III or IV fracture or triplane fracture (83) may require open reduction if the joint or physis cannot be anatomically reduced closed. The articular and physeal alignment can be evaluated by radiographic tomograms (trispiral or CT), MRI scans, or wrist arthroscopy. If anatomic alignment of the physis and articular surface is not present, the risk of growth arrest, long-term deformity, or limited function is great (Fig. 9-20). Even minimal displacement (more than 1 mm) should not be accepted in this situation. Arthroscopically assisted reduction is helpful to align and stabilize these rare physeal fractures (97,98). Although it is an equipment intensive operation with arthroscopy, external fixation, transphyseal and trans-epiphyseal pin or screw fixation, and fluoroscopy, anatomic reduction and stabilization of the physis and articular surface can be achieved (Fig. 9-21).
Complications from physeal fractures are relatively rare. The most frequent problem is malunion. Fortunately, these fractures often occur in children with significant growth remaining. The deformity from a Salter-Harris type I or II fracture is within the plane of motion of the wrist joint and, therefore, will remodel with ensuing growth (Fig. 9-23) (70,79,92). Repeat reduction should not be done more than 7 days after fracture because of the risk of growth arrest. The malunited fracture should be monitored over the next 6 to 12 months for remodeling. If the fracture does not remodel, persistent extension deformity of the distal radial articular surface puts the patient at risk for developing mid-carpal instability (101) or degenerative arthritis of the wrist. Corrective osteotomy with bone grafting and internal fixation is required (102). An opening-wedge dorsal osteotomy is made, iliac crest bone of appropriate trapezoidal shape to correct the deformity is inserted, and either a plate or external fixator is used to maintain correction until healing.
Intra-articular malunion is more worrisome because of the risk of development of degenerative arthritis if the articular step-off is more than 2 mm (103). MRI or CT scans can be useful in preoperative evaluations. Arthroscopy allows direct examination of the deformity and areas of impingement or potential degeneration. Intra-articular osteotomy with bone grafting in the metaphysis to support the reconstructed articular surface is controversial and risky. However, it has the potential of restoring anatomic alignment to the joint and preventing serious long-term complications. This problem fortunately is uncommon in children because of the rarity of the injury and this type of malunion.
FIGURE 9-23 A. Anteroposterior and lateral views of displaced radial physeal fracture. B. Healed malunion 1 month after radial physeal fracture. C. Significant remodeling at 5 months after fracture. D. Anatomic remodeling with no physeal arrest.
FIGURE 9-24 A. Anteroposterior x-ray of growth arrest with open ulnar physis. B. Magnetic resonance imaging scan of large area of growth arrest that was not deemed resectable by mapping.



Physeal Arrest
Distal radial physeal arrest can occur from either the trauma of the original injury (Fig. 9-24) (71,85,104) or late (more than 7 days) reduction of a displaced fracture. The incidence of radial growth arrest has been shown to be 4% to 5% of all displaced radial physeal fractures (71,105). The trauma to the physeal cartilage from displacement and compression is a significant risk factor for growth arrest. However, a correlation between the risk of growth arrest and the degree of displacement, type of fracture, or type of reduction has yet to be defined. Similarly, the risk of further compromising the physis with late reduction at various time intervals is still unclear. The current recommendation is for an atraumatic reduction of a displaced physeal fracture less than 7 days after injury.
FIGURE 9-25 A. Anteroposterior x-ray of radial growth arrest and ulnar overgrowth after physeal fracture. Patient complained of ulnar-sided wrist pain and clicking. B. Clinical photograph of ulnar overgrowth and radial deviation deformity.
When a growth arrest develops, the consequences depend on the severity of the arrest and the amount of growth remaining. A complete arrest of the distal radial physis in a skeletally immature patient can be a serious problem. The continued growth of the ulna with cessation of radial growth can lead to incongruity of the DRUJ, ulnocarpal impaction, and development of a TFCC tear (Fig. 9-25). The radial deviation deformity at the wrist can be severe enough to cause limitation of wrist and forearm motion. Pain and clicking can develop at the ulnocarpal or radioulnar joints, indicative of ulnocarpal impaction or a TFCC tear. The deformity will progress until the end of growth. Pain and limited motion and function will be present until forearm length is rebalanced; until the radiocarpal, ulnocarpal, and


radioulnar joints are restored; and until the TFCC tear and areas of chondromalacia are repaired or debrided (32,106,107).
FIGURE 9-26 Osseous bridge resection. A. This 10-year-old had sustained a distal radial physeal injury 3 years previously and now complained of prominence of the distal ulna with decreased supination and pronation. B. Polytomes revealed a well-defined central osseous bridge involving about 25% of the total diameter of the physis. C. The bridge was resected, and autogenous fat was inserted into the defect. Growth resumed with resumption of the normal ulnar variance. Epiphysiodesis of the distal ulna was postponed for 6 months. D. Unfortunately, the radius slowed its growth, and a symptomatic positive ulnar variance developed. E. This was treated with an epiphysiodesis (open arrow) and surgical shortening of the ulna. The clinical appearance and range of motion of the forearm returned to essentially normal.
Ideally, physeal arrest of the distal radius will be discovered early before the consequences of unbalanced growth develop. Radiographic screening 6 to 12 months after injury can identify the early arrest. A small area of growth arrest in a patient near skeletal maturity may be clinically inconsequential. However, a large area of arrest in a patient with marked growth remaining can lead to ulnocarpal impaction and forearm deformity if intervention is not performed early. An MRI scan can map the area of arrest (108). If it is less than 45% of the physis, a bar resection can be attempted (86,109). This may restore radial growth and prevent future problems (Fig. 9-26). If the bar is larger than 45% of the physis, bar resection is unlikely to be successful. An early ulnar epiphysiodesis will prevent growth imbalance of the forearm (106). The growth discrepancy between forearms in most patients is minor and does not require treatment. However, this is not the case for a patient with an arrest at a very young age, for whom complicated decisions regarding forearm lengthening need to occur.
Ulnocarpal Impaction Syndrome
The growth discrepancy between the radius and ulna can lead to relative radial shortening and ulnar overgrowth. The distal ulna can impinge on the lunate and triquetrum and cause pain with ulnar deviation, extension, and compression activities (110). This is particularly true in repetitive wrist loading sports such as field hockey, lacrosse, and gymnastics (111). Physical examination loading the ulnocarpal joint in ulnar deviation and compression will recreate the pain. X-rays show the radial arrest, ulnar overgrowth, and distal ulnocarpal impingement. The ulnocarpal impaction also may be caused by a hypertrophic ulnar styloid fracture union (Fig. 9-27) or an ulnar styloid nonunion (112,113). An MRI scan may reveal chondromalacia of the lunate or triquetrum, a tear of the TFCC, and the extent of the distal radial physeal arrest.
Treatment should correct all components of the problem. The ulnar overgrowth is corrected by either an ulnar shortening osteotomy or radial lengthening. Most often a marked degree of positive ulnar variance requires ulnar shortening to neutral or negative variance (Fig. 9-28). If the ulnar physis is still open, a simultaneous arrest should be performed to prevent recurrent deformity. If the degree of radial deformity is marked, this should be corrected by a realignment or lengthening osteotomy. Criteria for radial correction is debatable, but we have used radial inclination of less than 11 degrees on the AP x-ray (Fig. 9-29) (106). In the rare case of complete arrest in a very young patient, radial lengthening is preferable to ulnar shortening to rebalance the forearm.
Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears
Triangular fibrocartilage complex tears should be repaired. The presence of an ulnar styloid nonunion at the base often is indicative of an associated peripheral tear of the TFCC (32,106,107). The symptomatic ulnar styloid nonunion is excised (112,113,114) and any TFCC tear repaired. If physical examination or preoperative MRI scan indicates a TFCC tear in the absence of an ulnar styloid nonunion, an initial arthroscopic examination can define the lesion and appropriate treatment. Peripheral tears are the most common TFCC tears in children and adolescents and can be repaired arthroscopically by an outside-in suture technique. Tears off the sigmoid notch are the next most common in adolescents and can be repaired with arthroscopic-assisted, transradial sutures. Central tears are rare in children and as opposed to adults with degenerative central tears, arthroscopic debridement usually does not result in pain relief in children. Distal volar tears also are rare and are repaired open, at times with ligament reconstruction (32).
FIGURE 9-27 Anteroposterior x-ray revealing hypertrophic ulnar styloid healing as the source of the ulnar carpal impaction pain in this patient.
Median neuropathy can occur from direct trauma from the initial displacement of the fracture, traction ischemia from a persistently displaced fracture, or the development of a compartment syndrome in the carpal canal or volar forearm (Fig. 9-30) (31). All patients with displaced distal radial fractures should undergo a careful motor-sensory examination upon presentation to an acute care facility. The flexor pollicis longus, index flexor digitorum profundus, and abductor pollicis brevis muscles should be tested. Light touch and two-point discrimination sensibility of the thumb and index finger should be tested in any child over 5 years of age with a displaced Salter-Harris type I or II fracture. The presence of median neuropathy and marked volar soft-tissue swelling are indications for percutaneous pin stabilization of the fracture to lessen the risk of compartment syndrome in a cast.
Median neuropathy caused by direct trauma or traction ischemia


generally resolves after fracture reduction. The degree of neural injury will determine the length of time to recovery. Recovery can be monitored with an advancing Tinel sign along the median nerve. Motor-sensory testing can define progressive return of neural function.
FIGURE 9-28 A. Anteroposterior x-ray of distal radial growth arrest, ulnar overgrowth, and an ulnar styloid nonunion. Wrist arthroscopy revealed an intact triangular fibrocartilage complex. B. Anteroposterior and lateral x-rays after ulnar shortening osteotomy.
FIGURE 9-29 A. More severe ulnar overgrowth with dislocation of the distal radioulnar joint and flattening of the radial articular surface. B. Intraoperative fluoroscopic view of ulnar shortening and radial osteotomy to corrective deformities.
FIGURE 9-30 Volar forearm anatomy outlining the potential compression of the median nerve between the metaphysis of the radius and dorsally displaced physeal fracture. The taut volar transverse carpal ligament and fracture hematoma also are contributing factors. (Redrawn from Waters PM, Kolettis GJ, Schwend R. Acute median neuropathy following physeal fractures of the distal radius. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14:173–177; with permission.)
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Median neuropathy caused by a carpal tunnel syndrome will not recover until the carpal tunnel is decompressed. After anatomic fracture reduction and pin stabilization, volar forearm and carpal tunnel pressures are measured. Gelberman (115) recommended waiting 20 minutes or more to allow for pressure-volume equilibration before measuring pressures. If the pressures are elevated beyond 40 mm Hg or the difference between the diastolic pressure and the compartment pressure is less than 30 mm Hg (92), an immediate release of the affected compartments should be performed. The carpal tunnel is released through a palmar incision in line with the fourth ray, with care to avoid injuring the palmar vascular arch and the ulnar nerves exiting the Guyon’s canal. The transverse carpal ligament is released with a Z-plasty closure of the ligament to prevent late bow-stringing of the nerve against the palmar skin. The volar forearm fascia is released in the standard fashion.
Repetitive axial loading of the wrist in dorsiflexion can lead to physeal stress injuries, almost always involving the radius. Competitive gymnastics is by far the most common cause (21,22,23,25,116,117,118). Other activities reported to cause radial physeal stress fractures include break dancing (27). Factors that predispose to this injury include excessive training, poor techniques, and attempts to advance too quickly in competitive level. Proper coaching is important in preventing these injuries.
A child with a radial physeal stress fracture has recurring, activity-related wrist pain, usually aching and diffuse, in the region of the distal radial metaphysis and physis. Extremes of dorsiflexion and palmar flexion reproduce the pain. There is local tenderness over the dorsal, distal radial physis. Resistive contracture strength testing of the wrist dorsiflexors often reproduces the pain. There may be fusiform swelling about the wrist if there is reactive bone formation. The differential diagnosis includes physeal stress injury, ganglion, ligamentous or TFCC injury, tendonitis or muscle-tendon tear, fracture such as a scaphoid fracture, and osteonecrosis of the scaphoid (Preiser’s disease) or lunate (Kienbock’s disease). X-rays may be diagnostic. Physeal widening and reactive bone formation are indicative of chronic physeal stress fracture. Premature physeal closure indicates long-standing stress (24,119). In this situation, continued ulnar growth leads to an ulnar positive variance and pain from ulnocarpal impaction or a TFCC tear (20,25,111). Normal x-rays may not show an early physeal stress fracture. If the diagnosis is suggested clinically, a bone scan or MRI scan is indicated. Bone scans are sensitive but nonspecific. MRI scans usually are diagnostic.
Treatment first and foremost involves rest. This may be difficult depending on the skill level of the athlete and the desires of the child, coach, and parents to maintain constant training. Education regarding the long-term consequences of a growth arrest is important in this emotionally charged situation. Short-arm cast immobilization for several weeks may be the only way to restrict stress to the radial physis in some patients. Splint protection is appropriate in cooperative patients. Protection should continue until there is resolution of pain with examination and activity. The athlete can maintain cardiovascular fitness, strength, and flexibility while protecting the injured wrist. Once the acute physeal injury has healed, return to weight-bearing activities should be gradual. This requires the cooperation of the coach and parents. Adjustment of techniques and training methods often is necessary to prevent recurrence. The major concern is development of a radial growth arrest in a skeletally immature patient. This is an avoidable complication.
If a radial growth arrest has already occurred upon presentation, treatment depends on the degree of deformity and the patient’s symptoms. Physeal bar resection often is not possible because the arrest is too diffuse in stress injuries. If there is no significant ulnar overgrowth, a distal ulnar epiphysiodesis will prevent the development of an ulnocarpal impaction syndrome. For ulnar overgrowth and ulnocarpal pain, an ulnar shortening osteotomy is indicated. Techniques include transverse, oblique, and Z-shortening osteotomies. Transverse osteotomy has a higher risk of nonunion than either oblique or Z-shortening and should be avoided. The status of the TFCC also should

be evaluated by MRI scan or wrist arthroscopy. If there is an associated TFCC tear, it should be repaired as appropriate.
Isolated ulnar physeal fractures are rare injuries. Most ulnar physeal fractures occur in association with radial metaphyseal or physeal fractures. Physeal separations are classified by the standard Salter-Harris criteria. The rare pediatric Galeazzi injury usually involves an ulnar physeal fracture rather than a soft-tissue disruption of the distal radioulnar joint. Another ulnar physeal fracture is an avulsion fracture off the distal aspect of the ulnar styloid (68). Although an ulnar styloid injury is an epiphyseal avulsion, it can be associated with soft-tissue injuries of the TFCC and ulnocarpal joint but does not cause growth-related complications.
FIGURE 9-31 A, B. A 10-year-old boy sustained a closed Salter-Harris type I separation of the distal ulnar physis (arrows), combined with a fracture of the distal radial metaphysis. C. An excellent closed reduction was achieved atraumatically. D. Long-term growth arrest of the distal ulna occurred.
Physeal growth arrest is frequent with distal ulnar physeal fractures (Fig. 9-31). Occurring in 21% (120) to 55% (105,121) of patients. It is unclear why the distal ulna has a higher incidence of growth arrest after fracture than does the radius. Ulnae growth arrest in a young child leads to relative radial overgrowth and bowing.
Current Treatment Options
Treatment options are similar to those for radial physeal fractures: immobilization alone, closed reduction and cast immobilization, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, and open reduction. Often these fractures are minimally displaced or nondisplaced. Immobilization until fracture healing at 3 to 6 weeks is standard treatment. Closed reduction is indicated for displaced fractures with more than 50% translation or 20° angulation.

Most ulnar physeal fractures reduce to a near anatomic alignment with reduction of the radial fracture. Failure to obtain a reduction of the ulnar fracture may indicate that there is soft-tissue interposed in the fracture site. This is an indication for open reduction. Exposure should be from the side of the torn periosteum. The interposed soft-tissue (periosteum, extensor tendons, abductor digiti quinti, or flexor tendons) must be extracted from the fracture site (122,123,124). If reduction is not stable, a small-diameter smooth pin can be used to maintain alignment until healing at 3 to 4 weeks. Further injury to the physis should be avoided during operative exposure and reduction because of the high risk of growth arrest.
Ulnar styloid avulsion fractures are common in association with radial fractures (68) and represent a soft-tissue avulsion of the attachment of the TFCC or ulnocarpal ligaments. Treatment consists of immobilization and monitoring of long-term outcome, and most heal without sequelae (125). However, an acute displaced fracture of the base of the styloid represents a disruption of the TFCC. Most of these injuries are caused by high-velocity trauma in adolescents at or near skeletal maturity. Treatment should be open reduction with tension band fixation of the styloid to the metaphysis and repair of the TFCC. The tension band wire is removed at 3 to 6 weeks.
Some ulnar styloid fractures result in nonunion or hypertrophic union (32,112,113,114). Nonunion may be associated with TFCC tears or ulnocarpal impaction. The hypertrophic healing represents a pseudo-ulnar positive variance and ulnocarpal impaction. Both cause ulnar-sided wrist pain. Compression of the lunate or triquetrum on the distal ulna reproduces the pain. Clicking with ulnocarpal compression or forearm rotation represents either a TFCC tear or chondromalacia of the lunate or triquetrum. Surgical excision of the nonunion or hypertrophic union with repair of the TFCC to the base of the styloid is the treatment of choice. Postoperative immobilization for 4 weeks in a long-arm cast followed by 2 weeks in a short-arm cast protects the TFCC repair.
Growth Arrest
The most common complication of distal ulnar physeal fractures is growth arrest. Golz (121) described 18 such fractures, with growth arrest in 10%. If the patient is young enough, continued growth of the radius will lead to deformity and dysfunction. The distal ulnar aspect of the radial physis and epiphysis appears to be tethered by the foreshortened ulna (Fig. 9-32). The radial articular surface develops increased inclination toward the foreshortened ulna. This is similar to the deformity Peinado (126) created experimentally with arrest of the distal ulna in rabbits’ forelimbs. The distal ulna loses its normal articulation in the sigmoid notch of the distal radius. The metaphyseal-diaphyseal region of the radius often becomes notched from its articulation with the distal ulna during forearm rotation. Frequently, these patients have pain and limitation of motion with pronation and supination (110).
Ideally, this problem is identified before the development of marked ulnar foreshortening and subsequent radial deformity. Because it is well known that distal ulnar physeal fractures have a high incidence of growth arrest, these patients should have serial x-rays for early identification. Unfortunately, in the distal ulnar physis, physeal bar resection generally is unsuccessful. Surgical arrest of the radial physis can prevent radial deformity. Usually this occurs toward the end of growth so that the forearm length discrepancy is not a problem.
Rarely patients present late with established deformity. Treatment involves rebalancing the length of the radius and ulna. The options include hemiphyseal arrest of the radius, corrective radial closing wedge osteotomy, and ulnar lengthening (Figs. 9-32 and 9-33) (110,120,121), or a combination of these procedures (Figs. 9-34 and 9-35). The painful impingement of the radius and ulna with forearm rotation can be corrected with reconstitution of the distal radioulnar joint. If the radial physis has significant growth remaining, a radial physeal arrest should be done at the same time as the surgical rebalancing of the radius and ulna (127). Treatment is individualized depending on the age of the patient, degree of deformity, and level of pain and dysfunction.
The metaphysis of the distal radius is the most common site of forearm fracture in children and adolescents (2,3,128,129). They occur most commonly in boys in the nondominant arm (130). These fractures have a peak incidence during the adolescent growth spurt, which in girls is age 11 to 12 years and in boys is 12 to 13 years (8). During this time of extensive bone remodeling, there is relative osteoporosis of the distal radial metaphysis, which makes this area more susceptible to fracture with a fall.
Mechanism of Injury
The mechanism of injury generally is a fall on an outstretched hand. The usual dorsiflexion position of the wrist leads to tension failure on the volar side. Fracture type and degree of displacement depend on the height and velocity of the fall (128). These fractures can be nondisplaced torus or buckle injuries (common in younger children with a minimal fall) or dorsally displaced fractures with apex volar angulation (more common in older children with higher velocity injuries) (Fig. 9-33). Displacement may be severe enough to cause foreshortening and bayonet apposition (Fig. 9-34). Rarely, a mechanism such as a fall from a height can cause a distal radial fracture associated with a more proximal fracture of the forearm or elbow (Fig. 9-35) (131,132,133). These “floating elbow” situations are indicative of higher velocity of trauma and risk of compartment syndrome (30). In addition, a fall with a palmar flexed wrist can produce



a volarly displaced fracture with apex dorsal angulation (Fig. 9-36).
FIGURE 9-32 A. The appearance of the distal ulna in the patient seen in Figure 9-21, 3 years after injury, demonstrating premature fusion of the distal ulnar physis with 3.2 cm of shortening. The distal radius is secondarily deformed, with tilting and translocation toward the ulna. B. In the patient in Figure 9-21 with distal ulnar physeal arrest, a lengthening of the distal ulna was performed using a small unipolar distracting device. The ulna was slightly overlengthened to compensate for some subsequent growth of the distal radius. C. Six months after the lengthening osteotomy, there is some deformity of the distal ulna, but good restoration of length has been achieved. The distal radial epiphyseal tilt has corrected somewhat, and the patient has asymptomatic supination and pronation to 75 degrees. D. Similar case to Figure 9-32AC, but with more progressive distal radial deformity treated with corrective osteotomy and epiphysiodesis of the distal radius.
FIGURE 9-33 Metaphyseal biomechanical patterns. A. Torus fracture. Simple bulging of the thin cortex (arrow). B. Compression greenstick fracture. Angulation of the dorsal cortex (large curved arrow). The volar cortex is intact but slightly plastically deformed (small white arrows). C. Tension failure greenstick fracture. The dorsal cortex is plastically deformed (white arrow) and the volar cortex is complete and separated (black arrows). D. Complete length maintained. Both cortices are completely fractured, but the length of the radius has been maintained. (Reprinted from Wilkins KE, ed. Operative management of upper extremity fractures in children. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1994:24; with permission.)
FIGURE 9-34 Complete fractures; bayonet apposition. A. Dorsal bayonet. B. Volar bayonet.
Seasonal variation has been noted in these fractures in children younger than 15 years of age. (16). The incidence of wrist and forearm fractures was roughly half (5.7/1000 per year) in the three winter months in Wales compared with the rest of the year (10.7/1000 per year). In addition. the nonwinter month fractures were more severe in terms of requiring reduction and hospitalization in this longitudinal study. Certain sports, such as snowboarding, soccer goalkeeping, and horseback riding, have been shown to have an increased risk of distal radial fracture (11,12,13,14,69,134). Protective wrist guards have been shown to decrease the injury rate in snowboarders, especially beginners and persons with rental equipment (13).
FIGURE 9-35 A 10-year-old girl with an innocuous-appearing distal radial fracture associated with an ipsilateral angulated radial neck fracture (arrows).
Signs and Symptoms
Children with distal radial fractures present with pain, swelling, and deformity of the distal forearm (Fig. 9-37). The clinical signs depend on the degree of fracture displacement. With a nondisplaced torus fracture in a young child, medical attention may not be sought until several days after injury, because the intact periosteum is protective in this situation, lessening pain and the child’s restriction of activities. Most children with distal radial fractures, however, present acutely after the fall with an obvious deformity. Physical examination is limited by the patient’s pain and anxiety, but it is imperative to obtain an accurate examination of the motor and sensory components of the radial, median, and ulnar nerves before treatment. Median nerve motor function is evaluated by testing the abductor pollicis brevis (intrinsic) and flexor pollicis longus (extrinsic) muscles. Ulnar nerve motor evaluation includes testing the first dorsal interosseous (intrinsic), abductor digit quinti (intrinsic), and flexor digitorum profundus to the small finger (extrinsic) muscles. Radial nerve evaluation involves testing the common digital extensors for metacarpophalangeal joint extension. Sensibility to light touch and two-point discrimination should be tested. Normal two-point discrimination is less than 5 mm but is not present until age 5 to 7 years. Pin-prick sensibility testing will only hurt and scare the already anxious child and should be avoided. A prospective study indicated an 8% incidence of nerve injury in children with distal radial fractures (130).
Associated Injuries
The ipsilateral extremity should be carefully examined for fractures of the carpus (34), forearm, or elbow (87,133,135,136,137,138,139,140,141) because 3% to 13% of distal radial fractures have associated ipsilateral extremity fractures (133,142), increasing the risk of neurovascular compromise and compartment syndrome (52,132,133). In the multitrauma patient, fracture care is appropriately modified to coincide with appropriate systemic care.
FIGURE 9-36 Reverse bayonet. A. Typical volar bayonet fracture. Often the distal end of the proximal fragment is buttonholed through the extensor tendons (arrows). (Reprinted from Wilkins KE, ed. Operative management of upper extremity fractures in children. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1994:27; with permission.) B. Intact volar periosteum and disrupted dorsal periosteum (arrows). The extensor tendons are displaced to either side of the proximal fragment.
FIGURE 9-37 Dorsal bayonet deformity. A. Typical distal metaphyseal fracture with dorsal bayonet showing a dorsal angulation of the distal forearm. B. Usually the periosteum is intact on the dorsal side and disrupted on the volar side.


Diagnosis and Classification
X-rays are diagnostic of the fracture type and degree of displacement. Standard AP and lateral x-rays usually are sufficient. Complete wrist, forearm, and elbow views are necessary for high-velocity injuries or when there is clinical tenderness. More extensive radiographic studies (CT scan, tomograms) usually are not necessary unless there is intra-articular extension of the metaphyseal fracture in a skeletally mature adolescent.
These fractures are classified by fracture pattern, type of associated ulnar fracture, and direction of displacement. Fracture displacement is broadly classified as dorsal or volar. Most distal radial metaphyseal fractures are displaced dorsally with apex volar angulation (3). Volar displacement with apex dorsal angulation can occur with palmar flexion injuries.
Metaphyseal fracture patterns are torus, incomplete or greenstick, and complete fractures. Torus fractures are axial compression injuries. The site of cortical failure is the transition from metaphysis to diaphysis (143). These injuries are stable because of the intact periosteum. Rarely, they may extend into the physis, putting them at risk for growth impairment (81,108). Incomplete or greenstick fractures occur with a combination of compressive and rotatory forces, generally a dorsiflexion force and supination deforming force. This leads to a volar tension-side failure and a dorsal compression injury. The degree of force determines the amount of plastic deformation, dorsal comminution, and fracture angulation and rotation. If the force is sufficient, a complete fracture occurs with disruption of both the volar and dorsal cortices. Length may be maintained with apposition of the proximal and distal fragments. Frequently, the distal fragment lies proximal and dorsal to the proximal fragment in bayonet apposition (Table 9-2).
TABLE 9-2 Classification: Distal Metaphyseal Fractures
Directional displacement
Fracture combinations
   Isolated radius
   Radius with ulna
   Ulnar styloid
   Ulnar physis
   Ulnar metaphysis, incomplete
   Ulnar metaphysis, complete
Biomechanical patterns
   One cortex
   Two cortices
   Complete fracture
   Length maintained
   Bayonet apposition
The ulnar fracture often associated with radial metaphyseal fracture can be metaphyseal or physeal, or an ulnar styloid avulsion. Similar to radial metaphyseal fractures, the ulnar fracture can be complete or incomplete.
Distal radial fractures also can occur in conjunction with more proximal forearm fractures (144), Monteggia fracture–dislocations (145), supracondylar distal humeral fractures (52,132,135), or carpal fractures (34,136,137,138,140,141,145). The combination of a displaced supracondylar distal humeral fracture and a displaced distal radial metaphyseal fracture has been called the pediatric floating elbow. This injury combination is unstable and has an increased risk for malunion and neurovascular compromise.
Pediatric distal radial metaphyseal fractures are not classified by degree of instability. Unstable fractures have been predominately defined by the failure to maintain a successful closed reduction (Fig. 9-38). This occurs in approximately 30% of complete distal radial metaphyseal fractures (38,39,40). This high percentage of loss of alignment has been tolerated because of the remodeling potential of the distal radius. Anatomic remodeling is possible because the extension deformity is in the plane of motion of the wrist joint, the metaphyseal fracture is juxtaphyseal, and most of these fractures occur while there is still significant growth remaining. However, concern has increased about the high failure rate of closed reduction to maintain anatomic alignment of these fractures. Factors that have been identified as increasing the risk of loss of reduction with closed manipulation and casting include poor casting, bayonet apposition, translation of more than 50% the diameter of the radius, apex volar angulation of more than 30 degrees, isolated radial fractures, and radial and ulnar metaphyseal fractures at the same level (38,39,40).
Current Treatment Options
Treatment options are similar to those for radial physeal fractures: immobilization alone, closed reduction and cast immobilization, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, and open reduction. The fracture type, degree of fracture instability, associated soft-tissue or skeletal trauma, and the age of the patient all influence choice of treatment.
Torus Fractures
Torus fractures are compression injuries with minimal cortical disruption. If only one cortex is violated, the injury is stable. Treatment should consist of protected immobilization to prevent further injury and relieve pain (134,146,147). Once the patient is comfortable, range-of-motion exercises and nontraumatic activities can begin. Fracture healing usually occurs in 2 to 4 weeks (1,70,113,124). Simple torus fractures usually heal without long-term sequelae.
Bicortical disruption on both the AP and lateral views indicates a more severe injury than a stable torus fracture. Splint or limited immobilization in this situation puts the child at risk for displacement. More prolonged, long-arm cast protection in


a young patient who can wiggle out of a short-arm cast and closer follow-up generally are recommended to lessen the risk of malunion. These fractures generally heal in 3 to 6 weeks.
TABLE 9-3 Acceptable Angular Corrections in Degrees
Saggital Plane
Age (yr) Boys Girls Frontal Plane
4–9 20 15 15
9–11 15 10 5
11–13 10 10 0
>13 5 0 0
Acceptable residual angulation is that which will result in total radiographic and functional correction. (Courtesy B. deCourtivron, MD. Centre Hospitalie Universitaire de Tours. Tours, France.)
FIGURE 9-38 Serial x-rays at 3 days (A) and 10 days (B) revealing slow loss of reduction that is common after closed reduction of distal radial metaphyseal fractures.
Incomplete/Greenstick Fractures
Immobilization Alone
Treatment of incomplete distal radial and ulnar fractures depends on the age of the patient, the degree and direction of fracture displacement and angulation, the surgeon’s biases regarding remodeling, and the surgeon’s and community’s biases regarding deformity. In younger patients, the remodeling potential of an acute distal radial malunion is extremely high. Acceptable sagittal plane angulation of an acute distal radial metaphyseal fracture has been reported to be from 10 to 35 degrees in patients under 5 years of age (124,130,148,149,150,151,152). Similarly, in patients under 10 years of age, the degree of acceptable angulation has ranged from 10 to 25 degrees (124,130,148,149,150,151,152). In patients over 10 years of age, acceptable alignment has ranged from 5 to 20 degrees depending on the skeletal maturity of the patient (Table 9-3) (40,124,130,148,149,150,151,152,153).
FIGURE 9-39 Bayonet remodeling. A. After numerous attempts at closed reduction, the best alignment that could be obtained was dorsal bayonet apposition in this 8-year-old. B. Three months after fracture, there is good healing and early remodeling. C, D. Five years after the injury (age 13), remodeling was complete and the patient had normal appearance and forearm motion.
The high potential for remodeling of a distal radial metaphyseal malunion has led some clinicians to recommend immobilization alone. As mentioned, the range of accepted sagittal malalignment has been broad and is age and clinician dependent (Figs. 9-39 and 9-40).
Acceptable frontal plane deformity has been more uniform. The fracture tends to displace radially with an apex ulnar angulation. This does have the potential to remodel (154), but less so than sagittal plane deformity. Most researchers agree that only 10 degrees or less of acute malalignment in the frontal plane should be accepted. More malalignment than this may not remodel and may result in loss of forearm rotation because of the loss of interosseous space between the radius and ulna (Table 9-3) (155).
FIGURE 9-40 Extensive remodeling. A. Injury film of a 7-year-old with a tension failure greenstick fracture. B, C. Lateral and anteroposterior views of the same patient taken 1 month later showing development of 45-degree angulation in the sagittal plane and 40 degrees in the coronal plane. D, E. True appearance taken 4 years later shows only residual angulation of 10 degrees in the sagittal plane and full correction of radial angulation in the coronal plane. The patient had a range of forearm motion equal to that of the opposite extremity and was asymptomatic.


Closed Reduction
Most displaced and malaligned incomplete fractures should be reduced closed. The areas of controversy are the degree of acceptable deformity, whether the intact cortex should be fractured, and the position and type of immobilization.
Controversies about acceptable angulation of the fracture after closed reduction involve the same differences discussed in the immobilization section. As mentioned, more malalignment can be accepted in younger patients, in those with sagittal plane deformity, and in those without marked cosmetic deformity. Malaligned apex volar incomplete fractures are less obvious than the less common apex dorsal fractures.
As Evans (156) and Rang (79) emphasized, incomplete forearm fractures have a rotatory component to their malalignment. The more common apex volar fractures represent a supination deformity, whereas the less common apex dorsal fractures are malrotated in pronation. Correction of the malrotation is necessary to achieve anatomic alignment. Controversy exists regarding completion of greenstick fractures (5,79,157,158,159). Although many researchers advocate completion of the fracture to reduce the risk of subsequent loss of reduction from the intact periosteum and concave deformity acting as a tension band (130,160) to redisplace the fracture, completing the fracture increases the risk of instability and malunion.
The position and type of immobilization also have been controversial. Recommendations for the position of postreduction immobilization include supination, neutral, and pronation. The rationale for immobilization in pronation is that reduction of the more common apex volar fractures requires correction of the supination deformity (156). Following this rationale, apex dorsal fractures should be reduced and immobilized in supination. Pollen (152) believed that the brachioradialis was a deforming force in pronation and was relaxed in supination (Fig. 9-41) and advocated immobilization in supination for all displaced distal radial fractures. Kasser (92) recommended immobilization in slight supination to allow better molding of the volar distal radius. Some researchers advocate immobilization in a neutral position, believing this is best at maintaining the interosseous space and has the least risk of disabling loss of forearm rotation in the long term (150,161,162). Davis and Green (159) and Ogden (124) advocate that each fracture seek its own preferred position of stability. Gupta and Danielsson (88) randomized immobilization of distal radial metaphyseal greenstick fractures in neutral, supination, or pronation to try to determine the best position of immobilization. Their study showed a statistical improvement in final healing with immobilization in supination.
Another area of controversy is whether long-arm or short-arm cast immobilization is better. Most publications on pediatric distal radial fracture treatment advocate long-arm cast treatment for the first 3 to 4 weeks of healing (1,70,92,124,148,162). The rationale is that elbow flexion reduces the muscle forces acting to displace the fracture. In addition, a long-arm cast may further restrict the child’s activity and therefore decrease the risk of displacement. However, Chess et al (89,90) reported redisplacement and reduction rates with well-molded short-arm casts similar to those with long-arm casts. They used a cast index (sagittal diameter divided by coronal diameter at the fracture site) of 0.7 or less to indicate a well-molded cast. Wilkins achieved similar results with short-arm cast treatment (130). The short-arm cast offers the advantage of elbow mobility and better patient acceptance of casting. Despite these data and recommendations, in most centers the standard is long-arm cast immobilization (1,70,148,162,163).
FIGURE 9-41 The brachioradialis is relaxed in supination but may become a deforming force in pronation. (Reprinted from Pollen AG. Fractures and dislocations in children. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1973; with permission.)
Complete fractures of the distal radius, with or without an associated displaced ulnar fracture, are unstable fractures. Generally these fractures are displaced dorsally, tearing the volar periosteum and soft-tissues. The distal fragment of epiphysis and metaphysis often is in bayonet apposition with the proximal fragment. Concomitant radial and ulnar fractures at the same level may be more unstable than isolated fractures (40). However, Gibbons reported loss of reduction in 91% of isolated radial fractures after closed reduction. Although a rare fracture with bayonet apposition in a very young patient may remodel (130), the standard treatment for completely displaced fractures is reduction and stabilization. The current controversy is whether cast immobilization alone is adequate stabilization or whether percutaneous pin fixation is more appropriate for displaced, complete, distal radial metaphyseal fractures (164,165,166).
Reduction Techniques
Techniques of reduction have included initial distraction with finger traps (159,160) followed by direct manipulation of the

fracture by accentuating the deformity. Both Rang (79) and Fernandez (158) expressed concern about the success of finger trap distraction because the intact dorsal periosteum will not stretch adequately to allow reduction. They advocated sequential reduction maneuvers: initial manipulation of the distal fragment dorsally to accentuate the deformity (Fig. 9-42), thumb pressure on the relaxed dorsal edge of the distal fragment to correct the overriding, and reduction of the fracture by forcible application of distal and volar pressure (Fig. 9-43). Anatomic reduction may require repetitive “toggling” of the distal fragment volarly. Reduction is then assessed with fluoroscopic imaging (Fig. 9-44).
FIGURE 9-42 A, B. Use of the thumb to push the distal fragment hyperdorsiflexed 90 degrees (solid arrow) until length is reestablished. Countertraction is applied in the opposite direction (open arrows).
FIGURE 9-43 A, B. Once length has been reestablished, the distal fragment is flexed into the correct position. Alignment is checked by determining the position of the fragments with the thumb and forefingers of each hand.
FIGURE 9-44 Once reduced, the fracture is maintained with finger trap traction and countertraction on the arm. The quality of reduction is assessed quickly with the image intensifier.

There is considerable controversy about what constitutes an acceptable reduction (167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174). This is clearly age dependent, because the younger the patient, the greater the potential for remodeling. Volar-dorsal malalignment has the greatest potential for remodeling because this is in the plane of predominant motion of the joint. Marked radioulnar malalignment is less likely to remodel. Malrotation will not remodel. The ranges for acceptable reduction according to age are given in the immobilization section on incomplete fractures and apply to complete fractures as well.
Cast Immobilization
As discussed earlier, there is some disagreement regarding short-arm or long-arm cast immobilization (89,90,130). However, regardless of the length of the cast, it is imperative to have a well-molded cast over the fracture site (Fig. 9-45). After reduction of a dorsally displaced fracture, three-point fixation is used with dorsal pressure proximal and distal to the fracture site and volar pressure over the reduced fracture (Fig. 9-46). The cast should be molded to the normal contour of the forearm. An extension long-arm cast can be used in younger children to better maintain reduction of the ulnar bow. A thumb spica

component with felt over the dorsum of the thumb and wrist prevents distal migration of cast and skin irritation. Excessive swelling should be monitored due to dependency of the hand. If there is any concern regarding impending compartment syndrome, the cast and Webril should be immediately bivalved and the patient’s clinical status monitored closely. In general, closed reduction and well-molded casting will result in successful healing of the fracture in desired alignment (Fig. 9-47).
FIGURE 9-45 Three-point molding. Top. Three-point molding for dorsally angulated (apex volar) fractures, with the proximal and distal points on the dorsal aspect of the cast and the middle point on the volar aspect just proximal to the fracture site. Bottom. For volar angulated fractures, where the periosteum is intact volarly and disrupted on the dorsal surface, three-point molding is performed with the proximal and distal points on the volar surface of the cast and the middle point just proximal to the fracture site on the dorsal aspect of the cast.
FIGURE 9-46 Anteroposterior and lateral x-rays of anatomic alignment with closed reduction of a distal radial metaphyseal fracture.
The primary problem with closed reduction and cast immobilization is loss of reduction (Fig. 9-48). There are many studies that indicate an incidence of loss of reduction in the 20% to 30% range (Fig. 9-48) (38,39,166). Mani et al (38) and Proctor et al (39) described remanipulation rates of 21% and 23%, respectively. Mani et al (38) concluded that initial displacement of the radial shaft of over 50% was the single most reliable predictor of failure of reduction. Proctor et al (39) found that complete initial displacement resulted in a 52% incidence of redisplacement of distal radial fractures in children. Gibbons et al (41) noted that completely displaced distal radial fractures with intact ulnas had a remanipulation rate of 91% after closed reduction and cast immobilization alone compared to a 0% rate of remanipulation when the same fractures were treated with closed reduction, Kirschner wire fixation, and cast immobilization. All three researchers strongly advocated percutaneous pinning of distal radial fractures at risk of redisplacement. Widmann and Waters (40) prospectively studied all distal radial fractures in children requiring reduction over the course of 1 year. Of the 86 distal radial metaphyseal fractures, 31% lost reduction and required further intervention with repeat reduction, casting, or pinning. In patients over 10 years of age with angulation of more than 30 degrees, the remanipulation rate was 75%. These findings led to a prospective, randomized study by Miller et al (175) of distal radial metaphyseal fractures treated by either closed reduction and cast immobilization or closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Selection criteria were a closed metaphyseal fracture angulated more than 30° in a skeletally immature patient over 10 years of age. To maximize the outcome of the cast immobilization group, these patients were treated by a member of the Pediatric Orthopedic Society of North America with expertise in trauma care. General anesthesia, fluoroscopic control, and a long-arm cast were used. Despite these optimal conditions, 30% of the patients in the cast immobilization group lost reduction and required remanipulation. These findings were similar to McLaughlin’s prospective study of pinning and cast treatment of distal radius metaphyseal fractures (166). Again, closed reduction and cast immobilization had a loss of reduction rate of 21% whereas pinning maintained reduction. The authors of these prospective, randomized studies concluded that pinning is a safe effective means of treating distal radial metaphyseal fractures.
FIGURE 9-47 A. Lateral x-ray of displaced metaphyseal radial and ulnae fractures. B. Anteroposterior and lateral x-rays show anatomic alignment after closed reduction.
The results of all of these studies indicate that distal radial metaphyseal fractures with initial displacement of more than

30 degrees are inherently unstable. Loss of reduction is common, with the risk in the 20%-to-60% range. Incomplete reduction (38,39) and poor casting techniques (89,90,130) increase the risk of loss of reduction. In addition, the risk of loss of reduction increases with the age of the patient and the degree of initial displacement. Bayonet apposition in a child older than 10 years is the highest risk.
FIGURE 9-48 Results of angulation. A. Significant apex volar angulation of the distal fragment. B. The appearance was not as apparent cosmetically as in another patient with less angulation that was directed apex dorsally. (Reprinted from Wilkins KE, ed. Operative management of upper extremity fractures in children. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1994:27; with permission.) C. Radial deviation constricts the interosseous space, which may decrease forearm rotation. (Reprinted from Wilkins KE, ed. Operative management of upper extremity fractures in children. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1994:28; with permission.)
Loss of reduction requires repeat manipulation to avoid a malunion. Although the rate of malunion is frequent after these fractures (70,72,75,76,89,90,92,93,159,176,177), because of the potential for remodeling in skeletally immature patients it has not been considered a serious problem (Fig. 9-49) (43,64,65,148,168,169,178). Distal radial fractures are juxtaphyseal, the malunion often is in the plane of motion of the wrist joint (dorsal displacement with apex volar angulation), and the distal radius accounts for 60% to 80% of the growth of the radius. All these factors favor remodeling of a malunion. However, De Courtivron et al (153) reported that of 602 distal radial fractures, 14% had an initial malunion of more than 5 degrees. Of these, 78% corrected the frontal plane deformity and only 53% remodeled completely in the sagittal plane. In addition, 37% had loss of forearm rotation.
Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning
In the past decade or two, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning have become more common as the primary treatment of distal radial metaphyseal fractures in children and adolescents (38,39,40,42,179). The indications cited include fracture instability and high risk of loss of reduction (38,39,179), excessive local swelling that increases the risk of neurovascular compromise (31,42,130), ipsilateral fractures of the distal radius and elbow region (floating elbow) that increase the risk of compartment syndrome (133,155), and the likelihood that remanipulation

will be required (40,130). In addition, surgeon’s preference for pinning in a busy office practice has been considered acceptable due to similar complication rates and long-term outcomes with pinning and casting (166,175) obviating the need for remanipulation as alignment is secure.
FIGURE 9-49 A. Appearance 6 weeks after closed reduction of a distal forearm fracture in an 8½-year-old boy. The radius was reduced, and the [ol8]ulnar fracture remained overriding. B. Eighteen months after injury the ulnar fracture had remodeled completely with symmetric distal radioulnar joints.
Pinning usually is done from distal to proximal under fluoroscopic guidance. When possible, the physis is avoided. Adequate exposure should be obtained to avoid radial sensory nerve or extensor tendon injury. Smooth Kirschner or C-wires are used. In younger patients, a single pin with supplemental cast immobilization may be adequate fixation (Fig 9-50). Crossed pins are more stable (Fig. 9-51). The first pin, or single pin, enters from the radial side distal to the fracture and passes obliquely to the ulnar aspect of the radius proximal to the fracture.

The second pin enters the radius distal to the fracture between the fourth and fifth compartments and passes obliquely across the fracture into the proximal radial side of the radius. The pins are left out through the skin to allow easy removal. Another technique of pinning is intrafocal placement of multiple pins into the fracture site to lever the distal fragment into anatomic reduction (Kapandji technique, Fig. 9-52). The pins are then passed through the opposing cortex for stability (180,181). A supplemental, loose-fitting cast is applied. The advantage of pin fixation is that a tight, well-molded cast is not necessary to maintain reduction. This lessens the risk of neurovascular compromise with associated excessive swelling or ipsilateral fractures. Obviously, pin fixation avoids the risk of loss of reduction in an unstable fracture. Pinning does have the risk of infection and concerns regarding growth injury.
FIGURE 9-50 Severe swelling. A. An 11-year-old with marked displacement and severe swelling from a high-energy injury. B. Once reduced, the fragment was secured with an oblique percutaneous pin across the fracture site. (Reprinted from Wilkins KE, ed. Operative management of upper extremity fractures in children. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1994:29, with permission.)
FIGURE 9-51 Crossed pin technique for stabilization of distal radial metaphyseal fracture in skeletally immature patient.
External Fixation
Unlike distal radial fractures in adults, external fixation rarely is indicated for similar fractures in skeletally immature patients. Although it can be used successfully (176,182), the success rates of both closed reduction and percutaneous pinning techniques make it unnecessary for uncomplicated distal radial fractures in children. The best indication is severe associated soft-tissue injuries. A severe crush injury, open fracture, or replantation after amputation that requires extensive soft-tissue care and surgery are all indications for the use of external fixation. Supplemental external fixation also may be necessary for severely comminuted fractures to maintain length and provide additional stability to pin fixation. Standard application of the specific fixator chosen is done with care to avoid injury to the adjacent sensory nerves and extensor tendons.
FIGURE 9-52 Pin leverage. A. If a bayonet is irreducible, after sterile preparation, a chisel-point Steinmann pin can be inserted between the fracture fragments from a dorsal approach. Care must be taken not to penetrate too deeply past the dorsal cortex of the proximal fragment. B. Once the chisel is across the fracture site, it is levered into position and supplementary pressure is placed on the dorsum of the distal fragment (arrow) to slide it down the skid into place. This procedure is usually performed with an image intensifier.

Open Reduction
Open reduction is indicated for open or irreducible fractures. Open fractures constitute approximately 1% of all distal radial metaphyseal fractures. All open fractures, regardless of grade of soft-tissue injury, should be irrigated and debrided in the operating room (Fig. 9-53). The open wound should be enlarged adequately to debride the contaminated and nonviable tissues and protect the adjacent neurovascular structures. After thorough irrigation and debridement, the fracture should be anatomically reduced and stabilized, usually with two smooth pins. If the soft-tissue injury is severe, supplemental external fixation allows observation and treatment of the wound without jeopardizing the fracture reduction. The original open wound should not be closed primarily. Appropriate prophylactic antibiotics should be used depending on the severity of the open fracture.
Irreducible fractures are rare (Fig. 9-54) and generally are secondary to interposed soft-tissues. With dorsally displaced fractures, the interposed structure usually is the volar periosteum or pronator quadratus (183) and rarely the flexor tendons or neurovascular structures. In volarly displaced fractures, the periosteum or extensor tendons may be interposed. The fracture should be approached in a standard fashion opposite the side of displacement (i.e., volar approach for an irreducible dorsal fracture). The adjacent neurovascular and tendinous structures are protected and the offending soft-tissue is extracted from the fracture site. Pin stabilization is recommended to prevent problems with postoperative swelling or loss of reduction in cast.
FIGURE 9-53 Open fractures. X-ray (A) and clinical photo (B) of an open fracture of the distal radius. This patient needs formal irrigation and debridement in the operating room.
FIGURE 9-54 A 10-year-old girl with a markedly displaced closed fracture of the distal radius with an angulated ulnar fracture. Note the wide separation between the radial fragments. Dimpling of the skin was noted when longitudinal traction was applied and reduction was impossible. At open reduction, the proximal fragment was buttonholed through the forearm fascia and located between the median nerve and finger flexor tendons. The pronator quadratus muscle was also interposed between the two fragments.
Closed reduction rarely fails if there is no interposed soft-tissue. However, occasionally multiple attempts at reduction of a bayonet apposition fracture can lead to significant swelling that makes closed reduction impossible. If the patient is too old to remodel bayonet apposition, open reduction is appropriate. Pin fixation without violating the physis is recommended. Plate fixation can be used in more skeletally mature adolescents. Low profile, fragment specific fixation methods and locking plates also are now commonly used in adult distal radius fractures for internal fixation.
Minimally Displaced Fractures
Displaced greenstick fractures that are reduced are at risk for redisplacement. If left unreduced or poorly immobilized, a mild deformity can become severe during the course of healing. Therefore, closed anatomic reduction is performed in all bicortical fractures with more than 10 degrees of malalignment. Generally these fractures have apex volar angulation and dorsal displacement. Conscious sedation is used with portable fluoroscopy in the emergency care setting. The distal fragment and hand are distracted and then reduced volarly. With isolated distal radial fractures, it is imperative to reduce the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) with appropriate forearm rotation. For apex volar fractures, this usually is with pronation. If the fracture is apex dorsal with volar displacement, the reduction forces are the opposite. A long-arm cast with three-point molding is used for 3 to 4 weeks. X-rays are obtained every 7 to 10 days until there is sufficient callus formation. A short-arm cast or volar wrist splint is used until full healing, generally at 4 to 6 weeks after fracture reduction. The patient is then restricted from contact sports until full motion and strength are regained, which may take up to 3 weeks after cast removal. Formal therapy rarely is required. The patient and parents should be warned at the start of treatment of the risk of redisplacement of the fracture.
Bayonet Apposition
Marked displacement of distal radial metaphyseal fractures usually results in foreshortening and dorsal overlap of the distal fragment on the proximal fragment. This often is associated with a same-level ulnar metaphyseal fracture, similarly in bayonet apposition. Rarely, the distal fragment is in volar bayonet apposition. Both of these situations require more skill of reduction and complete analgesia at the fracture site. At our institution, we reduce this fracture in the emergency room with conscious sedation and supplemental local hematoma block or in the operating room with general anesthesia. In either situation, portable fluoroscopy is used. The fracture usually is reduced in the emergency room in young patients with minimal swelling and no neurovascular compromise and in whom cast treatment will be sufficient. Reduction with general anesthesia is preferred for older patients and for those with marked displacement, swelling, or associated neurovascular compromise in whom percutaneous pin treatment is chosen.
The reduction maneuver is the same regardless of anesthesia type or stabilization method. As opposed to a Colles’ fracture in an adult, traction alone will not reduce the fracture because the dorsal periosteum acts as a tension band that does not respond to increasing linear traction with weights. Finger traps with minimal weight (less than 10 lb) can be used to balance the hand and help with rotational alignment (the “steel resident”) (see Fig. 9-59). However, applying progressive weight will only distract the carpus and will not alter the fracture alignment.
After applying preliminary traction with either light-weight finger traps or hand traction, a hyperdorsiflexion maneuver is performed. The initial deformity is accentuated and the distal fragment is brought into marked dorsiflexion. The dorsum of the hand should be brought more than 90 degrees and at times parallel to the dorsum of the forearm to lessen the tension on the dorsal forearm. Thumb pressure is used on the distal fragment while still in this deformed position to restore length by bringing the distal fragment beyond the proximal fragment. Reduction is then obtained by flexing the distal fragment while maintaining length. Often this initial reduction maneuver restores length and alignment, but translational reduction is incomplete. The fracture should be completely reduced by toggling the distal fragment all the way volarly by repetitive slight dorsiflexion positioning of the distal fragment followed by volar pressure with the thumbs. It is important to anatomically reduce the fracture. Loss of reduction with cast immobilization is more likely if the fracture remains translated or malaligned.
If the patient presents late with marked swelling and the reduction is difficult, it is useful to try to lever the proximal fragment distally with a percutaneous smooth wire(s). This may prevent an unnecessary open reduction. Percutaneous pin fixation is used after reduction, either by standard pinning or intrafocal techniques.
Cast Treatment
If the patient is under 10 years of age, has no prereduction signs or symptoms of neurovascular impairment, or has minimal swelling, then cast immobilization is used. We use a long-arm cast. The cast is applied with the aid either of an assistant or finger traps and balancing counter weights on the upper arm. The advantage of the finger-trap steel resident is that there is no risk of muscle fatigue, mental distraction, or failure to maintain elbow flexion at 90 degrees that can occur with a human assistant. The cast is applied with the elbow flexed 90 degrees, the wrist in slight palmar flexion, and the forearm in the desired rotation for stability and alignment. This varies with each fracture and each surgeon. Our preference is slight supination (20 to 30 degrees) unless the fracture dictates differently. This allows excellent molding against the volar aspect of the distal radius at the fracture site.
One of the most important elements in a successful long-arm cast for a forearm fracture is the application of the Webril. The Webril should be applied in a continuous roll with overlap of one-third to one-half its width. Extra padding is applied over the olecranon, along the volar and dorsal forearm where the cast may have to be split, and at the ends of the cast to prevent irritation from fraying. Plaster of Paris is used for the cast to obtain the best mold possible. Initially a single layer is applied, followed by splints five layers thick along the volar and dorsal forearm and the extension region of the elbow. This lessens the bulk of the cast and still allows deep molds. The cast is completed with plaster of Paris rolls over the splints. A three-point

mold is applied at the fracture site as the cast hardens. In addition, molds are applied to maintain a straight ulnar border, the interosseous space, and straight posterior humeral line. This creates the classic “box” long-arm cast rather than the all too frequent “banana” cast that allows displacement. Final x-rays are obtained, and if the reduction is anatomic, the cast is overwrapped with fiberglass to lessen the weight, increase patient satisfaction, and prevent cast breakdown that could lead to loss of reduction.
Patients are either discharged or admitted to the hospital depending on the degree of concern regarding risk of excessive swelling, neurovascular compromise, and patient and parental reliability. If there is any doubt, the patient is admitted for observation. The cast is split anytime there are signs of neurovascular compromise. The patient is instructed to maintain elevation for at least 48 to 72 hours after discharge and return immediately if excessive swelling or neurovascular compromise occurs. The patient and family are warned of the risk of loss of reduction and the need for close follow-up. We inform our patients and parents that the risk of return to the day surgery unit for repeat reduction or pinning is approximately 20% to 30% during the first 3 weeks.
FIGURE 9-55 Remanipulation. A, B. Two weeks after what initially appeared to be an undisplaced greenstick fracture, a 14-year-old boy was found to have developed late angulation of 30 degrees in both the coronal and sagittal planes. C. Because this was beyond the limits of remodeling, a remanipulation was performed. To prevent reangulation, the fracture was secured with a pin placed percutaneously obliquely through the dorsal cortex.
Follow-up examinations and x-rays are obtained every 7 to 10 days for 3 weeks. If there is loss of reduction, we individualize treatment depending on the patient’s age, degree of deformity, time since fracture, and remodeling potential. If restoration of alignment with growth occurs, we reassure the family that the child should achieve anatomic alignment over time with growth. If the child is older, there is risk of further displacement, or the deformity is marked, repeat reduction is done in the day surgery unit with fluoroscopy. Most often, a percutaneous pin is used for the second reduction (Fig. 9-55).
Cast immobilization usually is for 4 to 6 weeks. The long-arm cast is changed to a short-arm cast at 3 to 4 weeks. With clinical and x-ray healing, a protective volar splint is used and activities are restricted until the patient regains full motion and strength, usually in 1 to 3 weeks after cast removal. As with other distal radial fractures, formal physical therapy rarely is required.
Percutaneous Pin Fixation
Percutaneous pinning of distal radial metaphyseal fractures is most often used in patients with excessive swelling or signs of neurologic injury. In these situations, the patient is at risk for

development of a forearm or carpal tunnel compartment syndrome with a well-molded, tight-fitting cast. Similarly, concurrent displaced supracondylar and distal radial fractures are treated with percutaneous fixation of both fractures to lessen the risk of neurovascular compromise (Fig. 9-56). Older patients near the end of growth with bayonet apposition fractures also are treated with percutaneous pin fixation because they have less ability to remodel and their fractures are very unstable with a high risk of displacement. Finally, open fractures usually are treated with pin fixation.
The pinning technique for the radius is either a single radial-sided pin or crossed radial- and ulnar-sided pins. Fixation of the ulna rarely is necessary. Stability with a single pin is checked with fluoroscopy, and if further fixation is needed, a second pin is added. The physis is avoided if possible. Intrafocal pins are used if reduction is not possible without levering the distal fragment into a reduced position. A small incision is made for the insertion of each pin to protect the radial sensory nerve and adjacent extensor tendons. Smooth pins are used and are removed in the office as soon as there is sufficient healing to make the fracture stable in a cast or splint, usually at 4 weeks. Rehabilitation is similar to that for cast-treated fractures.
Open Reduction
The two most common indications for open reduction are an open fracture and an irreducible fracture. All open fractures are irrigated and debrided in the operating room. The initial open wound is extended adequately to inspect and cleanse the open fracture site. After thorough irrigation and debridement, the fracture is reduced and stabilized. A cast rarely is applied in this situation because of concern about fracture stability, soft-tissue care, and excessive swelling. Crossed-pin fixation often is used with Gustilo grade 1 or 2 open fractures. More severe soft-tissue injuries usually require external fixation with a unilateral frame, with care taken to avoid soft-tissue impingement during pin placement. If flap coverage is necessary for the soft-tissue wounds, the fixator pins should be placed in consultation with the microvascular surgeon planning the soft-tissue coverage.
Irreducible fractures usually are secondary to soft-tissue entrapment. With dorsal displacement, this is most often either the volar periosteum or pronator quadratus, and open reduction through a volar approach is necessary to extract the interposed soft-tissues and reduce the fracture (Fig. 9-57). Percutaneous pin fixation usually is used to stabilize the fracture in patients with open physes. If plate fixation is used, it should avoid violation of the physis (Fig. 9-58). Displaced intra-articular injuries in skeletally immature patients are adult-like and require standard treatment, such as open reduction and internal fixation (Fig. 9-59) or combination treatment with internal and external fixation. Lower profile plating has been used more recently to lessen the incidence of tendon irritation or disruption, especially of the plates that are placed dorsally (Fig. 9-60).
FIGURE 9-56 Ipsilateral fractures. A. Markedly displaced ipsilateral distal radial and supracondylar fractures. B. Both fractures were reduced and stabilized with pins placed percutaneously. (Wilkins KE, ed. Operative management of upper extremity fractures in children. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1994:29; with permission.)
Distal radial metaphyseal fractures have complications similar to physeal fractures but with different frequencies. Loss of reduction and malunion are the most common problems, and growth-related complications are infrequent. Neurovascular compromise does occur and should be considered in the acute management of this fracture.
Loss of reduction is a common complication of distal radial metaphyseal fractures treated with cast immobilization. Because this complication occurs in at least 30% of bayonet apposition fractures (38,39,40,41,42), many surgeons treat this fracture primarily with pin fixation to avoid the problems that can occur with malunion. Otherwise it is clear that patients treated with cast immobilization need to be monitored closely (184).
Fortunately, many angular malunions of the distal radius will remodel (28,114,124,148,154,159,160,168,169,171,173,185,186) probably because of asymmetric physeal growth (171,187). True growth arrest associated with a distal radial metaphyseal fracture is very rare (188). The younger the patient, the less the deformity, and the closer the fracture is to the physis, the greater the potential for remodeling. It is unclear whether there is any capacity for rotational malunion remodeling



(178,189). Angular and rotational malunion that does not remodel can lead to loss of motion. The degree and plane of loss of motion, as well as the individual affected, determine if this is functionally significant (184). In cadaveric studies malangulation of more than 20 degrees of the radius or ulna caused loss of forearm rotation (162,190,191), whereas less than 10 degrees of malangulation did not alter forearm rotation significantly. Distal third malunion affected rotation less than middle or proximal third malunion. Radioulnar malunion affected forearm rotation more than volar-dorsal malunion. Excessive angulation may lead to a loss of rotation at a 1:2 degree ratio, whereas malrotation may lead to rotational loss at only a 1:1 degree loss (79). The functional loss associated with rotational motion loss is difficult to predict. This has led some clinicians to recommend no treatment (159,167), arguing that most of these fractures will remodel, and those that do not remodel will not cause a functional problem (192). However, a significant functional problem is present if shoulder motion cannot compensate for loss of supination.
FIGURE 9-57 A. Volar approach through the interval between the digital flexors and ulnar neurovascular bundle. FDS, flexor digitorum superficialis; FCU, flexor carpi ulnaris. B. Dorsal approach between the third and fourth dorsal compartments. EDC, extensor digitorum communis; EPL, extensor pollicis longus. (Reprinted from Holmes JR, Luis DS. Entrapment of pronator quadratus in pediatric distal-radius fractures: recognition and treatment. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14:498–500; with permission.)
FIGURE 9-58 Open reduction of open radial metaphyseal fracture and ulnar styloid base fracture. After thorough irrigation and debridement of the radius, internal fixation of the radius was performed with care taken to not violate the physis with hardware. The ulna styloid base fracture and TFCC were repaired with an open tension band technique with a suture and smooth wire.
FIGURE 9-59 A. Anteroposterior and lateral x-rays of a 15-year-old skeletally mature boy with a displaced intra-articular fracture. B. This fracture needs to be treated like an adult’s, with open reduction and internal fixation with a volar buttress plate.
FIGURE 9-60 A. CT scan of a displaced intra-articular fracture of a nearly skeletally mature adolescent. B. Dorsal plating with a low profile system to achieve anatomic reduction and stable fixation.
We prefer to reduce forearm fractures to as near to perfect alignment as possible. No element of malrotation is accepted in the reduction. As indicated in the treatment sections, fractures at high risk of loss of reduction and malunion are treated with anatomic reduction and pin or rarely plate fixation. Fractures treated in a cast are followed closely and re-reduced for any loss of alignment of more than 10 degrees. Although loss of forearm rotation can occur with anatomic healing (3,130,193), it is less likely than with malunions.
Unfortunately, not all fractures heal anatomically or remodel to anatomic alignment. Long-term malunion is a concern for mid-carpal instability (101) and long-term arthrosis. A distal radial malunion in a skeletally mature adolescent should be treated with a dorsal open wedge osteotomy, bone graft, and internal fixation (Fig. 9-61) (102,194,195).
Nonunion of a closed radial or ulnar fracture is rare. In children, nonunion has been universally related to a pathologic condition of the bone or vascularity (130). Congenital pseudarthrosis or neurofibromatosis (Fig. 9-62) (196) should be suspected in a patient with a nonunion after a benign fracture. This occurs most often after an isolated ulnar fracture. The distal bone is often narrowed, sclerotic, and plastically deformed. These fractures rarely heal with immobilization. Vascularized fibular bone grafting usually is necessary for healing of a nonunion associated with neurofibromatosis or congenital pseudarthrosis. If the patient is very young, this may include a vascularized epiphyseal transfer to restore distal growth.

Vascular impairment also can lead to nonunion. Distal radial nonunion has been reported in a child with an ipsilateral supracondylar fracture with brachial artery occlusion. Revascularization of the limb led to eventual union of the fracture. Nonunion also can occur with osteomyelitis and bone loss (112). Deébridement of the necrotic bone and either traditional bone grafting, osteoclasis lengthening, vascularized bone grafting, or creation of a single-bone forearm are surgical options. The choice depends on the individual patient.
Cross-union is a rare complication of pediatric distal radial and ulnar fractures. It has been described after high-energy trauma and internal fixation (197). A single pin crossing both bones increases the risk of cross-union (197). Synostosis take-down can be performed, but the results usually are less than full restoration of motion. It is important to determine if there is an element of rotational malunion with the cross-union because this will affect the surgical outcome.
Soft-tissue contraction across both bones also has been described (198). Contracture release resulted in restoration of forearm motion.
Fortunately, refractures after metaphyseal radial fractures are rare and much less common than after diaphyseal level radial

and ulnar fractures. Most commonly, refracture occurs with premature discontinuation of immobilization or early return to potentially traumatic activities. It is advisable to protectively immobilize the wrist until full x-ray and clinical healing (usually 6 weeks) and to restrict activities until full motion and strength are regained (usually an additional 1 to 6 weeks). Individuals involved in high-risk activities, such as downhill ski racing, snowboarding, or skateboarding, should be protected with a splint during those activities for much longer.
FIGURE 9-61 A. Radial metaphyseal fracture that did not remodel in a now 16-year-old skeletally mature boy. B. Corrective osteotomy with iliac crest bone graft and internal fixation was performed.
Growth Disturbance
Growth arrest of the distal radius after metaphyseal fracture is rare. Abram and Connolly each reported one patient with physeal arrest after nondisplaced torus fractures. Two additional patients were reported in a series of 150 distal radial metaphyseal fractures (199). Wilkins and O’Brien (130) proposed that these arrests may be in fractures that extend from the metaphysis to the physis. This coincides with a Peterson type I fracture (Fig. 9-63) (81,82) and in essence is a physeal fracture. These fractures should be monitored for growth arrest.
Both undergrowth and overgrowth of the distal radius after fracture were described by DePablos (200). The average difference in growth was 3 mm, a range of -5 to +10 mm of growth disturbance compared with the contralateral radius. Maximal overgrowth occurred in the 9- to 12-year-old age group. As long as the patient is asymptomatic, under- or overgrowth is not a problem. If ulnocarpal impaction or DRUJ disruption occurs, then surgical rebalancing of the radius and ulna may be necessary.
FIGURE 9-62 This 3-year-old presented to the emergency room with pain after an acute fall on his arm. The ulna is clearly pathologic with thinning and deformity before this injury. This represents neurofibromatosis.
Neurovascular Injuries
Both the median and ulnar (174,201) nerves are less commonly injured in metaphyseal fractures than in physeal fractures. The mechanisms of neural injury in a metaphyseal fracture include direct contusion from the displaced fragment, traction ischemia from tenting of the nerve over the proximal fragment (144,154), entrapment of the nerve in the fracture site (70,202), rare laceration of the nerve (Fig. 9-64), and the development of an acute compartment syndrome. If signs or symptoms of neuropathy are present, a prompt closed reduction should be performed. Extreme positions of immobilization should be avoided because this can lead to persistent traction or compression ischemia and increase the risk of compartment syndrome. If there is marked swelling, it is better to percutaneously pin the fracture than to apply a constrictive cast. If there is concern about compartment syndrome, the forearm and carpal canal pressures should be measured immediately. If pressures are markedly elevated, appropriate fasciotomies and compartment releases should be performed immediately. Finally, if the nerve was intact before reduction and is out after reduction, neural entrapment should


be considered, and surgical exploration and decompression may be required. Fortunately, most median and ulnar nerve injuries recover after anatomic reduction of the fracture.
FIGURE 9-63 Physeal arrest in a Peterson type I fracture. A. Injury film showing what appears to be a benign metaphyseal fracture. Fracture line extends into the physis (arrows). B. Two years postinjury, a central arrest (open arrow) has developed, with resultant shortening of the radius. (Reprinted from Wilkins KE, ed. Operative management of upper extremity fractures in children. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1994:21; with permission.)
FIGURE 9-64 A grade III open fracture of the radius resulted in complete disruption of the ulnar nerve. Intraoperative photographs of the nerve deficit between the operative jeweler’s forceps (A) and sural nerve grafting (B) after the wound was clean enough to allow for nerve reconstruction.
Infection after distal radial fractures is rare and is associated with open fractures or surgical intervention. Fee et al (203) described the development of gas gangrene in four children after minor puncture wounds or lacerations associated with distal radial fractures. Treatment involved only local cleansing of the wound in all four and wound closure in one. All four developed life-threatening clostridial infections. Three of the four required upper limb amputations, and the fourth underwent multiple soft-tissue and bony procedures for coverage and treatment of osteomyelitis.
Infections related to surgical intervention also are rare. Superficial pin site infections can occur and should be treated with pin removal and antibiotics. Deep-space infection from percutaneous pinning of the radius has not been described.
Fractures of the distal radius associated with DRUJ disruption have been called Galeazzi fracture–dislocations. Although Sir Ashley Cooper is credited with the first description of this injury in 1824, Riccardo Galeazzi (204,205) gave this fracture–dislocation its name with his 1934 report of 18 such injuries. In children, this injury may involve either disruption of the DRUJ ligaments or, more commonly, a distal ulnar physeal fracture (Fig. 9-65) (123,204,206,207,208). Galeazzi fracture–dislocations are relatively rare injuries in children. Walsh and McLaren (209) cited an occurrence of 3% of pediatric distal radial fractures in their study. Most series of Galeazzi fracture contain a relatively small number of pediatric patients (81,207,209,210).
Mechanism of Injury
The mechanism of injury is axial loading in combination with extremes of forearm rotation (Fig. 9-66) (208,211,212,213). In adults, the mechanism of injury usually is an axially loading fall with hyperpronation. This results in a distal radial fracture with a dorsal ulnar dislocation. However, in children, both supination (apex volar) and pronation (apex dorsal) deforming forces have been described (207,209,214). The mechanism of injury is most obvious when the radial fracture is an incomplete fracture. With an apex volar (supination) radial fracture, the distal ulna is displaced volarly, whereas with an apex dorsal (pronation) radial fracture, the distal ulna is displaced dorsally (Fig. 9-67). This is evident both on clinical and radiographic examinations. In addition, the radius is foreshortened in a complete fracture, causing more radial deviation of the hand and wrist (Fig. 9-68).
Signs and Symptoms
A child with a Galeazzi injury has pain and limitation of forearm rotation and wrist flexion and extension. Neurovascular impairment is rare. The radial deformity usually is clinically evident. The DRUJ disruption may be obvious by the prominence of the ulnar head. A subtle ligament disruption may be evident only by local tenderness and instability to testing on the DRUJ.
FIGURE 9-65 Galeazzi fracture–dislocation variant. Interposed periosteum can block reduction of the distal ulnar physis (arrow). This destabilizes the distal radial metaphyseal fracture. (Reprinted from Lanfried MJ, Stenclik M, Susi JG. Variant of Galeazzi fracture–dislocation in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1991;11:333; with permission.)
The radial fracture is evident on x-rays and concurrent injuries to the ulna or DRUJ should be identified. A true lateral view is necessary to identify the direction of displacement, which is imperative to determine the method of reduction. Rarely are special x-rays, such as a CT scan, necessary.
Galeazzi fracture–dislocations are most commonly described by direction of displacement of either the distal ulnar dislocation or the radial fracture. Letts (207,214) preferred to describe the direction of the ulna: volar or dorsal. Walsh and McLaren (209) classified pediatric Galeazzi injuries by the direction of displacement of the distal radial fracture. Dorsal displacement (apex volar) fractures were more common than volar displacement (apex dorsal) fractures in their series. Wilkins and O’Brien (130) modified the Walsh and McLaren method by classifying radial fractures as incomplete and complete fractures and ulnar injuries as true dislocations and physeal fractures (Table 9-4). DRUJ dislocations are called true Galeazzi lesions and distal ulnar physeal fractures are called Galeazzi equivalent lesions (123,207,214,215).
FIGURE 9-66 Walsh’s classification. A. The most common pattern, in which there is dorsal displacement with supination of the distal radius (open arrow). The distal ulna (black arrow) lies volar to the dorsally displaced distal radius. B. The least common pronation pattern. There is volar or anterior displacement of the distal radius (open arrow), and the distal ulna lies dorsal (black arrow). (Reprinted from Walsh HPJ, McLaren CANP. Galeazzi fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987;69:730–733; with permission.)

The radius normally rotates around the relatively stationary ulna. The two bones of the forearm articulate at the proximal and distal radioulnar joints. In addition, proximally the radius and ulna articulate with the distal humerus and distally with the carpus. These articulations are necessary for forearm pronation and supination. At the DRUJ, the concave sigmoid notch of the radius incompletely matches the convex, asymmetric, semicylindrical shape of the distal ulnar head (56). This allows some translation at the DRUJ with rotatory movements. The ligamentous structures are critical in stabilizing the radius as it rotates about the ulna (Fig. 9-69).
The DRUJ includes multiple soft-tissue attachments, the most important of which is the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC). The TFCC includes the volar and dorsal ligamentous attachments of the distal ulna to the radial sigmoid notch, as well as the distal extension to the ulnar styloid, carpus, and base of the fifth metacarpal. The volar ulnocarpal ligaments (V ligament) from the ulna to the lunate and triquetrum are important ulnocarpal stabilizers (56,216,217). The central portion of the TFCC is the articular disk (Fig. 9-70). The interaction between the bony articulation and the soft-tissue attachments accounts for stability of the DRUJ during pronation and supination. At the extremes of rotation, the joint is most stable. The compression loads between the radius and ulna are aided by the tensile loads of the TFCC to maintain stability throughout rotation.
Throughout the mid-forearm, the interosseous ligament connects the radius to the ulna. It passes obliquely from the proximal radius to the distal ulna. However, the interosseous ligament is not present in the distal radius. Moore et al (218) found that injuries to the TFCC and interosseous ligament were responsible for progressive shortening of the radius with fracture in a cadaveric study. The soft-tissue component to the injury is a major factor in the deformity and instability in a Galeazzi fracture–dislocation.
Current Treatment Options
Pediatric Galeazzi fractures have a higher success rate with nonoperative treatment than similar injuries in adults (208,210). In adults, it is imperative to anatomically reduce and internally fix the distal radial fracture (208,210,218,219,220). Generally the DRUJ is reduced with reduction and fixation of the radius. In pediatric patients, the distal radial fracture often is a greenstick type that is stable after reduction and cast immobilization is sufficient (209,210). Adolescents with complete fractures should be treated with internal fixation similar to adults.
Closed Reduction
The method of reduction for greenstick radial fractures depends on the type of displacement. With apex volar dorsally displaced fractures of the radius, the rotatory deformity is supination. Pronating the radius and applying a dorsal-to-volar reduction force should align the fracture and reduce the DRUJ. Similarly, if the incomplete radial fracture is an apex dorsal volar displaced fracture, the rotatory deformity is pronation. Supinating the forearm and applying a volar-to-dorsal force should reduce the incomplete fracture of the radius and the DRUJ dislocation (130,207,214,221). In both these situations, portable fluoroscopy can be used to evaluate the fracture–dislocation reduction and to test the stability of the distal ulna. If anatomically reduced and stable, a long-arm cast is applied with appropriate rotation and three-point molds. The cast is left in place for 6 weeks to allow the soft-tissue injuries to heal.
FIGURE 9-67 Supination-type Galeazzi fracture. A. View of the entire forearm of an 11-year-old boy with a Galeazzi fracture–dislocation. B. Close-up of the distal forearm shows that there has been disruption of the distal radioulnar joint (arrows). The distal radial fragment is dorsally displaced (apex volar), making this a supination type of mechanism. Note that the distal ulna is volar to the distal radius. C, D. The fracture was reduced by pronating the distal fragment. Because the distal radius was partially intact by its greenstick nature, the length was easily maintained, reestablishing the congruity of the distal radioulnar joint. The patient was immobilized in supination for 6 weeks, after which full forearm rotation and function returned.

In a Galeazzi equivalent injury with a radial fracture and an ulnar physeal fracture, both bones should be reduced. Usually this can be accomplished with the same methods of reduction if the radial fracture is incomplete. The distal ulnar physis can remodel a nonanatomic reduction if there is sufficient growth remaining and the ulnar physis continues to grow normally. Unfortunately, the risk of ulnar growth arrest after a Galeazzi equivalent has been reported to be as high as 55% (121).
Complete fractures of the distal radius have a higher rate of loss of reduction after closed treatment than do incomplete fractures (Fig. 9-71) (130). If not monitored closely and re-reduced if necessary, loss of reduction can lead to malunion with loss of motion and function. These injuries may be best treated with open reduction as in adults.
Open Reduction
The indication for open reduction of the radial fracture is failure to obtain or maintain fracture reduction. This most often occurs with unstable complete fractures. Open reduction and internal fixation of the radius are done through an anterior approach. Standard compression plating is preferred to intramedullary or

cross-pinning techniques (Fig. 9-72). Stable, anatomic reduction of the radius almost always leads to stable reduction of the DRUJ dislocation. A long-arm cast is used for 6 weeks to allow fracture and soft-tissue healing.
FIGURE 9-68 Pronation Galeazzi. This 8-year-old sustained a pronation Galeazzi fracture. A. The anteroposterior view shows some shortening of the distal radius (arrow) in relation to the distal ulna, which has a small greenstick component. B. The pronation component (arrow) is better appreciated on this lateral view. The distal ulna lies dorsal to the distal radius (open arrow).
TABLE 9-4 Classification: Galeazzi Fractures in Children
Type I: Dorsal (apex volar) displacement of distal radius
   Radius fracture pattern
   Distal ulna physis
   Disrupted (equivalent)
Type II: Volar (apex dorsal) displacement of distal radius
   Radius fracture pattern
   Distal ulna physis
Reprinted from Walsh HPJ, McLaren CAN, Owen R. Galeazzi fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987;69B:730–733.
Occasionally, the DRUJ dislocation cannot be reduced (Fig. 9-73) because of interposed soft-tissues, most commonly the periosteum, extensor tendons (extensor carpi ulnaris, extensor digit quinti), TFCC, or other ligamentous structures (207,222,223,224). The easiest approach for open reduction of the DRUJ is an extended ulnar approach. Care should be taken to avoid injury to the ulnar sensory nerve. This approach allows exposure both volarly and dorsally to extract the interposed soft-tissues and repair the torn structures. Smooth pin fixation of the DRUJ can be used to maintain reduction and allow application of a loose-fitting cast. The pin is removed in the office at 4 weeks with continuation of the cast for 6 weeks.
Similarly, the ulnar physeal fracture can be irreducible in a Galeazzi equivalent injury. This also has been reported to be secondary to interposed periosteum (123,208), extensor tendons (95,122,148,225), or joint capsule (226). Open reduction must be executed with care to avoid further violating the physis.
Incomplete Fractures
Incomplete fractures of the distal radius with either a true dislocation of the DRUJ or an ulnar physeal fracture are treated with



closed reduction and long-arm cast immobilization. This can be done in the emergency room with conscious sedation or in the operating room with general anesthesia. Portable fluoroscopy is used. If the fracture is apex volar with dorsal displacement of the radius and volar dislocation of the DRUJ, then pronation and volar-to-dorsal force on the radial fracture is used for reduction. If the fracture is apex dorsal with volar displacement of the radius and dorsal dislocation of the DRUJ, then supination and dorsal-to-volar force is applied to the distal radius for reduction. The reduction and stability of the fracture and DRUJ dislocation are checked on dynamic fluoroscopy before long-arm cast immobilization. If both are anatomically reduced and stable, the cast is used for 6 weeks to allow soft-tissue and fracture healing. In a Galeazzi equivalent injury, there is potential for remodeling of the physeal fracture if sufficient growth remains. As long as the DRUJ is reduced, malalignment of less than 10 degrees can remodel in a young child. The risk of physeal growth arrest is high with this physeal injury, and operative exposure may increase the risk of growth impairment. If the fracture is severely malaligned, the DRUJ cannot be reduced, or the patient is older and remodeling is unlikely, open reduction and smooth pin fixation are indicated (130).
FIGURE 9-69 Distal radioulnar joint stability in pronation (left) is dependent on (a) tension developed in the volar margin of the triangular fibrocartilage (TFCC, small arrows) and (b) compression between the contact areas of the radius and ulna (volar surface of ulnar articular head and dorsal margin of the sigmoid notch, large arrows). Disruption of the volar TFCC would therefore allow dorsal displacement of the ulna in pronation. The reverse is true in supination, where disruption of the dorsal margin of the TFCC would allow volar displacement of the ulna relative to the radius as this rotational extreme is reached. The dark area of the TFCC emphasizes the portion of the TFCC that is not supported by the ulnar dome. The dotted circle is the arc of load transmission (lunate to TFCC) in that position. (Redrawn from Bowers WH. Green’s operative hand surgery. New York: Churchill–Livingstone, 1993.)
FIGURE 9-70 Diagrammatic drawing of the TFCC and the prestyloid recess. The meniscal reflection runs from the dorsoulnar radius to the ulnovolar carpus. The arrow denotes access under the reflection to the tip of the styloid—mthe so-called prestyloid recess. (Redrawn from Bowers WH. Green’s operative hand surgery. New York: Churchill–Livingstone, 1993.)
FIGURE 9-71 Fractures of the distal radius are angulated toward the ulna due to the pull of the long forearm muscles and the pronator quadratus. (Redrawn from Cruess RL. The management of forearm injuries. Orthop Clin North Am 1973;4:969–982; with permission.)
FIGURE 9-72 A. The patient with the pronation injury shown in Figure 9-68 had a closed reduction and attempted fixation with pins placed percutaneously across the fracture site. However, this was inadequate in maintaining the alignment and length of the fracture of the distal radius. B. The length of the radius and the distal radioulnar relationship were best reestablished after internal fixation of the distal radius with a plate placed on the volar surface. The true amount of shortening present on the original injury film (see Fig. 9-68A) is not really appreciated until the fracture of the distal radius is fully reduced. (Reprinted from Wilkins KE, ed. Operative management of upper extremity fractures in children. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1994:34; with permission.)
FIGURE 9-73 An adolescent girl presented 4 weeks after injury with a painful, stiff wrist. A. By examination, she was noted to have a volar distal radioulnar dislocation that was irreducible even under general anesthesia. B. At the time of surgery the distal ulna was found to have buttonholed out of the capsule, and there was entrapped triangular fibrocartilage and periosteum in the joint.
Complete Fractures
Open reduction and internal fixation with an anterior plate and screws are used for complete Galeazzi fractures of the radius. The DRUJ usually reduces anatomically and is stable with reduction and fixation of the radius. The patient is immobilized in a long-arm cast for 4 weeks and a short-arm cast for 2 more weeks. Return to unrestricted activities and sports depends on restoration of full motion and strength.
Irreducible Dislocations
Irreducible dislocations are treated with open reduction. Extensile exposure is necessary to define the pathologic anatomy and carefully reduce the DRUJ. The interposed soft-tissues are extracted and repaired. Depending on the stability of the reduction and repair, a supplemental smooth pin may be used across the DRUJ for 4 weeks to maintain the joint reduction. This is particularly true if the patient presents late.
Malunion and DRUJ Subluxation
Malunion of the radius can lead to subluxation of the DRUJ, limited forearm rotation, and pain, usually secondary to persistent shortening and malrotation of the radial fracture. Most often this occurs when complete fractures are treated with closed reduction and there is failure to either obtain or maintain reduction of the radial fracture. The ulna remains subluxed and heals with an incongruent joint. Treatment of this requires proper recognition and corrective osteotomy. If physical examination is not definitive for diagnosis, then a CT scan in pronation, neutral rotation, or supination may be helpful. An MRI scan or wrist arthroscopy will aid in the diagnosis and management of associated ligamentous, chondral, or TFCC injuries that will benefit from debridement or repair. It is important to understand that if the DRUJ subluxation is caused by a radial malunion, a soft-tissue reconstruction of the DRUJ alone will fail (56). In the true soft-tissue disruption, often repair of the TFCC will stabilize the DRUJ. If there is no TFCC tear, soft-tissue reconstruction of the DRUJ ligaments with extensor retinaculum or local tendon is appropriate.
Ulnar Physeal Arrest
Golz et al (121) cited ulnar physeal arrest with in 55% of Galeazzi equivalent fractures. If the patient is young enough, this ulnar growth arrest in the presence of ongoing radial growth will lead to deformity. Initially there will be ulnar shortening. Over time, the foreshortened ulna can act as a tether, causing asymmetric growth of the radius. There will be increased radial articular inclination on the AP x-ray and subluxation of the DRUJ. Operative choices include ulnar lengthening, radial closing wedge osteotomy, radial epiphysiodesis, and a combination of the above procedures that is appropriate for the individual patient’s age, deformity, and disability.
Nerve Injury
Injuries to the ulnar nerve (210) and anterior interosseous nerve (227,228) have been described with Galeazzi fracture–dislocations. These injuries have had spontaneous recovery. Moore et al (229) described an 8% rate of injury to the radial nerve with operative exposure of the radius for internal fixation in their series. Careful surgical exposure, dissection, and retraction can decrease this risk.
1. Lawton L. Fractures of the distal radius and ulna in management of pediatric fractures. In Letts M, ed. Management of pediatric fractures. New York: Churchill-Livingstone, 1994:345–368.
2. Landin LA. Fracture patterns in children: analysis of 8682 fractures with special reference to incidence, etiology, and secular changes in a Swedish urban population, 1950–1979. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 1983;202:1–109.
3. Thomas EM, Tuson KW, Browne PS. Fractures of the radius and ulna in children. Injury 1975;7:120–124.
4. Cheng JC, Shen WY. Limb fracture pattern in different pediatric age groups: a study of 3,350 children. J Orthop Trauma 1993;7:15–22.
5. Johnson PG, Szabo RM. Angle measurements of the distal radius: a cadaver study. Skeletal Radiol 1993;22:243–246.
6. Worlock P, Stower M. Fracture patterns in Nottingham children. J Pediatr Orthop 1986;6:656–660.
7. Reed MH. Fractures and dislocations of the extremities in children. J Trauma 1977;17:35.
8. Bailey DA, Wedge JH, McCulloch RG, et al. Epidemiology of fractures of the distal end of the radius in children as associated with growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;71:1225–1231.
9. Kocher MS, Waters PM, Micheli LJ. Upper extremity injuries in the paediatric athlete. Sports Med 2000;30:117–135.
10. Sasaki K, Takagi M, Ida H, et al. Severity of upper limb injuries in snowboarding. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1999;119:292–295.
11. Sasaki K, Takagi M, Kiyoshige Y, et al. Snowboarder’s wrist: its severity compared with Alpine skiing. J Trauma 1999;46:1059–1061.
12. Matsumoto K, Sumi H, Sumi Y, et al. Wrist fractures from snowboarding: a prospective study for 3 seasons from 1998 to 2001. Clin J Sport Med 2004;14:64–71.
13. Ronning R, Ronning I, Gerner T, et al. The efficacy of wrist protectors in preventing snowboarding injuries. Am J Sports Med 2001;29:581–585.
14. Kyle SB, Nance ML, Rutherford GW Jr, et al. Skateboard-associated injuries: participation-based estimates and injury characteristics. J Trauma 2002;53:686–690.
15. Boyd KT, Brownson P, Hunter JB. Distal radial fractures in young goalkeepers: a case for an appropriately sized soccer ball. Br J Sports Med 2001;35:409–411.

16. Wareham K, Johansen A, Stone MD, et al. Seasonal variation in the incidence of wrist and forearm fractures, and its consequences. Injury 2003;34:219–222.
17. Ma D, Jones G. The association between bone mineral density, metacarpal morphometry, and upper limb fractures in children: a population-based case-control study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:1486–1491.
18. Goulding A, Jones IE, Taylor RW, et al. Dynamic and static tests of balance and postural sway in boys: effects of previous wrist bone fractures and high adiposity. Gait Posture 2003;17:136–141.
19. Nork SE, Hennrikus WL, Loncarich DP, et al. Relationship between ligamentous laxity and the site of upper extremity fractures in children: extension supracondylar fracture versus distal forearm fracture. J Pediatr Orthop B 1999;8:90–92.
20. Albanese SA, Palmer AK, Kerr DR, et al. Wrist pain and distal growth plate closure of the radius in gymnasts. J Pediatr Orthop 1989;9:23–28.
21. Caine D, Roy S, Singer KM, et al. Stress changes of the distal radial growth plate. A radiographic survey and review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 1992;20:290–298.
22. De Smet L, Claessens A, Lefevre J, et al. Gymnast wrist: an epidemiologic survey of ulnar variance and stress changes of the radial physis in elite female gymnasts. Am J Sports Med 1994;22:846–850.
23. Meeusen R, Borms J. Gymnastic injuries. Sports Med 1992;13:337–356.
24. Roy S, Caine D, Singer KM. Stress changes of the distal radial epiphysis in young gymnasts. A report of twenty-one cases and a review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 1985;13:301–308.
25. Tolat AR, Sanderson PL, De Smet L, et al. The gymnast’s wrist: acquired positive ulnar variance following chronic epiphyseal injury. J Hand Surg [Br] 1992;17:678–681.
26. Ekenstrom F. The anatomy of the distal radioulnar joint. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1992;275:14–18.
27. Gerber SD, Griffin PP, Simmons BP. Break dancer’s wrist. J Pediatr Orthop 1986;6:98–99.
28. Gandhi RK, Wilson P, Mason Brown JJ, et al. Spontaneous correction of deformity following fractures of the forearm in children. Br J Surg 1962;50:5–10.
29. Mizuta T, Benson WM, Foster BK, et al. Statistical analysis of the incidence of physeal injuries. J Pediatr Orthop 1987;7:518–523.
30. Ring D, Waters PM, Hotchkiss RN, et al. Pediatric floating elbow. J Pediatr Orthop 2001;21:456–459.
31. Waters PM, Kolettis GJ, Schwend R. Acute median neuropathy following physeal fractures of the distal radius. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14:173–177.
32. Terry CL, Waters PM. Triangular fibrocartilage injuries in pediatric and adolescent patients. J Hand Surg [Am] 1998;23:626–634.
33. Earp BE, Waters PW, Wyzokowski RJ. Arthroscopic treatment of partial scapholunate tears in pediatric and adolescent patients with chronic wrist pain. J Bone Joint Surg Am (submission).
34. Smida M, Nigrou K, Soohun T, et al. Combined fracture of the distal radius and scaphoid in children. Report of 2 cases. Acta Orthop Belg 2003;69:79–81.
35. Salter RB, Harris WR. Injuries involving the epiphyseal plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1963;45:587–622.
36. Boyden EM, Peterson HA. Partial premature closure of the distal radial physis associated with Kirschner wire fixation. Orthopedics 1991;14:585–588.
37. Waters PM, Mintzer CM, Hipp JA, et al. Noninvasive measurement of distal radius instability. J Hand Surg [Am] 1997;22:572–579.
38. Mani GV, Hui PW, Cheng JC. Translation of the radius as a predictor of outcome in distal radial fractures of children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993;75:808–811.
39. Proctor MT, Moore DJ, Paterson JM. Redisplacement after manipulation of distal radial fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993;75:453–454.
40. Widmann R, Waters PM, Reeves S. Complications of closed treatment of distal radius fractures in children. POSNA Annual Meeting. Miami, 1995.
41. Gibbons CL, Woods DA, Pailthorpe C, et al. The management of isolated distal radius fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14:207–210.
42. Waters PM, Miller B, Taylor B, et al. Prospective study of displaced radius fractures in adolescents treated with casting vs. percutaneous pinning. AAOS Annual Meeting, 2000.
43. Hughston JC. Fractures of the forearm. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1962;44:1664–1667.
44. Mino DE, Palmer AK, Levinsohn EM. Radiography and computerized tomography in the diagnosis of incongruity of the distal radio-ulnar joint. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:247–252.
45. Morton R. A radiographic survey of 170 clinically diagnosed as “Colles” fracture. Lancet 1907;1:731–732.
46. Short WH, Palmer AK, Werner FW, et al. A biomechanical study of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Am 1897;12:529–534.
47. van der Linden W, Ericson R. Colles’ fracture. How should its displacement be measured and how should it be immobilized? J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981;63:1285–1288.
48. Eksioglu F, Altinok D, Uslu MM, et al. Ultrasonographic findings in pediatric fractures. Turk J Pediatr 2003;45:136–140.
49. Hubner U, Schlicht W, Outzen S, et al. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000;82:1170–1173.
50. Garn SM, Rohmann CG, Silverman FN. Radiographic standards for postnatal ossification and tooth calcification. Med Radiogr Photogr 1967;43:45–66.
51. Greulich W, Pyle SI. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1959.
52. Ogden JA, Beall JK, Conlogue GJ, et al. Radiology of postnatal skeletal development. IV. Distal radius and ulna. Skeletal Radiol 1981;6:255–266.
53. Fernandez DL, Palmer AK. Fractures of the distal radius. In: Green D, Hotchkiss R, Pederson W, eds. Green’s operative hand surgery. New York: Churchill-Livingstone, 1999:929–985.
54. Hulten O. Uber anatomische variationen der hand-gelenkknochen. Acta Radiol 1928;9:155–168.
55. Hafner R, Poznanski AK, Donovan JM. Ulnar variance in children—mstandard measurements for evaluation of ulnar shortening in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, hereditary multiple exostosis and other bone or joint disorders in childhood. Skel Radiol 1989;18:513–516.
56. Bowers W. The distal radioulnar joint. In: Green D, Hotchkiss R, Pederson W, eds. Green’s operative hand surgery. New York: Churchill-Livingstone, 1999:986–1032.
57. Epner RA, Bowers WH, Guilford WB. Ulnar variance—mthe effect of wrist positioning and roentgen filming technique. J Hand Surg Am 1982;7:298–305.
58. Friedman SL, Palmer AK, Short WH, et al. The change in ulnar variance with grip. J Hand Surg Am 1993;18:713–716.
59. Steyers CM, Blair WF. Measuring ulnar variance: a comparison of techniques. J Hand Surg Am 1989;14:607–612.
60. Gelberman RH, Salamon PB, Jurist JM, et al. Ulnar variance in Kienbock’s disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975;57:674–676.
61. Palmer AK, Werner FW. The triangular fibrocartilage complex of the wrist—manatomy and function. J Hand Surg Am 1981;6:153–162.
62. Bruns. Dislocations in joint fractures. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1924:370.
63. Poland J. Traumatic separation of the epiphysis. London: Smith, Elder & Co., 1898.
64. Aitken AP. Further observations on the fractured distal radial epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1935;17:922–927.
65. Aitken AP. The end results of the fractured distal radial epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1935;17:302–308.
66. Peterson CA, Peterson HA. Analysis of the incidence of injuries to the epiphyseal growth plate. J Trauma 1972;12:275–281.
67. Peterson HA, Madhok R, Benson JT, et al. Physeal fractures: Part 1. Epidemiology in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1979–1988. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14:423–430.
68. Stansberry SD, Swischuk LE, Swischuk JL, et al. Significance of ulnar styloid fractures in childhood. Pediatr Emerg Care 1990;6:99–103.
69. Jones IE, Williams SM, Dow N, et al. How many children remain fracture-free during growth? A longitudinal study of children and adolescents participating in the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study. Osteoporos Int 2002;13:990–995.
70. Armstrong P, Joughlin J, Clarke H. Pediatric fractures of the forearm, wrist, and hand in skeletal trauma in children. In: Green N, Swiontkowski M, eds. Skeletal trauma in children. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1994:161–257.
71. Lee BS, Esterhai JL Jr, Das M. Fracture of the distal radial epiphysis. Characteristics and surgical treatment of premature, post-traumatic epiphyseal closure. Clin Orthop 1984:90–96.
72. Lesko PD, Georgis T, Slabaugh P. Irreducible Salter-Harris type II fracture of the distal radial epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 1987;7:719–721.
73. Pershad J, Monroe K, King W, et al. Can clinical parameters predict fractures in acute pediatric wrist injuries? Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:1152–1155.
74. Musharafieh RS, Macari G. Salter-Harris I fractures of the distal radius misdiagnosed as wrist sprain. J Emerg Med 2000;19:265–270.
75. Santoro V, Mara J. Compartmental syndrome complicating Salter-Harris type II distal radius fracture. Clin Orthop 1988:226–229.
76. Crawford AH. Pitfalls and complications of fractures of the distal radius and ulna in childhood. Hand Clin 1988;4:403–413.
77. Sasaki Y, Sugioka Y. The pronator quadratus sign: its classification and diagnostic usefulness for injury and inflammation of the wrist. J Hand Surg Br 1989;14:80–83.
78. Zammit-Maempel I, Bisset RA, Morris J, et al. The value of soft-tissue signs in wrist trauma. Clin Radiol 1988;39:664–668.
79. Rang M. Children’s fractures. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1983.
80. Arima J, Uchida Y, Miura H, et al. Osteochondral fracture in the distal end of the radius. J Hand Surg Am 1993;18:489–491.
81. Peterson HA. Physeal fractures: Part 3. Classification. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14:439–448.
82. Peterson HA. Physeal fractures: Part 2. Two previously unclassified types. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14:431–438.
83. Peterson HA. Triplane fracture of the distal radius: case report. J Pediatr Orthop 1996;16:192–194.
84. Stein AH Jr, Katz SF. Stabilization of comminuted fractures of the distal inch of the radius: percutaneous pinning. Clin Orthop 1975:174–181.
85. Horii E, Tamura Y, Nakamura R, et al. Premature closure of the distal radial physis. J Hand Surg Br 1993;18:11–16.
86. Langenskiold A, Osterman K. Surgical treatment of partial closure of the epiphysial plate. Reconstr Surg Traumatol 1979;17:48–64.
87. Compson JP. Trans-carpal injuries associated with distal radial fractures in children: a series of three cases. J Hand Surg Br 1992;17:311–314.
88. Gupta RP, Danielsson LG. Dorsally angulated solitary metaphyseal greenstick fractures in the distal radius: results after immobilization in pronated, neutral, and supinated position. J Pediatr Orthop 1990;10:90–92.
89. Chess DG, Hyndman JC, Leahey JL. Short-arm plaster for paediatric distal forearm fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987;69:506.
90. Chess DG, Hyndman JC, Leahey JL, et al. Short-arm plaster cast for distal pediatric forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14:211–213.
91. Manoli A 2nd. Irreducible fracture-separation of the distal radial epiphysis. Report of a case. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:1095–1096.
92. Kasser JR. Forearm fractures. In MacEwen GD, Kasser JR, Heinrich SD, eds. Pediatric fractures: a practical approach to assessment and treatment. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1993:165–190.
93. Hernandez J Jr, Peterson HA. Fracture of the distal radial physis complicated by compartment syndrome and premature physeal closure. J Pediatr Orthop 1986;6:627–630.

94. Lenoble E, Dumontier C, Goutallier D, et al. Fracture of the distal radius. A prospective comparison between trans-styloid and Kapandji fixations. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995;77:562–567.
95. Karlsson J, Appelqvist R. Irreducible fracture of the wrist in a child. Entrapment of the extensor tendons. Acta Orthop Scand 1987;58:280–281.
96. Young TB. Irreducible displacement of the distal radial epiphysis complicating a fracture of the lower radius and ulna. Injury 1984;16:166–168.
97. Geissler W, Freeland A, Weiss A-P, et al. Techniques of wrist arthroscopy. Instructional course lecture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:1184–1197.
98. Doi K, Hattori Y, Otsuka K, et al. Intra-articular fractures of the distal aspect of the radius: arthroscopically assisted reduction compared with open reduction and internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:1093–1110.
99. Freeland AE, Geissler WB. The arthroscopic management of intra-articular distal radius fractures. Hand Surg 2000;5:93–102.
100. Lindau T. Wrist arthroscopy in distal radial fractures using a modified horizontal technique. Arthroscopy 2001;17:E5.
101. Watson K, Talesnik J. Midcarpal instability caused by malunited fracture of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Am 1984:350.
102. Fernandez DL. Correction of post-traumatic wrist deformity in adults by osteotomy, bone-grafting, and internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:1164–1178.
103. Knirk JL, Jupiter JB. Intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68:647–659.
104. Valverde JA, Albinana J, Certucha JA. Early posttraumatic physeal arrest in distal radius after a compression injury. J Pediatr Orthop B 1996;5:57–60.
105. Cannata G, De Maio F, Mancini F, et al. Physeal fractures of the distal radius and ulna: long-term prognosis. J Orthop Trauma 2003;17:172–179; discussion 179–180.
106. Waters PM, Bae DS, Montgomery KD. Surgical management of posttraumatic distal radial growth arrest in adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 2002;22:717–724.
107. Palmer AK, Glisson RR, Werner FW. Relationship between ulnar variance and triangular fibrocartilage complex thickness. J Hand Surg Am 1984;9:681–682.
108. Peterson HA. Partial growth plate arrest and its treatment. J Pediatr Orthop 1984;4:246–258.
109. Langenskiold A. Surgical treatment of partial closure of the growth plate. J Pediatr Orthop 1981;1:3–11.
110. Bell MJ, Hill RJ, McMurtry RY. Ulnar impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1985;67:126–129.
111. DiFiori JP, Puffer JC, Aish B, et al. Wrist pain, distal radial physeal injury, and ulnar variance in young gymnasts: does a relationship exist? Am J Sports Med 2002;30:879–885.
112. Burgess RC, Watson HK. Hypertrophic ulnar styloid nonunions. Clin Orthop 1988:215–217.
113. Maffulli N, Fixsen JA. Painful hypertrophic non-union of the ulnar styloid. J Hand Surg Br 1990;15:355–357.
114. Onne L, Sandblom PH. Late results in fractures of the forearm in children. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 1949;98:549–567.
115. Gelberman RH. Acute carpal tunnel syndrome. In Gelbern AN, ed. Operative nerve repair and reconstruction. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1991:937–948.
116. Dobyns JH, Gabel GT. Gymnast’s wrist. Hand Clin 1990;6:493–505.
117. Mandelbaum BR, Bartolozzi AR, Davis CA, et al. Wrist pain syndrome in the gymnast. Pathogenetic, diagnostic, and therapeutic considerations. Am J Sports Med 1989;17:305–317.
118. Ruggles DL, Peterson HA, Scott SG. Radial growth plate injury in a female gymnast. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991;23:393–396.
119. Yong-Hing K, Wedge JH, Bowen CV. Chronic injury to the distal ulnar and radial growth plates in an adolescent gymnast. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:1087–1089.
120. Nelson DA, Buchanan JR, Harrison CS. Distal ulnar growth arrest. J Hand Surg Am 1984;9:164–171.
121. Golz RJ, Grogan DP, Greene TL, et al. Distal ulnar physeal injury. J Pediatr Orthop 1991;11:318–326.
122. Evans DL, Stauber M, Frykman GK. Irreducible epiphyseal plate fracture of the distal ulna due to interposition of the extensor carpi ulnaris tendon. A case report. Clin Orthop 1990;251:162–165.
123. Landfried MJ, Stenclik M, Susi JG. Variant of Galeazzi fracture-dislocation in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1991;11:332–335.
124. Ogden JA. Skeletal injury in the child. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1990.
125. Langenberg R. [Fracture of the ulnar styloid process. Effect on wrist function in the presence of distal radius fracture]. Zentralbl Chir 1989;114:1006–1011.
126. Peinado A. Distal radial epiphyseal displacement after impaired distal ulnar growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979;61:88–92.
127. Noonan KJ. Pediatric upper extremity fractures. In: Price CT, ed. Complication in orthopaedics. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2004.
128. Skillern PGJ. Complete fracture of the lower third of the radius in childhood with greenstick fracture of the ulna. Ann Surg 1915;61:209–225.
129. Kiely PD, Kiely PJ, Stephens MM, et al. Atypical distal radial fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop B 2004;13:202–205.
130. Wilkins KE, O’Brien E. Distal radius and ulnar fractures. In: Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002.
131. Weiker GG. Hand and wrist problems in the gymnast. Clin Sports Med 1992;11:189–202.
132. Papavasiliou V, Nenopoulos S. Ipsilateral injuries of the elbow and forearm in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1986;6:58–60.
133. Stanitski CL, Micheli LJ. Simultaneous ipsilateral fractures of the arm and forearm in children. Clin Orthop 1980:218–222.
134. Symons S, Rowsell M, Bhowal B, et al. Hospital versus home management of children with buckle fractures of the distal radius. A prospective, randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001;83:556–560.
135. Roposch A, Reis M, Molina M, et al. The floating forearm: supracondylar fractures of the humerus associated with ipsilateral forearm fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2001;21(3):307–312.
136. Hove LM. Simultaneous scaphoid and distal radial fractures. J Hand Surg Br 1994;19:384–388.
137. Grundy M. Fractures of the carpal scaphoid in children. A series of eight cases. Br J Surg 1969;56:523–524.
138. Greene WB, Anderson WJ. Simultaneous fracture of the scaphoid and radius in a child. J Pediatr Orthop 1982;2:191–194.
139. Templeton PA, Graham HK. The ‘floating elbow’ in children. Simultaneous supracondylar fractures of the humerus and of the forearm in the same upper limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995;77:791–796.
140. Trumble TE, Benirschke SK, Vedder NB. Ipsilateral fractures of the scaphoid and radius. J Hand Surg Am 1993;18:8–14.
141. Vahvanen V, Westerlund M. Fracture of the carpal scaphoid in children. A clinical and roentgenological study of 108 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1980;51:909–913.
142. Fowles JV, Kassab MT. Displaced supracondylar fractures of the elbow in children. A report on the fixation of extension and flexion fractures by two lateral percutaneous pins. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1974;56B:490–500.
143. Light TR, Ogden DA, Ogden JA. The anatomy of metaphyseal torus fractures. Clin Orthop 1984;188:103–111.
144. Banas MP, Dalldorf PG, Marquardt JD. Skateboard and in-line skate fractures: a report of one summer’s experience. J Orthop Trauma 1992;6:301–305.
145. Biyani A. Ipsilateral Monteggia equivalent injury and distal radial and ulnar fracture in a child. J Orthop Trauma 1994;8:431–433.
146. Solan MC, Rees R, Daly K. Current management of torus fractures of the distal radius. Injury 2002;33:503–505.
147. Davidson JS, Brown DJ, Barnes SN, et al. Simple treatment for torus fractures of the distal radius. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001;83:1173–1175.
148. Blount WP. Fractures in children. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1955.
149. Cooper RR. Management of common forearm fractures in children. J Iowa Med Soc 1964;54:689–698.
150. MacLaughlin HL. Trauma. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1959.
151. Sharrard WJW. Paediatric orthopaedics and fractures. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1971.
152. Pollen AG. Fractures and dislocations in children. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1973.
153. De Courtivron B. Spontaneous correction of the distal forearm fractures in children. European Pediatric Orthopaedic Society Annual Meeting. Brussels, Belgium, 1995.
154. Perona PG, Light TR. Remodeling of the skeletally immature distal radius. J Orthop Trauma 1990;4:356–361.
155. Wilkins KE. Operative management of upper extremity fractures in children. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Rosemont, Illinois, 1994.
156. Evans EM. Fractures of the radius and ulna. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1951;33-B:548–561.
157. Schranz PJ, Fagg PS. Undisplaced fractures of the distal third of the radius in children: an innocent fracture? Injury 1992;23:165–167.
158. Fernandez DL. Conservative treatment of forearm fractures in children. In: Chapchal G, ed. Fractures in children. New York: Thieme-Stratton, 1981.
159. Davis DR, Green DP. Forearm fractures in children: pitfalls and complications. Clin Orthop 1976;120:172–183.
160. Stuhmer KG. Fractures of the distal forearm. In: Weber BG, Burner C, Freuler F, eds. Treatment of fractures in children and adolescents. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1980:203–217.
161. Deffer PA, Schonholtz G, Litchman HM. Displaced distal forearm fractures in children. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 1963;24:42–47.
162. Tachdjian MO. Pediatric orthopedics, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1990.
163. Kasser JR. Fractures. In MacEwen GD, Kasser JR, Heinrich SD, eds. A practical approach to assessment and treatment. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1993:165–190.
164. Carpenter C, Williams P. Management of completely displaced metaphyseal fractures of the distal radius in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003;85:933; author reply 933–934.
165. Gambhir AK, Fischer J, Waseem M. Management of completely displaced metaphyseal fractures of the distal radius in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003;85:463; author reply 463.
166. McLauchlan GJ, Cowan B, Annan IH, et al. Management of completely displaced metaphyseal fractures of the distal radius in children. A prospective, randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84:413–417.
167. Daruwalla JS. A study of radioulnar movements following fractures of the forearm in children. Clin Orthop 1979;139:114–120.
168. Friberg KS. Remodelling after distal forearm fractures in children. I. The effect of residual angulation on the spatial orientation of the epiphyseal plates. Acta Orthop Scand 1979;50:537–546.
169. Friberg KS. Remodelling after distal forearm fractures in children. II. The final orientation of the distal and proximal epiphyseal plates of the radius. Acta Orthop Scand 1979;50:731–739.
170. Hogstrom H, Nilsson BE, Willner S. Correction with growth following diaphyseal forearm fracture. Acta Chir Scand 1976;47:229–303.
171. Larsen E, Vittas D, Torp-Pedersen S. Remodeling of angulated distal forearm fractures in children. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1988;237:190–195.
172. Roberts JA. Angulation of the radius in children’s fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986;68:751–754.
173. Roy DR. Completely displaced distal radius fractures with intact ulnas in children. Orthopedics 1989;12:1089–1092.

174. Vance RM, Gelberman RH. Acute ulnar neuropathy with fractures at the wrist. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60:962–965.
175. Miller BS, Taylor B, Widmann R, et al. Cast immobilization versus percutaneous pin fixation of displaced distal radius fractures in children: a prospective, randomized study. J Pediatr Orthop, in press.
176. Voto SJ, Weiner DS, Leighley B. Redisplacement after closed reduction of forearm fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1990;10:79–84.
177. Creasman C, Zaleske DJ, Ehrlich MG. Analyzing forearm fractures in children. The more subtle signs of impending problems. Clin Orthop 1984;188:40–53.
178. Fuller DJ, McCullough CJ. Malunited fractures of the forearm in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1982;64:364–367.
179. Guero S. Fractures and epiphyseal fracture separation of the distal bones of the forearm in children. In: Saffar P, Cooney WP, eds. Fractures of the distal radius, vol. 280. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1995.
180. Trumble TE, Wagner W, Hanel DP, et al. Intrafocal (Kapandji) pinning of distal radius fractures with and without external fixation. J Hand Surg Am 1998;23:381–394.
181. Low CK, Liau KH, Chew WY. Results of distal radial fractures treated by intra-focal pin fixation. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2001;30:573–576.
182. Schuind F, Cooney WP 3rd, Burny F, et al. Small external fixation devices for the hand and wrist. Clin Orthop 1993;293:77–82.
183. Holmes JR, Louis DS. Entrapment of pronator quadratus in pediatric distal-radius fractures: recognition and treatment. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14:498–500.
184. Younger AS, Tredwell SJ, Mackenzie WG, et al. Accurate prediction of outcome after pediatric forearm fracture. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14:200–206.
185. Friberg KS. Remodelling after distal forearm fractures in children. III. Correction of residual angulation in fractures of the radius. Acta Orthop Scand 1979;50:741–749.
186. Qairul IH, Kareem BA, Tan AB, et al. Early remodeling in children’s forearm fractures. Med J Malaysia 2001;56[Suppl D]:34–37.
187. Karaharju EO, Ryoppy SA, Makinen RJ. Remodelling by asymmetrical epiphysial growth. An experimental study in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1976;58:122–126.
188. Tang CW, Kay RM, Skaggs DL. Growth arrest of the distal radius following a metaphyseal fracture: case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Orthop B 2002;11:89–92.
189. Ryoppy S, Karaharju EO. Alteration of epiphyseal growth by an experimentally produced angular deformity. Acta Orthop Scand 1974;45:490–498.
190. Tarr RR, Garfinkel AI, Sarmiento A. The effects of angular and rotational deformities of both bones of the forearm. An in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:65–70.
191. Matthews LS, Kaufer H, Garver DF, et al. The effect on supination-pronation of angular malalignment of fractures of both bones of the forearm. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:14–17.
192. Johari AN, Sinha M. Remodeling of forearm fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop B 1999;8:84–87.
193. Nilsson BE, Obrant K. The range of motion following fracture of the shaft of the forearm in children. Acta Orthop Scand 1977;48:600–602.
194. Meier R, Prommersberger KJ, van Griensven M, et al. Surgical correction of deformities of the distal radius due to fractures in pediatric patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004;124:1–9.
195. Prommersberger KJ, Van Schoonhoven J, Lanz UB. Outcome after corrective osteotomy for malunited fractures of the distal end of the radius. J Hand Surg Br 2002;27:55–60.
196. Kameyama O, Ogawa R. Pseudarthrosis of the radius associated with neurofibromatosis: report of a case and review of the literature. J Pediatr Orthop 1990;10:128–131.
197. Vince KG, Miller JE. Cross-union complicating fracture of the forearm. Part II: Children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:654–661.
198. Fatti JF, Mosher JF. An unusual complication of fracture of both bones of the forearm in a child. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68:451–453.
199. Fodden DI. A study of wrist injuries in children: the incidence of various injuries and of premature closure of the distal radial growth plate. Arch Emerg Med 1992;9:9–13.
200. de Pablos J, Franzreb M, Barrios C. Longitudinal growth pattern of the radius after forearm fractures conservatively treated in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14:492–495.
201. Clarke AC, Spencer RF. Ulnar nerve palsy following fractures of the distal radius: clinical and anatomical studies. J Hand Surg Br 1991;16:438–440.
202. Wolfe JS, Eyring EJ. Median-nerve entrapment within a greenstick fracture; a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974;56:1270–1272.
203. Fee NF, Dobranski A, Bisla RS. Gas gangrene complicating open forearm fractures. Report of five cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977;59:135–138.
204. Reckling FW, Peltier LF. Riccardo Galeazzi and Galeazzi’s fracture. Surgery 1965;58:453–459.
205. Galeazzi R. Di una particulare sindrome, traumatica delle scheletro dell avambraccio. Attie Mem Soc Lombardi Chir 1934;2:12.
206. Bley L, Seitz WH, Jr. Injuries about the distal ulna in children. Hand Clin 1998;14:231–237.
207. Letts RM. Monteggia and Galeazzi fractures. In: Letts RM, ed. Management of pediatric fractures. New York: Churchill-Livingstone, 1994:313–321.
208. Reckling FW, Cordell LD. Unstable fracture-dislocations of the forearm. The Monteggia and Galeazzi lesions. Arch Surg 1968;96:999–1007.
209. Walsh HP, McLaren CA, Owen R. Galeazzi fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987;69:730–733.
210. Mikic ZD. Galeazzi fracture-dislocations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975;57:1071–1080.
211. Dameron TB Jr. Traumatic dislocation of the distal radio-ulnar joint. Clin Orthop 1972;83:55–63.
212. Rose-Innes AP. Anterior dislocation of the ulna at the inferior radio-ulnar joint. Case report, with a discussion of the anatomy of rotation of the forearm. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1960;42-B:515–521.
213. Snook GA, Chrisman OD, Wilson TC, et al. Subluxation of the distal radio-ulnar joint by hyperpronation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969;51:1315–1323.
214. Letts M, Rowhani N. Galeazzi-equivalent injuries of the wrist in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1993;13:561–566.
215. Homans J, Smith JA. Fracture of the lower end of the radius associated with fracture or dislocation of the lower end of the ulna. Boston Med Surg J 1922;187:401–407.
216. Schuind F, An KN, Berglund L, et al. The distal radioulnar ligaments: a biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Am 1991;16:1106–1114.
217. Werner FW, Palmer AK, Fortino MD, et al. Force transmission through the distal ulna: effect of ulnar variance, lunate fossa angulation, and radial and palmar tilt of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Am 1992;17:423–428.
218. Moore TM, Klein JP, Patzakis MJ, et al. Results of compression-plating of closed Galeazzi fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:1015–1021.
219. Mohan K, Gupta AK, Sharma J, et al. Internal fixation in 50 cases of Galeazzi fracture. Acta Orthop Scand 1988;59:318–320.
220. Kraus B, Horne G. Galeazzi fractures. J Trauma 1985;25:1093–1095.
221. Vesely DG. The distal radio-ulnar joint. Clin Orthop 1967;51:75–91.
222. Cetti NE. An unusual cause of blocked reduction of the Galeazzi injury. Injury 1977;9:59–61.
223. Biyani A, Bhan S. Dual extensor tendon entrapment in Galeazzi fracture-dislocation: a case report. J Trauma 1989;29:1295–1297.
224. Itoh Y, Horiuchi Y, Takahashi M, et al. Extensor tendon involvement in Smith’s and Galeazzi’s fractures. J Hand Surg Am 1987;12:535–540.
225. Ooi LH, Toh CL. Galeazzi-equivalent fracture in children associated with tendon entrapment—mreport of two cases. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2001;30:51–54.
226. Engber WD, Keene JS. Irreducible fracture-separation of the distal ulnar epiphysis. Report of a case. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:1130–1132.
227. Warren JD. Anterior interosseous nerve palsy as a complication of forearm fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1963;45:511–512.
228. Stahl S, Freiman S, Volpin G. Anterior interosseous nerve palsy associated with Galeazzi fracture. J Pediatr Orthop B 2000;9:45–46.
229. Moore TM, Lester DK, Sarmiento A. The stabilizing effect of soft-tissue constraints in artificial Galeazzi fractures. Clin Orthop 1985;194:189–194.